Modeling of various contact theories for the manipulation of different biological micro/nanoparticles based on AFM
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article, the modeling of various contact theories to be applied in the biomanipulation of different micro/nanoparticles based on the atomic force microscope has been studied, and the effect of adhesion force in different contact models on indentation depth and contact angle between tip and substrate has been explored for the target biological micro/nanoparticle. The contact models used in this research include the Hertz, JKR, DMT, BCP, COS, PT, and the SUN models. Also, the target particles comprise the biological micro/nanoparticles of DNA, yeast, platelet, and nanobacterium. Previous research works have investigated the contact models for the manipulation of non-biological gold micro/nanoparticles in the air environment. Since in a real biomanipulation situation, the biological micro/nanoparticles are displaced in biological environments; in this article, various contact theories for the biomanipulation of biological micro/nanoparticles in different biological environments have been modeled and compared for the first time. The results of modeling indicate that the use of Hertz contact model in analyzing the biomanipulation of biological nanoparticles is not appropriate, because it does not take the adhesion force into consideration and thus produces a significant error. Also, all the six contact models developed in this article show larger deformations for studied bionanoparticles in comparison to the gold nanoparticles, which can be justified with regards to the mechanical properties of gold.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Near-Field Optical Microscopy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmad MR, Nakajima M, Kojima S, Homma M, Fukuda T (2007) Mechanical properties characterization of individual yeast cells using environment-sem nanomanipulation system. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, San Diego, 29 Oct–2 Nov, pp 596–60110.1109/IROS.2007.4399639 ↗
2. Ahmad MR, Nakajima M, Kojima S, Homma M, Fukuda T (2008) The effects of cell sizes, environmental conditions, and growth phases on the strength of individual W303 yeast cells inside ESEM. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 7(3):408–41210.1109/TNB.2008.2002281 ↗
3. Arsuaga J, Tan RK, Vazquez M, Sumners DW, Harvey SC (2002) Investigation of viral DNA packaging using molecular mechanics models. J Biophys Chem 101–102:475–48410.1016/S0301-4622(02)00197-7 ↗
4. Burnham NA, Kulik AJ (1999) Surface forces and adhesion. In: Bhushan B (ed) Handbook of micro/nanotribology, Chap. 5. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton10.1201/9781420050493.ch5 ↗
5. Carpick RW, Ogletree DF, Salmeron M (1999) A general equation for fitting contact area and friction vs load measurements. J Colloid Interface Sci 211:395–40010.1006/jcis.1998.6027 ↗
6. Casquillas GV, Berre ML, Poel M, Tran PT (2010) Microfluidic tools for cell biological research. Nano Today 5:28–4710.1016/j.nantod.2009.12.001 ↗
7. Castillo J, Dimaki M, Svendsen WE (2010) Manipulation of biological samples using micro and nano techniques. J Integr Biol 1:30–4210.1039/B814549K ↗
8. Chabry L (1887) Contribution a l’embryologie normal et teratologique des ascidiens simples. J Anat Physiol 25:167–319
9. Chu YS, Dufour S, Thiery JP, Perez E, Pincet F (2003) Johnson–Kendall–Roberts theory applied to living cells. J Nanomedicine 6:523–529
10. Cisar JO, Xu DQ, Thompson J, Swaim W, Hu L, Kopecko DJ (2000) An alternative interpretation of nanobacteriainduced biomineralization. PNAS 97(21):11511–1151510.1073/pnas.97.21.11511 ↗
11. Daeinabi K, Korayem MH (2011) Indentation analysis of nano-particle using nano-contact mechanics models during nano-manipulation based on atomic force microscopy. J Nanoparticle Res 13:1075–109110.1007/s11051-010-0096-y ↗
12. Derjaguin BV, Muller VM, Toporov YuP (1975) Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 53(2):314–32610.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1 ↗
13. Falvo MR, Superfine R (2000) Mechanics and friction at the nanometer scale. J Nanoparticle Res 2(3):237–24810.1023/A:1010017130136 ↗
14. Hertz H (1881) Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 92:156–171
15. Ikai A, Afrin R, Sekiguchi H (2007) Pulling and pushing protein molecules by AFM. J Curr Nanosci 3:17–2910.2174/157341307779940535 ↗
