The emerging role of machine learning in nanomaterials research: applications, challenges, and future directions

1. Mendes BB, Zhang Z, Conniot J, Sousa DP, Ravasco JMJM, Onweller LA, Lorenc A, Rodrigues T, Reker D, Conde J (2024) A large-scale machine learning analysis of inorganic nanoparticles in preclinical cancer research. Nat Nanotechnol 19(6):867–878. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024-01673-710.1038/s41565-024-01673-7 ↗

2. Gorde PM, Dash DR, Singh SK, Singha P (2024) Advancements in sustainable food packaging: a comprehensive review on utilization of nanomaterials, machine learning and deep learning. Sustain Chem Pharm 39:101619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2024.10161910.1016/j.scp.2024.101619 ↗

3. Wu D, Lu J, Zheng N, Elsehrawy MG, Alfaiz FA, Zhao H, Alqahtani MS, Xu H (2023) Utilizing nanotechnology and advanced machine learning for early detection of gastric cancer surgery. Environ Res 245:117784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.11778410.1016/j.envres.2023.117784 ↗

4. Singh AV, Varma M, Rai M, Singh SP, Bansod G, Laux P, Luch A (2024) Advancing predictive risk assessment of chemicals via integrating machine learning, computational modelling, and chemical/nano-quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches. Adv Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.20230036610.1002/aisy.202300366 ↗

5. Jia Y, Hou X, Wang Z, Hu X (2021) Machine learning boosts the design and discovery of nanomaterials. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9(18):6130–6147. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0048310.1021/acssuschemeng.1c00483 ↗

6. Patel D (2024) Emerging sustainable nanomaterials and their applications and future scope. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 107–135). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-13849-2.00005-310.1016/b978-0-443-13849-2.00005-3 ↗

7. Mejia-Mendez JL, Reza-Zaldívar EE, Sanchez-Martinez A, Ceballos-Sanchez O, Navarro-López DE, Lozano LM, Armendariz-Borunda J, Tiwari N, Jacobo-Velázquez DA, Sanchez-Ante G, López-Mena ER (2024) Exploring the cytotoxic and antioxidant properties of lanthanide-doped ZnO nanoparticles: a study with machine learning interpretation. J Nanobiotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-02957-910.1186/s12951-024-02957-9 ↗

8. Tripathy A, Patne AY, Mohapatra S, Mohapatra SS (2024) Convergence of nanotechnology and machine learning: the state of the art, challenges, and perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 25(22):12368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25221236810.3390/ijms252212368 ↗

9. Tantra R, Oksel C, Puzyn T, Wang J, Robinson KN, Wang XZ, MA YC, Wilkins T (2014) Nano(Q)SAR: challenges, pitfalls and perspectives. Nanotoxicology 9(5):636–642. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2014.95269810.3109/17435390.2014.952698 ↗

10. Wang M, Wang T, Cai P, Chen X (2019) Nanomaterials discovery and design through machine learning. Small Methods. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.20190002510.1002/smtd.201900025 ↗

11. Gomes SIL, Amorim MJB, Pokhrel S, Mädler L, Fasano M, Chiavazzo E, Asinari P, Jänes J, Tämm K, Burk J, Scott-Fordsmand JJ (2021) Machine learning and materials modelling interpretation of in vivo toxicological response to TiO2 nanoparticles library (UV and non-UV exposure). Nanoscale 13(35):14666–14678. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1nr03231c10.1039/d1nr03231c ↗

12. Puzyn T, Rasulev B, Gajewicz A, Hu X, Dasari TP, Michalkova A, Hwang HM, Toropov A, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J (2011) Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol 6(3):175–178. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.1010.1038/nnano.2011.10 ↗

13. Pyrgiotakis G, Kundakcioglu OE, Pardalos PM, Moudgil BM (2011) Raman spectroscopy and support vector machines for quick toxicological evaluation of titania nanoparticles. J Raman Spectrosc 42(6):1222–1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.283910.1002/jrs.2839 ↗

14. Hafsa N, Rushd S, Al-Yaari M, Rahman M (2020) A generalized method for modeling the adsorption of heavy metals with machine learning algorithms. Water 12(12):3490. https://doi.org/10.3390/w1212349010.3390/w12123490 ↗

