Comparisons of the nanoparticle emission characteristics between GDI and PFI vehicles
Source abstract
Abstract
To compare the particle emissions of gasoline direct injection (GDI) and port fuel injection (PFI) vehicles in this study, the particulate matter of exhaust emissions was sampled from a constant volume sampler tunnel and tailpipe using a chassis dynamometer. Using the gravimetric method and a condensation particle counter, the particulate matter mass (PM) and particle number (PN) of the particle size according to the current regulations were measured. Nanometer-sized particle emissions, which are smaller than regulated particle emissions, were measured by an engine exhaust particle sizer. Four test vehicles, which included two GDI vehicles and two PFI vehicles, were tested in various driving modes. The test results show that the particle emissions from the GDI vehicles were higher than the particle emissions from the PFI vehicles. In addition, the test vehicles had the highest emissions in cold start conditions. In the GDI vehicles, the PM and PN satisfied the current regulations but PN did not satisfy the EURO 6c regulations that will be implemented in 2017. In all driving modes, the particle size distribution show that the most common particle size was approximately 50 nm, and the results according to the driving patterns of each mode were confirmed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vehicle emissions and performance · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Andersson J, Giechaskiel B, Muñoz-Bueno R, Sandbach E, Dilara P (2007) Particle measurement programme (PMP) light-duty inter-laboratory correlation exercise (ILCE_LD) final report. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability
2. Arsie I, Di Iorio S, Vaccaro S (2011) Experimental characterization of nanoparticles emissions in a port fuel injection spark ignition engine. SAE Technical Paper. doi: 10.4271/2011-24-0208
3. Bonandrini G, Di Gioia R, Papaleo D, Venturoli L (2012) Numerical study on multiple injection strategies in DISI engines for particulate emission control. SAE Technical Pap. doi: 10.4271/2012-01-0400
4. Bonatesta F, Chiappetta E, La Rocca A (2014) Part-load particulate matter from a GDI engine and the connection with combustion characteristics. Appl Energy 124:366–376. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.03010.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.030 ↗
5. Braisher M, Stone R, Price P (2010) Particle number emissions from a range of European vehicles. SAE Technical Paper. doi: 10.4271/2010-01-0786
6. Brehob DD, Fleming JE, Haghgooie M, Stein RA (1998) Stratified-charge engine fuel economy and emission characteristics. SAE Technical Paper. doi: 10.4271/982704
7. Brugge D, Durant JL, Rioux C (2007) Near-highway pollutants in motor vehicle exhaust: a review of epidemiologic evidence of cardiac and pulmonary health risks. Environ Health 6:23. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-6-2310.1186/1476-069X-6-23 ↗
8. Cavina N, Businaro A, Moro D, Di Gioia R, Bonandrini G, Papaleo D, Picerno M (2015) Assessment of the influence of GDI injection system parameters on soot emission and combustion stability through a numerical and experimental approach. SAE Int J Engines. doi: 10.4271/2015-24-2422
9. Donaldson K, Stone V, Gilmour PS, Brown DM, MacNee W (2000) Ultrafine particles: mechanisms of lung injury. R Sco Lond Math Phys Eng Sci. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2000.0681
10. (EC) R (No 715/2007) (2007) On type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information
11. Fu H, Wang Y, Li X, Shuai S-J (2014) Impacts of cold-start and gasoline RON on particulate emission from vehicles powered by GDI and PFI engines. SAE Technical Paper. doi: 10.4271/2014-01-2836
12. Kayes D, Hochgreb S (1998) Investigation of the dilution process for measurement of particulate matter from spark-ignition engines. SAE Technical Paper. doi: 10.4271/982601
