Size and morphological effect of Au–Fe3O4 heterostructures on magnetic resonance imaging
Source abstract
Abstract
Various sizes and morphologies of Au–Fe3O4 heterostructures including dumbbell-like nanoparticles (DBNPs) and flower-like nanoparticles (FLNPs) have been synthesized via thermal decomposition of iron–oleate complex in the presence of different sizes of Au seeds for MR imaging application. The size of Au seeds and the concentration of iron–oleate complex have been proved to be crucial parameters for controlling the morphology of Au–Fe3O4 heterostructures. The use of 5-nm Au seeds can only fabricate Au–Fe3O4 DBNPs, while both DBNPs and FLNPs are produced by using 10-nm Au NPs as the seeds. The obtained Au–Fe3O4 heterostructures are then modified with 8-arm PEG-amine and show a good phase transfer with satisfactory hydrodynamic size for further MR imaging application. The Au–Fe3O4 DBNPs with small Au seeds result in an increase in spin–spin relaxivity, and the r 2 values are 125.5 ± 13.5, 118.3 ± 2.3, and 143.8 ± 3.2 mM−1 s−1 for 5-nm Au–Fe3O4 DBNPs, 10-nm Au–Fe3O4 DBNPs, and 10-nm Au–Fe3O4 FLNPs, respectively. The Au–Fe3O4 FLNPs shows an increased relaxivity when compared with that of Au–Fe3O4 DBNPs, presumably attributed to the magnetic coupling effect among Fe3O4 domains on the surface of Au seeds.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Berret JF, Schonbeck N, Gazeau F, El Kharrat D, Sandre O, Vacher A, Airiau M (2006) Controlled clustering of superparamagnetic nanoparticles using block copolymers: design of new contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Chem Soc 128:1755–1761. doi: 10.1021/ja056299910.1021/ja0562999 ↗
2. Chen HJ, Kou XS, Yang Z, Ni WH, Wang JF (2008) Shape- and size-dependent refractive index sensitivity of gold nanoparticles. Langmuir 24:5233–5237. doi: 10.1021/la800305j10.1021/la800305j ↗
3. Cho SJ, Jarrett BR, Louie AY, Kauzlarich SM (2006) Gold-coated iron nanoparticles: a novel magnetic resonance agent for T-1 and T-2 weighted imaging. Nanotechnology 17:640–644. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/17/3/00410.1088/0957-4484/17/3/004 ↗
4. Chung HJ, Lee H, Bae KH, Lee Y, Park J, Cho SW, Hwang JY, Park H, Langer R, Anderson D, Park TG (2011) Facile synthetic route for surface-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles: cell labeling and magnetic resonance imaging studies. ACS Nano 5:4329–4336. doi: 10.1021/nn201198f10.1021/nn201198f ↗
5. Cornell RM, Schwertmann U (1996) The iron oxides. VCH, New York
6. De M, Chou SS, Joshi HM, Dravid VP (2011) Hybrid magnetic nanostructures (MNS) for magnetic resonance imaging applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63:1282–1299. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.07.00110.1016/j.addr.2011.07.001 ↗
7. Frey NA, Peng S, Cheng K, Sun SH (2009a) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, functionalization, and applications in bioimaging and magnetic energy storage. Chem Soc Rev 38:2532–2542. doi: 10.1039/b815548h10.1039/b815548h ↗
8. Frey NA, Phan MH, Srikanth H, Srinath S, Wang C, Sun SH (2009b) Interparticle interactions in coupled Au–Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J Appl Phys 105:07B502. doi: 10.1063/1.305658210.1063/1.3056582 ↗
9. Garcia I, Gallo J, Genicio N, Padro D, Penades S (2011) Magnetic glyconanoparticles as a versatile platform for selective immunolabeling and imaging of cells. Bioconj Chem 22:264–273. doi: 10.1021/bc100392310.1021/bc1003923 ↗
10. Gu HW, Yang ZM, Gao JH, Chang CK, Xu B (2005) Heterodimers of nanoparticles: formation at a liquid–liquid interface and particle-specific surface modification by functional molecules. J Am Chem Soc 127:34–35. doi: 10.1021/ja045220h10.1021/ja045220h ↗
