journal article·2011-12Open access

Computational analysis of factors influencing thermal conductivity of nanofluids

G. Okeke, S. Witharana, S. J. Antony, Y. Ding

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 13· Issue 12

Abstract

Numerical investigations are conducted to study the effect of factors such as particle clustering and interfacial layer thickness on thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Based on this, parameters including Kapitza radius and fractal and chemical dimension which have received little attention by previous research are rigorously investigated. The degree of thermal enhancement is analyzed for increasing aggregate size, particle concentration, interfacial thermal resistance, and fractal and chemical dimensions. This analysis is conducted for water-based nanofluids of Alumina (Al2O3), CuO, and Titania (TiO2) nanoparticles where the particle concentrations are varied up to 4 vol%. Results from the numerical work are validated using available experimental data. For the case of aggregate size, particle concentration, and interfacial thermal resistance, the aspect ratio (ratio of radius of gyration of aggregate to radius of primary particle, Rg/a) is varied from 2 to 60. It was found that the enhancement decreases with interfacial layer thickness. Also the rate of decrease is more significant after a given aggregate size. For a given interfacial resistance, the enhancement is mostly sensitive to Rg/a < 20 indicated by the steep gradients of data plots. Predicted and experimental data for thermal conductivity enhancement are in good agreement. On the influence of fractal and chemical dimensions (dland df) of Alumina–water nanofluid, the Rg/a was varied from 2 to 8, dl from 1.2 to 1.8, and df from 1.75 to 2.5. For a given concentration, the enhancement increased with the reduction of dl or df. It appears a distinctive sensitivity of the enhancement to df, in particular, in the range 2–2.25, for all values of Rg/a. However, the sensitivity of dl was largely depended on the value of Rg/a. The information gathered from this study on the sensitivity of thermal conductivity enhancement to aggregate size, particle concentration, interfacial resistance, and fractal and chemical dimensions will be useful in manufacturing highly thermally conductive nanofluids. Further research on the refine cluster evolution dynamics as a function of particle-scale properties is underway.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer · Thermal properties of materials · Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Avsec J, Oblak M (2007) The calculation of thermal conductivity, viscosity and thermodynamic properties for nanofluids on the basis of statistical nanomechanics. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:4331–434110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.01.064 ↗
2. Bruggeman DAG (1935) Calculation of various physics constants in heterogenous substances. I Dielectricity constants and conductivity of mixed bodies from isotropic substances. Annalen der Physik 24:636–66410.1002/andp.19354160705 ↗
3. Buongiorno J, Venerus DC, Prabhat N, McKrell T, Townsend J, Christianson R, Tolmachev YV, Keblinski P, Hu LW, Alvarado JL et al (2009) A benchmark study on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. J Appl Phys 106:09431210.1063/1.3245330 ↗
4. Chen H, Yang W, He Y, Ding Y, Zhang L, Tan C, Lapkin AA, Bavykin DV (2008) Heat transfer and flow behaviour of aqueous suspensions of titanate nanotubes (nanofluids). Powder Technol 183:63–7210.1016/j.powtec.2007.11.014 ↗
5. Ding Y, Chen H, Musina Z, Jin Y, Zhang T, Witharana S, Yang W (2010) Relationship between the thermal conductivity and shear viscosity of nanofluids. Phys Scr T139:01407810.1088/0031-8949/2010/T139/014078 ↗
6. Evans W, Prasher R, Fish J, Meakin P, Phelan P, Keblinski P (2008) Effect of aggregation and interfacial thermal resistance on thermal conductivity of nanocomposites and colloidal nanofluids. Int J Heat and Mass Transf 51:1431–143810.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.10.017 ↗
7. Every AG, Tzou Y, Hasselman DPH, Raj R (1992) The effect of particle size on the thermal conductivity of ZnS/Diamond composites. Acta metall mater 40:123–12910.1016/0956-7151(92)90205-S ↗
8. Feng Y, Yu B, Xu P, Zou M (2007) The effective thermal conductivity of nanofluids based on the nanolayer and the aggregation of nanoparticles. J Phys D Appl Phys 40:3164–317110.1088/0022-3727/40/10/020 ↗
9. Garg P, Alvarado JL, Marsh C, Carlson TA, Kessler DA, Annamalai K (2009) An experimental study on the effect of ultrasonication on viscosity and heat transfer performance of multi-wall carbon nanotube-based aqueous nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:5090–510110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.04.029 ↗
10. Hamilton RL, Crosser OK (1962) Thermal conductivity of hetrogeneous two-component systems. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 1:187–19110.1021/i160003a005 ↗
11. He YR, Jin Y, Chen HS, Ding YL, Cang DQ, Lu HL (2007) Heat transfer and flow behaviour of aqueous suspensions of TiO2 nanoparticles (nanofluids) flowing upward through a vertical pipe. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:2272–228110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.10.024 ↗
