Measurement of filtration efficiency of Nuclepore filters challenged with polystyrene latex nanoparticles: experiments and modeling
Source abstract
Abstract
Membrane filtration has been demonstrated to be effective for the removal of liquid-borne nanoparticles (NPs). Such technique can be applied to purify and disinfect drinking water as well as remove NPs in highly pure chemicals used in the industries. This study aims to study the filtration process of a model membrane filter, the Nuclepore filter. Experiments were carried out using standard filtration tools and the nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) technique was used to measure particle (50–500 nm) concentration upstream and downstream of the filter to determine the filtration efficiency. The NTA technique has been calibrated using 150-nm polystyrene latex particles to determine its accuracy of particle concentration measurement. Measurements were found reliable within a certain concentration limit (about 108–1010 particles/cm3), which is dependent on the camera settings during the measurement. Experimental results are comparable with previously published data obtained using the aerosolization method, validating the capability of the NTA technique. The capillary tube model modified from that developed for aerosol filtration was found to be useful to represent the experimental results, when a sticking coefficient of 0.15 is incorporated. This suggests that only 15% of the particle collisions with the filter results in successful attachment. The small sticking coefficient found can be explained by the unfavorable surface interactions between the particles and the filter medium.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · Urban Stormwater Management Solutions · Membrane Separation Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Botes M, Cloete TE (2010) The potential of nanofibers and nanobiocides in water purification. Crit Rev Microbiol 36:68–8110.3109/10408410903397332 ↗
2. Brown RC (1993) Air filtration. Pergamon Press, London
3. Cyrs WD, Boysen DA, Casuccio G, Lersch T, Peters TM (2010) Nanoparticle collection efficiency of capillary pore membrane filters. J Aerosol Sci 41(7):655–66410.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.04.007 ↗
4. Domingos RF, Baalousha MA, Ju-Nam Y, Reid MM, Tufenkji N, Lead JR, Leppard GG, Wilkinson KJ (2009) Characterizing manufactured nanoparticles in the environment: multimethod determination of particle sizes. Environ Sci Technol 43:7277–728410.1021/es900249m ↗
5. Filipe V, Hawe A, Jiskoot W (2010) Critical evaluation of nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) by nanoSight for the measurement of nanoparticles and protein aggregates. Pharm Res 27:796–81010.1007/s11095-010-0073-2 ↗
6. Guo H, Wyart Y, Perot J, Nauleau F, Moulin P (2010) Low-pressure membrane integrity tests for drinking water treatment: a review. Water Res 44:41–5710.1016/j.watres.2009.09.032 ↗
7. Hinds WC (1999) Aerosol technology: properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. Wiley, New York
8. John W, Reischl G, Goren S, Plotkin D (1978) Anomalous filtration of solid particles by nuclepore filters. Atmos Environ 12:1555–155710.1016/0004-6981(78)90100-2 ↗
9. Laxen DPH, Chandler IM (1982) Comparison of filtration techniques for size distribution in fresh-waters. Anal Chem 54:1350–135510.1021/ac00245a023 ↗
10. Lee JK (1992) Particulate retention by microporous membrane filters in liquid filtration. PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota
11. Ling TY, Wang J, Pui DYH (2010) Measurement of retention efficiency of filters against nanoparticles in liquids using an aerosolization technique. Environ Sci Technol 44:774–77910.1021/es901955e ↗
12. Lippa P, Mueller U, Hetzer B, Wagner T (2009) Characterization of nanoparticulate fouling and breakthrough during low-pressure membrane filtration. Desalin Water Treat 9:234–24010.5004/dwt.2009.812 ↗
13. Logan BE (1993) Theoretical analysis of size distributions determined with screens and filters. Limnol Oceanogr 38:372–38110.4319/lo.1993.38.2.0372 ↗
14. Logan BE, Hilbert TA, Arnold RG (1993) Removal of bacteria in laboratory filters—models and experiments. Water Res 27:955–96210.1016/0043-1354(93)90059-Q ↗
15. Lundhal P, Stokes R, Smith E, Martin R, Graham D (2008) Synthesis and characterisation of monodispersed silver nanoparticles with controlled size ranges. Micro Nano Lett 3:62–6510.1049/mnl:20080003 ↗
16. Madaeni SS (1999) The application of membrane technology for water disinfection. Water Res 33:301–30810.1016/S0043-1354(98)00212-7 ↗
17. Nassar T, Rom A, Nyska A, Benita S (2009) Novel double coated nanocapsules for intestinal delivery and enhanced oral bioavailability of tacrolimus, a P-gp substrate drug. J Control Release 133:77–8410.1016/j.jconrel.2008.08.021 ↗
18. Rubow KL, Liu BYH (1986) Characteristics of membrane filters for particle collection. In: Raber RR (ed) Fluid filtration: gas, vol 1, ASTM STP 975. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philidelphia
19. Savage N, Diallo MS (2005) Nanomaterials and water purification: opportunities and challenges. J Nanopart Res 7:331–34210.1007/s11051-005-7523-5 ↗
20. Smith TN, Phillips CR (1975) Inertial collection of aerosol-particles at circular aperture. Environ Sci Technol 9:564–56810.1021/es60104a009 ↗
21. Smith TN, Phillips CR, Melo OT (1976) Diffusive collection of aerosol-particles on nuclepore membrane-filter. Environ Sci Technol 10:274–27710.1021/es60114a004 ↗
22. Spurny KR, Lodge JP, Frank ER, Sheesley DC (1969) Aerosol filtration by means of Nuclepore filters: structural and filtration properties. Environ Sci Technol 3:453–46410.1021/es60028a004 ↗
23. Tanny GB, Strong DK, Presswood WG, Meltzer TH (1979) Adsorptive retention of pseudomonas diminuta by membrane filters. J Parenter Drug Assoc 33:40–51
24. Trushkevych O, Collings N, Hasan T, Scardaci V, Ferrari AC, Wilkinson TD, Crossland WA, Milne WI, Geng J, Johnson BFG, Macaulay S (2008) Characterization of carbon nanotube-thermotropic nematic liquid crystal composites. J Phys D Appl Phys 41:12510610.1088/0022-3727/41/12/125106 ↗
25. Van Hoecke K, Quik JTK, Mankiewicz-Boczek J, De Schamphelaere KAC, Elsaesser A, Van der Meeren P, Barnes C, McKerr G, Howard CV, Van De Meent D, Rydzynski K, Dawson KA, Salvati A, Lesniak A, Lynch I, Silversmit G, De Samber B, Vincze L, Janssen CR (2009) Fate and effects of CeO2 nanoparticles in aquatic ecotoxicity tests. Environ Sci Technol 43:4537–454610.1021/es9002444 ↗
26. Wang J, Kim SC, Pui DYH (2008a) Investigation of the figure of merit for filters with a single nanofiber layer on a substrate. J Aerosol Sci 39:323–33410.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.12.003 ↗
27. Wang J, Kim SC, Pui DYH (2008b) Figure of merit of composite filters with micrometer and nanometer fibers. Aerosol Sci Technol 42:722–72810.1080/02786820802249133 ↗
28. Wang J, Kim SC, Pui DYH (2011) Carbon nanotube penetration through a screen filter: numerical modeling and comparison with experiments. Aerosol Sci Technol 45:443–45210.1080/02786826.2010.541531 ↗
29. Yao KM, Habibian MT, O’Melia CR (1971) Water and waste water filtration: concepts and applications. Environ Sci Technol 5:1105–111210.1021/es60058a005 ↗