Evidence for magnetic interactions among magnetite nanoparticles dispersed in photoreticulated PEGDA-600 matrix
Source abstract
Abstract
Magnetite nanoparticles having mean diameter of about 8 nm have been prepared by a thermo-chemical route. Different amounts (5 and 10% wt) of a stable dispersion of magnetite nanoparticles in n-hexane were added to polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA-600) oligomer containing 2% wt of radicalic photoinitiator. The homogenized mixture was poured on a silica glass substrate and the resulting film was photoreticulated in N2 atmosphere using a UV lamp. As a result, a polymer-based magnetic nanocomposite was obtained, where the magnetic nanoparticles are dispersed in the diamagnetic matrix, as checked by SEM. Morphology, composition, and size of as-prepared nanoparticles were checked by SEM and X-ray diffraction. The magnetic properties of magnetite nanoparticles prior to and after inclusion in the polymeric matrix have been studied by means of an alternating-gradient magnetometer (T interval: 10300 K, HMAX: 18 kOe). FC-ZFC curves were obtained in the same temperature interval. The results show that the nanocomposites cannot be simply described as containing superparamagnetic particles undergoing an anisotropy-driven blocking and that collective magnetic interactions play a non-negligible role. Low-temperature hysteretic properties indicate that the polymeric matrix affects the effective anisotropy of magnetite nanoparticles. Dispersion of magnetite NPs in PEGDA has non-trivial consequences on their magnetic properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Allia P, Coisson M, Knobel M, Tiberto P, Vinai F (1999) Magnetic hysteresis based on dipolar interactions in granular magnetic systems. Phys Rev B 60:12207–12218. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1220710.1103/PhysRevB.60.12207 ↗
2. Allia P, Coisson M, Tiberto P, Vinai F, Knobel M, Novak MA, Nunes WC (2001) Granular Cu-Co alloys as interacting superparamagnets. Phys Rev B 64: 144420-1–144420-12. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.14442010.1103/PhysRevB.64.144420 ↗
3. Bickford LR, Pappis J, Stull JR (1955) Magnetostriction and permeability of magnetite and cobalt-substituted magnetite. Phys Rev 99:1210–121410.1103/PhysRev.99.1210 ↗
4. Chicot D, Roudet F, Zaoui A, Louis G, Lepingle V (2010) Influence of visco-elasto-plastic properties of magnetite on the elastic modulus: multicyclic indentation and theoretical studies. Mater Chem Phys 119:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.07.03310.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.07.033 ↗
5. Chiolerio A, Vescovo L, Sangermano M (2010) Conductive UV-cured acrylic inks for resistor fabrication: models for their electrical properties. Macromol Chem Phys 211:2008–2016. doi: 10.1002/macp.20109004310.1002/macp.201000242 ↗
6. Cullity BD (1972) Introduction to magnetic materials. Addison-Wesley, Reading
7. Dai Q, Berman D, Virwani K, Frommer J, Jubert PO, Lam M, Topuria T, Imaino W, Alshakim N (2010) Self-assembled ferrimagnet-polymer composites for magnetic recording media. Nano Lett 10:3216–3221. doi: 10.1021/nl102274910.1021/nl1022749 ↗
8. Gangopadhyay R, De A (2000) Conducting polymer nanocomposites: a brief overview. Chem Mater 12:608–622. doi: 10.1021/cm990537f10.1021/cm990537f ↗
9. Garcia-Otero J, Garcia-Bastida AJ, Rivas J (1998) Influence of temperature on the coercive field of non-interacting fine magnetic particles. J Magn Magn Mater 189:377–383. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00243-110.1016/S0304-8853(98)00243-1 ↗
10. Gittleman JI, Abeles B, Bozowski S (1974) Superparamagnetism and relaxation effects in granular Ni–SiO2 and Ni–Al2O3 films. Phys Rev B 9:3891–389710.1103/PhysRevB.9.3891 ↗
