A density functional theory study of the adsorption of bimetallic Fe n Pt m clusters on defective graphene: structural, electronic, and magnetic properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent studies have suggested that graphene can serve as an excellent support material for the synthesis of advanced metal nanoparticle–graphene electrocatalysts. Compared with single-metal systems, rational design of bimetallic nanostructures with various compositions can provide more attractive opportunities to enhance their functionalities because of the novel electronic and magnetic properties. In this study, we have studied the adsorption of a series of bimetallic Fe n Pt m clusters (n + m ≤ 4) on defective graphene with monovacancy by performing density functional theory calculations. Particular attention is paid to addressing the structural stability and exploring the effects of Fe n Pt m clusters anchoring on the electronic and magnetic properties of defective graphene. The results reveal that all studied Fe n Pt m clusters can be stably adsorbed on defective graphene, with large binding energies ranging from 6.44 (for Fe2Pt2) to 7.94 eV (for Fe2Pt). Moreover, the functionalized defective graphenes exhibit semiconducting or half-metallic nature, which is dependent on the values of n and m. Meanwhile, most of decorated defective graphenes exhibit nonzero magnetic moments, contributed mainly by the adsorbed clusters. In addition, these composites of Fe n Pt m /graphenes possess high chemical reactivity toward O2. The elongation of the O–O bonds of the adsorbed O2 molecules indicates that they can be used as oxidative catalysts.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Abergel DSL, Apalkov V, Berashevich J, Ziegler K, Chakraborty T (2010) Properties of graphene: a theoretical perspective. Adv Phys 59:261–482. doi: 10.1080/00018732.2010.48797810.1080/00018732.2010.487978 ↗
2. Allen MJ, Tung VC, Kaner RB (2010) Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene. Chem Rev 110:132–145. doi: 10.1021/cr900070d10.1021/cr900070d ↗
3. Banhart F, Kotakoski J, Krasheninnikov AV (2011) Structural defects in graphene. ACS Nano 5:26–41. doi: 10.1021/nn102598m10.1021/nn102598m ↗
4. Barcaro G, Ferrando R, Fortunelli A, Rossi G (2010) Exotic supported CoPt nanostructures: from clusters to wires. J Phys Chem Lett 1:111–115. doi: 10.1021/jz900076m10.1021/jz900076m ↗
5. Cabrera-Sanfelix P (2009) Adsorption and reactivity of CO2 on defective graphene sheets. J Phys Chem A 113:493–498. doi: 10.1021/jp807087y10.1021/jp807087y ↗
6. Carlsson JM, Scheffler M (2006) Structural, electronic, and chemical properties of nanoporous carbon. Phys Rev Lett 96:046806–046809. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.04680610.1103/PhysRevLett.96.046806 ↗
7. Chisholm MF, Duscher G, Windl W (2012) Oxidation resistance of reactive atoms in graphene. Nano Lett 12:4651–4655. doi: 10.1021/nl301952e10.1021/nl301952e ↗
8. Choi W, Lahiri L, Seelaboyina R, Kang YS (2010) Synthesis of graphene and its applications: a review. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 35:52–71. doi: 10.1080/1040843090350503610.1080/10408430903505036 ↗
9. Delley B (1990) An all-electron numerical method for solving the local density functional for polyatomic molecules. J Chem Phys 92:508–517. doi: 10.1063/1.45845210.1063/1.458452 ↗
10. Fampiou I, Ramasubramaniam A (2012) Binding of Pt nanoclusters to point defects in graphene: adsorption, morphology, and electronic structure. J Phys Chem C 116:6543–6555. doi: 10.1021/jp211011710.1021/jp2110117 ↗
11. Geim AK (2009) Graphene: status and prospects. Science 324:1530–1534. doi: 10.1126/science.115887710.1126/science.1158877 ↗
12. Guo SJ, Sun SH (2012) FePt nanoparticles assembled on graphene as enhanced catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. J Am Chem Soc 134:2492–2495. doi: 10.1021/ja210433410.1021/ja2104334 ↗
