Cu–Ni core–shell nanoparticles: structure, stability, electronic, and magnetic properties: a spin-polarized density functional study
Source abstract
Abstract
Bimetallic core–shell nanoparticles (CSNPs) have attracted great interest not only because of their superior stability, selectivity, and catalytic activity but also due to their tunable properties achieved by changing the morphology, sequence, and sizes of both core and shell. In this study, the structure, stability, charge transfer, electronic, and magnetic properties of 13-atom and 55-atom Cu and Cu–Ni CSNPs were investigated using the density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The results show that Ni@Cu CSNPs with a Cu surface shell are more energetically favorable than Cu@Ni CSNPs with a Ni surface shell. Interestingly, three-shell Ni@Cu12@Ni42 is more stable than two-shell Cu13@Ni42, while two-shell Ni13@Cu42 is more stable than three-shell Cu@Ni12@Cu42. Analysis of Bader charge illustrates that the charge transfer increases from Cu core to Ni shell in Cu@Ni NPs, while it decreases from Ni core to Cu shell in Ni@Cu NPs. Furthermore, the charge transfer results that d-band states have larger shift toward the Fermi level for the Ni@Cu CSNPs with Cu surface shell, while the Cu@Ni CSNPs with Ni surface shell have similar d-band state curves and d-band centers with the monometallic Ni NPs. In addition, the Cu–Ni CSNPs possess higher magnetic moment when the Ni atoms aggregated at core region of CSNPs, while having lower magnetic moment when the Ni atoms segregate on surface region. The change of the Cu atom location in CSNPs has a weak effect on the total magnetic moment. Our findings provide useful insights for the design of bimetallic core–shell catalysts.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Austin N, Butina B, Mpourmpakis G (2016) CO2 activation on bimetallic CuNi nanoparticles. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 26:487–492. doi: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.08.00710.1016/j.pnsc.2016.08.007 ↗
2. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–1797910.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
3. Borjesson A, Zhu WM, Amara H, Bichara C, Bolton K (2009) Computational studies of metal-carbon nanotube interfaces for regrowth and electronic transport. Nano Lett 9:1117–1120. doi: 10.1021/nl803624510.1021/nl8036245 ↗
4. Boyukata M, Belchior JC (2008) Structural and energetic analysis of copper clusters: MD study of Cu-n (n = 2-45). J Braz Chem Soc 19:884–89310.1590/S0103-50532008000500012 ↗
5. Carroll KJ, Calvin S, Ekiert TF, Unruh KM, Carpenter EE (2010) Selective nucleation and growth of Cu and Ni core/shell nanoparticles. Chem Mater 22:2175–2177. doi: 10.1021/cm100403210.1021/cm1004032 ↗
6. Chatterjee J, Bettge M, Haik Y, Chen CJ (2005) Synthesis and characterization of polymer encapsulated Cu-Ni magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia applications. J Magn Magn Mater 293:303–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.02.02410.1016/j.jmmm.2005.02.024 ↗
7. Chen WP, Li LT, Qi JQ, Wang Y, Gui ZL (1998) Influence of electroless nickel plating on multilayer ceramic capacitors and the implications for reliability in multilayer ceramic capacitors. J Am Ceram Soc 81:2751–275210.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02693.x ↗
8. Damianos K, Solokha P, Ferrando R (2013) Core-shell and matryoshka structures in MgNi nanoalloys: a computational study. RSC Adv 3:9419–9430. doi: 10.1039/c3ra40861b10.1039/c3ra40861b ↗
9. Ding F, Larsson P, Larsson JA, Ahuja R, Duan HM, Rosen A, Bolton K (2008) The importance of strong carbon-metal adhesion for catalytic nucleation of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 8:463–468. doi: 10.1021/nl072431m10.1021/nl072431m ↗
10. Ferrando R, Jellinek J, Johnston RL (2008) Nanoalloys: from theory to applications of alloy clusters and nanoparticles. Chem Rev 108:845–910. doi: 10.1021/cr040090g10.1021/cr040090g ↗
11. Gawande MB et al (2015) Core-shell nanoparticles: synthesis and applications in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Chem Soc Rev 44:7540–7590. doi: 10.1039/c5cs00343a10.1039/c5cs00343a ↗
12. Guisbiers G, Khanal S, Ruiz-Zepeda F, de la Puente JR, Jose-Yacaman M (2014) Cu-Ni nano-alloy: mixed, core-shell or Janus nano-particle? Nanoscale 6:14630–14635. doi: 10.1039/c4nr05739b10.1039/c4nr05739b ↗
