Influence of organic molecules on the aggregation of TiO2 nanoparticles in acidic conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Engineered nanoparticles released into the environment may interact with natural organic matter (NOM). Surface complexation affects the surface potential, which in turn may lead to aggregation of the particles. Aggregation of synthetic TiO2 (anatase) nanoparticles in aqueous suspension was investigated at pH 2.8 as a function of time in the presence of various organic molecules and Suwannee River fulvic acid (SRFA), using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results showed that the average hydrodynamic diameter and ζ-potential were dependent on both concentration and molecular structure of the organic molecule. Results were also compared with those of quantitative batch adsorption experiments. Further, a time study of the aggregation of TiO2 nanoparticles in the presence of 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid (2,3-DHBA) and SRFA, respectively, was performed in order to observe changes in ζ-potential and particle size over a time period of 9 months. In the 2,3-DHBA-TiO2 system, ζ-potentials decreased with time resulting in charge neutralization and/or inversion depending on ligand concentration. Aggregate sizes increased initially to the micrometer size range, followed by disaggregation after several months. No or very little interaction between SRFA and TiO2 occurred at the lowest concentrations tested. However, at the higher concentrations of SRFA, there was an increase in both aggregate size and the amount of SRFA adsorbed to the TiO2 surface. This was in correlation with the ζ-potential that decreased with increased SRFA concentration, leading to destabilization of the system. These results stress the importance of performing studies over both short and long time periods to better understand and predict the long-term effects of nanoparticles in the environment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Abbas Z, Holmberg JP, Hellström AK, Hagström M, Bergenholtz J, Hassellöv M, Ahlberg E (2011) Synthesis, characterization and particle size distribution of TiO2 colloidal nanoparticles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 384:254–261. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.03.06410.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.03.064 ↗
2. Arvidsson R, Molander S, Sandén BA, Hassellöv M (2011) Challenges in exposure modeling of nanoparticles in aquatic environments. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 17:245–262. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2011.53863910.1080/10807039.2011.538639 ↗
3. Atmuri AK, Henson MA, Bhatia SR (2013) A population balance equation model to predict regimes of controlled nanoparticle aggregation. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 436:325–332. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.07.00210.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.07.002 ↗
4. Bahri S, Jonsson CM, Jonsson CL, Azzolini D, Sverjensky DA, Hazen RM (2011) Adsorption and surface complexation study of L-DOPA on rutile (alpha-TiO(2)) in NaCl solutions. Environ Sci Technol 45:3959–3966. doi: 10.1021/es104283210.1021/es1042832 ↗
5. Bian SW, Mudunkotuwa IA, Rupasinghe T, Grassian VH (2011) Aggregation and dissolution of 4 nm ZnO nanoparticles in aqueous environments: influence of pH, ionic strength, size, and adsorption of humic acid. Langmuir 27:6059–6068. doi: 10.1021/la200570n10.1021/la200570n ↗
6. Bottero J-Y et al (2011) Manufactured metal and metal-oxide nanoparticles: properties and perturbing mechanisms of their biological activity in ecosystems. Compt Rendus Geosci 343:168–176. doi: 10.1016/j.crte.2011.01.00110.1016/j.crte.2011.01.001 ↗
7. Brown HC, McDaniel DH, Häfliger O (1955) Chapter 14—dissociation constants. In: Braude EA, Nachod FC (eds) Determination of organic structures by physical methods. Academic Press, New York City, pp 567–662. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4832-3166-2.50018-410.1016/B978-1-4832-3166-2.50018-4 ↗
8. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319. doi: 10.1021/ja01269a02310.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
9. Domingos RF, Tufenkji N, Wilkinson KJ (2009) Aggregation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Role of a Fulvic Acid. Environ Sci Technol 43:1282–1286. doi: 10.1021/es802359410.1021/es8023594 ↗
