A comparative study on the morphology of P3HT:PCBM solar cells with the addition of Fe3O4 nanoparticles by spin and rod coating methods
Source abstract
Abstract
Our previous study presented up to 20% power conversion efficiency (PCE) enhancement of poly(3-hexylthiophene):phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (P3HT:PCBM) solar cells under the Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) self-assembly (SA) effect by spin coating. Fe3O4 NPs (about 11 nm hydrodynamic diameter) form a thin layer at the top interface of the light absorbing active layer, which results in the generation of PCBM rich region improving the charge transport (Zhang et al. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 160:126–133, 2017). In order to investigate the feasibility of this Fe3O4 NPs SA effect under large-scale production condition, a smooth rod was implemented to mimic roll-to-roll coating technique and yield active layers having about the same thickness as the spin-coated ones. Small angle neutron scattering and grazing incidence X-ray diffraction were employed finding out similar morphologies of the active layers by these two coating techniques. However, rod-coated solar cell’s PCE decreases with the addition of Fe3O4 NPs compared with the one without them. This is because PCBM rich region is not created at the top interface of the active layer due to the absence of Fe3O4 NPs, which is attributed to the weak convective flow and low diffusion rate. Moreover, in the rod-coated solar cells, the presence of Fe3O4 NPs causes decrease in P3HT crystallinity, thus the charge transport and the device performance. Our study confirms the role of spin coating in the Fe3O4 NPs SA effect and enables researchers to explore this finding in other polymer nanocomposite systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Andersen TR, Larsen-Olsen TT, Andreasen B, Boittiger APL, Carle JE, Helgesen M, Bundgaard E, Norrman K, Andreasen JW, Jorgensen M, Krebs FC (2011) Aqueous processing of low-band-gap polymer solar cells using roll-to-roll methods. ACS Nano 5(5):4188–4196. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn200933r10.1021/nn200933r ↗
2. Apilo P, Hiltunen J, Valimaki M, Heinilehto S, Sliz R, Hast J (2015) Roll-to-roll gravure printing of organic photovoltaic modules–insulation of processing defects by an interfacial layer. Prog Photovolt 23(7):918–928. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.250810.1002/pip.2508 ↗
3. Bigioni TP, Lin XM, Nguyen TT, Corwin EI, Witten TA, Jaeger HM (2006) Kinetically driven self assembly of highly ordered nanoparticle monolayers. Nat Mater 5(4):265–270. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat161110.1038/nmat1611 ↗
4. Chen D, Nakahara A, Wei D, Nordlund D, Russell TP (2011) P3HT/PCBM bulk heterojunction organic photovoltaics: correlating efficiency and morphology. Nano Lett 11(2):561–567. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl103482n10.1021/nl103482n ↗
5. Chen HP, Hsiao YC, Hu B, Dadmun M (2014) Tuning the morphology and performance of low bandgap polymer: fullerene heterojunctions via solvent annealing in selective solvents. Adv Funct Mater 24(32):5129–5136. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20140055210.1002/adfm.201400552 ↗
6. Chou KW, Yan B, Li R, Li EQ, Zhao K, Anjum DH, Alvarez S, Gassaway R, Biocca A, Thoroddsen ST, Hexemer A, Amassian A (2013) Spin-cast bulk heterojunction solar cells: a dynamical investigation. Adv Mater 25(13):1923–1929. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20120344010.1002/adma.201203440 ↗
7. Coakley KM, McGehee MD (2004) Conjugated polymer photovoltaic cells. Chem Mater 16 (23):4533–4542. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm049654n10.1021/cm049654n ↗
8. Dang MT, Hirsch L, Wantz G, Wuest JD (2013) Controlling the morphology and performance of bulk heterojunctions in solar cells. Lessons learned from the benchmark poly(3-hexylthiophene):[6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester system. Chem Rev 113(5):3734–3765. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300005u10.1021/cr300005u ↗
9. Deegan RD, Bakajin O, Dupont TF, Huber G, Nagel SR, Witten TA (1997) Capillary flow as the cause of ring stains from dried liquid drops. Nature 389(6653):827–829. https://doi.org/10.1038/3982710.1038/39827 ↗
10. Germack DS, Chan CK, Kline RJ, Fischer DA, Gundlach DJ, Toney MF, Richter LJ, DeLongchamp DM (2010) Interfacial segregation in polymer/fullerene blend films for photovoltaic devices. Macromolecules 43(8):3828–3836. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma100027b10.1021/ma100027b ↗
11. González DM, Körstgens V, Yao Y, Song L, Santoro G, Roth SV, Müller-Buschbaum P (2015) Improved power conversion efficiency of P3HT:PCBM organic solar cells by strong spin–orbit coupling-induced delayed fluorescence. Adv Energy Mater 5(8):1401, 770. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20140177010.1002/aenm.201401770 ↗
12. Heeger AJ (2014) 25th anniversary article: bulk heterojunction solar cells: understanding the mechanism of operation. Adv Mater 26(1):10–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20130437310.1002/adma.201304373 ↗
13. Hong S, Yi M, Kang H, Kong J, Lee W, Kim JR, Lee K (2014) Effect of solvent on large-area polymer-fullerene solar cells fabricated by a slot-die coating method. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 126:107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2014.03.04210.1016/j.solmat.2014.03.042 ↗
