Forced and natural convection in aggregate-laden nanofluids
Source abstract
Abstract
A number of experimental and theoretical studies of convective heat transfer in nanofluids (liquid suspensions of nanoparticles, typically with features below 100 nm in size) reveal contrasting results; nanoparticles can either enhance or reduce the convective heat transfer coefficient. These disparate conclusions regarding the influence of nanoparticles on convective heat transfer may arise due to the aggregation of nanoparticles, which is often not considered in studies of nanofluids. Here, we examine theoretically forced and natural convective heat transfer of aggregate-laden nanofluids using Monte Carlo-based models to determine how the aggregate morphology influences the convective heat transfer coefficient. Specifically, in this study, it is first shown that standard heat transfer correlations should apply to nanofluids, and the main influence of the nanoparticles is to alter suspension thermal conductivity, dynamic viscosity, density, specific heat, and thermal expansion coefficient. Aggregated particles in suspension are modeled as quasi-fractal aggregates composed of individual primary particles described by the primary particle radius, number of primary particles, fractal (Hausdorff) dimension, pre-exponential factor, and degree of coalescence between primary particles. A sequential algorithm is used to computationally generate aggregates with prescribed morphological descriptors. Four types of aggregates are considered; spanning the range of aggregate morphologies observed in nanofluids. For each morphological type, the influences of aggregates on nanofluid dynamic viscosity and thermal conductivity are determined via first passage-based Brownian dynamics calculations. It is found that depending on both the material properties of the nanoparticles as well as the nanoparticle morphology, the addition of nanoparticles to a suspension can either increase or decrease both the forced and natural convective heat transfer coefficients, with both a 51% increase and a 32% decrease in the heat transfer coefficient achievable at particle volume fractions of 0.05. This study shows clearly that the influence of particle morphology needs to be accounted for in all studies of heat transfer in nanofluids.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Anoop KB, Sundararajan T, Das SK (2009) Effect of particle size on the convective heat transfer in nanofluid in the developing region. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:2189–219510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.11.063 ↗
2. Bachok N, Ishak A, Pop I (2011) Flow and heat transfer over a rotating porous disk in a nanofluid. Phys B 406:1767–177210.1016/j.physb.2011.02.024 ↗
3. Buongiorno J (2006) Convective transport in nanofluids. J Heat Transf 128:240–25010.1115/1.2150834 ↗
4. Buongiorno J, Venerus DC, Prabhat N, McKrell T, Townsend J, Christianson R, Tolmachev YV, Keblinski P, Hu LW, Alvarado JL, Bang IC, Bishnoi SW, Bonetti M, Botz F, Cecere A, Chang Y, Chen G, Chen HS, Chung SJ, Chyu MK, Das SK, Di Paola R, Ding YL, Dubois F, Dzido G, Eapen J, Escher W, Funfschilling D, Galand Q, Gao JW, Gharagozloo PE, Goodson KE, Gutierrez JG, Hong HP, Horton M, Hwang KS, Iorio CS, Jang SP, Jarzebski AB, Jiang YR, Jin LW, Kabelac S, Kamath A, Kedzierski MA, Kieng LG, Kim C, Kim JH, Kim S, Lee SH, Leong KC, Manna I, Michel B, Ni R, Patel HE, Philip J, Poulikakos D, Reynaud C, Savino R, Singh PK, Song PX, Sundararajan T, Timofeeva E, Tritcak T, Turanov AN, Van Vaerenbergh S, Wen DS, Witharana S, Yang C, Yeh WH, Zhao XZ, Zhou SQ (2009) A benchmark study on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. J Appl Phys 106:09431210.1063/1.3245330 ↗
