journal article·2019-07Open access

Chromium substituted iron oxide nanowires as affordable electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction

Serra Kocabas, Asude Cetin, Ahmet M. Önal, Emren Nalbant Esenturk

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 21· Issue 7

Abstract

Earth-abundant metal oxides have become center of attention in the application of electrochemical energy conversion and storage. In this work, CrFeO3 was synthesized as a new catalyst for oxygen evolution reaction (OER). The structural and chemical properties of CrFeO3 were characterized by TEM, SEM, EDX, XRD, XPS, and BET analyses. The microscopy images reveal that CrFeO3 have wire-like morphology, which was formed by assembly of ca. 14 nm nanocrystallites. Then, potential utility of the synthesized nanowires (NWs) as catalysts in OER has been investigated. The CrFeO3 NW-modified fluorinated tin oxide (FTO) electrodes exhibited promising OER performance with an onset potential of 1.63 V vs RHE, overpotential of 737 mV at 10 mA cm−2 current density, and Tafel slope of 57 mV dec−1. Additionally, CrFeO3 NWs are demonstrated to be very stable electrocatalyst during OER. The CrFeO3 NWs present an overall electrocatalytic performance that is comparable to the one of RuO2, and promise a great potential as an effective and affordable OER catalyst.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Fuel Cells and Related Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Banerjee A, Pai M, Bhattacharya K et al (2008) Catalytic decomposition of sulfuric acid on mixed Cr/Fe oxide samples and its application in sulfur–iodine cycle for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.07.01710.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.07.017 ↗
2. Bao J, Zhang X, Fan B et al (2015) Ultrathin spinel-structured nanosheets rich in oxygen deficiencies for enhanced electrocatalytic water oxidation. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:7399–7404. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20150222610.1002/anie.201502226 ↗
3. Bian L, Li H, Li Y et al (2017) Enhanced photovoltage response of hematite-X-ferrite interfaces (X = Cr, Mn, Co, or Ni). Nanoscale Res Lett 12:136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-1885-310.1186/s11671-017-1885-3 ↗
4. Chambers SA, Droubay TC, Kaspar TC et al (2017) Electronic and optical properties of a semiconducting spinel (Fe2CrO4). Adv Funct Mater 27:1605040. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20160504010.1002/adfm.201605040 ↗
5. Cheng F, Zhang T, Zhang Y et al (2013) Enhancing electrocatalytic oxygen reduction on MnO2 with vacancies. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:2474–2477. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20120858210.1002/anie.201208582 ↗
6. de Araujo JCS, Sousa CBA, Oliveira AC et al (2010) Dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene with CO2 to produce styrene over Fe-containing ceramic composites. Appl Catal A Gen 377:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.01.01610.1016/j.apcata.2010.01.016 ↗
7. Ding J, Zhong Q, Zhang S (2014) Simultaneous removal of NOX and SO2 with H2O2 over Fe based catalysts at low temperature. RSC Adv 4:5394. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra46418k10.1039/c3ra46418k ↗
8. Ekebas E, Cetin A, Önal AM, Nalbant Esenturk E (2019) Magnesium substituted cobalt spinel nanostructures for electrocatalytic water oxidation. J Appl Electrochem 49:315–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-018-01285-910.1007/s10800-018-01285-9 ↗
9. Elmaci G, Frey CE, Kurz P, Zümreoğlu-Karan B (2015) Water oxidation catalysis by birnessite@iron oxide core–shell nanocomposites. Inorg Chem 54:2734–2741. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic502908w10.1021/ic502908w ↗
10. Elmacı G, Frey CE, Kurz P, Zümreoğlu-Karan B (2016) Water oxidation catalysis by using nano-manganese ferrite supported 1D-(tunnelled), 2D-(layered) and 3D-(spinel) manganese oxides. J Mater Chem A 4:8812–8821. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA00593D10.1039/C6TA00593D ↗
11. Fang Z, Hao Z, Dong Q, Cui Y (2018) Bimetallic NiFe2O4 synthesized via confined carburization in NiFe-MOFs for efficient oxygen evolution reaction. J Nanopart Res 20:106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4209-310.1007/s11051-018-4209-3 ↗