13. Guo HZ, Jin JR, Chen YZ, Liu X, Zeng DQ, Wang LS, Peng DL (2016) Controllable synthesis of Cu-Ni core-shell nanoparticles and nanowires with tunable magnetic properties. Chem Commun 52:6918–6921. doi: 10.1039/c6cc02868c10.1039/c6cc02868c ↗
14. Guo L, Li AX, An XY, Cao ZR, Liu NY (2015) Catalytic activity of TM@Cu-12 core shell nanoclusters for water gas shift reaction. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:8330–8340. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.12010.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.120 ↗
15. Henkelman G, Arnaldsson A, Jónsson H (2006) A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density. Comput Mater Sci 36:354–360. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
16. Hibino T, Hashimoto A, Inoue T, Tokuno J, Yoshida S, Sano M (2000) A low-operating-temperature solid oxide fuel cell in hydrocarbon-air mixtures. Science 288:2031–2033. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5473.203110.1126/science.288.5473.2031 ↗
17. Knickelbein MB (2001) Electric dipole polarizabilities of Ni12-58. J Chem Phys 115:5957–596410.1063/1.1398578 ↗
18. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci 6:15–50. doi: 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
19. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–177510.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
20. Kuznetsov AA et al (2007) Local radiofrequency-induced hyperthermia using CuNi nanoparticles with therapeutically suitable Curie temperature. J Magn Magn Mater 311:197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.11.19910.1016/j.jmmm.2006.11.199 ↗
21. Li ZW, Li M, Bian ZF, Kathiraser Y, Kawi S (2016) Design of highly stable and selective core/yolk-shell nanocatalysts—a review. Applied Catalysis B-Environmental 188:324–341. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.06710.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.067 ↗
22. Lin JH, Guliants VV (2012) Alumina-supported Cu@Ni and Ni@Cu core-shell nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and catalytic activity in water-gas-shift reaction. Applied Catalysis a-General 445:187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2012.08.01310.1016/j.apcata.2012.08.013 ↗
23. Lin J-H, Biswas P, Guliants VV, Misture S (2010) Hydrogen production by water-gas shift reaction over bimetallic Cu-Ni catalysts supported on La-doped mesoporous ceria. Applied Catalysis a-General 387:87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.08.00310.1016/j.apcata.2010.08.003 ↗
24. Nikje MMA, Vakili M (2015) Engineered magnetic core-shell structures. Curr Pharm Des 21:5312–5323. doi: 10.2174/138161282166615091709335210.2174/1381612821666150917093352 ↗
25. Noh SH, Seo MH, Seo JK, Fischer P, Han B (2013) First principles computational study on the electrochemical stability of Pt-Co nanocatalysts. Nanoscale 5:8625–8633. doi: 10.1039/c3nr02611f10.1039/c3nr02611f ↗
26. Ozcelik S, Guvenc ZB (2003) Structures and melting of Cu-n (n = 13, 14, 19, 55, 56) clusters. Surf Sci 532:312–316. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6028(03)00432-110.1016/s0039-6028(03)00432-1 ↗
27. Panizon E, Olmos-Asar JA, Peressi M, Ferrando R (2015) Study of structures and thermodynamics of CuNi nanoalloys using a new DFT-fitted atomistic potential. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:28068–28075. doi: 10.1039/c5cp00215j10.1039/c5cp00215j ↗
28. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
29. Piotrowski MJ, Piquini P, Da Silva JLF (2012) Platinum-based nanoalloys PtnTM55-n (TM = Co, Rh, Au): a density functional theory investigation. J Phys Chem C 116:18432–18439. doi: 10.1021/jp302844f10.1021/jp302844f ↗
30. Purbia R, Paria S (2015) Yolk/shell nanoparticles: classifications, synthesis, properties, and applications. Nanoscale 7:19789–19873. doi: 10.1039/c5nr04729c10.1039/c5nr04729c ↗
31. Rapallo A, Olmos-Asar JA, Oviedo OA, Luduena M, Ferrando R, Mariscal MM (2012) Thermal properties of Co/Au nanoalloys and comparison of different computer simulation techniques. J Phys Chem C 116:17210–17218. doi: 10.1021/jp302001c110.1021/jp302001c1 ↗