15. Lamoureux PS, Winther KT, Torres JAG, Streibel V, Zhao M, Bajdich M, Abild‐Pedersen F, Bligaard T (2019) Machine learning for computational heterogeneous catalysis. ChemCatChem 11(16): 3581–3601. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.20190059510.1002/cctc.201900595 ↗

16. Zeni C, Rossi K, Glielmo A, Baletto F (2019) On machine learning force fields for metallic nanoparticles. Adv Phys X 4(1):1654919. https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2019.165491910.1080/23746149.2019.1654919 ↗

17. Lombardo F, Pittino F, Goldoni D, Selmi L (2023) Machine learning and data augmentation methods for multispectral capacitance images of nanoparticles with nanoelectrodes array biosensors. Eng Appl Artif Intell 127:107246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10724610.1016/j.engappai.2023.107246 ↗

18. Li Y, Zhang W, Cui Z, Shi L, Shang Y, Ji Y, Wang J (2024) Machine learning-assisted nanosensor arrays: an efficiently high-throughput food detection analysis. Trends Food Sci Technol 149:104564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2024.1045610.1016/j.tifs.2024.10456 ↗

19. Pawar C, Shreeprakash B, Mokshanatha B, Nikam KC, Motgi N, Jathar LD, Shelare SD, Sharma S, Dwivedi SP, Bains PS, Kumar A, Abbas M (2024) Machine learning-based assessment of the influence of nanoparticles on biodiesel engine performance and emissions: a critical review. Arch Comput Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10144-010.1007/s11831-024-10144-0 ↗

20. Yadav S, Naidu S, Das B (2024) In vitro systems to demonstrate the nano effect (scope: in vitro systems to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of biomaterials for nanomedicine applications). In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 41–61). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-22257-3.00003-910.1016/b978-0-443-22257-3.00003-9 ↗

21. Mary P, Mujeeb A (2024) A machine learning framework for the prediction of antibacterial capacity of silver nanoparticles. Nano Express 5(2):025022. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-959x/ad4c8010.1088/2632-959x/ad4c80 ↗

22. Khan O, Parvez M, Alhodaib A, Yahya Z, Ahamad T, Yadav AK, Shukla AK (2024) Development and selection of lignocellulose biomass and nano-additive combination for co-pyrolysis operation in power generation using hybrid prediction and machine learning model – a k-means cluster approach. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 72:104061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2024.10406110.1016/j.seta.2024.104061 ↗

23. Jahanian M, Hosseini SS, Dehkordi ZA, Sadeghi K, Kalhori SRN, Ayyoubzadeh SM, Ahmadi M (2024) Machine learning approaches for recognition and classification of nanomaterial morphology. Mater Today Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.11081810.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110818 ↗

24. Price CC, Li Y, Zhou G, Younas R, Zeng SS, Scanlon TH, Munro JM, Hinkle CL (2024) Predicting and accelerating nanomaterial synthesis using machine learning featurization. Nano Lett 24(46):14862–14867. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0450010.1021/acs.nanolett.4c04500 ↗

25. Greaves GE, Pinna A, Taylor JM, Porter AE, Phillips CC (2024) In depth mapping of mesoporous silica nanoparticles in malignant glioma cells using scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy. Chem Biomed Imaging 2(12):842–849. https://doi.org/10.1021/cbmi.4c0005310.1021/cbmi.4c00053 ↗

26. Greaves GE, Allison L, Machado P, Morfill C, Fleck RA, Porter AE, Phillips CC (2024) Infrared nanoimaging of neuronal ultrastructure and nanoparticle interaction with cells. Nanoscale 16(12):6190–6198. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3nr04948e10.1039/d3nr04948e ↗

27. Zheng T, Huang Z, Ge H, Hu P, Fan X, Jia B (2024) Applying machine learning to design delicate amorphous micro-nano materials for rechargeable batteries. Energy Storage Mater 71:103614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2024.10361410.1016/j.ensm.2024.103614 ↗