5. Cerda JJ, Sintes T, Sorensen CM, Chakrabarti A (2004) Structure factor scaling in colloidal phase separation. Phys Rev E 70:05140510.1103/PhysRevE.70.051405 ↗
6. Choi SUS (2009) Nanofluids: from vision to reality through research. J Heat Transf 131:03310610.1115/1.3056479 ↗
7. Corcione M (2011) Rayleigh–Benard convection heat transfer in nanoparticle suspensions. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 32:65–7710.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2010.08.004 ↗
8. Eastman JA, Choi SUS, Li S, Yu W, Thompson LJ (2001) Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 78:718–72010.1063/1.1341218 ↗
9. Eastman JA, Phillpot SR, Choi SUS, Keblinski P (2004) Thermal transport in nanofluids. Annu Rev Mater Res 34:219–24610.1146/annurev.matsci.34.052803.090621 ↗
10. Eggersdorfer ML, Kadau D, Herrmann HJ, Pratsinis SE (2011) Multiparticle sintering dynamics: from fractal-like aggregates to compact structures. Langmuir 27:6358–636710.1021/la200546g ↗
11. Evans W, Prasher R, Fish J, Meakin P, Phelan P, Keblinski P (2008) Effect of aggregation and interfacial thermal resistance on thermal conductivity of nanocomposites and colloidal nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 51:1431–143810.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.10.017 ↗
12. Filippov AV, Zurita M, Rosner DE (2000) Fractal-like aggregates: relation between morphology and physical properties. J Colloid Interf Sci 229:261–27310.1006/jcis.2000.7027 ↗
13. Friedlander SK (2000) Smoke, dust, and haze. Oxford University Press, New York
14. Gao JW, Zheng RT, Ohtani H, Zhu DS, Chen G (2009) Experimental investigation of heat conduction mechanisms in nanofluids. Clue on clustering. Nano Lett 9:4128–413210.1021/nl902358m ↗
15. Globe S, Dropkin D (1959) Natural convection heat transfer in liquids confined by two horizontal plates and heated from below. J Heat Transf 81:24–2810.1115/1.4008124 ↗
16. Gopalakrishnan R, Thajudeen T, Hogan CJ (2011) Collision limited reaction rates for arbitrarily shaped particles across the entire diffusive Knudsen number range. J Chem Phys 135:05430210.1063/1.3617251 ↗
17. Grass RN, Tsantilis S, Pratsinis SE (2006) Design of high-temperature, gas-phase synthesis of hard or soft TiO2 agglomerates. AICHE J 52:1318–132510.1002/aic.10739 ↗
18. Havlin S, Ben-Avraham D (2002) Diffusion in disorder media. Adv Phys 51:198–29210.1080/00018730110116353 ↗
19. Heris SZ, Etemad G, Esfahany MN (2006) Experimental investigation of oxide nanofluids laminar flow convection heat transfer. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 33:529–53510.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2006.01.005 ↗
20. Ho CJ, Chen MW, Li ZW (2008) Numerical simulation of natural convection of nanofluid in a square enclosure: effects due to uncertainties of viscosity and thermal conductivity. Int J Heat Mass Transf 51:4506–451610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.12.019 ↗
21. Huang H, Oh C, Sorensen CM (1998) Structure factor scaling in aggregating systems. Phys Rev E 57:875–88010.1103/PhysRevE.57.875 ↗
22. Incropera FP, Dewitt DP, Bergman TL, Lavine AS (2007) Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. Wiley, Hoboken
23. Inkyo M, Tahara T, Iwaki T, Iskandar F, Hogan CJ, Okuyama K (2006) Experimental investigation of nanoparticle dispersion by beads milling with centrifugal bead separation. J Colloid Interf Sci 304:535–54010.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.021 ↗
24. Jiang JK, Oberdorster G, Biswas P (2009) Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. J Nanopart Res 11:77–8910.1007/s11051-008-9446-4 ↗