11. Guardia P, Batlle-Brugal B, Roca AG, Iglesias O, Morales MP, Serna CJ, Labarta A, Batlle X (2007) Surfactant effects in monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles of controlled size. J Magn Magn Mater 316:e756–e759. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.08510.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.085 ↗
12. Jalali M, Wuthrich R (2009) Improving electromagnetic shielding of composite structures with metallic nanoparticles synthesized by electrochemical discharges. Proceedings of international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility. doi: 10.1109/EMCEUROPE.2009.518968910.1109/EMCEUROPE.2009.5189689 ↗
13. Jaworek A, Sobczyk AT (2008) Electrospraying route to nanotechnology: an overview. J Electr 66:197–219. doi: 10.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.00110.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.001 ↗
14. Kester E, Rabe U, Presmanes L, Tailhades Ph, Arnold W (1999) Measurement of mechanical properties of nanoscaled ferrites using atomic force microscopy at ultrasonic frequencies. Nanostruct Mater 12:779–782. doi: #10.1016/S0965-9773(99)00235-410.1016/S0965-9773(99)00235-4 ↗
15. Kumagai M, Kano MR, Morishita Y, Ota M, Imai Y, Nishiyama N, Sekino M, Ueno S, Miyazono K, Kazunori K (2009) Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of experimental pancreatic tumor in vivo by block copolymer-coated magnetite nanoparticles with TGF-β inhibitor. J Contr Release 140:306–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.06.00210.1016/j.jconrel.2009.06.002 ↗
16. Lee WK, Dai Z, King WP, Sheehan PE (2010) Maskless nanoscale writing of nanoparticle—polymer composites and nanoparticle assemblies using thermal nanoprobes. Nano Lett 10:129–133. doi: 10.1021/nl903045610.1021/nl9030456 ↗
17. Li S, Lin MM, Toprak MS, Kim DK, Muhammed M (2010) Nanocomposites of polymer and inorganic nanoparticles for optical and magnetic applications. Nano Rev 1: 5214-1–5214-19. doi: 10.3402/nano.v1i0.521410.3402/nano.v1i0.5214 ↗
18. Lin H, Freeman BD (2006) Gas permeation and diffusion in cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol diacrylate). Macromolecules 39:3568–3580. doi: 10.1021/ma051686o10.1021/ma051686o ↗
19. Nicolais L, Carotenuto G (2005) Metal-polymer nanocomposites. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken. doi: 10.1002/047169543210.1002/0471695432 ↗
20. Nikolaev VI, Shipilin AM (2000) On the thermal expansion of nanoparticles. Phys Solid State 42–1:112–113. doi: 10.1134/1.113117610.1134/1.1131176 ↗
21. Pankhurst QA, Connolly J, Jones SK, Dobson J (2003) Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J Phys D Appl Phys 36:R167–R181. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/22/22400110.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201 ↗
22. Sadd MH (2009) Elasticity: theory, applications and numerics. Academic Press, Burlington
23. Shull RD, Kerch HM, Ritter JJ (1994) Magnetic properties of colloidal silica: potassium silicate gel/iron nanocomposites. J Appl Phys 75:6840–6842. doi: 10.1063/1.35680210.1063/1.356802 ↗
24. Sohn BH, Cohen RE, Papaefthymiou GC (1998) Magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoclusters within microdomains of block copolymers. J Magn Magn Mater 182:216–22410.1016/S0304-8853(97)00675-6 ↗
25. Sun S, Zeng H, Robinson DB, Raoux S, Rice PM, Wang SX, Li G (2004) Monodisperse MFe2O4 (M: Fe, Co, Mn) nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 124:8204–8205. doi: 10.1021/ja038085210.1021/ja026501x ↗
26. Tartaj P, Gonzalez-Carreno T, Serna CJ (2001) Single-step nanoengineering of silica coated maghemite hollow spheres with tunable magnetic properties. Adv Mater 13:1620–1624. doi: 10.1002/1521-4095(200111)10.1002/1521-4095(200111)13:21<1620::AID-ADMA1620>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
27. Vázquez M, Luna C, Morales MP, Sanz R, Serna CJ, Mijangos C (2004) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, ordering and properties. Phys B 354:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2004.09.02710.1016/j.physb.2004.09.027 ↗