Peptide-functionalized iron oxide magnetic nanoparticle for gold mining
Source abstract
Abstract
Here, we present our work on preparing a novel nanomaterial composed of inorganic binding peptides and magnetic nanoparticles for inorganic mining. Two previously selected and well-characterized gold-binding peptides from cell surface display, AuBP1 and AuBP2, were exploited. This nanomaterial (AuBP-MNP) was designed to fulfill the following two significant functions: the surface conjugated gold-binding peptide will recognize and selectively bind to gold, while the magnetic nano-sized core will respond and migrate according to the applied external magnetic field. This will allow the smart nanomaterial to mine an individual material (gold) from a pool of mixture, without excessive solvent extraction, filtration, and concentration steps. The working efficiency of AuBP-MNP was determined by showing a dramatic reduction of gold nanoparticle colloid concentration, monitored by spectroscopy. The binding kinetics of AuBP-MNP onto the gold surface was determined using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy, which exhibits around 100 times higher binding kinetics than peptides alone. The binding capacity of AuBP-MNP was demonstrated by a bench-top mining test with gold microparticles. Graphical abstract.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diatoms and Algae Research · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Bruce IJ, Sen T (2005) Surface modification of magnetic nanoparticles with alkoxysilanes and their application in magnetic bioseparations. Langmuir 21:7029–7035. doi: 10.1021/la050553t10.1021/la050553t ↗
2. Carlos L, Einschlag FSG, González MC, Mártire DO (2013) Applications of magnetite nanoparticles for heavy metal removal from wastewater. Waste Water Treat Technol Recent Anal Dev 63–78. doi: 10.5772/5460810.5772/54608 ↗
3. Duff DG, Baiker A, Edwards PP (1993) A new hydrosol of gold clusters. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 272:96. doi: 10.1039/c3993000009610.1039/c39930000096 ↗
4. Frank RA, Roy JW, Bickerton G et al (2014) Profiling oil sands mixtures from industrial developments and natural groundwaters for source identification. Environ Sci Technol 48:2660–2670. doi: 10.1021/es500131k10.1021/es500131k ↗
5. Ge S, Shi X, Sun K et al (2009) A facile hydrothermal synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles with tunable magnetic properties. J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces 113:13593–13599. doi: 10.1021/jp902953t10.1021/jp902953t ↗
6. Hattori T, Umetsu M, Nakanishi T et al (2012) A high-affinity gold-binding camel antibody: antibody engineering for one-pot functionalization of gold nanoparticles as biointerface molecules. Bioconjug Chem 23:1934–1944. doi: 10.1021/bc300316p10.1021/bc300316p ↗
7. Hennig A, Hoffmann A, Borcherding H et al (2011) Simple colorimetric method for quantification of surface carboxy groups on polymer particles. Anal Chem 83:4970–4974. doi: 10.1021/ac200761910.1021/ac2007619 ↗
8. Hermanson GT (2013) Chapter 14—microparticles and nanoparticles. In: Bioconjugate Techniques. pp 549–58710.1016/B978-0-12-382239-0.00014-5 ↗
9. Hnilova M, Oren EE, Seker UOS et al (2008) Effect of molecular conformations on the adsorption behavior of gold-binding peptides. Langmuir 24:12440–1244510.1021/la801468c ↗
10. Niide T, Shimojo K, Wakabayashi R et al (2013) Enzymatic fabrication of protein-decorated gold nanoparticles by the aid of artificial peptides with gold-binding affinity. Langmuir 29:15596–15605. doi: 10.1021/la401327h10.1021/la401327h ↗
11. Nuss P, Eckelman MJ (2014) Life cycle assessment of metals: a scientific synthesis. PLoS One 9:1–12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.010129810.1371/journal.pone.0101298 ↗
12. Sarikaya M, Tamerler C, Jen A (2003) Molecular biomimetics: nanotechnology through biology. Nat Mater 25:577–58510.1038/nmat964 ↗
13. Seker UOS, Sharma VK, Akhavan S, Demir HV (2014) Engineered peptides for nanohybrid assemblies. Langmuir 30:2137–2143. doi: 10.1021/la500160p10.1021/la500160p ↗
14. So CR, Iii JLK, Oren EE et al (2009a) Molecular recognition and supramolecular self-assembly of a genetically engineered gold binding peptide on Au{111}. ACS Nano 3:1525–1531. doi: 10.1021/nn900171s10.1021/nn900171s ↗
15. So CR, Tamerler C, Sarikaya M (2009b) Adsorption, diffusion, and self-assembly of an engineered gold-binding peptide on Au(111) investigated by atomic force microscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48:5174–5177. doi: 10.1002/anie.20080525910.1002/anie.200805259 ↗
16. Tamerler C, Khatayevich D, Gungormus M et al (2010) Molecular biomimetics: GEPI-based biological routes to technology. Biopolymers 94:78–94. doi: 10.1002/bip.2136810.1002/bip.21368 ↗
17. Tamerler C, Sarikaya M (2007) Molecular biomimetics: utilizing nature’s molecular ways in practical engineering. Acta Biomater 3:289–299. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2006.10.00910.1016/j.actbio.2006.10.009 ↗
18. Tamerler C, Sarikaya M (2009) Genetically designed peptide-based molecular materials. ACS Nano 3:1606–1615. doi: 10.1021/nn900720g10.1021/nn900720g ↗
19. Whaley SR, English DS, Hu EL et al (2000) Selection of peptides with semiconductor binding specificity for directed nanocrystal assembly. Nature 405:665–668. doi: 10.1038/3501504310.1038/35015043 ↗
20. Xiang S, Xing G, Xue W et al (2012) Comparison of two different deposition methods of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane on glass slides and their application in the ThinPrep cytologic test. Analyst 137:1669–1673. doi: 10.1039/c2an15983j10.1039/c2an15983j ↗