13. Hashimoto A, Suenaga K, Gloter A, Urita K, Iijima S (2004) Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers. Nature 430:870–873. doi: 10.1038/nature0281710.1038/nature02817 ↗
14. Hirshfeld FL (1977) Bonded-atom fragments for describing molecular charge densities. Theor Chim Acta 44:129–138. doi: 10.1007/BF0054909610.1007/BF00549096 ↗
15. Hu YJ, Zhang H, Wu P, Zhang H, Zhou B, Cai CX (2011) Bimetallic Pt–Au nanocatalysts electrochemically deposited on graphene and their electrocatalytic characteristics towards oxygen reduction and methanol oxidation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:4083–4094. doi: 10.1039/C0CP01998D10.1039/c0cp01998d ↗
16. Ji ZY, Zhu GX, Shen XP, Zhou H, Wu CM, Wang M (2012) Reduced graphene oxide supported FePt alloy nanoparticles with high electrocatalytic performance for methanol oxidation. New J Chem 36:1774–1780. doi: 10.1039/C2NJ40133A10.1039/c2nj40133a ↗
17. Krasheninnikov AV, Lehtiene PO, Foster AS, Pyykkö P, Nieminen RM (2009) Embedding transition-metal atoms in graphene: structure, bonding, and magnetism. Phys Rev Lett 102:126807–126810. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.12680710.1103/PhysRevLett.102.126807 ↗
18. Li Y, Zhou Z, Yu G, Chen W, Chen Z (2010) CO catalytic oxidation on iron-embedded graphene: computational quest for low-cost nanocatalysts. J Phys Chem C 114:6250–6254. doi: 10.1021/jp911535v10.1021/jp911535v ↗
19. Lim D-H, Wilcox J (2011) DFT-based study on oxygen adsorption on defective graphene-supported Pt nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 115:22742–22747. doi: 10.1021/jp205244m10.1021/jp205244m ↗
20. Lim D-H, Wilcox J (2012) Mechanisms of the oxygen reduction reaction on defective graphene-supported Pt nanoparticles from first-principles. J Phys Chem C 116:3653–3660. doi: 10.1021/jp210796e10.1021/jp210796e ↗
21. Lim D-H, Negreira AS, Wilcox J (2011) DFT studies on the interaction of defective graphene-supported Fe and Al nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 115:8961–8970. doi: 10.1021/jp201291410.1021/jp2012914 ↗
22. Liu X, Li L, Meng CG, Han Y (2012a) Palladium nanoparticles/defective graphene composites as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts: a first-principles study. J Phys Chem C 116:2710–2719. doi: 10.1021/jp209698310.1021/jp2096983 ↗
23. Liu X, Meng CG, Han Y (2012b) Substrate-mediated enhanced activity of Ru nanoparticles in catalytic hydrogenation of benzene. Nanoscale 4:2288–2295. doi: 10.1039/C2NR00031H10.1039/c2nr00031h ↗
24. Liu X, Meng CG, Han Y (2012c) Unique reactivity of Fe nanoparticles–defective graphene composites toward NHx (x = 0, 1, 2, 3) adsorption: a first-principles study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:15036–15045. doi: 10.1039/C2CP42141K10.1039/c2cp42141k ↗
25. Liu X, Yao KX, Meng CG, Han Y (2012d) Graphene substrate-mediated catalytic performance enhancement of Ru nanoparticles: a first-principles study. Dalton Trans 41:1289–1296. doi: 10.1039/C1DT11186H10.1039/C1DT11186H ↗
26. Loh KP, Bao Q, Ang PK, Yang J (2010) The chemistry of graphene. J Mater Chem 20:2277–2289. doi: 10.1039/B920539J10.1039/b920539j ↗
27. Lu Y–Y, Zhou M, Zhang C, Feng Y-P (2009) Metal-embedded graphene: a possible catalyst with high activity. J Phys Chem C 113:20156–20160. doi: 10.1021/jp908829m10.1021/jp908829m ↗
28. Ma Y, Lehtinen PO, Foster AS, Nieminen RM (2004) Magnetic properties of vacancies in graphene and single-walled carbon nanotubes. New J Phys 6:68. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/06810.1088/1367-2630/6/1/068 ↗
29. McAllister MJ, Li JL, Adamson DH, Schniepp HC, Abdala AA, Liu J, Herrera-Alonso M, Milius DL, Car R, Prud’homme RK, Aksay IA (2007) Single sheet functionalized graphene by oxidation and thermal expansion of graphite. Chem Mater 19:4396–4404. doi: 10.1021/cm063080010.1021/cm0630800 ↗
30. Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD (1976) Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 13:5188–5192. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