16. Jalili N, Laxminarayana K (2004) A review of atomic force microscopy imaging systems: application to molecular metrology and biological sciences. Mechatronics 14:907–94510.1016/j.mechatronics.2004.04.005 ↗
17. Javier F, Wolfgang M, Robert W (2005) Nanomanipulation by atomic force microscopy. J Adv Eng Mater 7(4):193–19610.1002/adem.200400174 ↗
18. Johnson KL, Kendall K, Roberts AD (1971) Surface energy and the contact of elastic solid. Proc R Soc Lond A 324:301–31310.1098/rspa.1971.0141 ↗
19. Kienbergera F, Costa LT, Zhu R, Kada G, Reithmayer M, Chtcheglova L, Rankl C, Pacheco AB, Thalhammer S, Pastushenko V, Heckl WM, Blaas D, Hinterdorfer P (2007) Dynamic force microscopy imaging of plasmid DNA and viral RNA. Biomaterial 28:2403–241110.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.025 ↗
20. Komzolora SG, Sorokin AA (2004) Electrostatic properties of E. Coli: genome DNA. Comput Struct Funct Genomics 25:80–82
21. Korayem MH, Rastegar Z, Taheri M (2012a) Sensitivity analysis of contact mechanics models in manipulation of biological cell. Nanosci Nanotechnol 2:49–5610.5923/j.nn.20120203.02 ↗
22. Korayem MH, Taheri M, Zakeri M (2012b) Sensitivity analysis of nano-particles manipulation based on different friction models. Appl Surf Sci 258:6713–672210.1016/j.apsusc.2011.12.024 ↗
23. Korayem MH, Rastegar Z, Taheri M (2012c) Application of Johnson–Kendall–Roberts Model in nano-manipulation of biological cell: air and liquid environment. Micro Nano Lett 7(6):576–58010.1049/mnl.2012.0292 ↗
24. Kurk T, Adams DG, Connel SD, Thomson NH (2010) Three-channel false colour AFM images for improved interpretation of complex surfaces: a study of filamentous cyanobacteria. Ultramicroscopy 110:718–72210.1016/j.ultramic.2010.02.038 ↗
25. Mell JC, Burgess SM (2002) Yeast as a model genetic organism. In: Encylopedia of Life Science, Macmillan10.1038/npg.els.0000821 ↗
26. Miyazaki H, Hayashi K (1999) Atomic force microscopic measurement of the mechanical properties of intact endothelial cells in fresh arteries. Med Biol Eng Comput 37:530–53610.1007/BF02513342 ↗
27. Pi′etrement O, Troyon M (2000) General equations describing elastic indentation depth and normal contact stiffness versus load. J Colloid Interface Sci 226:166–17110.1006/jcis.2000.6808 ↗
28. Piner RD, Xu TT, Fisher FT, Qiao Y, Ruoff RS (2003) Atomic force microscopy study of clay nanoplatelets and their impurities. Langmuir 19:7995–800110.1021/la0347814 ↗
29. Radmacher M, Fritz M, Kacher CM, Cleveland JP, Hansma PK (1996) Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope. Biophys J 70:556–56710.1016/S0006-3495(96)79602-9 ↗
30. Rawal BD, Pretorius AM (2005) Nanobacterium sanguineum—is it a new life-form in search of human ailment or commensal: overview of its transmissibility and chemical means of intervention. Med Hypotheses 65:1062–106610.1016/j.mehy.2005.06.024 ↗
31. Requicha AAG (1999) Nanorobotics. In Nof S (ed) Handbook of industrial robotics, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 199–21010.1002/9780470172506.ch11 ↗
32. Schaap AT, Carrasco C, Pablo P, MacKintosh FC, Schmidt CF (2006) Elastic response, buckling, and instability of microtubules under radial indentation. Biophys J 91:1521–153110.1529/biophysj.105.077826 ↗
33. Shen Y, Nakajima M, Ahmad MR., Kojima S, Homma M, Fukuda T (2011) Effect of ambient humidity on the strength of the adhesion force of single. J Ultramicroscopy 111:1–810.1016/j.ultramic.2011.02.008 ↗
34. Sitti M, Hashimoto H (2003) Teleoperated touch feedback from the surfaces at the nanoscale modeling and experiments. ASME Trans Mechatron 8(2):287–29810.1109/TMECH.2003.812828 ↗
35. Sun Y, Akhremitchev B, Walker GC (2004) Using the adhesive interaction between atomic force microscopy tips and polymer surfaces to measure the elastic modulus of compliant samples. Langmuir 20:5837–584510.1021/la036461q ↗
36. Tafazzoli A, Sitti M (2004) Dynamic behavior and simulation of nanoparticles sliding during nanoprobe-based positioning. In: Proceedings of IMECE’04 2004 ASME international mechanical engineering congress, Anaheim, pp 1–810.1115/IMECE2004-62470 ↗
37. Xie H, Lambert P, Régnier S (2011) Analysis of nanoscale mechanical grasping under ambient conditions. J Micromech Microeng 21:1–12
38. Yi L, Shen XC, Wang JJ, Bao L, Zhang Zh, Pang D (2007) Measuring radial Young’s modulus of DNA by tapping mode AFM. Chin Sci Bull 52:3189–319210.1007/s11434-007-0475-7 ↗
39. Zhupanska OI (2012) Adhesive full stick contact of a rigid cylinder with an elastic half-space. Int J Eng Sci 55:54–6510.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.02.002 ↗