journal article·2011-11

Effect of dipolar interaction on the magnetization state of chains of rectangular particles located either head-to-tail or side-by-side

D. Bisero, P. Cremon, M. Madami, M. Sepioni, S. Tacchi, G. Gubbiotti, G. Carlotti, A. O. Adeyeye, N. Singh, S. Goolaup

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 13· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Magnetostatic coupling in arrays of closely spaced magnetic elements is becoming an important issue in the path to the fabrication of spintronic devices. Dense chains of rounded-corners rectangular particles (dots) of lateral size 1025 9 450 nm 2, with interdot spacing variable in the range between 55 and 700 nm, have been patterned by deep UV lithography, followed by the lift-off of two permalloy films of thickness 20 and 40 nm. Magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) and magnetic force microscopy (MFM) experiments, together with micromagnetic simulations, were per- formed to study the dependence of the magnetization configuration on the dipolar coupling. Both MOKE measurements and MFM images clearly show that, at remanence, the magnetic state of isolated particles of thickness 20 nm takes the form of a distorted single domain (C-state or S-State configurations). Instead, when the particle thickness is double (40 nm), closure states characterized by one, two or three vortices occur at remanence. However, when the 40 nm thick dots are placed in chains along the easy axis (head to tail), as the separation is progressively reduced, the single domain state is stabilized at remanence. On the other hand, when the 40 nm thick particles are placed side by side in chains the effect of dipolar interactions is to favour the nucleation of vortex states. For small inter-element separation, there is only one vortex per particle and it has the same chirality in adjacent particles, due to the dipolar interaction. Different from this, for the 20 nm thick samples and sub-100 nm separation, adjacent particles are single-domain but with antiparallel magnetization in neighbour elements, like in an artificial antiferromagnet.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Adeyeye AO, Singh N (2008) Large area patterned magnetic nanostructures. J Phys D Appl Phys 41:15300110.1088/0022-3727/41/15/153001 ↗
2. Carlotti G, Gazzadi GC, Gubbiotti G, Madami M, Tacchi S, Vavassori P (2006) Intrinsic magnetic anisotropy versus coupling in arrays of closely-spaced circular Fe/GaAs (100) dots patterned by focused ion beam. Thin Solid Films 515:739–74310.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.258 ↗
3. Cowburn RP (2002) Probing antiferromagnetic coupling between nanomagnets. Phys Rev B 65:092409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.09240910.1103/PhysRevB.65.092409 ↗
4. Cowburn RP, Welland ME (2000) Room temperature magnetic quantum cellular automata. Science 287:1466–146810.1126/science.287.5457.1466 ↗
5. García JM, Thiaville A, Miltat J (2002) MFM imaging of nanowires and elongated patterned elements. J Magn Magn Mater 249:163–16910.1016/S0304-8853(02)00525-5 ↗
6. Gubbiotti G, Madami M, Tacchi S, Carlotti G, Socino G, Okuno T (2006a) Effect of dipolar interdot coupling on the magnetic properties of permalloy nano-cylinders. Surf Sci 600:4143–414610.1016/j.susc.2006.01.135 ↗
7. Gubbiotti G, Madami M, Tacchi S, Carlotti G, Okuno T (2006b) Normal mode splitting in interacting arrays of cylindrical permalloy dots. J Appl Phys 99:08C701. doi: 10.1063/1.215080610.1063/1.2150806 ↗
8. Guslienko KY (2001) Magnetic anisotropy in two-dimensional dot arrays induced by magnetostatic interdot coupling. Phys Lett A 278:293–29810.1016/S0375-9601(00)00793-3 ↗
9. Imre A, Csaba G, Ji L, Orlov A, Bernstein GH, Porod W (2006) Majority logic gate for magnetic quantum-dot cellular automata. Science 311:205–20810.1126/science.1120506 ↗
10. Jain S, Ren Y, Adeyeye AO, Singh N (2009) Configurational anisotropy and control of magnetic vortex chirality in arrays of circular Ni80Fe20 nanoscale dots. Phys Rev B 80:132401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.13240110.1103/PhysRevB.80.132401 ↗
11. Martin JI, Nogues J, Liuc K, Vicent JL, Schuller IK (2003) Ordered magnetic nanostructures: fabrication and properties. J Magn Magn Mater 256:449–501 and references therein10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00898-3 ↗
12. Natali M, Prejbeanu IL, Lebib A, Buda LD, Ounadjela K, Chen Y (2002) Correlated magnetic vortex chains in mesoscopic cobalt dot arrays. Phys Rev Lett 88:157203. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.15720310.1103/PhysRevLett.88.157203 ↗
13. Novosad V, Guslienko KY, Shima H, Otani Y, Kim SG, Fukamichi K, Kikuchi N, Kitakami O, Shimada Y (2002) Effect of interdot magnetostatic interaction on magnetization reversal in circular dot arrays. Phys Rev B 65:060402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.06040210.1103/PhysRevB.65.060402 ↗
14. Remhof A, Schumann A, Westphalen A, Zabel H, Mikuszeit N, Vedmedenko EY, Last T, Kunze U (2008) Magnetostatic interactions on a square lattice. Phys Rev B 77:134409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.13440910.1103/PhysRevB.77.134409 ↗
15. Sepioni M, Madami M, Tacchi S, Gubbiotti G, Carlotti G, Bisero D, Adeyeye AO, Singh N, Goolaup S (2010) Dipolar interaction in dense chains of submicrometric rectangular dots. J Phys Conf Series 200:072089. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/200/7/07208910.1088/1742-6596/200/7/072089 ↗
16. Shigeto K, Okuno T, Mibu K, Shinjo T, Ono T (2002) Magnetic force microscopy observation of antivortex core with perpendicular magnetization in patterned thin film of permalloy. Appl Phys Lett 80:4190–419210.1063/1.1483386 ↗