journal article·2014-01

Hydrogen bonding in water nanoconfined between graphene surfaces: a molecular dynamics simulation study

Hossein Eslami, Neda Heydari

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 16· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations are done to study the structure and dynamics of hydrogen bonds (HBs) in water, nanoconfined between parallel graphene surfaces, at a constant parallel component of pressure, 101.3 kPa, and at constant temperatures, ranging from 300 to 390 K. The results indicate that layering of water molecules beside the surfaces strongly influences the structure of HBs. Very close to the surfaces, due to the geometrical restrictions, the hydrogen atoms of water preferentially orient toward the surfaces, and hence, scarify their HB network. The number of HBs per donor, compared to the corresponding bulk value, is reduced in the organized water layers beside the surfaces. In contrary, their number is increased at distances corresponding to the density profile minima, due to the formation of HBs between donors and acceptors in the neighboring organized layers. An analysis of the temperature dependence of the number of HBs shows that the HBs closer to the surfaces are weaker than those in the bulk water. Besides, the entropy change for HB breakage in the pore is lower than that for the bulk water. The short-time behavior of HB dynamics, with a characteristic time ≈0.1 ps, is shown to be insensitive to the surface proximity. However, an examination of the long-time relaxation of HBs indicates that HBs closer to the surface relax slower than those in the bulk. Such a slower relaxation is shown to be connected to the slower diffusive motion of water, depending on the surface proximity. Consequently, the rate constants for forward (HB breakage) and backward (HB formation) reactions in the pore are smaller than the corresponding bulk values. In all cases, the effect of surfaces is shown to extend up to ≈1.0 nm (interphase thickness) from the surfaces.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81:3684–369010.1063/1.448118 ↗
2. Berendsen HJC, Grigera JR, Straatsma TP (1987) The missing term in effective pair potentials. J Phys Chem 91:6269–627110.1021/j100308a038 ↗
3. Choudhury N, Pettitt BM (2005) On the mechanism of hydrophobic association of nanoscopic solutes. J Am Chem Soc 127:3556–356710.1021/ja0441817 ↗
4. Cicero G, Grossman JC, Schwegler E, Gygi F, Galli G (2008) Water confined in nanotubes and between graphene sheets: a first principle study. J Am Chem Soc 130:1871–187810.1021/ja074418+ ↗
5. Eslami H, Mehdipour N (2012) Local chemical potential and pressure tensor in inhomogeneous nanoconfined fluids. J Chem Phys 137:14470210.1063/1.4757016 ↗
6. Eslami H, Müller-Plathe F (2009) Structure and mobility of nanoconfined polyamide-6,6 oligomers: application of a molecular dynamics technique with constant temperature, surface area, and parallel pressure. J Phys Chem B 113:5568–558110.1021/jp8112655 ↗
7. Eslami H, Müller-Plathe F (2010) Viscosity of nanoconfined polyamide-6,6 oligomers: atomistic reverse nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulation. J Phys Chem B 114:387–39510.1021/jp908659w ↗
8. Eslami H, Müller-Plathe F (2013) How thick is the interphase in an ultrathin polymer film? coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of polyamide-6,6 on graphene. J Phys Chem C 117:5249–525710.1021/jp400142h ↗
9. Eslami H, Mozaffari F, Moghadasi J, Müller-Plathe F (2008) Molecular dynamics simulation of confined fluids in isosurface-isothermal-isobaric ensemble. J Chem Phys 129:19470210.1063/1.3009844 ↗
10. Eslami H, Mohammadzadeh L, Mehdipour N (2012) Anisotropic heat transport in nanoconfined polyamide-6,6 oligomers: atomistic reverse nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulation. J Chem Phys 136:10490110.1063/1.3692297 ↗
11. Eslami H, Jaafari B, Mehdipour N (2013) Coarse grained molecular dynamics simulation of nanoconfined water. ChemPhysChem 14:1063–107010.1002/cphc.201200873 ↗
12. Hirunsit P, Balbuena PB (2007) Effects of confinement on water structure and dynamics: a molecular simulation study. J Phys Chem C 111:1709–171510.1021/jp063718v ↗
13. Huang DM, Chandler D (2000) Temperature and length scale dependence of hydrophobic effects and their possible implications for protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:8324–832710.1073/pnas.120176397 ↗
14. Huang DM, Chandler D (2002) The hydrophobic effect and the influence of solute–solvent attractions. J Phys Chem B 106:2047–205310.1021/jp013289v ↗
15. Koga K, Gao GT, Tanaka H, Zeng XC (2002) How does water freeze inside carbon nanotubes? Phys A 314:462–46910.1016/S0378-4371(02)01074-9 ↗
16. Kolesnikov AI, Zanotti JM, Loong C-K, Thiyagarajan P, Moravsky AP, Loutfy RO, Burham CJ (2004) Anomalously soft dynamics of water in a nanotube: a revelation of nanoscale confinement. Phys Rev Lett 93:03550310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.035503 ↗
17. Luna M, Colchero J, Baro AM (1999) Study of water droplets and films on graphite by noncontact scanning force microscopy. J Phys Chem B 103:9576–958110.1021/jp991256y ↗
18. Luzar A (2000) Resolving the hydrogen bond dynamics conundrum. J Chem Phys 113:1066310.1063/1.1320826 ↗
19. Luzar A, Chandler D (1996) Hydrogen-bond kinetics in liquid water. Nature (London) 379:55–5810.1038/379055a0 ↗
20. Maibaum L, Chandler D (2003) A coarse-grained model of water confined in a hydrophobic tube. J Phys Chem B 107:1189–119310.1021/jp0267196 ↗
21. Marti J, Nagy G, Gordillo MC, Guardia E (2006) Molecular simulation of liquid water confined inside graphite channels: thermodynamics and structural properties. J Chem Phys 124:0947010.1063/1.2172590 ↗
22. Milischuk AA, Ladanyi BM (2011) Structure and dynamics of water confined in silica nanopores. J Chem Phys 135:17470910.1063/1.3657408 ↗
23. Müller-Plathe F (1993) YASP: a molecular simulation package. Comput Phys Commun 78:77–9410.1016/0010-4655(93)90144-2 ↗
24. Perkyns JS, Pettitt BM (1996) Dependence of hydration free energy on solute size. J Phys Chem 100:1323–132910.1021/jp951495v ↗
25. Rapaport DC (1983) Hydrogen bonds in water. Mol Phys 50:1151–116210.1080/00268978300102931 ↗
26. Schwendel D, Hayashi T, Dahint R, Pertsin A, Grunze M, Steitz R, Schreiber F (2003) Interaction of water with self-assembled monolayers: neutron reflectivity measurements of the water density in the interface region. Langmuir 19:2284–229310.1021/la026716k ↗
27. Wallqvist A, Berne BJ (1995) Computer simulation of hydrophobic hydration forces on stacked plates at short range. J Phys Chem 99:2893–289910.1021/j100009a053 ↗
28. Yaminsky VV, Amelina EA, Shchukin ED (1983) Interaction between particles in a nonwetting liquid. Colloids Surf 6:68–7510.1016/0166-6622(83)80007-9 ↗
29. Zangi R, Mark AE (2003) Bilayer ice and alternate liquid phases of confined water. J Chem Phys 119:169410.1063/1.1580101 ↗