32. Reshetenko TV, Avdeeva LB, Ismagilov ZR, Chuvilin AL, Ushakov VA (2003) Carbon capacious Ni-Cu-Al2O3 catalysts for high-temperature methane decomposition. Applied Catalysis a-General 247:51–63. doi: 10.1016/s0926-860x(03)00080-210.1016/s0926-860x(03)00080-2 ↗
33. Sahoo S, Rollmann G, Entel P (2006) Segregation and ordering in binary transition metal clusters. Phase Transit 79:693–700. doi: 10.1080/0141159060096116410.1080/01411590600961164 ↗
34. Sanville E, Kenny SD, Smith R, Henkelman G (2007) Improved grid-based algorithm for Bader charge allocation. J Comput Chem 28:899–908. doi: 10.1002/jcc.2057510.1002/jcc.20575 ↗
35. Singh R, Kroll P (2008) Structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of 13-, 55-, and 147-atom clusters of Fe, Co, and Ni: a spin-polarized density functional study. Phys Rev B 78. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.24540410.1103/PhysRevB.78.245404 ↗
36. Songping W, Li J, Jing N, Zhenou Z, Song L (2007) Preparation of ultra fine copper-nickel bimetallic powders for conductive thick film. Intermetallics 15:1316–1321. doi: 10.1016/j.intermet.2007.04.00110.1016/j.intermet.2007.04.001 ↗
37. Sun Q, Zhang XQ, Wang Y, Lu AH (2015) Recent progress on core-shell nanocatalysts. Chin J Catal 36:683–691. doi: 10.1016/s1872-2067(14)60298-910.1016/s1872-2067(14)60298-9 ↗
38. Sun XL, Li DG, Guo SJ, Zhu WL, Sun SH (2016) Controlling core/shell Au/FePt nanoparticle electrocatalysis via changing the core size and shell thickness. Nanoscale 8:2626–2631. doi: 10.1039/c5nr06492a10.1039/c5nr06492a ↗
39. Vizcaino AJ, Carrero A, Calles JA (2007) Hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming over Cu-Ni supported catalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:1450–1461. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.10.02410.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.10.024 ↗
40. Wang QA, Lim KH, Yang SW, Yang YH, Chen YA (2011) Atomic carbon adsorption on Ni nanoclusters: a DFT study. Theor Chem Accounts 128:17–24. doi: 10.1007/s00214-010-0736-410.1007/s00214-010-0736-4 ↗
41. Wang Q, Wang H, Wei L, Yang S-W, Chen Y (2012) Reactive sites for chiral selective growth of single-walled carbon nanotubes: a DFT study of Ni-55-C-n complexes. J Phys Chem A 116:11709–11717. doi: 10.1021/jp308115f10.1021/jp308115f ↗
42. Wei SY, Wang Q, Zhu JH, Sun LY, Lin HF, Guo ZH (2011) Multifunctional composite core-shell nanoparticles. Nanoscale 3:4474–4502. doi: 10.1039/c1nr11000d10.1039/c1nr11000d ↗
43. Xiang Y, Sun DY, Gong XG (2000) Generalized simulated annealing studies on structures and properties of Ni-n (n = 2-55) clusters. J Phys Chem A 104:2746–275110.1021/jp992923q ↗
44. Xiao BB, Zhu YF, Lang XY, Wen Z, Jiang Q (2014) Al-13@Pt-42 core-shell cluster for oxygen reduction reaction. Scientific Reports 4. doi: 10.1038/srep0520510.1038/srep05205 ↗
45. Yamauchi T, Tsukahara Y, Sakata T, Mori H, Yanagida T, Kawai T, Wada Y (2010) Magnetic Cu-Ni (core-shell) nanoparticles in a one-pot reaction under microwave irradiation. Nanoscale 2:515–523. doi: 10.1039/b9nr00302a10.1039/b9nr00302a ↗
46. Yang ZX, Zhang YX, Wu RQ (2012) High stability and reactivity of Pt-based core-shell nanoparticles for oxygen reduction reaction. J Phys Chem C 116:13774–13780. doi: 10.1021/jp300971e10.1021/jp300971e ↗
47. Yang ZM, Wang Q, Shan XY, Li WQ, Chen GH, Zhu HJ (2015) DFT study of Fe-Ni core-shell nanoparticles: stability, catalytic activity, and interaction with carbon atom for single-walled carbon nanotube growth. J Chem Phys 142. doi: 10.1063/1.490789710.1063/1.4907897 ↗
48. Zhang MH, Wang N, Yang YP, Huang SP (2015) Insight into the relationship between structure and magnetic properties in icosahedral FenPt55-n (n = 0-55) nanoparticles: DFT approach. Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling 62:294–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2015.10.01010.1016/j.jmgm.2015.10.010 ↗
49. Zhao B, Shao G, Fan BB, Zhao WY, Zhang R (2015a) Preparation and electromagnetic wave absorption properties of novel dendrite-like NiCu alloy composite. RSC Adv 5:42587–42590. doi: 10.1039/c5ra05323d10.1039/c5ra05323d ↗
50. Zhao B, Zhao WY, Shao G, Fan BB, Zhang R (2015b) Morphology-control synthesis of a core-shell structured NiCu alloy with tunable electromagnetic-wave absorption capabilities Acs. Appl Mater Interfaces 7:12951–12960. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b0271610.1021/acsami.5b02716 ↗