Nano Mapper: an Internet knowledge mapping system for nanotechnology development
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanotechnology research has experienced rapid growth in recent years. Advances in information technology enable efficient investigation of publications, their contents, and relationships for large sets of nanotechnology-related documents in order to assess the status of the field. This paper presents the development of a new knowledge mapping system, called Nano Mapper (http://nanomapper.eller.arizona.edu), which integrates the analysis of nanotechnology patents and research grants into a Web-based platform. The Nano Mapper system currently contains nanotechnology-related patents for 1976-2006 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), European Patent Office (EPO), and Japan Patent Office (JPO), as well as grant documents from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) for the same time period. The system provides complex search functionalities, and makes available a set of analysis and visualization tools (statistics, trend graphs, citation networks, and content maps) that can be applied to different levels of analytical units (countries, institutions, technical fields) and for different time intervals. The paper shows important nanotechnology patenting activities at USPTO for 2005-2006 identified through the Nano Mapper system.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Research Data Management Practices · Intellectual Property and Patents · Scientific Computing and Data Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Adams J, Griliches Z (1998) Research productivity in a system of universities. Ann INSEE 49(50):127–162
2. Arora A, Gambardella A (1998) The impact of NSF Support for basic research in economics. Economics Working Paper Archive at WUSTL10.2139/ssrn.163309 ↗
3. Chen H, Schuffels C, Orwig R (1996) Internet categorization and search: a self-organizing approach. J Vis Commun Image Represent 7(1):88–10210.1006/jvci.1996.0008 ↗
4. Chen H, Roco MC, Li X, Lin Y (2008) Trends in nanotechnology patents. Nat Nanotechnol 3(3):123–125. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.5110.1038/nnano.2008.51 ↗
5. Criscuolo P (2006) The ‘home advantage’ effect and patent families. A comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USPTO and the EPO. Scientometrics 66(1):23–4110.1007/s11192-006-0003-6 ↗
6. European Commission (1997) Second European Report on S&T Indicators. European Commission, Bruxelles
7. Ganguli P (1998) Intellectual property rights in transition. World Patent Inf 20:171–18010.1016/S0172-2190(99)00005-8 ↗
8. Gansner E, North S (2000) An Open Graph Visualization System and its applications to Software Engineering. Software-Pract Exp 30(11):1203–1233. doi:10.1002/1097-024X(200009)30:11<1203::AID-SPE338>3.0.CO;2-N10.1002/1097-024X(200009)30:11<1203::AID-SPE338>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
9. Huang MH, Chiang LY, Chen DZ (2003a) Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: a study of Taiwan’s high-tech companies. Scientometrics 58(3):489–50610.1023/B:SCIE.0000006876.29052.bf ↗
10. Huang Z, Chen H, Yip A, Ng G, Guo F, Chen Z-K et al (2003b) Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: country, institution and technology field. J Nanopart Res 5:333–36310.1023/A:1025556800994 ↗
11. Huang Z, Chen HC, Chen ZK, Roco MC (2004) International Nanotechnology Development in 2003: country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. J Nanopart Res 6(4):325–35410.1007/s11051-004-4117-6 ↗
12. Huang Z, Chen HC, Yan LJ, Roco MC (2005) Longitudinal Nanotechnology Development (1991–2002): National Science Foundation Funding and its impact on patents. J Nanopart Res 7(4–5):343–376. doi:10.1007/s11051-005-5468-310.1007/s11051-005-5468-3 ↗
13. Huang Z, Chen HC, Li X, Roco MC (2006) Connecting NSF funding to patent innovation in nanotechnology (2001–2004). J Nanopart Res 8(6):859–87910.1007/s11051-006-9147-9 ↗
14. Hullmann A (2006) Who is winning the global nanorace? Nat Nanotechnol 1(2):81–83. doi:10.1038/nnano.2006.11010.1038/nnano.2006.110 ↗
15. Hullmann A, Meyer M (2003) Publications and patents in nanotechnology—an overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics 58(3):507–527. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006877.45467.a710.1023/B:SCIE.0000006877.45467.a7 ↗
16. Karki MM (1997) Patent citation analysis: a policy analysis tool. World Patent Inf 19:269–27210.1016/S0172-2190(97)00033-1 ↗
17. Kostoff R, Murday J, Lau C, Tolles W (2006) The seminal literature of nanotechnology research. J Nanopart Res 8(2):193–213. doi:10.1007/s11051-005-9034-910.1007/s11051-005-9034-9 ↗
18. Lewison G (1998) Gastroenterology research in the United Kingdom: funding sources and impact. Gut 43(2):288–29310.1136/gut.43.2.288 ↗
19. Li X, Chen H, Huang Z, Roco MC (2007a) Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976–2004). J Nanopart Res 9(3):337–35210.1007/s11051-006-9194-2 ↗
20. Li X, Lin YL, Chen HC, Roco MC (2007b) Worldwide nanotechnology development: a comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004). J Nanopart Res 9(6):977–1002. doi:10.1007/s11051-007-9273-z10.1007/s11051-007-9273-z ↗
21. Meyer MS (2001) Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: an exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics 51(1):163–18310.1023/A:1010572914033 ↗
22. Narin F (1994) Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics 30(1):147–15510.1007/BF02017219 ↗
23. Narin F (1998) Patents and publicly funded research. Assessing the value of research in the chemical sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 59–72
24. Ong T-H, Chen H, Sung W-K, Zhu B (2005) NewsMap: a knowledge map for online news. Decis Support Syst 39:583–597. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2004.03.00810.1016/j.dss.2004.03.008 ↗
25. Oppenheim C (2000) Do patent citations count? In: Cronin B, Atkins HB (eds) The Web of knowledge—a Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. Information Today, Medford, NJ, ASIS Monograph Series, pp 405–432
26. Payne AA, Siow A (2003) Does federal research funding increase university research output? Adv Econ Anal Policy 3(1):Article 110.2202/1538-0637.1018 ↗
27. Roco MC (2005) International perspective on Government Nanotechnology Funding in 2005. J Nanopart Res 7(6):707–712. doi:10.1007/s11051-005-3141-510.1007/s11051-005-3141-5 ↗
28. Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P (2000) Nanotechnology research directions. Springer, Dordrecht10.1007/978-94-015-9576-6 ↗
29. Schummer J (2004) Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics 59(3):425–465. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018542.71314.3810.1023/B:SCIE.0000018542.71314.38 ↗