14. Hou L, Wang E, Bergqvist J, Andersson BV, Wang Z, Müller C, Campoy-Quiles M, Andersson MR, Zhang F, Inganäs O (2011) Lateral phase separation gradients in spin-coated thin films of high-performance polymer:fullerene photovoltaic blends. Adv Funct Mater 21(16):3169–3175. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20110056610.1002/adfm.201100566 ↗
15. Hu L, Kim HS, Lee JY, Peumans P, Cui Y (2010) Scalable coating and properties of transparent, flexible, silver nanowire electrodes. ACS Nano 4(5):2955–2963. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100523210.1021/nn1005232 ↗
16. Huang Y, Kramer EJ, Heeger AJ, Bazan GC (2014) Bulk heterojunction solar cells: morphology and performance relationships. Chem Rev 114(14):7006–7043. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400353v10.1021/cr400353v ↗
17. Kiel JW, Eberle APR, Mackay ME (2010) Nanoparticle agglomeration in polymer-based solar cells. Phys Rev Lett 168(16):701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.16870110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.168701 ↗
18. Kline S (2006) Reduction and analysis of SANS and USANS data using IGOR Pro. J Appl Crystallogr 39(6):895–900. https://doi.org/10.1107/S002188980603505910.1107/S0021889806035059 ↗
19. Kotlarchyk M, Chen SH (1983) Analysis of small angle neutron scattering spectra from polydisperse interacting colloids. J Chem Phys 79(5):2461–2469. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.44605510.1063/1.446055 ↗
20. Krebs FC, Espinosa N, Hosel M, Sondergaard RR, Jorgensen M (2014) A 25th anniversary article: rise to power–OPV-based solar parks. Adv Mater 26(1):29–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20130203110.1002/adma.201302031 ↗
21. Li G, Yao Y, Yang H, Shrotriya V, Yang G, Yang Y (2007) Solvent annealing effect in polymer solar cells based on poly(3-hexylthiophene) and methanofullerenes. Adv Funct Mater 17 (10):1636–1644. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20060062410.1002/adfm.200600624 ↗
22. Li M, Gao K, Wan X, Zhang Q, Kan B, Xia R, Liu F, Yang X, Feng H, Ni W, Wang Y, Peng J, Zhang H, Liang Z, Yip HL, Peng X, Cao Y, Chen Y (2017) Solution-processed organic tandem solar cells with power conversion efficiencies > 12%. Nat Photon 11(2):85–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.24010.1038/nphoton.2016.240 ↗
23. Mackay ME, Dao TT, Tuteja A, Ho DL, Van Horn B, Kim HC, Hawker CJ (2003) Nanoscale effects leading to non-Einstein-like decrease in viscosity. Nat Mater 2(11):762–766. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat99910.1038/nmat999 ↗
24. Rabani E, Reichman DR, Geissler PL, Brus LE (2003) Drying-mediated self-assembly of nanoparticles. Nature 426(6964):271–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0208710.1038/nature02087 ↗
25. Rivnay J, Mannsfeld SC, Miller CE, Salleo A, Toney MF (2012) Quantitative determination of organic semiconductor microstructure from the molecular to device scale. Chem Rev 112(10):5488–519. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300110910.1021/cr3001109 ↗
26. Rogers JT, Schmidt K, Toney MF, Kramer EJ, Bazan GC (2011) Structural order in bulk heterojunction films prepared with solvent additives. Adv Mater 23 (20):2284–2288. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20100369010.1002/adma.201003690 ↗
27. Treat ND, Chabinyc ML (2014) Phase separation in bulk heterojunctions of semiconducting polymers and fullerenes for photovoltaics. Annu Rev Phys Chem 65(1):59–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-10371210.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103712 ↗
28. Tuteja A, Mackay ME, Hawker CJ, Van Horn B (2005) Effect of ideal, organic nanoparticles on the flow properties of linear polymers: non-Einstein-like behavior. Macromolecules 38(19):8000–8011. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma050974h10.1021/ma050974h ↗
29. van Franeker JJ, Westhoff D, Turbiez M, Wienk MM, Schmidt V, Janssen RAJ (2015) Controlling the dominant length scale of liquid-liquid phase separation in spin-coated organic semiconductor films. Adv Funct Mater 25(6):855–863. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20140339210.1002/adfm.201403392 ↗
30. Wu WR, Su CJ, Chuang WT, Huang YC, Yang PW, Lin PC, Chen CY, Yang TY, Su AC, Wei KH, Liu CM, Jeng US (1601) Surface layering and supersaturation for top-down nanostructural development during spin coating of polymer/fullerene thin films. Adv Energy Mater 6 (22):842. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20160184210.1002/aenm.201601842 ↗
31. Xiong K, Hou L, Wu M, Huo Y, Mo W, Yuan Y, Sun S, Xu W, Wang E (2015) From spin coating to doctor blading: a systematic study on the photovoltaic performance of an isoindigo-based polymer. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 132:252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2014.08.03910.1016/j.solmat.2014.08.039 ↗
32. Youn H, Park HJ, Guo LJ (2015) Organic photovoltaic cells: from performance improvement to manufacturing processes. Small 11(19):2228–2246. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20140288310.1002/smll.201402883 ↗
33. Zhang W, Shen H, Guralnick BW, Kirby BJ, Nguyen NA, Remy R, Majkrzak CF, Mackay ME (2016) Correlation between morphology and device performance of pbttt:pc71bm solar cells. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 155:387–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.06.04210.1016/j.solmat.2016.06.042 ↗
34. Zhang W, Nguyen NA, Murray R, Mackay ME (2017) Device performance enhancement of polymer solar cells by nanoparticle self-assembly. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 160:126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.03010.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.030 ↗