28. Mekki-Berrada F, Ren Z, Huang T, Wong WK, Zheng F, Xie J, Tian IPS, Jayavelu S, Mahfoud Z, Bash D, Hippalgaonkar K, Khan S, Buonassisi T, Li Q, Wang X (2021) Two-step machine learning enables optimized nanoparticle synthesis. NPJ Comput Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00520-w10.1038/s41524-021-00520-w ↗

29. Dumit VI, Ammar A, Bakker MI, Bañares MA, Bossa C, Costa A, Cowie H, Drobne D, Exner TE, Farcal L, Friedrichs S, Furxhi I, Grafström R, Haase A, Himly M, Jeliazkova N, Lynch I, Maier D, Noorlander CW, Shin HK, Soler-Illia GJAA, Suarez-Merino B, Willighagen E, Nymark P (2023) From principles to reality. Fair implementation in the nanosafety community. Nano Today 51:101923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2023.10192310.1016/j.nantod.2023.101923 ↗

30. Mariani M, Sisti LG, Isonne C, Nardi A, Mete R, Ricciardi W, Villari P, De Vito C, Damiani G (2022) Impact of hospital mergers: a systematic review focusing on healthcare quality measures. Eur J Public Health 32(2):191–199. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac00210.1093/eurpub/ckac002 ↗

31. Joudeh N, Linke D (2022) Nanoparticle classification, physicochemical properties, characterization, and applications: a comprehensive review for biologists. J Nanobiotechnol 20(1):262. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01477-810.1186/s12951-022-01477-8 ↗

32. Yang L, Wang H, Leng D, Fang S, Yang Y, Du Y (2024) Machine learning applications in nanomaterials: recent advances and future perspectives. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.15668710.1016/j.cej.2024.156687 ↗

33. Mobarak MH, Mimona MA, Islam MA, Hossain N, Zohura FT, Imtiaz I, Rimon MIH (2023) Scope of machine learning in materials research—a review. Appl Surf Sci Adv 18:100523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.10052310.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100523 ↗

34. Hossain N, Mobarak MH, Mimona MA, Islam MA, Hossain A, Zohura FT, Chowdhury MA (2023) Advances and significances of nanoparticles in semiconductor applications–a review. Results Eng 19:101347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.10134710.1016/j.rineng.2023.101347 ↗

35. Diao S, Wu Q, Li S, Xu G, Ren X, Tan L, Jiang G, Song P, Meng X (2025) From synthesis to properties: expanding the horizons of machine learning in nanomaterials research. Mater Horiz 12(12):4133–416410.1039/D4MH01909A ↗

36. Dhoble S, Wu T, Kenry N (2024) Decoding nanomaterial‐biosystem interactions through machine learning. Angewandte Chemie Int Ed 63(16). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20231838010.1002/anie.202318380 ↗

37. Wang H, Cao H, Yang L (2024) Machine learning-driven multidomain nanomaterial design: from bibliometric analysis to applications. ACS Appl Nano Mater. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c0494010.1021/acsanm.4c04940 ↗

38. Kuznetsova V, Coogan Á, Botov D, Gromova Y, Ushakova EV, Gun’ko YK (2024) Expanding the horizons of machine learning in nanomaterials to chiral nanostructures. Adv Mater 36(18). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20230891210.1002/adma.202308912 ↗

39. Telari E, Tinti A, Settem M, Guardiani C, Kunche LK, Rees M, Hoddinott H, Dearg M, Von Issendorff B, Held G, Slater T, Palmer RE, Maragliano L, Ferrando R, Giacomello A (2025) Inherent structural descriptors via machine learning. Rep Prog Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/add95b10.1088/1361-6633/add95b ↗

40. Bhat N, Birbilis N, Barnard AS (2024) Unsupervised learning and pattern recognition in alloy design. Digit Discov. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4dd00282b10.1039/d4dd00282b ↗

41. Rapetti D, Piane MD, Cioni M, Polino D, Ferrando R, Pavan GM (2023) Machine learning of atomic dynamics and statistical surface identities in gold nanoparticles. Commun Chem 6(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-023-00936-z10.1038/s42004-023-00936-z ↗

42. Ting JYC, Opletal G, Barnard AS (2024) Unsupervised pattern recognition on the surface of simulated metal nanoparticles for catalytic applications. Catal Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4cy01000k10.1039/d4cy01000k ↗

