journal article·2011-11

Evidence for magnetic interactions among magnetite nanoparticles dispersed in photoreticulated PEGDA-600 matrix

P. Allia, P. Tiberto, M. Coisson, A. Chiolerio, F. Celegato, F. Vinai, M. Sangermano, L. Suber, G. Marchegiani

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 13· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Magnetite nanoparticles having mean diameter of about 8 nm have been prepared by a thermo-chemical route. Different amounts (5 and 10% wt) of a stable dispersion of magnetite nanoparticles in n-hexane were added to polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA-600) oligomer containing 2% wt of radicalic photoinitiator. The homogenized mixture was poured on a silica glass substrate and the resulting film was photoreticulated in N2 atmosphere using a UV lamp. As a result, a polymer-based magnetic nanocomposite was obtained, where the magnetic nanoparticles are dispersed in the diamagnetic matrix, as checked by SEM. Morphology, composition, and size of as-prepared nanoparticles were checked by SEM and X-ray diffraction. The magnetic properties of magnetite nanoparticles prior to and after inclusion in the polymeric matrix have been studied by means of an alternating-gradient magnetometer (T interval: 10–300 K, HMAX: 18 kOe). FC-ZFC curves were obtained in the same temperature interval. The results show that the nanocomposites cannot be simply described as containing superparamagnetic particles undergoing an anisotropy-driven blocking and that collective magnetic interactions play a non-negligible role. Low-temperature hysteretic properties indicate that the polymeric matrix affects the effective anisotropy of magnetite nanoparticles. Dispersion of magnetite NPs in PEGDA has non-trivial consequences on their magnetic properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Allia P, Coisson M, Knobel M, Tiberto P, Vinai F (1999) Magnetic hysteresis based on dipolar interactions in granular magnetic systems. Phys Rev B 60:12207–12218. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1220710.1103/PhysRevB.60.12207 ↗
2. Allia P, Coisson M, Tiberto P, Vinai F, Knobel M, Novak MA, Nunes WC (2001) Granular Cu-Co alloys as interacting superparamagnets. Phys Rev B 64: 144420-1–144420-12. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.14442010.1103/PhysRevB.64.144420 ↗
3. Bickford LR, Pappis J, Stull JR (1955) Magnetostriction and permeability of magnetite and cobalt-substituted magnetite. Phys Rev 99:1210–121410.1103/PhysRev.99.1210 ↗
4. Chicot D, Roudet F, Zaoui A, Louis G, Lepingle V (2010) Influence of visco-elasto-plastic properties of magnetite on the elastic modulus: multicyclic indentation and theoretical studies. Mater Chem Phys 119:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.07.03310.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.07.033 ↗
5. Chiolerio A, Vescovo L, Sangermano M (2010) Conductive UV-cured acrylic inks for resistor fabrication: models for their electrical properties. Macromol Chem Phys 211:2008–2016. doi: 10.1002/macp.20109004310.1002/macp.201000242 ↗
6. Cullity BD (1972) Introduction to magnetic materials. Addison-Wesley, Reading
7. Dai Q, Berman D, Virwani K, Frommer J, Jubert PO, Lam M, Topuria T, Imaino W, Alshakim N (2010) Self-assembled ferrimagnet-polymer composites for magnetic recording media. Nano Lett 10:3216–3221. doi: 10.1021/nl102274910.1021/nl1022749 ↗
8. Gangopadhyay R, De A (2000) Conducting polymer nanocomposites: a brief overview. Chem Mater 12:608–622. doi: 10.1021/cm990537f10.1021/cm990537f ↗
9. Garcia-Otero J, Garcia-Bastida AJ, Rivas J (1998) Influence of temperature on the coercive field of non-interacting fine magnetic particles. J Magn Magn Mater 189:377–383. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00243-110.1016/S0304-8853(98)00243-1 ↗
10. Gittleman JI, Abeles B, Bozowski S (1974) Superparamagnetism and relaxation effects in granular Ni–SiO2 and Ni–Al2O3 films. Phys Rev B 9:3891–389710.1103/PhysRevB.9.3891 ↗
