Influence of particle size on the low and high strain rate behavior of dense colloidal dispersions of nanosilica
Source abstract
Abstract
Shear thickening is a non-Newtonian flow behavior characterized by the increase in apparent viscosity with the increase in applied shear rate, particularly when the shear rate exceeds a critical value termed as the critical shear rate (CSR). Due to this remarkable property of shear-thickening fluids (STFs), they are extensively used in hip protection pads, protective gear for athletes, and more recently in body armor. The use of STFs in body armor has led to the development of the concept of liquid body armor. In this study, the effect of particle size is explored on the low and high strain rate behavior of nanosilica dispersions, so as to predict the efficacy of STF-aided personal protection systems (PPS), specifically for ballistic applications. The low strain rate study was conducted on cone and plate rheometer, whereas the high strain rate characterization of STF was conducted on in-house fabricated split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system. Spherical nanosilica particles of three different sizes (100, 300, and 500 nm) as well as fumed silica particles of four different specific surface areas (Aerosil A-90, A-130, A-150, and A-200), respectively, were used in this study. The test samples were prepared by dispersing nanosilica particles in polypropylene glycol (PPG) using ultrasonic homogenization method. The low strain rate studies aided in determining the CSR of the synthesized STF dispersions, whereas the high strain rate studies explored the impact-resisting ability of STFs in terms of the impact toughness and the peak stress attained during the impact loading of STF in SHPB testing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Engineering and Material Science Research · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Barnes HA (1989) Shear-thickening (“dilatancy”) in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in Newtonian liquids. Society of Rheology 33:329–36610.1122/1.550017 ↗
2. Barroso EG, Duarte FM, Couto M, Maia JM (2010) High strain rate rheological characterization of low viscosity fluids. Polym Test 29:419–424. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.11.01210.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.11.012 ↗
3. Bender JW, Wagner NJ (1995) Optical measurement of the contributions of colloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci 172:171–18410.1006/jcis.1995.1240 ↗
4. Boersma WH, Laven J, Stein HN (1992) Viscoelastic properties of concentrated shear-thickening dispersions. J Colloid Interface Sci 149:10–22. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(92)90385-y10.1016/0021-9797(92)90385-y ↗
5. Bossis G, Brady JF (1989) The rheology of Brownian suspensions. J Chem Phys 91:1866–1866. doi: 10.1063/1.45709110.1063/1.457091 ↗
6. Brady JF, Bossis G (1988) Stokesian dynamics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 20:111–15710.1146/annurev.fl.20.010188.000551 ↗
7. Cao G (2004) Nanostructures and nanomaterials—synthesis. Properties and Applications vol 2. doi: 10.1142/978186094596010.1142/9781860945960 ↗
8. Clyens S, Evans CR, Johnson KL (1982) Measurement of the viscosity of supercooled liquids at high shear rates with a Hopkinson torsion bar. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Phys Eng Sci 381:195–214. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1982.006510.1098/rspa.1982.0065 ↗
9. Crawford NC, Popp LB, Johns KE, Caire LM, Peterson BN, Liberatore MW (2013) Shear thickening of corn starch suspensions: does concentration matter? J Colloid Interface Sci 396:83–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.01.02410.1016/j.jcis.2013.01.024 ↗
10. Decker MJ, Halbach CJ, Nam CH, Wagner NJ, Wetzel ED (2007) Stab resistance of shear thickening fluid (STF)-treated fabrics. Compos Sci Technol 67:565–578. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.007 ↗
11. Fischer C, Braun SA, Pe B, Michaud V, Plummer CJG (2006) Dynamic properties of sandwich structures with integrated shear-thickening fluids. J Smart Mater Struc 15:1467–1475. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/03610.1088/0964-1726/15/5/036 ↗
12. Fischer C, Bennani A, Michaud V, Jacquelin E, Månson J-AE (2010) Structural damping of model sandwich structures using tailored shear thickening fluid compositions. Smart Mater Struct 19:035017–035017. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/19/3/03501710.1088/0964-1726/19/3/035017 ↗
13. Helber R, Doncker F (1990) Vibration attenuation by passive stiffness switching mounts. J Sound and Vibration 138:47–5710.1016/0022-460X(90)90703-3 ↗
14. Hoffman RL (1972) Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions. I Observation of a Flow Instability J Rheology 16:155–155. doi: 10.1122/1.54925010.1122/1.549250 ↗
