journal article·2013-11

A model to estimate the size of nanoparticle agglomerates in gas−solid fluidized beds

Lilian de Martín, J. Ruud van Ommen

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 15· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

The estimation of nanoparticle agglomerates’ size in fluidized beds remains an open challenge, mainly due to the difficulty of characterizing the inter-agglomerate van der Waals force. The current approach is to describe micron-sized nanoparticle agglomerates as micron-sized particles with 0.1–0.2-μm asperities. This simplification does not capture the influence of the particle size on the van der Waals attraction between agglomerates. In this paper, we propose a new description where the agglomerates are micron-sized particles with nanoparticles on the surface, acting as asperities. As opposed to previous models, here the van der Waals force between agglomerates decreases with an increase in the particle size. We have also included an additional force due to the hydrogen bond formation between the surfaces of hydrophilic and dry nanoparticles. The average size of the fluidized agglomerates has been estimated equating the attractive force obtained from this method to the weight of the individual agglomerates. The results have been compared to 54 experimental values, most of them collected from the literature. Our model approximates without a systematic error the size of most of the nanopowders, both in conventional and centrifugal fluidized beds, outperforming current models. Although simple, the model is able to capture the influence of the nanoparticle size, particle density, and Hamaker coefficient on the inter-agglomerate forces.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Granular flow and fluidized beds · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows · Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Ackler HD, French RH, Chiang YM (1996) Comparisons of hamaker constants for ceramic systems with intervening vacuum or water: from force laws and physical properties. J Colloid Interface Sci 179(2):460–46910.1006/jcis.1996.0238 ↗
2. Castellanos A (2005) The relationship between attractive interparticle forces and bulk behaviour in dry and uncharged fine powders. Adv Phys 54(4):263–37610.1080/17461390500402657 ↗
3. Castellanos A, Valverde JM, Quintanilla MAS (2001) Aggregation and sedimentation in gas-fluidized beds of cohesive powders. Phys Rev E 64:041,30410.1103/PhysRevE.64.041304 ↗
4. Chaouki J, Chavarie C, Klvana D, Pajonk G (1985) Effect of interparticle forces on the hydrodynamic behaviour of fluidized aerogels. Powder Technol 43(2):117–12510.1016/0032-5910(85)87003-0 ↗
5. de Martín L, Bouwman WG, van Ommen JR (2012) Two-level hierarchical structure in nano-powder agglomerates in gas media. In: Bulleting of the Americal Physical Society, vol 57
6. Espin MJ, Valverde JM, Quintanilla MAS, Castellanos A (2009) Electromechanics of fluidized beds of nanoparticles. Phys Rev E 79:011,30410.1103/PhysRevE.79.011304 ↗
7. Forsyth AJ, Rhodes MJ (2000) A simple model incorporating the effects of deformation and asperities into the van der waals force for macroscopic spherical solid particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 223(1):133–13810.1006/jcis.1999.6630 ↗
8. French RH, Cannon RM, DeNoyer LK, Chiang YM (1994) Full spectral calculation of non-retarded hamaker constants for ceramic systems from interband transition strengths. Solid State Ion 75:13–3310.1016/0167-2738(94)00217-G ↗
9. Friedlander SK (2000) Smoke, dust, and haze: fundamentals of aerosol dynamics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, USA
10. Israelachvili JN (2011) Intermolecular and surface forces, 3rd edn. Academic Press, London