12. Freire FNA, Rocha HHB, Santos MRP et al (2008) Structural studies of a new electroceramic composite: Pb(Fe0.5Nb0.5)O3 (PFN)-Cr0.75Fe1.25O3(CRFO). J Mater Sci 43:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2091-y10.1007/s10853-007-2091-y ↗
13. Gao M, Sheng W, Zhuang Z et al (2014) Efficient water oxidation using nanostructured α-nickel-hydroxide as an electrocatalyst. J Am Chem Soc 136:7077–7084. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja502128j10.1021/ja502128j ↗
14. Grzelczak M, Zhang J, Pfrommer J et al (2013) Electro- and photochemical water oxidation on ligand-free Co3O4 nanoparticles with tunable sizes. ACS Catal 3:383–388. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs300752310.1021/cs3007523 ↗
15. Guan X (2018) Magnesium cobaltate nanowires@magnanese dioxide nanoflakes core-shell arrays on graphene-decorated nickel foam for high-performance supercapacitors. Int J Electrochem Sci:5016–5030. https://doi.org/10.20964/2018.05.1410.20964/2018.05.14 ↗
16. Jin Z, Li P, Jin Y, Xiao D (2018) Superficial-defect engineered nickel/iron oxide nanocrystals enable high-efficient flexible fiber battery. Energy Storage Mater 13:160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.01.01010.1016/j.ensm.2018.01.010 ↗
17. Kanazawa T, Maeda K (2017) Chromium-substituted hematite powder as a catalytic material for photochemical and electrochemical water oxidation. Catal Sci Technol 7:2940–2946. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CY00580F10.1039/C7CY00580F ↗
18. Kim D-W, Rhee K-Y, Park S-J (2012) Synthesis of activated carbon nanotube/copper oxide composites and their electrochemical performance. J Alloys Compd 530:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.02.15710.1016/j.jallcom.2012.02.157 ↗
19. Landon J, Demeter E, İnoğlu N et al (2012) Spectroscopic characterization of mixed Fe–Ni oxide electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline electrolytes. ACS Catal 2:1793–1801. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs300264410.1021/cs3002644 ↗
20. Lee SY, González-Flores D, Ohms J et al (2014) Screen-printed calcium-birnessite electrodes for water oxidation at neutral pH and an “electrochemical Harriman series”. ChemSusChem 7:3442–3451. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20140253310.1002/cssc.201402533 ↗
21. Li G, Liu X, Bai W (2018) Fabrication of porous MgCo2O4 with rod-like morphology and its superb catalytic activity towards ammonium perchlorate thermal decomposition. Mater Res Express 5:035036. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aab4e710.1088/2053-1591/aab4e7 ↗
22. Li M, Xiong Y, Liu X et al (2015) Facile synthesis of electrospun MFe2O4 (M = Co, Ni, Cu, Mn) spinel nanofibers with excellent electrocatalytic properties for oxygen evolution and hydrogen peroxide reduction. Nanoscale 7:8920–8930. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR07243J10.1039/C4NR07243J ↗
23. Liu G, Gao X, Wang K et al (2016a) Uniformly mesoporous NiO/NiFe2O4 biphasic nanorods as efficient oxygen evolving catalyst for water splitting. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:17976–17986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.26810.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.268 ↗
24. Liu G, Wang K, Gao X et al (2016b) Fabrication of mesoporous NiFe2O4 nanorods as efficient oxygen evolution catalyst for water splitting. Electrochim Acta 211:871–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.11310.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.113 ↗
25. Liu J, Nan Y, Chang X et al (2017) Hierarchical nitrogen-enriched porous carbon materials derived from Schiff-base networks supported FeCo2O4 nanoparticles for efficient water oxidation. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:10802–10812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.10010.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.100 ↗
26. Liu Y, Niu Z, Lu Y et al (2018) Facile synthesis of CuFe2O4 crystals efficient for water oxidation and H2O2 reduction. J Alloys Compd 735:654–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.18110.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.181 ↗
27. Lobo LS, Rubankumar A (2018) Investigation on structural and electrical properties of FeMnO3 synthesized by sol-gel method. Ionics (Kiel) 25(1341):1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-018-2776-z10.1007/s11581-018-2776-z ↗