11. Hiramatsu H, Osterloh FE (2004) A simple large-scale synthesis of nearly monodisperse gold and silver nanoparticles with adjustable sizes and with exchangeable surfactants. Chem Mater 16:2509–2511. doi: 10.1021/cm049532v10.1021/cm049532v ↗
12. Ji XJ, Shao RP, Elliott AM, Stafford RJ, Esparza-Coss E, Bankson JA, Liang G, Luo ZP, Park K, Markert JT, Li C (2007) Bifunctional gold nanoshells with a superparamagnetic iron oxide-silica core suitable for both MR imaging and photothermal therapy. J Phys Chem C 111:6245–6251. doi: 10.1021/jp070224510.1021/jp0702245 ↗
13. Jiang J, Gu HW, Shao HL, Devlin E, Papaefthymiou GC, Ying JY (2008) Manipulation bifunctional Fe3O4–Ag heterodimer nanoparticles for two-photon fluorescence imaging and magnetic manipulation. Adv Mater 20:4403–4407. doi: 10.1002/adma.20080049810.1002/adma.200800498 ↗
14. Jin YD, Jia CX, Huang SW, O’Donnell M, Gao XH (2010) Multifunctional nanoparticles as coupled contrast agents. Nat Commun 1:41. doi: 10.1038/ncomms104210.1038/ncomms1042 ↗
15. Jun YW, Huh YM, Choi JS, Lee JH, Song HT, Kim S, Yoon S, Kim KS, Shin JS, Suh JS, Cheon J (2005) Nanoscale size effect of magnetic nanocrystals and their utilization for cancer diagnosis via magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Chem Soc 127:5732–5733. doi: 10.1021/ja042215510.1021/ja0422155 ↗
16. Kim D, Yu MK, Lee TS, Park JJ, Jeong YY, Jon S (2011) Amphiphilic polymer-coated hybrid nanoparticles as CT/MRI dual contrast agents. Nanotechnology 22:155101. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/15/15510110.1088/0957-4484/22/15/155101 ↗
17. Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Elst LV, Muller RN (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev 108:2064–2110. doi: 10.1021/cr068445e10.1021/cr068445e ↗
18. Lin FH, Doong RA (2011) Bifunctional Au–Fe3O4 heterostructures for magnetically recyclable catalysis of nitrophenol reduction. J Phys Chem C 115:6591–6598. doi: 10.1021/jp110956k10.1021/jp110956k ↗
19. Lin FH, Chen W, Liao YH, Doong RA, Li YD (2011) Effective approach for the synthesis of monodisperse magnetic nanocrystals and M-Fe3O4 (M = Ag, Au, Pt, Pd) heterostructures. Nano Res 4:1223–1232. doi: 10.1007/s12274-011-0173-210.1007/s12274-011-0173-2 ↗
20. Liu J, Zhang W, Zhang HL, Yang ZY, Li TR, Wang BD, Huo X, Wang R, Chen HT (2013) A multifunctional nanoprobe based on Au–Fe3O4 nanoparticles for multimodal and ultrasensitive detection of cancer cells. Chem Commun 49:4938–4940. doi: 10.1039/c3cc41984c10.1039/c3cc41984c ↗
21. Lu AH, Salabas EL, Schuth F (2007) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew Chem Int Edit 46:1222–1244. doi: 10.1002/anie.20060286610.1002/anie.200602866 ↗
22. Mamidala V, Xing GC, Ji W (2010) Surface plasmon enhanced third-order nonlinear optical effects in Ag–Fe3O4 nanocomposites. J Phys Chem C 114:22466–22471. doi: 10.1021/jp108091210.1021/jp1080912 ↗
23. Mao YW, Yi PW, Deng ZW, Ge JP (2013) Fe3O4–Ag heterostructure nanocrystals with tunable Ag domains and magnetic properties. CrystEngComm 15:3575–3581. doi: 10.1039/c3ce40095f10.1039/c3ce40095f ↗
24. Na HB, Song IC, Hyeon T (2009) Inorganic nanoparticles for MRI contrast agents. Adv Mater 21:2133–2148. doi: 10.1002/adma.20080236610.1002/adma.200802366 ↗
25. Narayanan S, Sathy BN, Mony U, Koyakutty M, Nair SV, Menon D (2012) Biocompatible magnetite/gold nanohybrid contrast agents via green chemistry for MRI and CT bioimaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:251–260. doi: 10.1021/am201311c10.1021/am201311c ↗