11. Katainen J, Paajanen M, Ahtola E, Pore V, Lahtinen J (2006) Adhesion as an interplay between particle size and surface roughness. J Colloid Interface Sci 304(2):524–52910.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.015 ↗
12. Kim HY, Sofo JO, Velegol D, Cole MW, Lucas AA (2007) Van der waals dispersion forces between dielectric nanoclusters. Langmuir 23(4):1735–174010.1021/la061802w ↗
13. Krupp H (1967) Particle adhesion, theory and experiment. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 1:111–23910.1016/0001-8686(67)80004-6 ↗
14. Li Q, Rudolph V, Peukert W (2006) London-van der waals adhesiveness of rough particles. Powder Technol 161(3):248–25510.1016/j.powtec.2005.10.012 ↗
15. Matsuda S, Hatano H, Tsutsumi A (2001) Ultrafine particle fluidization and its application to photocatalytic NOx treatment. Chem Eng J 82(13):183–18810.1016/S1385-8947(00)00339-9 ↗
16. Matsuda S, Hatano H, Muramoto T, Tsutsumi A (2004) Modeling for size reduction of agglomerates in nanoparticle fluidization. AIChE J 50(11):2763–277110.1002/aic.10258 ↗
17. Nam CH, Pfeffer R, Dave RN, Sundaresan S (2004) Aerated vibrofluidization of silica nanoparticles. AIChE J 50(8):1776–178510.1002/aic.10237 ↗
18. Quintanilla MAS, Valverde JM, Espin MJ, Castellanos A (2012) Electrofluidization of silica nanoparticle agglomerates. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(1):531–53810.1021/ie200538v ↗
19. Rabinovich YI, Adler JJ, Ata A, Singh RK, Moudgil BM (2000) Adhesion between nanoscale rough surfaces: I. Role of asperity geometry. J Colloid Interface Sci 232(1):10–1610.1006/jcis.2000.7167 ↗
20. Rumpf H (1990) Particle technology. Chapman & Hall, London10.1007/978-94-011-7944-7 ↗
21. Shabanian J, Jafari R, Chaouki J (2012) Fluidization of ultrafine powders. Int Rev Chem Eng 4(1):16–50
22. Tahmasebpoor M, de Martín L, Talebi M, Mostoufi N, van Ommen JR (2013) The role of the hydrogen bond in dense nanoparticle-gas suspensions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:5788–579310.1039/c3cp43687j ↗
23. Valverde JM, Castellanos A (2006) Fluidization of nanoparticles: a modified Richardson–Zaki law. AIChE J 52(2):838–84210.1002/aic.10652 ↗
24. Valverde JM, Castellanos A (2008a) Fluidization of nanoparticles: A simple equation for estimating the size of agglomerates. Chem Eng J 140(13):296–30410.1016/j.cej.2007.09.032 ↗
25. Valverde JM, Castellanos A (2008b) A modified Richardson–Zaki equation for fluidization of geldart B magnetic particles. Powder Technol 181(3):347–35010.1016/j.powtec.2007.05.018 ↗
26. van Ommen JR, Valverde JM, Pfeffer R (2012) Fluidization of nanopowders: a review. J Nanopart Res 14(3):737–76610.1007/s11051-012-0737-4 ↗
27. Wang XS, Palero V, Soria J, Rhodes MJ (2006a) Laser-based planar imaging of nano-particle fluidization: Part I. Determination of aggregate size and shape. Chem Eng Sci 61(16):5476–548610.1016/j.ces.2006.04.012 ↗
28. Wang XS, Palero V, Soria J, Rhodes MJ (2006b) Laser-based planar imaging of nano-particle fluidization: Part II. Mechanistic analysis of nanoparticle aggregation. Chem Eng Sci 61(24):8040–804910.1016/j.ces.2006.09.046 ↗
29. Wu MK, Friedlander SK (1993) Note on the power law equation for fractal-like aerosol agglomerates. J Colloid Interface Sci 159(1):246–24810.1006/jcis.1993.1319 ↗
30. Yao W, Guangsheng G, Fei W, Jun W (2002) Fluidization and agglomerate structure of SiO2 nanoparticles. Powder Technol 124(12):152–15910.1016/S0032-5910(01)00491-0 ↗
31. Zhou L, Zhang F, Zhou T, Kage H, Mawatari Y (2013) A model for estimating agglomerate sizes of non-magnetic nanoparticles in magnetic fluidized beds. Korean J Chem Eng 30(2):501–50710.1007/s11814-012-0170-5 ↗