journal article·2014-04

Measuring scientific research in emerging nano-energy field

Jiancheng Guan, Na Liu

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 16· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively explore scientific research profiles in the field of emerging nano-energy during 1991–2012 based on bibliometrics and social network analysis. We investigate the growth pattern of research output, and then carry out across countries/regions comparisons on research performances. Furthermore, we examine scientific collaboration across countries/regions by analyzing collaborative intensity and networks in 3- to 4-year intervals. Results indicate with an impressively exponential growth pattern of nano-energy articles, the world share of scientific “giants,” such as the USA, Germany, England, France and Japan, display decreasing research trends, especially in the USA. Emerging economies, including China, South Korea and India, exhibit a rise in terms of the world share, illustrating strong development momentum of these countries in nano-energy research. Strikingly, China displays a remarkable rise in scientific influence rivaling Germany, Japan, France, and England in the last few years. Finally, the scientific collaborative network in nano-energy research has expanded steadily. Although the USA and several major European countries play significantly roles on scientific collaboration, China and South Korea exert great influence on scientific collaboration in recent years. The findings imply that emerging economies can earn competitive advantages in some emerging fields by properly engaging a catch-up strategy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Alivisatos P, Cummings P, De Yoreo J, Fishthorn K, Gates B, Hwang R, Lowndes D, Majumdar A, Makowski L, Michalske T (2005) Nanoscience research for energy needs. http://eprints.internano.org/73/1/DoE_Nanocience_Research_for_Energy.pdf
2. Arora SK, Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P (2013) Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics 95(1):351–37010.1007/s11192-012-0903-6 ↗
3. Bajwa RS, Yaldram K, Rafique S (2013) A scientometric assessment of research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology: Pakistan perspective. Scientometrics 94(1):333–34210.1007/s11192-012-0699-4 ↗
4. Bhushan B (2010) Introduction to nanotechnology. In: Bhushan B (ed) Springer handbook of nanotechnology. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–1310.1007/978-3-642-02525-9_1 ↗
5. Bornmann L, Anegon FD, Leydesdorff L (2012) The new excellence indicator in the world report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011. J Informetr 6(2):333–33510.1016/j.joi.2011.11.006 ↗
6. Chen XB, Li C, Gratzel M, Kostecki R, Mao SS (2012) Nanomaterials for renewable energy production and storage. Chem Soc Rev 41(23):7909–793710.1039/c2cs35230c ↗
7. de Solla Price DJ (1963) Little science, big science. Columbia University Press, New York
8. Diallo MS, Fromer NA, Jhon MS (2013) Nanotechnology for sustainable development: retrospective and outlook. J Nanopart Res 15(11):204410.1007/s11051-013-2044-0 ↗
9. Dong BS, Xu GQ, Luo X, Cai Y, Gao W (2012) A bibliometric analysis of solar power research from 1991 to 2010. Scientometrics 93(3):1101–111710.1007/s11192-012-0730-9 ↗
10. EIA U (2013) International energy outlook 2013. United States Energy Information Administration, Washington. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/world.cfm
11. Fisher RA (1921) Some remarks on the methods formulated in a recent article on “The quantitative analysis of plant growth”. Ann Appl Biol 7(4):367–37210.1111/j.1744-7348.1921.tb05524.x ↗
12. Fromer NA, Diallo MS (2013) Nanotechnology and clean energy: sustainable utilization and supply of critical materials. J Nanopart Res 15(11):201110.1007/s11051-013-2011-9 ↗
13. Gonzalez-Brambila CN, Veloso FM, Krackhardt D (2013) The impact of network embeddedness on research output. Res Policy 42(9):1555–156710.1016/j.respol.2013.07.008 ↗
14. Guan J, Gao X (2008) Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics. Scientometrics 75(2):357–37910.1007/s11192-007-1871-0 ↗
15. Guo KW (2012) Green nanotechnology of trends in future energy: a review. Int J Energy Res 36(1):1–1710.1002/er.1928 ↗
16. Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(46):16569–1657210.1073/pnas.0507655102 ↗
17. Huang C, Notten A, Rasters N (2011) Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. J Technol Transf 36(2):145–17210.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 ↗
18. Li EY, Liao CH, Yen HR (2013) Co-authorship networks and research impact: a social capital perspective. Res Policy 42(9):1515–153010.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012 ↗
19. Liu W, Gu M, Hu G, Li C, Liao H, Tang L, Shapira P (2013) Profile of developments in biomass-based bioenergy research: a 20-year perspective. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1152-z10.1007/s11192-013-1152-z ↗
20. Mahapatra M (1985) On the validity of the theory of exponential growth of scientific literature. In: 15th IASLIC conference proceedings, IASLIC, Bangalore, pp 61–70
21. Mallik A, Mandal N (2014) Bibliometric analysis of global publication output and collaboration structure study in microRNA research. Scientometrics 98:2011–203710.1007/s11192-013-1128-z ↗
22. Menendez-Manjon A, Moldenhauer K, Wagener P, Barcikowski S (2011) Nano-energy research trends: bibliometrical analysis of nanotechnology research in the energy sector. J Nanopart Res 13(9):3911–392210.1007/s11051-011-0344-9 ↗
23. Milojevic S (2012) Multidisciplinary cognitive content of nanoscience and nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 14(1):68510.1007/s11051-011-0685-4 ↗
24. Molinari JF, Molinari A (2008) A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. Scientometrics 75(1):163–17410.1007/s11192-007-1853-2 ↗
25. Plc BP (2013) BP energy outlook 2030. London, UK. http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/about-bp/statistical-review-of-world-energy-2013/energy-outlook-2030.html
26. Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P, Schoeneck DJ (2008) Refining search terms for nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 10(5):715–72810.1007/s11051-007-9266-y ↗
27. Roco MC, Mirkin CA, Hersam MC (2011) Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: summary of international study. J Nanopart Res 13(3):897–91910.1007/s11051-011-0275-5 ↗
28. Sanz-Casado E, Garcia-Zorita JC, Serrano-Lopez AE, Larsen B, Ingwersen P (2013) Renewable energy research 1995–2009: a case study of wind power research in EU, Spain, Germany and Denmark. Scientometrics 95(1):197–22410.1007/s11192-012-0825-3 ↗
29. Sci2Team (2009) Science of science (Sci2) tool. Indiana University and SciTech Strategies. http://sci2.cns.iu.edu
30. Serrano E, Rus G, Garcia-Martinez J (2009) Nanotechnology for sustainable energy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(9):2373–238410.1016/j.rser.2009.06.003 ↗
31. So DS, Kim CW, Chung PS, Jhon MS (2012) Nanotechnology policy in Korea for sustainable growth. J Nanopart Res 14(6):85410.1007/s11051-012-0854-0 ↗
32. Tang L, Shapira P (2011) China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics 88(1):1–1610.1007/s11192-011-0376-z ↗
33. Tegart G (2009) Energy and nanotechnologies: priority areas for Australia’s future. Technol Forecast Soc Change 76(9):1240–124610.1016/j.techfore.2009.06.010 ↗