31. Neto AHC, Guinea F, Peres NMR, Novoselov KS, Geim AK (2009) The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys 81:109–162. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
32. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669. doi: 10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
33. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
34. Philipsen PHT, Baerends EJ (1996) Cohesive energy of 3d transition metals: density functional theory atomic and bulk calculations. Phys Rev B 54:5326–5333. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.532610.1103/PhysRevB.54.5326 ↗
35. Rao CNR, Biswas K, Subrahmanyam KS, Govindaraj A (2009a) Graphene, the new nanocarbon. J Mater Chem 19:2457–2469. doi: 10.1039/b815239j10.1039/b815239j ↗
36. Rao CNR, Sood AK, Subrahmanyam KS, Govindaraj A (2009b) Graphene: the new two-dimensional nanomaterial. Angew Chem Int Ed 48:7752–7777. doi: 10.1002/anie.20090167810.1002/anie.200901678 ↗
37. Rao CV, Cabrera CR, Ishikawa Y (2011) Graphene-supported Pt–Au alloy nanoparticles: a highly efficient anode for direct formic acid fuel cells. J Phys Chem C 115:21963–21970. doi: 10.1021/jp202561n10.1021/jp202561n ↗
38. Rodríguez-Manzo JA, Cretu O, Banhart Florian (2010) Trapping of metal atoms in vacancies of carbon nanotubes and graphene. ACS Nano 4:3422–3428. doi: 10.1021/nn100356q10.1021/nn100356q ↗
39. Schedin F, Geim AK, Moeozov SV, Hill EW, Blake P, Katsnelson MI, Novoselov KS (2007) Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene. Nat Mater 6:652–655. doi: 10.1038/nmat196710.1038/nmat1967 ↗
40. Srivatava MK, Wang Y, Kemper AF, Cheng H-P (2012) Density functional study of gold and iron clusters on perfect and defected graphene. Phys Rev B 85:165444–165458. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.16544410.1103/PhysRevB.85.165444 ↗
41. Taghioskoui M (2009) Trends in graphene research. Mater Today 12:34–37. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(09)70274-310.1016/S1369-7021(09)70274-3 ↗
42. Tang YN, Yang ZX, Dai XQ (2012) A theoretical simulation on the catalytic oxidation of CO on Pt/graphene. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:16566–16572. doi: 10.1039/C2CP41441D10.1039/c2cp41441d ↗
43. Terronesa M, Botello-Méndez AR, Campos-Delgado J, López-Urías F, Vega-Cantú YI, Rodríguez-Macías FJ, Elías AL, Muñoz-Sandoval E, Cano-Márquez AG, Charlier J-C, Terrones H (2010) Graphene and graphite nanoribbons: morphology, properties, synthesis, defects and applications. Nanotoday 5:351–372. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.06.01010.1016/j.nantod.2010.06.010 ↗
44. Wang HT, Wang QX, Chen YC, Li K, Yao YB, Zhang Q, Dong CZ, Wang P, Schwingenschlögl U, Yang W, Zhang XX (2012) Doping monolayer graphene with single atom substitutions. Nano Lett 12:141–144. doi: 10.1021/nl203162910.1021/nl2031629 ↗
45. Yazyev OV, Helm L (2007) Defect-induced magnetism in graphene. Phys Rev B 75:125408–125412. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.12540810.1103/PhysRevB.75.125408 ↗
46. Yumura T, Awano T, Kobayashi H, Yamabe T (2012) Platinum clusters on vacancy-type defects of nanometer-sized graphene patches. Molecules 17:7941–7960. doi: 10.3390/molecules1707794110.3390/molecules17077941 ↗
47. Zhang Y, Talapatra S, Kar S, Vajtai R, Nayak SK, Ajayan PM (2007) First-principles study of defect-induced magnetism in carbon. Phys Rev Lett 99:107201–107204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.10720110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.107201 ↗
48. Zhang Y-H, Chen Y-B, Zhou K-G, Liu C-H, Zheng J, Zhang H-L, Peng Y (2009) Improving gas sensing properties of graphene by introducing dopants and defects: a first-principles study. Nanotechnology 20:185504. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/18/18550410.1088/0957-4484/20/18/185504 ↗
49. Zhu Y, Murali S, Cai W, Li X, Suk JW, Potts JR, Ruoff RS (2010) Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 22:3906–3924. doi: 10.1002/adma.20100106810.1002/adma.201001068 ↗