25. Kakac S, Pramuanjaroenkij A (2009) Review of convective heat transfer enhancement with nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:3187–319610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.02.006 ↗
26. Kang EH, Mansfield ML, Douglas JF (2004) Numerical path integration technique for the calculation of transport properties of proteins. Phys Rev E 69:03191810.1103/PhysRevE.69.031918 ↗
27. Keblinski P, Phillpot SR, Choi SUS, Eastman JA (2002) Mechanisms of heat flow in suspensions of nano-sized particles (nanofluids). Int J Heat Mass Transf 45:855–86310.1016/S0017-9310(01)00175-2 ↗
28. Keblinski P, Prasher R, Eapen J (2008) Thermal conductance of nanofluids: is the controversy over? J Nanopart Res 10:1089–109710.1007/s11051-007-9352-1 ↗
29. Khanafer K, Vafai K, Lightstone M (2003) Buoyancy-driven heat transfer enhancement in a two-dimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46:3639–365310.1016/S0017-9310(03)00156-X ↗
30. Kim IC, Torquato S (1991) Effective conductivity of suspensions of hard-spheres by Brownian-motion simulation. J Appl Phys 69:2280–228910.1063/1.348708 ↗
31. Kim IC, Torquato S (1992) Effective conductivity of suspensions of overlapping spheres. J Appl Phys 71:2727–273510.1063/1.351046 ↗
32. Kim S, Lee K-S, Zachariah MR, Lee D (2010) Three-dimensional off-lattice Monte Carlo simulations on a direct relation between experimental process parameters and fractal dimension of colloidal aggregates. J Colloid Interf Sci 344:353–36110.1016/j.jcis.2010.01.008 ↗
33. Mansfield ML, Douglas JF (2008a) Improved path integration method for estimating the intrinsic viscosity of arbitrarily shaped particles. Phys Rev E 78:04671210.1103/PhysRevE.78.046712 ↗
34. Mansfield ML, Douglas JF (2008b) Transport properties of rodlike particles. Macromolecules 41:5422–543210.1021/ma702839w ↗
35. Mansfield ML, Douglas JF (2008c) Transport properties of wormlike chains with applications to double helical DNA and carbon nanotubes. Macromolecules 41:5412–542110.1021/ma702837v ↗
36. Mansfield ML, Douglas JF (2010a) Properties of knotted ring polymers. II. Transport properties. J Chem Phys 133:04490410.1063/1.3457161 ↗
37. Mansfield ML, Douglas JF (2010b) Influence of variable hydrodynamic interaction strength on the transport properties of coiled polymers. Phys Rev E 81:02180310.1103/PhysRevE.81.021803 ↗
38. Mansfield ML, Douglas JF, Garboczi EJ (2001) Intrinsic viscosity and the electrical polarizability of arbitrarily shaped objects. Phys Rev E 64:06140110.1103/PhysRevE.64.061401 ↗
39. Mansfield ML, Douglas JF, Irfan S, Kang EH (2007) Comparison of approximate methods for calculating the friction coefficient and intrinsic viscosity of nanoparticles and macromolecules. Macromolecules 40:2575–258910.1021/ma061069f ↗
40. Nie C, Marlow WH, Hassan YA (2008) Discussion of proposed mechanisms of thermal conductivity enhancement in nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 51:1342–134810.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.11.034 ↗
41. Oh C, Sorensen CM (1998) Structure factor of diffusion-limited aggregation clusters: local structure and non-self-similarity. Phys Rev E 57:784–79010.1103/PhysRevE.57.784 ↗
42. Oueslati FS, Bennacer R (2011) Heterogeneous nanofluids: natural convection heat transfer enhancement. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:22210.1186/1556-276X-6-222 ↗
43. Pak BC, Cho Y (1998) Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Exp Heat Transf 11:151–17010.1080/08916159808946559 ↗
44. Pease LF, Tsai DH, Hertz JL, Zangmeister RA, Zachariah MR, Tarlov MJ (2010) Packing and size determination of colloidal nanoclusters. Langmuir 26:11384–1139010.1021/la100839t ↗