10. Fattahi A, Solouki T (2003) Using solution equilibria to determine average molecular weight of the Suwannee River fulvic acids. Anal Chim Acta 496:325–337. doi: 10.1016/s0003-2670(03)01010-910.1016/s0003-2670(03)01010-9 ↗
11. Fokkink LGJ, de Keizer A, Lyklema J (1987) Specific ion adsorption on oxides: surface charge adjustment and proton stoichiometry. J Colloid Interface Sci 118:454–462. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(87)90481-410.1016/0021-9797(87)90481-4 ↗
12. Gallego-Urrea JA, Perez Holmberg J, Hassellov M (2014) Influence of different types of natural organic matter on titania nanoparticle stability: effects of counter ion concentration and pH. Environ Sci Nano 1:181–189. doi: 10.1039/C3EN00106G10.1039/C3EN00106G ↗
13. Grassian VH (2008) When size really matters: size-dependent properties and surface chemistry of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in gas and liquid phase environments. J Phys Chem C 112:18303–18313. doi: 10.1021/jp806073t10.1021/jp806073t ↗
14. Gulley-Stahl H, Hogan PA, Schmidt WL, Wall SJ, Buhrlage A, Bullen HA (2010) Surface complexation of catechol to metal oxides: an ATR-FTIR, adsorption, and dissolution study. Environ Sci Technol 44:4116–4121. doi: 10.1021/es902040u10.1021/es902040u ↗
15. Hassellov M, von der Kammer F, Beckett R (2006) Environmental colloids and particles: current knowledge and future developments. Chapter 5, vol Vol. 10. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester ISBN: 978-0-470-02432-4,
16. Hochella MF, Lower SK, Maurice PA, Penn RL, Sahai N, Sparks DL, Twining BS (2008) Nanominerals, mineral nanoparticles, and earth systems. Science 319(5870):1631–163510.1126/science.1141134 ↗
17. Holmberg JP, Johnson A-C, Bergenholtz J, Abbas Z, Ahlberg E (2013) Near room temperature synthesis of monodisperse TiO nanoparticles: growth mechanism. J Phys Chem C 117(10):5453–546110.1021/jp4001434 ↗
18. Hotze EM, Bottero JY, Wiesner MR (2010) Theoretical framework for nanoparticle reactivity as a function of aggregation state. Langmuir 26:11170–11175. doi: 10.1021/la904696310.1021/la9046963 ↗
19. Huang CP, O’Melia CR, Morgan JJ (1995) Aquatic chemistry. Advances in Chemistry, vol 244. American Chemical Society, Washingto. D.C doi: 10.1021/ba-1995-024410.1021/ba-1995-0244 ↗
20. Jonsson CM, Jonsson CL, Sverjensky DA, Cleaves HJ, Hazen RM (2009) Attachment of L-glutamate to rutile (alpha-TiO2): a potentiometric, adsorption, and surface complexation study. Langmuir 25:12127–12135. doi: 10.1021/la901635t10.1021/la901635t ↗
21. Jonsson CM, Jonsson CL, Estrada C, Sverjensky DA, Cleaves HJ, Hazen RM (2010) Adsorption of l-aspartate to rutile (α-TiO2): experimental and theoretical surface complexation studies. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:2356–2367. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2010.01.00310.1016/j.gca.2010.01.003 ↗
22. Keller AA et al (2010) Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ Sci Technol 44:1962–1967. doi: 10.1021/es902987d10.1021/es902987d ↗
23. Kleber M, Sollins P, Sutton R (2007) A conceptual model of organo-mineral interactions in soils: self-assembly of organic molecular fragments into zonal structures on mineral surfaces. Biogeochemistry 85:9–24. doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9103-510.1007/s10533-007-9103-5 ↗
24. Lana-Villarreal T, Rodes A, Pérez JM, Gómez R (2005) A spectroscopic and electrochemical approach to the study of the interactions and Photoinduced electron transfer between catechol and anatase nanoparticles in aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc 127:12601–12611. doi: 10.1021/ja052798y10.1021/ja052798y ↗
25. Lee J, Bartelt-Hunt SL, Li Y, Gilrein EJ (2016) The influence of ionic strength and organic compounds on nanoparticle TiO2 (n-TiO2) aggregation. Chemosphere 154:187–193. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.05910.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.059 ↗
26. Liao DL, Wu GS, Liao BQ (2009) Zeta potential of shape-controlled TiO2 nanoparticles with surfactants. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 348:270–275. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.07.03610.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.07.036 ↗
27. Loosli F, Le Coustumer P, Stoll S (2013) TiO2 nanoparticles aggregation and disaggregation in presence of alginate and Suwannee River humic acids. pH and concentration effects on nanoparticle stability. Water Res 47:6052–6063. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.02110.1016/j.watres.2013.07.021 ↗