26. Papa AL, Maurizi L, Vandroux D, Walker P, Millot N (2011) Synthesis of titanate nanotubes directly coated with USPIO in hydrothermal conditions: a new detectable nanocarrier. J Phys Chem C 115:19012–19017. doi: 10.1021/jp205689310.1021/jp2056893 ↗
27. Park J, An KJ, Hwang YS, Park JG, Noh HJ, Kim JY, Park JH, Hwang NM, Hyeon T (2004) Ultra-large-scale syntheses of monodisperse nanocrystals. Nat Mater 3:891–895. doi: 10.1038/nmat125110.1038/nmat1251 ↗
28. Peng S, Lee YM, Wang C, Yin HF, Dai S, Sun SH (2008) A facile synthesis of monodisperse Au nanoparticles and their catalysis of CO oxidation. Nano Res 1:229–234. doi: 10.1007/s12274-008-8026-310.1007/s12274-008-8026-3 ↗
29. Smolensky ED, Park HY, Zhou Y, Rolla GA, Marjańska M, Botta M, Pierre VC (2013) Scaling laws at the nano size: the effect of particle size and shape on the magnetism and relaxivity of iron oxide nanoparticle contrast agents. J Mater Chem B 1:2818–2828. doi: 10.1039/C3TB00369H10.1039/c3tb00369h ↗
30. Umut E, Pineider F, Arosio P, Sangregorio C, Corti M, Tabak F, Lascialfari A, Ghigna P (2012) Magnetic, optical and relaxometric properties of organically coated gold-magnetite (Au–Fe3O4) hybrid nanoparticles for potential use in biomedical applications. J Magn Magn Mater 324:2373–2379. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.03.00510.1016/j.jmmm.2012.03.005 ↗
31. Wang C, Xu CJ, Zeng H, Sun SH (2009a) Recent progress in syntheses and applications of dumbbell-like nanoparticles. Adv Mater 21:3045–3052. doi: 10.1002/adma.20090032010.1002/adma.200900320 ↗
32. Wang CG, Chen J, Talavage T, Irudayaraj J (2009b) Gold nanorod/Fe3O4 nanoparticle “nano-pearl-necklaces” for simultaneous targeting, dual-mode imaging, and photothermal ablation of cancer cells. Angew Chem Int Edit 48:2759–2763. doi: 10.1002/anie.20080528210.1002/anie.200805282 ↗
33. Wang MH, Wang C, Young KL, Hao LL, Medved M, Rajh T, Fry HC, Zhu LY, Karczmar GS, Watson C, Jiang JS, Markovic NM, Stamenkovic VR (2012) Cross-linked heterogeneous nanoparticles as bifunctional probe. Chem Mater 24:2423–2425. doi: 10.1021/cm300381f10.1021/cm300381f ↗
34. Wei YH, Klajn R, Pinchuk AO, Grzybowski BA (2008) Synthesis, shape control, and optical properties of hybrid Au/Fe3O4 “nanoflowers”. Small 4:1635–1639. doi: 10.1002/smll.20080051110.1002/smll.200800511 ↗
35. Xie J, Zhang F, Aronova M, Zhu L, Lin X, Quan QM, Liu G, Zhang GF, Choi KY, Kim K, Sun XL, Lee S, Sun SH, Leapman R, Chen XY (2011) Manipulating the power of an additional phase: a flower-like Au–Fe3O4 optical nanosensor for imaging protease expressions in vivo. ACS Nano 5:3043–3051. doi: 10.1021/nn200161v10.1021/nn200161v ↗
36. Xu C, Xie J, Ho D, Wang C, Kohler N, Walsh EG, Morgan JR, Chin YE, Sun SH (2008) Au–Fe3O4 dumbbell nanoparticles as dual-functional probes. Angew Chem Int Edit 47:173–176. doi: 10.1002/anie.20070439210.1002/anie.200704392 ↗
37. Yu H, Chen M, Rice PM, Wang SX, White RL, Sun SH (2005) Dumbbell-like bifunctional Au–Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Nano Lett 5:379–382. doi: 10.1021/nl047955q10.1021/nl047955q ↗
38. Zhen GL, Muir BW, Moffat BA, Harbour P, Murray KS, Moubaraki B, Suzuki K, Madsen I, Agron-Olshina N, Waddington L, Mulvaney P, Hartley PG (2011) Comparative study of the magnetic behavior of spherical and cubic superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 115:327–334. doi: 10.1021/jp104953z10.1021/jp104953z ↗
39. Zhou T, Wu BY, Xing D (2012) Bio-modified Fe3O4 core/Au shell nanoparticles for targeting and multimodal imaging of cancer cells. J Mater Chem 22:470–477. doi: 10.1039/c1jm13692e10.1039/C1JM13692E ↗