15. Hoffman RL (1974) Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions. II Theory and experimental tests Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 46:491–506. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(74)90059-910.1016/0021-9797(74)90059-9 ↗
16. Hoffman RL (1998) Explanations for the cause of shear thickening in concentrated colloidal suspensions:111–12410.1122/1.550884 ↗
17. Kalman DP, Merrill RL, Wagner NJ, Wetzel ED (2009) Effect of particle hardness on the penetration behavior of fabrics intercalated with dry particles and concentrated particle-fluid suspensions. Appl Mater Interfaces 1:2602–2612. doi: 10.1021/am900516w10.1021/am900516w ↗
18. Kang TJ, Hong KH, Yoo MR (2010) Preparation and properties of fumed silica/Kevlar composite fabrics for application of stab resistant material. Fibers and Polymers 11:719–724. doi: 10.1007/s12221-010-0719-z10.1007/s12221-010-0719-z ↗
19. Kenner V (1980) The fluid Hopkinson bar. Exp Mech 20:226–232. doi: 10.1007/bf0232770510.1007/bf02327705 ↗
20. Laun HM (1991) Rheology of extremely shear thickening polymer dispersions. J Rheol 35:999–103410.1122/1.550257 ↗
21. Lee YS, Wagner NJ (2003) Dynamic properties of shear thickening colloidal suspensions. Rheol Acta 42:199–208. doi: 10.1007/s00397-002-0290-710.1007/s00397-002-0290-7 ↗
22. Lee YS, Wagner NJ (2006) Rheological properties and small-angle neutron scattering of a shear thickening. Nanoparticle Dispersion at High Shear Rates Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 45:7015–7024. doi: 10.1021/ie051269010.1021/ie0512690 ↗
23. Lee YS, Wetzel ED, Wagner NJ (2003) The ballistic impact characteristics of Kevlar woven fabrics impregnated with a colloidal shear thickening fluid. J Material Sc 38:2825–283310.1023/A:1024424200221 ↗
24. Lee BW, Kim IJ, Kim CG (2009) The influence of the particle size of silica on the ballistic performance of fabrics impregnated with silica colloidal suspension. J Compos Mater 43:2679–2698. doi: 10.1177/002199830934529210.1177/0021998309345292 ↗
25. Lim AS, Lopatnikov SL, Wagner NJ, Gillespie JW (2010a) An experimental investigation into the kinematics of a concentrated hard-sphere colloidal suspension during Hopkinson bar evaluation at high stresses. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 165:1342–1350. doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.06.01510.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.06.015 ↗
26. Lim AS, Lopatnikov SL, Wagner NJ, Gillespie JW (2010b) Investigating the transient response of a shear thickening fluid using the split Hopkinson pressure bar technique. Rheol Acta 5:879–890. doi: 10.1007/s00397-010-0463-810.1007/s00397-010-0463-8 ↗
27. Lim AS, Lopatnikov SL, Wagner NJ, Gillespie JW (2011) Phenomenological modeling of the response of a dense colloidal suspension under dynamic squeezing flow. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 166:680–688. doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2011.03.00510.1016/j.jnnfm.2011.03.005 ↗
28. Maranzano BJ, Wagner NJ (2002) Flow-small angle neutron scattering measurements of colloidal dispersion microstructure evolution through the shear thickening transition. J Chem Phys 117:10291–10291. doi: 10.1063/1.151925310.1063/1.1519253 ↗
29. Ovarlez G, Rodts S, Chateau X, Coussot P (2009) Phenomenology and physical origin of shear localization and shear banding in complex fluids. Rheol Acta 48:831–844. doi: 10.1007/s00397-008-0344-610.1007/s00397-008-0344-6 ↗
30. Raghavan SR, Khan SA (1997) Shear-thickening response of fumed silica suspensions under steady and oscillatory shear. J Colloid Interface Sc 67:57–6710.1006/jcis.1996.4581 ↗
31. Robinovitch SN, Hayes WC, Ta MM (1995) Energy-shunting hip padding system attenuates femoral impact force in a simulated fall. J Biomech Engg 117:409–413. doi: 10.1115/1.279420010.1115/1.2794200 ↗
32. Srivastava A, Majumdar A, Butola BS (2011) Improving the impact resistance performance of Kevlar fabrics using silica based shear thickening fluid. Mater Sci Eng A 529:224–229. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.09.02110.1016/j.msea.2011.09.021 ↗
33. Tadros DTF (2010) Rheology of dispersions: principles and applications. Wiley-VCH Verlag Gmbh & Co KGaA. doi: 10.1002/978352763156810.1002/9783527631568 ↗
34. Tan VBC, Tay TE, Teo WK (2005) Strengthening fabric armour with silica colloidal suspensions. Int J Solids Struct 42:1561–1576. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.08.01310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.08.013 ↗
35. Wetzel ED, Lee YS, Egres RG, Kirkwood KM, Kirkwood JE, Wagner NJ (2004) The effect of rheological parameters on the ballistic properties of shear thickening fluid (STF)—Kevlar composites Physica:1–610.1063/1.1766538 ↗
36. Yang H, Ruan J, Zou J, Wu Q, Zhou Z, Zhou Z (2009) Rheological responses of fumed silica suspensions under steady and oscillatory shear. Science in China Series E: Technol Sci 52:910–915. doi: 10.1007/s11431-008-0283-610.1007/s11431-008-0283-6 ↗