A time-dependent model to determine the thermal conductivity of a nanofluid
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, we analyse the time-dependent heat equations over a finite domain to determine expressions for the thermal diffusivity and conductivity of a nanofluid (where a nanofluid is a fluid containing nanoparticles with average size below 100 nm). Due to the complexity of the standard mathematical analysis of this problem, we employ a well-known approximate solution technique known as the heat balance integral method. This allows us to derive simple analytical expressions for the thermal properties, which appear to depend primarily on the volume fraction and liquid properties. The model is shown to compare well with experimental data taken from the literature even up to relatively high concentrations and predicts significantly higher values than the Maxwell model for volume fractions approximately >1 %. The results suggest that the difficulty in reproducing the high values of conductivity observed experimentally may stem from the use of a static heat flow model applied over an infinite domain rather than applying a dynamic model over a finite domain.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer · Heat Transfer and Optimization · Heat Transfer Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Buongiorno J, Venerus DC, Prabhat N, McKrell T, Townsend J et al (2009) A benchmark study on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. J Appl Phys 106:09431210.1063/1.3245330 ↗
2. Chandrasekar M, Suresh S, Bose AC (2010) Experimental investigations and theoretical determination of thermal conductivity and viscosity of Al2O3/water nanofluid. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 34:210–21610.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.10.022 ↗
3. Das SK, Choi SU, Yu W, Pradeep T (2008) Nanofluids: science and technology. Wiley ,Hoboken
4. Das SK, Putra N, Thiesen P, Roetzel W (2003) Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity enhancement for nanofluids. J Heat Transf 125:567–57410.1115/1.1571080 ↗
5. Eastman JA, Phillpot SR, Choi SUS, Keblinski P (2004) Thermal transport in nanofluids. Annu Rev Mater Res 34:21946. doi: 10.1146/annurev.matsci.34.052803.09062110.1146/annurev.matsci.34.052803.090621 ↗
6. Eastman JA, Choi SUS, Yu W, Thompson LJ (2001) Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett. 78:6, 718–72010.1063/1.1341218 ↗
7. Hamilton RL, Crosser OK (1962) Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two component systems. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 1:187–19110.1021/i160003a005 ↗
8. Keblinski P, Eastman JA, Cahill DG (2005) Nanofluids for thermal transport. Mater Today 8:3610.1016/S1369-7021(05)70936-6 ↗
9. Keblinski P, Phillpot SR, Choi SUS, Eastman JA (2002) Mechanisms of heat flow in suspensions of nano-sized particles (nanofluids). Int J Heat Mass Trans 45:85586310.1016/S0017-9310(01)00175-2 ↗
10. Keblinski P, Prasher R, Eapen J (2008) Thermal conductance of nanofluids: is the controversy over?. J Nanopart Res 10:1089–109710.1007/s11051-007-9352-1 ↗
11. Kleinstreuer C, Feng Y (2011) Experimental and theoretical studies of nanofluid thermal conductivity enhancement: a review. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:22910.1186/1556-276X-6-229 ↗
12. Koo J, Kleinstreuer C (2004) A new thermal conductivity model for nanofluids. J Nanopart Res 6:577588
13. Kwak K, Kim C (2005) Viscosity and thermal conductivity of copper oxide nanofluid dispersed in ethylene glycol. Korea-Aust Rheol J 17(2):35–40
14. Kwek D, Crivoi A, Duan Fei (2010) Effects of temperature and particle size on the thermal property measurements of Al2O3–water nanofluids. J Chem Eng Data 55:5690–569510.1021/je1006407 ↗
15. Lee S, Choi SUS, Li S, Eastman JA (1999) Measuring thermal conductivity of fluids containing oxide nanoparticles. J Heat Transf 121:280–28910.1115/1.2825978 ↗
16. Li CH, Peterson GP (2007) The effect of particle size on the effective thermal conductivity of Al2O3–water nanofluids. J Appl Phys 101: 04431210.1063/1.2436472 ↗
17. Maxwell JC (1891) A treatise on electricity and magnetism, 3rd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford
18. Mitchell SL, Myers TG (2010a) Application of standard and refined heat balance integral methods to one-dimensional stefan problems. SIAM Rev 52(1):578610.1137/080733036 ↗
19. Mitchell SL, Myers TG (2010b) Improving the accuracy of heat balance integral methods applied to thermal problems with time dependent boundary conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53(17-18):3540–3551. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.04.01510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.04.015 ↗
20. Mitchell SL, Myers TG (2008) Heat balance integral method for one-dimensional finite ablation. J Thermophys Heat Transf 22:(3) 508–51410.2514/1.31755 ↗
21. Myers TG (2009) Optimizing the exponent in the heat balance and refined integral methods. Int Commun Heat Mass Trans 36(2):143–147. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2008.10.01310.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2008.10.013 ↗
22. Myers TG (2010) Optimal exponent heat balance and refined integral methods applied to Stefan problems. Int J Heat Mass Trans doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.10.04510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.10.045 ↗
23. Philip J, Shima PD (2012) Thermal properties of nanofluids. Adv Colliod Interface Sci 183:30–4510.1016/j.cis.2012.08.001 ↗
24. Prasher R, Bhattacharya P, Phelan PE (2005) Thermal conductivity of nanoscale colloidal solutions (nanofluids). Phys Rev Lett 94:02590110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.025901 ↗
25. Teng TP, Hung YH, Teng TC, Moa HE, Hsu HG (2010) The effect of alumina/water nanofluid particle size on thermal conductivity. Appl Therm Eng 30:2213–221810.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.05.036 ↗
26. Tillman P, Hill JM (2007) Determination of nanolayer thickness for a nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Trans 34:399–40710.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2007.01.011 ↗
27. Timofeeva EV, Gavrilov AN, McCloskey JM, Tolmachev YV, Sprunt S, Lopatina LM, Selinger JV (2007) Thermal conductivity and particle agglomeration in alumina nanofluids: experiment and theory. Phys Rev E 76:06120310.1103/PhysRevE.76.061203 ↗
28. Wang X, Xu X, Choi SUS (1999) Thermal conductivity of nanoparticlefluid mixture. J Thermophys Heat Transf 13:(4) 474–48010.2514/2.6486 ↗
29. Wang BX, Zhou LP, Peng XF (2003) A fractal model for predicting the effective thermal conductivity of liquid with suspension of nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46:2665–267510.1016/S0017-9310(03)00016-4 ↗
30. Wood DM, Ashcroft NW (1977) Effective medium theory of optical properties of small particle composites. Philos Mag 35(2):269280
31. Yoo DH, Hong KS, Hong TE, Eastman JA, Yang HS (2007) Thermal conductivity of Al2O3/water nanofluids. J Korean Phys Soc 51:S84–S87
32. Yu W, Choi SUS (2003) The role of interfacial layers in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: a renovated Maxwell model. J Nanopart Res 5:167–17110.1023/A:1024438603801 ↗
33. Yu W, Choi SUS (2004) The role of interfacial layers in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: a renovated Hamilton–Crosser model. J Nanopart Res 6:355–36110.1007/s11051-004-2601-7 ↗
34. Zhou SQ, Rui N (2008) Measurement of the specific heat capacity of water-based Al2O3 nanofluid. Appl Phys Lett 92:09312310.1063/1.2890431 ↗