Exposure media a critical factor for controlling dissolution of CuO nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
Dissolution is an important property that influences nanoparticle abundance and biological responses, and often becomes a critical factor in determining the safety of nanoparticles. In our study, the dissolution behavior of commercial (c-CuO) and synthesized CuO (s-CuO) nanoparticles, of size 31 ± 4 nm and 7 ± 1 nm, respectively, in a range of simulated aqueous media (artificial sea water, artificial lysosomal fluid, simulated body fluid, and 1 mM NaNO3) was assessed. The study demonstrated significant differences in the dissolution behavior of the nanoparticles based on the exposure concentration and exposure media. In biological media, both c-CuO and s-CuO demonstrated more than 80% dissolution within 12 to 24 h as compared to less than 15% dissolution in environmental media over the 7-day period. Due to the inherent size difference between c-CuO and s-CuO nanoparticles, the rate of dissolution was found to be higher in the case of s-CuO nanoparticles. To validate the role of dissolution, the microbial response of CuO nanoparticles and its ionic species was evaluated on E. coli. This study highlights the interplay between particulate and ionic form and experimentally validates how the suspension media acts as a critical factor governing the solubility of nanoparticles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Adam N, Leroux F, Knapen D, Bals S, Blust R (2015) The uptake and elimination of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles in Daphnia magna under chronic exposure scenarios. Water Res 68:249–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.00110.1016/j.watres.2014.10.001 ↗
2. Angelé-Martínez C, Nguyen KVT, Ameer FS, Anker JN, Brumaghim JL (2017) Reactive oxygen species generation by copper(II) oxide nanoparticles determined by DNA damage assays and EPR spectroscopy. Nanotoxicology 11:278–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2017.129375010.1080/17435390.2017.1293750 ↗
3. Baek YW, An YJ (2011) Microbial toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles (CuO, NiO, ZnO, and Sb 2O 3) to Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptococcus aureus. Sci Total Environ 409:1603–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.01410.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.014 ↗
4. Bale CW, Bélisle E, Chartrand P, Decterov SA, Eriksson G, Gheribi AE, Hack K, Jung IH, Kang YB, Melançon J, Pelton AD, Petersen S, Robelin C, Sangster J, Spencer P, van Ende MA (2016) FactSage thermochemical software and databases, 2010-2016. CALPHAD: Comput Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem 54:35–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2016.05.00210.1016/j.calphad.2016.05.002 ↗
5. Bastús N, Puntes V (2017) Nanosafety: towards safer nanoparticles by design. Curr Med Chem 24:1. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986732466617041312491510.2174/0929867324666170413124915 ↗
6. Behra R, Sigg L, Clift MJD, Herzog F, Minghetti M, Johnston B, Petri-Fink A, Rothen-Rutishauser B (2013) Bioavailability of silver nanoparticles and ions: from a chemical and biochemical perspective. J R Soc Interface 10:20130396–20130396. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.039610.1098/rsif.2013.0396 ↗
7. Bondarenko O, Juganson K, Ivask A, Kasemets K, Mortimer M, Kahru A (2013) Toxicity of Ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a critical review. Arch Toxicol 87:1181–120010.1007/s00204-013-1079-4 ↗
8. Colombo MF, Austrilino L, Nascimento OR, Castellano EE, Tabak M (1987) On the interaction of copper with tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane. Can J Chem 65:821–826. https://doi.org/10.1139/v87-13910.1139/v87-139 ↗
9. Garner KL, Suh S, Keller AA (2017) Assessing the risk of engineered nanomaterials in the environment: development and application of the nanoFate model. Environ Sci Technol 51:5541–5551. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b0527910.1021/acs.est.6b05279 ↗
10. Gunawan C, Teoh WY, Marquis CP, Amal R (2011) Cytotoxic origin of copper(II) oxide nanoparticles: comparative studies with micron-sized particles, leachate, and metal salts. ACS Nano 5:7214–7225. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn202024810.1021/nn2020248 ↗
11. Ivask A, Juganson K, Bondarenko O, Mortimer M, Aruoja V, Kasemets K, Blinova I, Heinlaan M, Slaveykova V, Kahru A (2014) Mechanisms of toxic action of Ag, ZnO and CuO nanoparticles to selected ecotoxicological test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a comparative review. Nanotoxicology 8:57–7110.3109/17435390.2013.855831 ↗