43. Roncaglia C, Rapetti D, Ferrando R (2021) Regression and clustering algorithms for AgCu nanoalloys: from mixing energy predictions to structure recognition. Phys Chem Chem Phys 23(40):23325–23335. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cp02143e10.1039/d1cp02143e ↗

44. Roncaglia C, Ferrando R (2023) Machine learning assisted clustering of nanoparticle structures. J Chem Inf Model 63(2):459–473. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c0120310.1021/acs.jcim.2c01203 ↗

45. Zhang H, Fichthorn KA (2024) Structural classification of Ag and Cu nanocrystals with machine learning. Nanoscale 16(36):17154–17164. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4nr02531h10.1039/d4nr02531h ↗

46. Kioumourtzoglou S, Hof S, Kalk C, Toth V, Görlin M, Nováková J, Sá J (2024) Nanomaterials as a service (NaaS) concept: on-demand protocols for volume synthesis of nanomaterials. Nanoscale Horiz 9(8):1364–1371. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4nh00174e10.1039/d4nh00174e ↗

47. Han C, Dong X, Zhang W, Huang X, Gong L, Su C (2025) Intelligent systems for inorganic nanomaterial synthesis. Nanomaterials 15(8):631. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1508063110.3390/nano15080631 ↗

48. Nayak M, Narayana ASS (2025) Machine learning for nano process optimization. Edge of Intelligence: Exploring the Frontiers of AI at the Edge 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394314409.ch1110.1002/9781394314409.ch11 ↗

49. Yao L, An H, Zhou S, Kim A, Luijten E, Chen Q (2022) Seeking regularity from irregularity: unveiling the synthesis–nanomorphology relationships of heterogeneous nanomaterials using unsupervised machine learning. Nanoscale 14(44):16479–16489. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2nr03712b10.1039/d2nr03712b ↗

50. Masson J, Biggins JS, Ringe E (2023) Machine learning for nanoplasmonics. Nat Nanotechnol 18(2):111–123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-022-01284-010.1038/s41565-022-01284-0 ↗

51. Xu Y, Xu D, Yu N, Liang B, Yang Z, Asif MS, Yan R, Liu M (2023) Machine learning enhanced optical microscopy for the rapid morphology characterization of silver nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15(14):18244–18251. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c0244810.1021/acsami.3c02448 ↗

52. Peivaste I, Ramezani S, Alahyarizadeh G, Ghaderi R, Makradi A, Belouettar S (2024) Rapid and accurate predictions of perfect and defective material properties in atomistic simulation using the power of 3D CNN-based trained artificial neural networks. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50893-910.1038/s41598-023-50893-9 ↗

53. Regonia PR, Olorocisimo JP, De Los Reyes F, Ikeda K, Pelicano CM (2022) Machine learning-enabled nanosafety assessment of multi-metallic alloy nanoparticles modified TiO2 system. NanoImpact 28:100442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2022.10044210.1016/j.impact.2022.100442 ↗

54. Kang N, Joo Y, An H, Hwang H (2025) Colloidal systems as experimental platforms for physics-informed machine learning. Nanoscale Horiz. https://doi.org/10.1039/d5nh00568j10.1039/d5nh00568j ↗

55. Chaffart D, Yuan Y, Ricardez-Sandoval LA (2024) Multiscale physics-informed neural network framework to capture stochastic thin-film deposition. J Phys Chem C 128(9):3733–3750. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0716810.1021/acs.jpcc.3c07168 ↗

56. Chen Y, Negro LD (2022) Physics-informed neural networks for imaging and parameter retrieval of photonic nanostructures from near-field data. APL Photon. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.007296910.1063/5.0072969 ↗

57. Liu D, Li Q, Zhu Y, Cheng R, Zeng T, Yang H, Ma J, He J, Li Q, Yuan C (2025) Physics-informed neural networks for phase-field simulation in designing high energy storage performance polymer nanocomposites. Appl Phys Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.024400210.1063/5.0244002 ↗

58. Zhao W, Chen Z, Shang Y, Wang Q, Wang L, Liu B, Liu Y, Yang Y (2025) A physics-informed machine learning framework for accelerated discovery of single-phase B2 multi-principal element intermetallics. NPJ Comput Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-025-01775-310.1038/s41524-025-01775-3 ↗