13. Kim J, Choi K, Myung C-L, Lee Y, Park S (2013) Comparative investigation of regulated emissions and nano-particle characteristics of light duty vehicles using various fuels for the FTP-75 and the NEDC mode. Fuel 106:335–343. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.04710.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.047 ↗
14. Künzli N et al (2000) Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment. The Lancet 356:795–801. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02653-210.1016/S0140-6736(00)02653-2 ↗
15. Lee KW, Yeom DJ (2012) Establishment of an installation process of a valve seat to a cylinder head using the cae technique. Int J Automot Technol 13:687–692. doi: 10.1007/s12239-012-0067-710.1007/s12239-012-0067-7 ↗
16. Li T, Chen X, Yan Z (2013) Comparison of fine particles emissions of light-duty gasoline vehicles from chassis dynamometer tests and on-road measurements. Atmos Environ 68:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.03110.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.031 ↗
17. Luijten B, Adomeit P, Brunn A, Somers B (2013) Experimental investigation of in-cylinder wall wetting in GDI engines using a shadowgraphy method. SAE Technical paper. doi: 10.4271/2013-01-1604
18. Maricq MM, Podsiadlik DH, Chase RE (1999) Examination of the size-resolved and transient nature of motor vehicle particle emissions. Environ Sci Technol 33:1618–1626. doi: 10.1021/es980880610.1021/es9808806 ↗
19. Merola SS, Sementa P, Tornatore C, Vaglieco BM (2009) Spectroscopic investigations and high resolution visualization of the combustion phenomena in a boosted PFI SI engine. SAE Int J Engines 1:1617–1629. doi: 10.4271/2009-01-181410.4271/2009-01-1814 ↗
20. Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622–627. doi: 10.1126/science.111439710.1126/science.1114397 ↗
21. Pesiridis A (2012) Issues in the integration of active control turbochargers with internal combustion engines. Int J Automot Technol 13:873–884. doi: 10.1007/s12239-012-0088-210.1007/s12239-012-0088-2 ↗
22. Price P, Stone R, OudeNijeweme D, Chen X (2007) Cold start particulate emissions from a second generation DI gasoline engine. SAE Technical Paper. doi: 10.4271/2007-01-1931
23. Rubino L, Phillips PR, Twigg MV (2005) Measurements of ultrafine particle number emissions from a light-duty diesel engine using SMPS, DMS, ELPI and EEPS. SAE Technical Paper. doi: 10.4271/2005-24-01510.4271/2005-24-015 ↗
24. Sementa P, Vaglieco BM, Catapano F (2012) Thermodynamic and optical characterizations of a high performance GDI engine operating in homogeneous and stratified charge mixture conditions fueled with gasoline and bio-ethanol. Fuel 96:204–219. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.06810.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.068 ↗
25. Shin Y, Cheng WK, Heywood JB (1994) Liquid gasoline behavior in the engine cylinder of a SI engine. SAE Technical Paper. doi: 10.4271/941872
26. Tong K, Quay BD, Zello JV, Santavicca DA (2001) Fuel volatility effects on mixture preparation and performance in a GDI engine during cold start. SAE Technical Paper. doi: 10.4271/2001-01-3650
27. Tornatore C, Marchitto L, Valentino G, Corcione FE, Merola SS (2012) Optical diagnostics of the combustion process in a PFI SI boosted engine fueled with butanol-gasoline blend. Energy 45:277–287. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.00610.1016/j.energy.2012.03.006 ↗
28. Witze P, Green RM (1997) LIF and flame-emission imaging of liquid fuel films and pool fires in an SI engine during a simulated cold start. SAE Technical Paper. doi: 10.4271/970866
29. Zhang S, McMahon W (2012) Particulate emissions for LEV II light-duty gasoline direct injection vehicles. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr 5:637–646. doi: 10.4271/2012-01-044210.4271/2012-01-0442 ↗
30. Zhao F, Lai MC, Harrington DL (1999) Automotive spark-ignited direct-injection gasoline engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci 25:437–562. doi: 10.1016/s0360-1285(99)00004-010.1016/S0360-1285(99)00004-0 ↗