28. Lyvén B, Hassellöv M, Turner DR, Haraldsson C, Andersson K (2003) Competition between iron- and carbon-based colloidal carriers for trace metals in a freshwater assessed using flow field-flow fractionation coupled to ICPMS. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:3791–3802. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00087-510.1016/S0016-7037(03)00087-5 ↗
29. Menard A, Drobne D, Jemec A (2011) Ecotoxicity of nanosized TiO2. Review of in vivo data. Environ Pollut 159:677–684. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.02710.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.027 ↗
30. Molina R, Al-Salama Y, Jurkschat K, Dobson PJ, Thompson IP (2011) Potential environmental influence of amino acids on the behavior of ZnO nanoparticles. Chemosphere 83:545–551. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.02010.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.020 ↗
31. Parikh SJ, Kubicki JD, Jonsson CM, Jonsson CL, Hazen RM, Sverjensky DA, Sparks DL (2011) Evaluating glutamate and aspartate binding mechanisms to rutile (alpha-TiO2) via ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and quantum chemical calculations. Langmuir 27:1778–1787. doi: 10.1021/la103826p10.1021/la103826p ↗
32. Petosa AR, Jaisi DP, Quevedo IR, Elimelech M, Tufenkji N (2010) Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions. Environ Sci Technol 44:6532–6549. doi: 10.1021/es100598h10.1021/es100598h ↗
33. Pettibone JM, Cwiertny DM, Scherer M, Grassian VH (2008) Adsorption of organic acids on TiO2 nanoparticles: effects of pH, nanoparticle size, and nanoparticle aggregation. Langmuir 24:6659–6667. doi: 10.1021/la703991610.1021/la7039916 ↗
34. Ritchie JD, Perdue EM (2003) Proton-binding study of standard and reference fulvic acids, humic acids, and natural organic matter. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:85–96. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01044-X10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01044-X ↗
35. Roco MC (2011) The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years. J Nanopart Res 13:427–445. doi: 10.1007/s11051-010-0192-z10.1007/s11051-010-0192-z ↗
36. Rosenqvist J, Jonsson CM (2017) Potentiometric study of dissociation constants of dihydroxybenzoic acids at reduced ionic strengths and temperatures. Am J Anal Chem 8:142–150. doi: 10.4236/ajac.2017.8201110.4236/ajac.2017.82011 ↗
37. Stumm W (1993) Aquatic colloids as chemical reactants: surface structure and reactivity. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 73:1–18. doi: 10.1016/0927-7757(93)80003-W10.1016/0927-7757(93)80003-W ↗
38. Thio BJR, Zhou D, Keller AA (2011) Influence of natural organic matter on the aggregation and deposition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 189:556–563. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.07210.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.072 ↗
39. Tiller CL, O’Melia CR (1993) Natural organic matter and colloidal stability: models and measurements In: Tadros, Th.F Gregory J (ed) Colloids in the aquatic environment. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 89–102. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-85861-038-2.50010-310.1016/B978-1-85861-038-2.50010-3 ↗
40. Topping DO, McFiggans GB, Coe H (2005) A curved multi-component aerosol hygroscopicity model framework: part 2—including organic compounds. Atmos Chem Phys 5:1223–1242. doi: 10.5194/acp-5-1223-200510.5194/acp-5-1223-2005 ↗
41. Vance ME, Kuiken T, Vejerano EP, McGinnis SP, Hochella MF Jr, Rejeski D, Hull MS (2015) Nanotechnology in the real world: redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 6:1769–1780. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.6.18110.3762/bjnano.6.181 ↗
42. von der Kammer F, Ottofuelling S, Hofmann T (2010) Assessment of the physico-chemical behavior of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in aquatic environments using multi-dimensional parameter testing. Environ Pollut 158:3472–3481. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.05.00710.1016/j.envpol.2010.05.007 ↗
43. Wiesner MR, Lowry GV, Alvarez P, Dionysiou D, Biswas P (2006) Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 40:4336–434510.1021/es062726m ↗
44. Yang XN, Cui FY (2013) Stability of nano-sized titanium dioxide in an aqueous environment: effects of pH, dissolved organic matter and divalent cations. Water Sci Technol 68:276–282. doi: 10.2166/wst.2013.16510.2166/wst.2013.165 ↗