Risk assessment of occupational exposure to engineered and incidental nanomaterials: differences and challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Nanotechnology research and applications · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Andraos C, Gulumian M, Ichihara G, Kim B, Yu IJ (2022) Editorial: occupational exposure to nanomaterials. Front Toxicol 4:101460010.3389/ftox.2022.1014600 ↗
2. Kalantary S, Golbabaei F, Latifi M, Shokrgozar MA, Yaseri M (2019) Evaluation resistance levels of the PCL/Gt nanofiber mats during exposure to PAHs for use in the occupational setting. SN Appl Sci 1:1–810.1007/s42452-019-0896-3 ↗
3. Ghafari J, Moghadasi N, Shekaftik SO (2020) Oxidative stress induced by occupational exposure to nanomaterials: a systematic review. Ind Health 58(6):492–50210.2486/indhealth.2020-0073 ↗
4. Omari Shekaftik S, H. Shirazi F, Yarahmadi R, Rasouli M, Ashtarinezhad A (2022) Investigating the relationship between occupational exposure to nanomaterials and symptoms of nanotechnology companies’ employees. Arch Environ Occup Health. 77(3):209–1810.1080/19338244.2020.1863315 ↗
5. Johnson DR, Methner MM, Kennedy AJ, Steevens JA (2010) Potential for occupational exposure to engineered carbon-based nanomaterials in environmental laboratory studies. Environ Health Perspect 118(1):49–5410.1289/ehp.0901076 ↗
6. Boccuni F, Rondinone B, Petyx C, Iavicoli S (2008) Potential occupational exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in Italy. J Clean Prod 16(8–9):949–95610.1016/j.jclepro.2007.04.021 ↗
7. Manke A, Luanpitpong S, Rojanasakul Y (2014) Potential occupational risks associated with pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes. Occup Med Health Aff 2:1000165. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6879.100016510.4172/2329-6879.1000165 ↗
8. Omari Shekaftik S, Ashtarinezhad A, Yarahmadi R, Rasouli M, Soleimani M, Hosseini SF (2020) Relationship between chemical composition and physical State of used nanomaterials in nanotechnology companies with type and prevalance of symptoms of employees of these companies in Tehran. Iran IOH 17(2):1–12
9. Nasirzadeh N, Golbabaei F, Omari SS (2023) Laboratory activities involving nanomaterials: risk assessment and investigating researchers symptoms. Nanoscale 15(6):2674–268910.1039/D2NR06118J ↗
10. Kim KH, Kim JB, Ji JH, Lee SB, Bae GN (2015) Nanoparticle formation in a chemical storage room as a new incidental nanoaerosol source at a nanomaterial workplace. J Hazard Mater 298:36–4510.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.002 ↗
11. Dolez PI (2015) Chapter 1.1 - nanomaterials definitions, classifications, and applications. In: Dolez PI (ed) Nanoengineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–4010.1016/B978-0-444-62747-6.00001-4 ↗
12. Rodríguez-Ibarra C, Déciga-Alcaraz A, Ispanixtlahuatl-Meráz O, Medina-Reyes EI, Delgado-Buenrostro NL, Chirino YI (2020) International landscape of limits and recommendations for occupational exposure to engineered nanomaterials. Toxicol Lett 322:111–11910.1016/j.toxlet.2020.01.016 ↗
13. Mihalache R, Verbeek J, Graczyk H, Murashov V, van Broekhuizen P (2017) Occupational exposure limits for manufactured nanomaterials, a systematic review. Nanotoxicology 11(1):7–1910.1080/17435390.2016.1262920 ↗
14. Omari Shekaftik S, Jadid H, Dehdashti MJ, Mohammadian Y, Ebrahimi W (2023) Toward a minimum data set for assessing the risks of activities involved with nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 25(2):2510.1007/s11051-023-05674-w ↗
15. Rasmussen K, Rauscher H, Kearns P, González M, Sintes JR (2019) Developing OECD test guidelines for regulatory testing of nanomaterials to ensure mutual acceptance of test data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 104:74–8310.1016/j.yrtph.2019.02.008 ↗
16. Belosi F, Koivisto AJ, Furxhi I, de Ipina JL, Nicosia A, Ravegnani F et al (2023) Critical aspects in occupational exposure assessment with different aerosol metrics in an industrial spray coating process. NanoImpact 30:10045910.1016/j.impact.2023.100459 ↗
17. Ostraat M, Engel S, Swain K, Kuhlbusch T, Asbach C (2015) Harmonized tiered approach to measure and assess the potential exposure to airborne emissions of engineered nano-objects and their agglomerates and aggregates at workplaces series on the safety of manufactured nanomaterials no. 55-ENV/JM/MONO 55:JT03378848.