59. Chumpu R, Chu C, Treeratanaphitak T, Marukatat S, Hsu S (2023) Physics-informed graph neural networks accelerating microneedle simulations towards novelty of micro-nano scale materials discovery. Eng Appl Artif Intell 126:106894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10689410.1016/j.engappai.2023.106894 ↗

60. Sauceda HE, Gálvez-González LE, Chmiela S, Paz-Borbón LO, Müller K, Tkatchenko A (2022) BIGDML—towards accurate quantum machine learning force fields for materials. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31093-x10.1038/s41467-022-31093-x ↗

61. Kovács DP, Moore JH, Browning NJ, Batatia I, Horton JT, Pu Y, Kapil V, Witt WC, Magdău I, Cole DJ, Csányi G (2025) MACE-OFF: short-range transferable machine learning force fields for organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c0709910.1021/jacs.4c07099 ↗

62. Jinnouchi R, Minami S (2025) Machine learning force fields in electrochemistry: from fundamentals to applications. ACS Nano 19(25):22600–22644. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5c0555310.1021/acsnano.5c05553 ↗

63. Belardinelli P, Chandrashekar A, Wiebe R, Alijani F, Lenci S (2022) Machine learning to probe modal interaction in dynamic atomic force microscopy. Mech Syst Signal Process 179:109312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10931210.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109312 ↗

64. Sun C, Zhao H, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Guo H, Hao X (2022) A soft-sensing model for predicting cement-specific surface area based on inception-residual-quasi-recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 71:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2022.320865110.1109/TIM.2022.3208651 ↗

65. Yang Z, Buehler MJ (2022) Linking atomic structural defects to mesoscale properties in crystalline solids using graph neural networks. NPJ Comput Mater 8(1):198. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00879-410.1038/s41524-022-00879-4 ↗

66. Zheng F, Lu J, Zhu Z, Jiang H, Yan Y, He Y, Yuan S, Sun Q (2023) Predicting molecular self-assembly on metal surfaces using graph neural networks based on experimental data sets. ACS Nano 17(17):17545–17553. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c0640510.1021/acsnano.3c06405 ↗

67. Zhang J, Koneru A, Sankaranarayanan SKRS, Lilley CM (2023) Graph neural network guided evolutionary search of grain boundaries in 2D materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15(16):20520–20530. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c0116110.1021/acsami.3c01161 ↗

68. Zhao S, Chen H, Zhao J (2024) A physical-information-flow-constrained temporal graph neural network-based simulator for granular materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 433:117536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.11753610.1016/j.cma.2024.117536 ↗

69. Eğer ZE, Acar P (2024) Uncertainty quantification of phase transitions in magnetic materials lattices. Appl Phys Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.018384410.1063/5.0183844 ↗

70. Dai J, Adhikari S, Wen M (2024) Uncertainty quantification and propagation in atomistic machine learning. Rev Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2024-002810.1515/revce-2024-0028 ↗

71. Batko K, Ślęzak A (2022) The use of big data analytics in healthcare. J Big Data 9(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00553-410.1186/s40537-021-00553-4 ↗

72. Naeem M, Jamal T, Diaz-Martinez J, Butt SA, Montesano N, Tariq MI, ... De-La-Hoz-Valdiris E (2022) Trends and future perspective challenges in big data. In Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis and Applications: Proceedings of the Sixth Euro-China Conference on Intelligent Data Analysis and Applications, 15–18 October 2019, Arad, Romania (pp. 309–325). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5036-9_3010.1007/978-981-16-5036-9_30 ↗

73. Yang RX, McCandler CA, Andriuc O, Siron M, Woods-Robinson R, Horton MK, Persson KA (2022) Big data in a nano world: a review on computational, data-driven design of nanomaterials structures, properties, and synthesis. ACS Nano 16(12):19873–19891. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c0841110.1021/acsnano.2c08411 ↗