11. Guardia P, Batlle-Brugal B, Roca AG, Iglesias O, Morales MP, Serna CJ, Labarta A, Batlle X (2007) Surfactant effects in monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles of controlled size. J Magn Magn Mater 316:e756–e759. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.08510.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.085 ↗
12. Jalali M, Wuthrich R (2009) Improving electromagnetic shielding of composite structures with metallic nanoparticles synthesized by electrochemical discharges. Proceedings of international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility. doi: 10.1109/EMCEUROPE.2009.518968910.1109/EMCEUROPE.2009.5189689 ↗
13. Jaworek A, Sobczyk AT (2008) Electrospraying route to nanotechnology: an overview. J Electr 66:197–219. doi: 10.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.00110.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.001 ↗
14. Kester E, Rabe U, Presmanes L, Tailhades Ph, Arnold W (1999) Measurement of mechanical properties of nanoscaled ferrites using atomic force microscopy at ultrasonic frequencies. Nanostruct Mater 12:779–782. doi: #10.1016/S0965-9773(99)00235-410.1016/S0965-9773(99)00235-4 ↗
15. Kumagai M, Kano MR, Morishita Y, Ota M, Imai Y, Nishiyama N, Sekino M, Ueno S, Miyazono K, Kazunori K (2009) Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of experimental pancreatic tumor in vivo by block copolymer-coated magnetite nanoparticles with TGF-β inhibitor. J Contr Release 140:306–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.06.00210.1016/j.jconrel.2009.06.002 ↗
16. Lee WK, Dai Z, King WP, Sheehan PE (2010) Maskless nanoscale writing of nanoparticle—polymer composites and nanoparticle assemblies using thermal nanoprobes. Nano Lett 10:129–133. doi: 10.1021/nl903045610.1021/nl9030456 ↗
17. Li S, Lin MM, Toprak MS, Kim DK, Muhammed M (2010) Nanocomposites of polymer and inorganic nanoparticles for optical and magnetic applications. Nano Rev 1: 5214-1–5214-19. doi: 10.3402/nano.v1i0.521410.3402/nano.v1i0.5214 ↗
18. Lin H, Freeman BD (2006) Gas permeation and diffusion in cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol diacrylate). Macromolecules 39:3568–3580. doi: 10.1021/ma051686o10.1021/ma051686o ↗
19. Nicolais L, Carotenuto G (2005) Metal-polymer nanocomposites. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken. doi: 10.1002/047169543210.1002/0471695432 ↗
20. Nikolaev VI, Shipilin AM (2000) On the thermal expansion of nanoparticles. Phys Solid State 42–1:112–113. doi: 10.1134/1.113117610.1134/1.1131176 ↗
21. Pankhurst QA, Connolly J, Jones SK, Dobson J (2003) Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J Phys D Appl Phys 36:R167–R181. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/22/22400110.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201 ↗
22. Sadd MH (2009) Elasticity: theory, applications and numerics. Academic Press, Burlington
23. Shull RD, Kerch HM, Ritter JJ (1994) Magnetic properties of colloidal silica: potassium silicate gel/iron nanocomposites. J Appl Phys 75:6840–6842. doi: 10.1063/1.35680210.1063/1.356802 ↗
24. Sohn BH, Cohen RE, Papaefthymiou GC (1998) Magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoclusters within microdomains of block copolymers. J Magn Magn Mater 182:216–22410.1016/S0304-8853(97)00675-6 ↗
25. Sun S, Zeng H, Robinson DB, Raoux S, Rice PM, Wang SX, Li G (2004) Monodisperse MFe2O4 (M: Fe, Co, Mn) nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 124:8204–8205. doi: 10.1021/ja038085210.1021/ja026501x ↗
26. Tartaj P, Gonzalez-Carreno T, Serna CJ (2001) Single-step nanoengineering of silica coated maghemite hollow spheres with tunable magnetic properties. Adv Mater 13:1620–1624. doi: 10.1002/1521-4095(200111)10.1002/1521-4095(200111)13:21<1620::AID-ADMA1620>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
27. Vázquez M, Luna C, Morales MP, Sanz R, Serna CJ, Mijangos C (2004) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, ordering and properties. Phys B 354:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2004.09.02710.1016/j.physb.2004.09.027 ↗