12. Keller AA, Wang H, Zhou D, Lenihan HS, Cherr G, Cardinale BJ, Miller R, Ji Z (2010) Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ Sci Technol 44:1962–1967. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902987d10.1021/es902987d ↗
13. Ko CK, Lee WG (2010) Effects of pH variation in aqueous solutions on dissolution of copper oxide. Surf Interface Anal 42:1128–113010.1002/sia.3238 ↗
14. Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T, Yamamuro T (1990) Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W3. J Biomed Mater Res 24:721–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.82024060710.1002/jbm.820240607 ↗
15. Leung YH, Xu X, Ma APY, Liu F, Ng AMC, Shen Z, Gethings LA, Guo MY, Djurišić AB, Lee PKH, Lee HK, Chan WK, Leung FCC (2016) Toxicity of ZnO and TiO2 to Escherichia coli cells. Sci Rep 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3524310.1038/srep35243 ↗
16. Li Y, Niu J, Zhang W, Zhang L, Shang E (2014) Influence of aqueous media on the ROS-mediated toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles toward green fluorescent protein-expressing Escherichia coli under UV-365 irradiation. Langmuir 30:2852–2862. https://doi.org/10.1021/la500002810.1021/la5000028 ↗
17. Ludwig C, Casey WH, Rock PA (1995) Prediction of ligand-promoted dissolution rates from the reactivities of aqueous complexes. Nature 375:44–4710.1038/375044a0 ↗
18. Marques MRC, Loebenberg R, Almukainzi M (2011) Simulated biologic fluids with possible application in dissolution testing. Dissolut Technol 15–28. https://doi.org/10.14227/DT180311P1510.14227/DT180311P15 ↗
19. Martin MN, Allen AJ, Maccuspie RI, Hackley VA (2014) Dissolution, agglomerate morphology, and stability limits of protein-coated silver nanoparticles. Langmuir 30:11442–11452. https://doi.org/10.1021/la502973z10.1021/la502973z ↗
20. Midander K, Cronholm P, Karlsson HL, Elihn K, Möller L, Leygraf C, Wallinder IO (2009) Surface characteristics, copper release, and toxicity of nano- and micrometer-sized copper and copper(ll) oxide particles: a cross-disciplinary study. Small 5:389–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20080122010.1002/smll.200801220 ↗
21. Misra SK, Dybowska A, Berhanu D, Luoma SN, Valsami-Jones E (2012a) The complexity of nanoparticle dissolution and its importance in nanotoxicological studies. Sci Total Environ 438:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.06610.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.066 ↗
22. Misra SK, Dybowska A, Berhanu D, Croteau MN, Luoma SN, Boccaccini AR, Valsami-Jones E (2012b) Isotopically modified nanoparticles for enhanced detection in bioaccumulation studies. Environ Sci Technol 46:1216–1222. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203975710.1021/es2039757 ↗
23. Misra SK, Nuseibeh S, Dybowska A, Berhanu D, Tetley TD, Valsami-Jones E (2014) Comparative study using spheres, rods and spindle-shaped nanoplatelets on dispersion stability, dissolution and toxicity of CuO nanomaterials. Nanotoxicology 8:422–432. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2013.79601710.3109/17435390.2013.796017 ↗
24. Neumann PZ, Sass-Kortsak A (1967) The state of copper in human serum: evidence for an amino acid-bound fraction. J Clin Invest 46:646–658. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI10556610.1172/JCI105566 ↗
25. Rosenberg M, Vija H, Kahru A, Keevil CW, Ivask A (2018) Rapid in situ assessment of Cu-ion mediated effects and antibacterial efficacy of copper surfaces. Sci Rep 8:8172. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26391-810.1038/s41598-018-26391-8 ↗
26. Rousk J, Ackermann K, Curling SF, Jones DL (2012) Comparative toxicity of nanoparticulate CuO and ZnO to soil bacterial communities. PLoS One 7:e34197. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.003419710.1371/journal.pone.0034197 ↗
27. Sirelkhatim A, Mahmud S, Seeni A, Kaus NHM, Ann LC, Bakhori SKM, Hasan H, Mohamad D (2015) Review on zinc oxide nanoparticles: antibacterial activity and toxicity mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett 7:219–24210.1007/s40820-015-0040-x ↗
28. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms. US Environ Prot Agency 1–107. Doi: fifth edition October 2002
29. Utembe W, Potgieter K, Stefaniak AB, Gulumian M (2015) Dissolution and biodurability: important parameters needed for risk assessment of nanomaterials. Part Fibre Toxicol 12:1110.1186/s12989-015-0088-2 ↗
30. Zhao J, Liu Y, Pan B, Gao G, Liu Y, Liu S, Liang N, Zhou D, Vijver MG, Peijnenburg WJGM (2017) Tannic acid promotes ion release of copper oxide nanoparticles: impacts from solution pH change and complexation reactions. Water Res 127:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.00610.1016/j.watres.2017.10.006 ↗