74. Wyrzykowska E, Mikolajczyk A, Lynch I, Jeliazkova N, Kochev N, Sarimveis H, Doganis P, Karatzas P, Afantitis A, Melagraki G, Serra A, Greco D, Subbotina J, Lobaskin V, Bañares MA, Valsami-Jones E, Jagiello K, Puzyn T (2022) Representing and describing nanomaterials in predictive nanoinformatics. Nat Nanotechnol 17(9):924–932. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-022-01173-610.1038/s41565-022-01173-6 ↗

75. Fortino V, Kinaret PaS, Fratello M, Serra A, Saarimäki LA, Gallud A, Gupta G, Vales G, Correia M, Rasool O, Ytterberg J, Monopoli M, Skoog T, Ritchie P, Moya S, Vázquez-Campos S, Handy R, Grafström R, Tran L, Greco D (2022) Biomarkers of nanomaterials hazard from multi-layer data. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31609-510.1038/s41467-022-31609-5 ↗

76. Yan X, Yue T, Winkler DA, Yin Y, Zhu H, Jiang G, Yan B (2023) Converting nanotoxicity data to information using artificial intelligence and simulation. Chem Rev 123(13):8575–8637. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c0007010.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00070 ↗

77. Van Rijn J, Afantitis A, Culha M, Dusinska M, Exner TE, Jeliazkova N, Longhin EM, Lynch I, Melagraki G, Nymark P, Papadiamantis AG, Winkler DA, Yilmaz H, Willighagen E (2022) European registry of materials: global, unique identifiers for (undisclosed) nanomaterials. J Cheminform. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-022-00614-710.1186/s13321-022-00614-7 ↗

78. Cai Y, Wu D, Sun X, Wu S, Xu J, Huang JZ (2024) CDFRS: a scalable sampling approach for efficient big data analysis. Inf Process Manage 61(4):103746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2024.10374610.1016/j.ipm.2024.103746 ↗

79. Lankford S, Afli H, Way A (2023) AdaptMLLM: fine-tuning multilingual language models on low-resource languages with integrated LLM playgrounds. Information 14(12):638. https://doi.org/10.3390/info1412063810.3390/info14120638 ↗

80. Gupta T, Zaki M, Krishnan NA, Mausam (2022) MatSciBERT: a materials domain language model for text mining and information extraction. npj Comput Mater 8(1):102. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00784-w10.1038/s41524-022-00784-w ↗

81. Trewartha A, Walker N, Huo H, Lee S, Cruse K, Dagdelen J, Jain A (2022) Quantifying the advantage of domain-specific pre-training on named entity recognition tasks in materials science. Patterns 3(4):100488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.10048810.1016/j.patter.2022.100488 ↗

82. Xie J, Sun L, Zhao YF (2025) On the data quality and imbalance in machine learning-based design and manufacturing—a systematic review. Engineering 45(2):105–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.04.02410.1016/j.eng.2024.04.024 ↗

83. Yang Z, Li L, Lin K, Wang J, Lin CC, Liu Z, Wang L (2023) The dawn of LMMs: preliminary explorations with GPT-4V(ision). arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17421. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.1742110.48550/arXiv.2309.17421 ↗

84. Serrano BA, Gheorghe LC, Exner TE, Resch S, Wolf C, Himly M, Falk A, Bossa N, Vazquez S, Papadiamantis AG, Afantitis A, Melagraki G, Maier D, Saramveis H, Willighagen E, Lobaskin V, Oldfield JD, Lynch I (2024) The role of FAIR nanosafety data and nanoinformatics in achieving the UN sustainable development goals: the NanoCommons experience. RSC Sustainability 2(5):1378–1399. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3su00148b10.1039/d3su00148b ↗

85. Ammar A, Evelo C, Willighagen E (2024) Fair assessment of nanosafety data reusability with community standards. Sci Data. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03324-x10.1038/s41597-024-03324-x ↗

86. Blekos K, Chairetakis K, Lynch I, Marcoulaki E (2023) Principles and requirements for nanomaterial representations to facilitate machine processing and cooperation with nanoinformatics tools. J Cheminform. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-022-00669-610.1186/s13321-022-00669-6 ↗

87. Elberskirch L, Binder K, Riefler N, Sofranko A, Liebing J, Minella CB, Mädler L, Razum M, Van Thriel C, Unfried K, Schins RPF, Kraegeloh A (2022) Digital research data: from analysis of existing standards to a scientific foundation for a modular metadata schema in nanosafety. Part Fibre Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-021-00442-x10.1186/s12989-021-00442-x ↗