18. Omari Shekaftik S, Moghadasi N, Nasirzadeh N (2023) National (Iranian) and global use of control banding-based methods for assessing the risks of activities involved with nanomaterials: a comparative review. J Nanopart Res 25(7):14510.1007/s11051-023-05800-8 ↗
19. Paik SY, Zalk DM, Swuste P (2008) Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures. Ann Occup Hyg 52(6):419–428
20. Zalk DM, Paik SY (2011) Risk assessment using control banding. Elsevier, Assessing nanoparticle risks to human health, pp 139–166
21. Erbis S, Ok Z, Isaacs JA, Benneyan JC, Kamarthi S (2016) Review of research trends and methods in nano environmental, health, and safety risk analysis. Risk Anal 36(8):1644–166510.1111/risa.12546 ↗
22. McCord TA, Legaspi MT, West EA, Yung PK, Larson DL, Paik SY, Zalk DM (2021) Quantitative validation of control bands using Bayesian statistical analyses. Annals of Work Exposures and Health 65(1):63–8310.1093/annweh/wxaa081 ↗
23. Omari Shekaftik S, Ashtarinezhad A, Shirazi FH, Hosseini A, Yarahmadi R (2021) Assessing the risk of main activities of nanotechnology companies by the NanoTool method. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 27(4):1145–115310.1080/10803548.2019.1693778 ↗
24. Sousa M, Arezes P, Silva F (2021) Occupational exposure to incidental nanoparticles: a review on control banding. J Phys: Conf Ser 1953(1):012008
25. Landsiedel R, Sauer UG, de Jong WH (2017) Chapter 8 - risk assessment and risk management. In: Fadeel B, Pietroiusti A, Shvedova AA (eds) Adverse effects of engineered nanomaterials (second edition). Academic Press, pp 189–22210.1016/B978-0-12-809199-9.00008-2 ↗
26. Omari Shekaftik S, Sedghi Noushabadi Z, Ashtarinezhad A (2022) Nanosafety: a knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) study among Iranian researchers working in nanotechnology laboratories. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 28(4):2541–254510.1080/10803548.2021.2005958 ↗
27. Omari Shekaftik S, Nasirzadeh N, Baba-Ahangar T, Najaflou M, Beigzadeh Z, Dehdashti MJ et al (2022) Academic nanotechnology laboratories: investigating good practices and students’ health status. J Nanopart Res 24(9):17710.1007/s11051-022-05548-7 ↗
28. Zalk DM, Paik SY, Chase WD (2019) A quantitative validation of the control banding nanotool. Ann Work Expo Health 63(8):898–91710.1093/annweh/wxz057 ↗
29. Omari Shekaftik S, Nasirzadeh N, Mohammadiyan M, Mohammadpour S (2023) An analysis on control banding-based methods used for occupational risk assessment of nanomaterials. Nanotoxicology 17(10):628–65010.1080/17435390.2023.2293141 ↗
30. Silva F, Arezes P, Swuste P (2015) Risk assessment in a research laboratory during sol–gel synthesis of nano-TiO2. Saf Sci 80:201–21210.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.010 ↗
31. Simeone FC, Blosi M, Ortelli S, Costa AL (2019) Assessing occupational risk in designs of production processes of nano-materials. NanoImpact 14:10014910.1016/j.impact.2019.100149 ↗
32. Ahmadi Kanrash F, Omari Shekaftik S, Aliakbar A, Soleimany F, Haghighi Asl A, Ebrahimi W, Amini RS (2022) Comparative risk assessment of tasks involved with nanomaterials using NanoTool & guidance methods. J Chem Health Risks 12(3):371–378
33. Omari Shekaftik S, Nasirzadeh N, Mohammadiyan M, Mohammadpour S (2023) An analysis on control banding-based methods used for occupational risk assessment of nanomaterials. Nanotoxicology 17(10):628–5010.1080/17435390.2023.2293141 ↗
34. Zalk DM, Paik SY (2011) Chapter 6 - risk assessment using control banding. In: Ramachandran G (ed) Assessing nanoparticle risks to human health. William Andrew Publishing, Oxford, pp 139–16610.1016/B978-1-4377-7863-2.00006-6 ↗
35. Sousa M, Arezes P, Silva F (eds) (2021) Occupational exposure to incidental nanoparticles: a review on control banding. J Phys Conference Series, 1953 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1953/1/01200810.1088/1742-6596/1953/1/012008 ↗
36. Zalk DM, Swuste P (2020) Barrier banding: a concept for safety solutions utilizing control banding principles. J Chem Health Saf 27(4):219–22810.1021/acs.chas.9b00021 ↗
37. Zalk DM, Paik SY, Chase WD (2019) A quantitative validation of the control banding nanotool. Ann Work Expo Health 63(8):898–91710.1093/annweh/wxz057 ↗
38. Zalk D (2010) Control banding: a simplified, qualitative strategy for the assessment of occupational risks and selection of solutions. Delft (Netherlands): TU Delft publisher. pp 10–35
39. Sousa M, Arezes P, Silva F (2023) Occupational exposure to incidental nanomaterials in metal additive manufacturing: an innovative approach for risk management. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(3):251910.3390/ijerph20032519 ↗
40. Dugheri S, Cappelli G, Trevisani L, Kemble S, Paone F, Rigacci M et al (2022) A qualitative and quantitative occupational exposure risk assessment to hazardous substances during powder-bed fusion processes in metal-additive manufacturing. Safety 8(2):3210.3390/safety8020032 ↗
41. Levin M, Rojas E, Vanhala E, Vippola M, Liguori B, Kling KI et al (2015) Influence of relative humidity and physical load during storage on dustiness of inorganic nanomaterials: implications for testing and risk assessment. J Nanopart Res 17:1–1310.1007/s11051-015-3139-6 ↗
42. Van Hoornick N, Prodanov D, Pardon A (eds) (2017) Banding approach for engineered nanomaterial risk assessment and control. J Phys Conference Series, 838(1):01201710.1088/1742-6596/838/1/012017 ↗