12. Jang SP, Choi SUS (2004) Role of Brownian motion in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Appl Phys Lett 84:4316–431810.1063/1.1756684 ↗
13. Keblinski P, Phillpot SR, Choi SUS, Eastman JA (2002) Mechanisms of heat flow in suspensions of nano-sized particles (nanofluids). Int J Heat Mass Transf 45:855–86310.1016/S0017-9310(01)00175-2 ↗
14. Kim SJ, Bang IC, Buongiorno J, Hu LW (2007) Surface wettability change during pool boiling of nanofluids and its effect on critical heat flux. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:4105–411610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.02.002 ↗
15. Koo J, Kleinstreuer C (2004) A new thermal conductivity model for nanofluids. J Nanopart Res 6:577–58810.1007/s11051-004-3170-5 ↗
16. Kumar DH, Patel HE, Kumar VRR, Sundararajan T, Pradeep T, Das SK (2004) Model for heat conduction in nanofluids. Phys Rev Lett 93:01443010.1103/PhysRevLett.93.144301 ↗
17. Leong KC, Yang C, Murshed SMS (2006) A model for the thermal conductivity of nanofluids—the effect of interfacial layer. J Nanopart Res 8:245–25410.1007/s11051-005-9018-9 ↗
18. Li CH, Peterson GP (2006) Experimental investigation of temperature and volume fraction variations on the effective thermal conductivity of nanoparticle suspensions (nanofluids). J Appl Phys 99:08431410.1063/1.2191571 ↗
19. Margolina A (1985) The fractal dimension of cluster perimeters generated by a kinetic walk. J Phys A Math Gen 18:L651–L65610.1088/0305-4470/18/11/004 ↗
20. Maxwell JC (1881) A treatise on electricity and magnetism, vol 1, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford
21. Murshed SMS, Leong KC, Yang C (2005) Enhanced thermal conductivity of TiO2—water based nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci 44:367–37310.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2004.12.005 ↗
22. Murshed SMS, Leong KC, Yang C (2008) Thermophysical and electrokinetic properties of nanofluids—a critical review. Appl Therm Eng 28(17–18):2109–212510.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.01.005 ↗
23. Nan CW, Birringer R, Clarke DR, Gleiter H (1997) Effective thermal conductivity of Particulate composites with interfacial thermal resistance. J Appl Phys 81:6692–669910.1063/1.365209 ↗
24. Prasher R, Bhattacharya P, Phelan PE (2005) Thermal conductivity of nanoscale colloidal solutions (nanofluids). Phys Rev Lett 94(2):02590110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.025901 ↗
25. Prasher R, Bhattacharya P, Phelan PE (2006a) Brownian-motion-based convective-conductive model for the effective thermal conductivity of nanofluids. J Heat Transf Trans ASME 128:588–59510.1115/1.2188509 ↗
26. Prasher R, Evans W, Meakin P, Fish J, Phelan P, Keblinski P (2006b) Effect of aggregation on thermal conduction in colloidal nanofluids. Appl Phys Lett 89:13310810.1063/1.2356113 ↗
27. Prasher R, Phelan PE, Bhattacharya P (2006c) Effect of aggregation kinetics on the thermal conductivity of nanoscale colloidal solutions (nanofluids). Nano Lett 6:1529–153410.1021/nl060992s ↗
28. Putnam SA, Cahill DG, Braun PV, Ge ZB, Shimmin RG (2006) Thermal conductivity of nanoparticle suspensions. J Appl Phys 99:08430810.1063/1.2189933 ↗
29. Ren Y, Xie H, Cai A (2005) Effective thermal conductivity of nanofluids containing spherical nanoparticles. J Phys D Appl Phys 38:3958–396110.1088/0022-3727/38/21/019 ↗
30. Waite TD, Cleaver JK, Beattie JK (2001) Aggregation kinetics and fractal structure of gamma-alumina assemblages. J Colloid Interface Sci 241:333–33910.1006/jcis.2001.7694 ↗
31. Wang B-X, Zhou L-P, Peng X-F (2003) A fractal model for predicting the effective thermal conductivity of liquid with suspension of nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46(14):2665–267210.1016/S0017-9310(03)00016-4 ↗
32. Wen DS, Ding YL (2004) Experimental investigation into convective heat transfer of nanofluids at the entrance region under laminar flow conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 47:5181–518810.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.07.012 ↗
33. Wen DS, Ding YL (2005) Experimental investigation into the pool boiling heat transfer of aqueous based gamma-alumina nanofluids. J Nanopart Res 7:265–27410.1007/s11051-005-3478-9 ↗
34. Wen DS, Ding YL, Williams RA (2006) Pool boiling heat transfer of aqueous TiO2-based nanofluids. J Enhanc Heat Transf 13:231–24410.1615/JEnhHeatTransf.v13.i3.30 ↗
35. Witharana S, Chen H, Ding Y (2010). Shear stability and thermophysical properties of nanofluids. In: IEEE-international conference on information and automation for sustainability, Colombo10.1109/ICIAFS.2010.5715723 ↗
36. Wong KV, Kurma T (2008) Transport properties of alumina nanofluids. Nanotechnology 19:44570510.1088/0957-4484/19/44/445705 ↗
37. Xuan Y, Li Q (2000) Heat transfer enhancement of nanofluids. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 21:58–6410.1016/S0142-727X(99)00067-3 ↗
38. Xuan Y, Li Q, Hu W (2003) Aggregation structure and thermal conductivity of nanofluids. AIChE J 49:1038–104310.1002/aic.690490420 ↗
39. Yoo D, Hong KS, Yang H (2007) Study of thermal conductivity of nanofluids for the application of heat transfer fluids. Thermochim Acta 455:797–817