Dissipative particle dynamics simulation on drug loading/release in polyester-PEG dendrimer
Source abstract
Abstract
Polyester-PEG dendrimers are attractive for in vivo delivery of anti-cancer drug because of their biodegradability and low cytotoxicity. In this drug delivery system, G5-PEG polyester dendrimer is composed of hydrophobic polyester dendritic blocks and hydrophilic poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG), in which DOX molecules are efficiently encapsulated in the core of microspheres due to their affinity with G5 dendritic blocks. A dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) computational method was used to investigate the loading/release mechanism of anti-cancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) in G5-PEG polyester dendrimer. Four sequential transient stages were found during the drug encapsulation process: (1) all components distribute randomly in the cubic box at the initial stage, (2) DOX molecules dispersion in the G5-PEG dendritic microsphere, (3) amalgamation of the small core–shell dendritic microspheres into bigger ones, and (4) the stabilization stage. The loaded DOX content was calculated to be 16.7 % with a loading efficiency of 100 %, which is close to the experiment results (15.2 % DOX content with the loading efficiency of 99 %). The simulation also successfully revealed the drug release dynamics at pH 7.4 and pH 5 (37 °C). At pH 7.4, no DOX molecule was released from G5-PEG/DOX when only considered the influence of temperature on drug release. It demonstrates that the increase of system temperature (from 25 to 37 °C) is not the major factor for drug release at pH 7.4. When considered protonation of DOX at pH 5, it is benefit to generate some pores on the surface of G5-PEG/DOX microspheres, and the aperture of the pores increased with the simulation steps increased, which leads to the increasingly exposure of DOX molecules to water. However, the drug could not release toward the aqueous solution. It demonstrated that the protonation of DOX is not the major factor for the drug’s rapid release at pH 5 though it may facilitate the drug release process. Such results are in qualitatively consistent with the experimental observations and could provide valuable guidance in later design and optimization of this drug delivery system. The same tool could also be used to evaluate and design other similar drug/gene delivery systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers · Block Copolymer Self-Assembly · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Almutairi A, Akers WJ, Berezin MY, Achilefu S, Fréchet JM (2008) Monitoring the biodegradation of dendritic near-infrared nanoprobes by in vivo fluorescence imaging. J Mol Pharm 5:1103–111010.1021/mp8000952 ↗
2. Español P, Warren PB (1995) Statistical mechanics of dissipative particle dynamics. Europhys Lett 30(4):191. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/30/4/00110.1209/0295-5075/30/4/001 ↗
3. Fan FC, Olafson BD, Blanco M, Hsu SL (1992) Application of molecular simulation to derive phase diagrams of binary mixtures. Macromolecules 25:3667–367610.1021/ma00040a010 ↗
4. Gillies ER, Fréchet JMJ (2002) Designing macromolecules for therapeutic applications: polyester dendrimer–poly(ethylene oxide) “bow-tie” hybrids with tunable molecular weight and architecture. J Am Chem Soc 124:14137–1414610.1021/ja028100n ↗
5. Gillies ER, Dy E, Fréchet JMJ, Szoka FC (2005) Biological evaluation of polyester dendrimer: poly(ethylene oxide)“bow-tie” hybrids with tunable molecular weight and architecture. Mol Pharm 2:129–13810.1021/mp049886u ↗
6. Groot RD, Madden TJ (1998) Dynamic simulation of diblock copolymer microphase separation. J Chem Phys 108:8713. doi: 10.1063/1.47630010.1063/1.476300 ↗
7. Groot RD, Rabone KL (2001) Mesoscopic simulation of cell membrane damage, morphology change and rupture by nonionic surfactants. Biophys J 81:725–73610.1016/S0006-3495(01)75737-2 ↗
8. Groot RD, Warren PB (1997) Dissipative particle dynamics: bridging the gap between atomistic and mesoscopic simulation. J Chem Phys 107:4423. doi: 10.1063/1.47478410.1063/1.474784 ↗
9. Groot RD, Madden TJ, Tildesley DJ (1999) On the role of hydrodynamic interactions in block copolymer microphase separation. J Chem Phys 110:9739. doi: 10.1063/1.47893910.1063/1.478939 ↗
10. Guillaudeu SJ, Fox ME, Haidar YM, Dy EE, Szoka FC, Fréchet JMJ (2008) PEGylated dendrimers with core functionality for biological applications. Bioconjug Chem 19:461–46910.1021/bc700264g ↗