28. Nagamuthu S, Vijayakumar S, Lee S-H, Ryu K-S (2016) Hybrid supercapacitor devices based on MnCo2O4 as the positive electrode and FeMn2O4 as the negative electrode. Appl Surf Sci 390:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.07210.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.072 ↗
29. Ozkendir OM (2013) Electronic and crystal structure analysis of the FeCrO3 oxide. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena 191:54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2013.10.00410.1016/j.elspec.2013.10.004 ↗
30. Pham M-H, Dinh C-T, Vuong G-T et al (2014) Visible light induced hydrogen generation using a hollow photocatalyst with two cocatalysts separated on two surface sides. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:5937. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp54629b10.1039/c3cp54629b ↗
31. Pukazhselvan D, Nasani N, Pérez J et al (2016) Two step mechanochemical synthesis of Nb doped MgO rock salt nanoparticles and its application for hydrogen storage in MgH2. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:11716–11722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.17510.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.175 ↗
32. Rocha HHB, Freire FNA, Silva RR et al (2009) Structural properties study of the magneto-dielectric composite: Cr0.75Fe1.25O3 (CRFO):Fe0.5Cu0.75Ti0.75O3(FCTO). J Alloys Compd 481:438–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.00210.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.002 ↗
33. Silambarasan M, Ramesh PS, Geetha D, Venkatachalam V (2017) A report on 1D MgCo2O4 with enhanced structural, morphological and electrochemical properties. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:6880–6888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-6388-610.1007/s10854-017-6388-6 ↗
34. Sun C, Yang J, Dai Z et al (2016) Nanowires assembled from MnCo2O4@C nanoparticles for water splitting and all-solid-state supercapacitor. Nano Res 9:1300–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-016-1025-x10.1007/s12274-016-1025-x ↗
35. Sun S, Zhou Z, Zhang L, Tang R (2018) Oxidation behavior and stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of Fe27Ni16Cr3.5Al based AFA alloy in supercritical water. Mater Res Express 5:066525. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aac98910.1088/2053-1591/aac989 ↗
36. Xie Y, Wang X, Tang K et al (2018) Blending Fe3O4 into a Ni/NiO composite for efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalyst. Electrochim Acta 264:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.13610.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.136 ↗
37. Xu S, Dong D, Wang Y et al (2014) Perovskite chromates cathode with resolved and anchored nickel nano-particles for direct high-temperature steam electrolysis. J Power Sources 246:346–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.08210.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.082 ↗
38. Yan W, Cao X, Ke K et al (2016) One-pot synthesis of monodispersed porous CoFe2O4 nanospheres on graphene as an efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. RSC Adv 6:307–313. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA23306B10.1039/C5RA23306B ↗
39. Yang H, Liu Y, Luo S et al (2017) Lateral-size-mediated efficient oxygen evolution reaction: insights into the atomically thin quantum dot structure of NiFe2O4. ACS Catal 7:5557–5567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b0000710.1021/acscatal.7b00007 ↗
40. Yao W, Duan T, Li Y et al (2015) Perovskite chromate doped with titanium for direct carbon dioxide electrolysis. New J Chem 39:2956–2965. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NJ01868K10.1039/C4NJ01868K ↗
41. Zhao J, Li X, Cui G, Sun X (2018) Highly-active oxygen evolution electrocatalyzed by an Fe-doped NiCr2O4 nanoparticle film. Chem Commun 54:5462–5465. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CC02568A10.1039/C8CC02568A ↗
42. Zhao Q, Yan Z, Chen C, Chen J (2017) Spinels: controlled preparation, oxygen reduction/evolution reaction application, and beyond. Chem Rev 117:10121–10211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0005110.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00051 ↗
43. Zhao Y, Zhou X, Ding Y et al (2016) A study of photocatalytic, chemical, and electrocatalytic water oxidation on ACo2O4 (A=Ni, Cu, Zn) samples through doping different metal ions. J Catal 338:30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.02.00310.1016/j.jcat.2016.02.003 ↗