88. Exner TE, Papadiamantis AG, Melagraki G, Amos JD, Bossa N, Gakis GP, Charitidis CA, Cornelis G, Costa AL, Doganis P, Farcal L, Friedrichs S, Furxhi I, Klaessig FC, Lobaskin V, Maier D, Rumble J, Sarimveis H, Suarez-Merino B, Vázquez S, Wiesner MR, Afantitis A, Lynch I (2023) Metadata stewardship in nanosafety research: learning from the past, preparing for an “on-the-fly” FAIR future. Front Phys. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.123387910.3389/fphy.2023.1233879 ↗

89. Chen C, Yaari Z, Apfelbaum E, Grodzinski P, Shamay Y, Heller DA (2022) Merging data curation and machine learning to improve nanomedicines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 183:114172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2022.11417210.1016/j.addr.2022.114172 ↗

90. Maxson T, Soyemi A, Zhang X, Chen BWJ, Szilvási T (2025) MS25: materials science-focused benchmark data set for machine learning interatomic potentials. J Chem Inf Model. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c0126210.1021/acs.jcim.5c01262 ↗

91. Kim G, Na B, Kim G, Cho H, Kang S, Lee HS, ... Kim Y (2023) Benchmark of machine learning force fields for semiconductor simulations: datasets, metrics, and comparative analysis. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 36:51434–51476

92. Choudhary K, Wines D, Li K, Garrity KF, Gupta V, Romero AH, Krogel JT, Saritas K, Fuhr A, Ganesh P, Kent PRC, Yan K, Lin Y, Ji S, Blaiszik B, Reiser P, Friederich P, Agrawal A, Tiwary P, Beyerle E, Minch P, Rhone TD, Takeuchi I, Wexler RB, Mannodi-Kanakkithodi A, Ertekin E, Mishra A, Mathew N, Wood M, Rohskopf AD, Hattrick-Simpers J, Wang S-H, Achenie LEK, Xin H, Williams M, Biacchi AJ, Tavazza F (2024) JARVIS-leaderboard: a large scale benchmark of materials design methods. NPJ Comput Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-024-01259-w10.1038/s41524-024-01259-w ↗

93. Huang W, Dong Z, Lin L (2024) Density functional theory and machine learning of transition metals in MO2C for gas sensors. ACS Appl Nano Mater. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c0427410.1021/acsanm.4c04274 ↗

94. Lv Y, Chen G, Ma R, Lee JY, Kang B (2023) Hybrid scheme of DFT and machine learning to accelerate the design of graphyne nanoribbons as electrocatalysts for the ORR and HER. Fuel 357:130017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.13001710.1016/j.fuel.2023.130017 ↗

95. Nyangiwe NN (2025) Applications of density functional theory and machine learning in nanomaterials: a review. Next Mater 8:100683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.10068310.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100683 ↗

96. Choudhary MK, Raj A, VS, GS, Ravindran P (2025) Composition and structure based GGA bandgap prediction using machine learning approach. Adv Theory Simul. https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.20250077110.1002/adts.202500771 ↗

97. Yaghoobi M, Alaei M, Shirazi M, Rezaei N, De Gironcoli S (2024).Discovery of novel silicon allotropes with optimized band gaps to enhance solar cell efficiency through evolutionary algorithms and machine learning. Comput Mater Sci 113392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.11339210.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113392 ↗

98. Kandy AKA, Rossi K, Raulin-Foissac A, Laurens G, Lam J (2023) Comparing transferability in neural network approaches and linear models for machine-learning interaction potentials. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.107.17410610.1103/physrevb.107.174106 ↗

99. Kayode GO, Montemore MM (2023) Latent variable machine learning framework for catalysis: general models, transfer learning, and interpretability. JACS Au 4(1):80–91. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.3c0041910.1021/jacsau.3c00419 ↗

100. Babbar A, Ragunathan S, Mitra D, Dutta A, Patra TK (2023) Explainability and transferability of machine learning models for predicting the glass transition temperature of polymers. arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.09898