11. Guo XD, Zhang LJ, Qian Y (2012) Systematic multiscale method for studying the structure–performance relationship of drug-delivery systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:4719–473010.1021/ie2014668 ↗
12. Hoogerbrugge PJ, Koelman J (1992) Simulating microscopic hydrodynamic phenomena with dissipative particle dynamics. Europhys Lett 19:155. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/19/3/00110.1209/0295-5075/19/3/001 ↗
13. Jang WD, Selim KMK, Lee CH, Kang IK (2009) Bioinspired application of dendrimers: from bio-mimicry to biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 34:1–2310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.08.003 ↗
14. Joralemon JM, McRae S, Emrick T (2010) PEGylated polymers for medicine: from conjugation to self-assembled systems. Chem Commun 46:1377–139310.1039/b920570p ↗
15. Kojima C, Regino C, Umeda Y, Kobayashi H, Kono K (2010) Influence of dendrimer generation and polyethylene glycol length on the biodistribution of PEGylated dendrimers. Int J Pharm 383:293–29610.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.09.015 ↗
16. Lee W, Ju S, Wang Y, Chang J (2007) Modeling of polyethylene and poly (l-lactide) polymer blends and diblock copolymer: chain length and volume fraction effects on structural arrangement. J Chem Phys 127(6):064902. doi: 10.1063/1.275149810.1063/1.2751498 ↗
17. Lin SL, Wen XF, Cai ZQ, Pi PH, Zheng DF, Cheng J, Zhang LJ, Qian Y, Yang ZR (2011) Synthesis and dissipative particle dynamics simulation of cross-linkable fluorinated diblock copolymers: self-assembly aggregation behavior in different solvents. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:17323–1733210.1039/c1cp20186g ↗
18. Lin SL, Xu MY, Yang ZR (2012) Dissipative particle dynamics study on the mesostructures of n-octadecane/water emulsion with alternating styrene–maleic acid copolymers as emulsifier. Soft Matter 8(2):375–38410.1039/C1SM06378B ↗
19. Long CX, Zhang LJ, Qian Y (2006) Mesoscale simulation of drug molecules distribution in the matrix of solid lipid microparticles (SLM). Chem Eng J 119:99–10610.1016/j.cej.2006.03.031 ↗
20. Luo ZL, Jiang JW (2012) pH-sensitive drug loading/releasing in amphiphilic copolymer PAE–PEG: integrating molecular dynamics and dissipative particle dynamics simulations. J Control Release 162:185–19310.1016/j.jconrel.2012.06.027 ↗
21. Ma XP, Tang JB, Shen YQ, Fan MH, Tang HD, Radosz M (2009) Facile synthesis of polyester dendrimers from sequential click coupling of asymmetrical monomers. J Am Chem Soc 131:14795–1480310.1021/ja9037406 ↗
22. Ma XP, Zhou ZX, Jin E, Sun QH, Zhang B, Tang JB, Shen YQ (2013) Facile synthesis of polyester dendrimers as drug delivery carriers. Macromolecules 46:37–4210.1021/ma301849a ↗
23. Maiti A, McGrother S (2004) Bead–bead interaction parameters in dissipative particle dynamics: relation to bead-size, solubility parameter, and surface tension. J Chem Phys 120:1594. doi: 10.1063/1.163029410.1063/1.1630294 ↗
24. Padilla De Jesús O, Ihre H, Gagne L, Fréchet JMJ, Szoka FC (2002) Polyester dendritic systems for drug delivery applications: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Bioconjug Chem 13:453–46110.1021/bc010103m ↗
25. Parrott MC, Benhabbour SR, Saab C, Lemon JA, Parker S, Valliant JF, Adronov A (2009) Synthesis, radiolabeling, and bio-imaging of high-generation polyester dendrimers. J Am Chem Soc 131:2906–291610.1021/ja8078175 ↗
26. Ramos-Rodríguez DA, Rodríguez-Hidalgo MR, Soto-Figueroa C, Vicente L (2010) Mol Phys 108(5):65710.1080/00268971003657094 ↗
27. Rodríguez-Hidalgo M, Soto-Figueroa C, Vicente L (2011) Mesoscopic simulation of the drug release mechanism on the polymeric vehicle P(ST-DVB) in an acid environment. Soft Matter 7:8224–823010.1039/c1sm05667k ↗
28. Saeki S, Kuwahara N, Nakata M, Kaneko M (1976) Upper and lower critical solution temperatures in poly(ethylene glycol) solutions. Polymer 17:685–68910.1016/0032-3861(76)90208-1 ↗
29. Scocchi G, Posocco P, Fermeglia M, Pricl S (2007) Polymer–clay nanocomposites: a multiscale molecular modeling approach. J Phys Chem B 111(9):2143–215110.1021/jp067649w ↗
30. Sung YT, Seo WJ, Kim YH, Lee HS, Kim WN (2004) Evaluation of interfacial tension for poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene by rheological measurements and interaction parameter of the two polymers. Korea-Australia Rheol. J. 16(3):135–140
31. Vicente L, Soto-Figueroa C, Pacheco-Sánchez H, Hernández-Trujillo J, Matínez-Magadán JM (2006) Application of molecular simulation to calculate miscibility of a model asphaltene molecule. Fluid Phase Equilib 239:100–10610.1016/j.fluid.2005.11.001 ↗