45. Peukert W, Schwarzer HC, Stenger F (2005) Control of aggregation in production and handling of nanoparticles. Chem Eng Process 44:245–25210.1016/j.cep.2004.02.018 ↗
46. Prasher R, Phelan PE, Bhattacharya P (2006a) Effect of aggregation kinetics on the thermal conductivity of nanoscale colloidal solutions (nanofluid). Nano Lett 6:1529–153410.1021/nl060992s ↗
47. Prasher R, Evans W, Meakin P, Fish J, Phelan P, Keblinski P (2006b) Effect of aggregation on thermal conduction in colloidal nanofluids. Appl Phys Lett 89:14311910.1063/1.2360229 ↗
48. Putra N, Roetzel W, Das SK (2003) Natural convection of nano-fluids. Heat Mass Transf 39:775–78410.1007/s00231-002-0382-z ↗
49. Sahu M, Suttiponparnit K, Suvachittanont S, Charinpanitkul T, Biswas P (2011) Characterization of doped TiO(2) nanoparticle dispersions. Chem Eng Sci 66:3482–349010.1016/j.ces.2011.04.003 ↗
50. Schmid HJ, Tejwani S, Artelt C, Peukert W (2004) Monte Carlo simulation of aggregate morphology for simultaneous coagulation and sintering. J Nanopart Res 6:613–62610.1007/s11051-004-2161-x ↗
51. Schmid HJ, Al-Zaitone B, Artelt C, Peukert W (2006) Evolution of the fractal dimension for simultaneous coagulation and sintering. Chem Eng Sci 61:293–30510.1016/j.ces.2004.11.068 ↗
52. Schmidt-Ott A (1988) In situ measurement of the fractal dimensionality of ultrafine aerosol particles. Appl Phys Lett 52:954–95610.1063/1.99239 ↗
53. Schwarzer HC, Peukert W (2005) Prediction of aggregation kinetics based on surface properties of nanoparticles. Chem Eng Sci 60:11–2510.1016/j.ces.2004.06.050 ↗
54. Sorensen CM (2011) The mobility of fractal aggregates: a review. Aerosol Sci Technol 45:765–77910.1080/02786826.2011.560909 ↗
55. Sorensen CM, Chakrabarti A (2011) The sol to gel transition in irreversible particulate systems. Soft Matter 7:2284–229610.1039/c0sm00228c ↗
56. Stenger F, Mende S, Schwedes J, Peukert W (2005) Nanomilling in stirred media mills. Chem Eng Sci 60:4557–456510.1016/j.ces.2005.02.057 ↗
57. Swihart MT (2003) Vapor-phase synthesis of nanoparticles. Curr Opin Colloid Interf Sci 8:127–13310.1016/S1359-0294(03)00007-4 ↗
58. Thajudeen T, Hogan CJ (2011) First passage calculation of the conductivity of particle aggregate-laden suspensions and composites. Powder Technol. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.11.02810.1016/j.powtec.2011.11.028 ↗
59. Tsai DH, Pease LF, Zangmeister RA, Tarlov MJ, Zachariah MR (2009) Aggregation kinetics of colloidal particles measured by gas-phase differential mobility analysis. Langmuir 25:140–14610.1021/la703164j ↗
60. Tsantilis S, Pratsinis SE (2004) Soft- and hard-agglomerate aerosols made at high temperatures. Langmuir 20:5933–593910.1021/la036389w ↗
61. Tzou DY (2008) Thermal instability of nanofluids in natural convection. Int J Heat Mass Transf 51:2967–297910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.09.014 ↗
62. Wang XQ, Mujumdar AS (2007) Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: a review. Int J Therm Sci 46:1–1910.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2006.06.010 ↗
63. Wen D, Ding Y (2004) Experimental investigation into convective heat transfer of nanofluids at the entrance region under laminar flow conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 47:5181–518810.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.07.012 ↗
64. Wensel J, Wright B, Thomas D, Douglas W, Mannhalter B, Cross W, Hong HP, Kellar J, Smith P, Roy W (2008) Enhanced thermal conductivity by aggregation in heat transfer nanofluids containing metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 92:02311010.1063/1.2834370 ↗
65. Xuan Y, Li Q (2003) Investigation on convective heat transfer and flow features of nanofluids. J Heat Transf 125:151–15510.1115/1.1532008 ↗