NanoSQUID as magnetic sensor for magnetic nanoparticles characterization
Source abstract
Abstract
Integrated magnetic sensors based on niobium dc SQUID (Superconducting Quantum Interference Device) for nanoparticle characterizations are presented. The SQUIDs consists of two Dayem bridges of 90 nm × 250 nm and loop area of 4, 1, and 0.55 μm2. The devices are realized by using an e-beam lithography nano-fabrication process which can directly pattern the devices in an electron-positive resist and then transferred to a 20 nm single niobium layer by a lift-off post-process. The SQUIDs were designed to have a hysteretic current–voltage characteristic in order to work as a magnetic flux-current transducer. The presence of an integrated niobium coil, tightly coupled to the SQUID, allows us to easily excite the SQUID and to flux bias the SQUID at its optimal working point. Current–voltage characteristics, critical current as a function of the external magnetic field and switching current distributions were performed at liquid helium temperature. A critical current modulation of about 20% and a current-magnetic flux transfer coefficient (responsivity) of 30 μA/Φ0 have been obtained, resulting in a magnetic flux resolution better than 1 mΦ0. The authors performed preliminary measurements with and without iron oxide nanoparticles on the SQUID loop in order to show the device sensitivity in view of nano-magnetism applications. It was showed that the presence of magnetic nanoparticles can be easily detected and the magnetic relaxation curve measured.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Magnetic properties of thin films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Bouchiat V (2009) Detection of magnetic moments using a nano-SQUID: limits of resolution and sensitivity in near-field SQUID magnetometry. Supercond Sci Technol 22:06400210.1088/0953-2048/22/6/064002 ↗
2. Clarke J, Braginski AI (eds) (2006) The SQUID handbook: fundamentals and technology of SQUIDs and SQUID systems, vol 2. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA, Weinheim, p 251
3. Cleuziou JP et al (2006) Carbon nanotube superconducting quantum interference device. Nature Nanotech 1:53–5910.1038/nnano.2006.54 ↗
4. Faucher M, Jubert PO, Fruchart O, Wernsdorfer W, Bouchiat V (2009) Optimizing the flux coupling between a nanoSQUID and a magnetic particle using atomic force microscope nanolithography. Supercond Sci Technol 22:06401010.1088/0953-2048/22/6/064010 ↗
5. Finkler A et al (2010) Self-aligned nanoscale SQUID on a tip. Nanoletters 10:1046–104910.1021/nl100009r ↗
6. Granata C et al (2008) An integrated superconductive magnetic nanosensor for high-sensitivity nanoscale applications. Nanotechnology 19:275501–27550610.1088/0957-4484/19/27/275501 ↗
7. Granata C, Vettoliere A, Walke P, Nappi C, Russo M (2009) Performance of nano superconducting quantum interference devices for small spin cluster detection. J Appl Phys 106:023925. doi: 10.1063/1.318395910.1063/1.3183959 ↗
8. Hao L et al (2008) Measurement and noise performance of nano-superconducting-quantum interference devices fabricated by focused ion beam. Appl Phys Lett 92:192507–19250910.1063/1.2917580 ↗
9. Jamet M, Wernsdorfer W, Thirion C, Mailly D, Dupuis V, Me′linon P, Pe′rez A (2001) Magnetic anisotropy of a single cobalt nanocluster. Phys Rev Lett 86:4676–467910.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4676 ↗
10. Josephs-Franks P, Hao L, Tzalenchuk A, Davies J, Kazakova O, Gallop JC, Brown L, Macfarlane JC (2003) Measurement of the spatial sensitivity of miniature SQUIDs using magnetic-tipped STM. Supercond Sci Technol 16:1570–157410.1088/0953-2048/16/12/054 ↗
11. Lam SKH, Gnanarajan Sabaratnasingam (2009) Hysteretic behaviour of nanoSQUIDs—prospective application as trapped-vortex memory. Supercond Sci Technol 22:06400510.1088/0953-2048/22/6/064005 ↗
12. Lam SKH, Tilbrook DL (2003) Development of a niobium nanosuperconducting quantum interference device for the detection of small spin populations. Appl Phys Lett 82:1078–108010.1063/1.1554770 ↗
13. Lam SKH, Yang W, Wiogo HTR, Foley CP (2008) Attachment of magnetic molecules on a nanoSQUID. Nanotechnology 19:28530310.1088/0957-4484/19/28/285303 ↗
14. Podd GJ, Hutchinson GD, Williams DA, Hasko DG (2007) Micro-SQUIDs with controllable asymmetry via hot-phonon controlled junctions. Phys Rev B 75:13450110.1103/PhysRevB.75.134501 ↗
15. Tettamanzi GC, Pakes CI, Lam SKH, Prawer S (2009) Flux noise in ion-implanted nanoSQUIDs. Supercond Sci Technol 22:06400610.1088/0953-2048/22/6/064006 ↗
16. Tilbrook DL (2009) NanoSQUID sensitivity for isolated dipoles and small spin populations. Supercond Sci Technol 22:064003. doi: 10.1088/0953-2048/22/6/06400310.1088/0953-2048/22/6/064003 ↗
17. Troeman AGP, Derking H, Borger B, Pleikies J, Veldhuis D, Hilgenkamp H (2007) NanoSQUIDs based on niobium constrictions. Nano lett 7:2152–2156. doi: 10.1021/nl070870f10.1021/nl070870f ↗
18. Vohralik PF, Lam SKH (2009) NanoSQUID detection of magnetization from ferritin nanoparticles. Supercond Sci Technol 22:064007. doi: 10.1088/0953-2048/22/6/06400710.1088/0953-2048/22/6/064007 ↗
19. Volkov I, Chukharin M, Snigirev O et al (2008) Determination of the anisotropy constant and saturation magnetization of magnetic nanoparticles from magnetization relaxation curves. J Nanopart Res 10:487–497. doi: 10.1007/s11051-007-9282-y10.1007/s11051-007-9282-y ↗
20. Wernsdorfer W (2009) From micro-to nano-SQUIDs: applications to nanomagnetism. Supercond Sci Technol 22:064013. doi: 10.1088/0953-2048/22/6/06401310.1088/0953-2048/22/6/064013 ↗
21. Wernsdorfer W, Doudin B, Mailly D, Hasselbach K, Benoit A, Meier J, Ansermet J-Ph, Barbara B (1996) Nucleation of the magnetization reversal in individual nanosized nickel wires. Phys Rev Lett 77:187310.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1873 ↗
22. Wernsdorfer W, Bonet Orozco E, Hasselbach K, Benoit A, Barbara B, Demoncy N, Loiseau A, Boivin D, Pascard H, Mailly D (1997a) Experimental evidence of the n′eel–brownmodel of magnetization reversal. Phys Rev Lett 78:179110.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1791 ↗
23. Wernsdorfer W, Bonet Orozco E, Hasselbach K, Benoit A, Mailly D, Kubo O, Nakano H, Barbara B (1997b) Macroscopic quantum tunneling of magnetization of single ferrimagnetic nanoparticles of barium ferrite. Phys Rev Lett 79:401410.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4014 ↗
24. Wernsdorfer W, Mailly D, Benoit A (2000) Single nanoparticle measurement techniques. J Appl Phys 87:5094. doi: 10.1063/1.37325910.1063/1.373259 ↗