journal article·2023-03Open access

Amorphous non-doped and Se-, Cu-, and Zn-doped Sb2S3 nanoparticles prepared by a hot-injection method: bandgap tuning and possible observation of the quantum size effect

Ivana Validžić, Maja Popović, Jelena Potočnik, Christina Graf, Maximilian Joschko, Yulia A. Kuznetsova, Dmitry A. Zatsepin

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 25· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract The modified hot-injection method was applied for the synthesis of amorphous non-doped and copper (Cu) and selenium (Se) doped antimony (III) sulfide (Sb2S3) nanoparticles with reduced sizes. Moreover, zinc (Zn) doped Sb2S3 nanoparticles were synthesized for the first time by the same approach. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and TEM of amorphous undoped and doped samples revealed small spherical nanoparticles of a few (1-4) nanometers aggregated into larger spherical clusters, while introducing different dopant ions into the Sb2S3 structure did neither influence the spherical morphology nor the sizes of samples. The presence of the basic elements (S and Sb) and dopants (Cu, Se, or Zn) was confirmed by EDX analysis and mapping. Additionally, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) was performed on the Zn-doped Sb2S3 sample, confirming spherical morphology as well as quantitative incorporation of Zn in the Sb2S3 lattice. X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) results of the non-doped and doped samples revealed an amorphous structure. The crystalline Zn-doped Sb2S3 samples obtained by heating the amorphous ones revealed well-defined peaks from only the Sb2S3 phase, confirming a successful doping process. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) revealed high optical bandgap energies (2.03–2.12 eV) in comparison to the values (1.6–1.7 eV) obtained for large spherical non-doped and doped particles. It was demonstrated that there is not only a significant reduction in particle size compared to previously synthesized non-doped and doped amorphous nanoparticles of the same composition, but that there is also a significant increase in the bandgap values of 0.4-0.5 eV, which could be attributed to a quantum size effect. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements revealed pure phase composition without any impurities for the undoped sample, and characteristic peaks for copper 2p, selenium, and zinc Auger peaks for the doped samples, respectively. The XPS valence band measurements were performed due to the weak Zn Auger peak, confirming a shift towards lower binding energy compared to the non-doped sample, demonstrating the doping of the observed sample. Photoluminescence (PL) measurements show that embedding Zn into the Sb2S3 host lattice suppresses the wide luminescence band with peaks at 1.7 eV, 2.0 eV, 2.2 eV, and 2.4 eV, which is related to intrinsic defects. Furthermore, the energy dependence of the light emission on the size of the synthesized nanoparticles suggests that the quantum confinement effect causes the light emission.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Crystal Structures and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. Kondrotas R, Chen C, Tang J (2018) Sb2S3 solar cells. Joule 2:857–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.00310.1016/j.joule.2018.04.003 ↗
2. Gur TM (2018) Review of electrical energy storage technologies, materials and systems: challenges and prospects for large-scale grid storage. Energy Environ Sci 11:2696–2767. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE01419A10.1039/C8EE01419A ↗
3. Hasanuzzaman M, Zubir US, Ilham NI, Seng Che H (2017) Global electricity demand, generation, grid system, and renewable energy polices : a review. WIREs Energy Environ 6:e222. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.22210.1002/wene.222 ↗
4. Hosenuzzaman M, Rahim NA, Selvaraj J, Hasanuzzaman M, Malek ABMA, Nahar A (2015) Global prospects, progress, policies, and environmental impact of solar photovoltaic power generation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:284–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.04610.1016/j.rser.2014.08.046 ↗
5. Yalew SG, van Vliet MTH, Gernaat DEHJ, Ludwig F, Miara A, Park C, Byers E, De Cian E, Piontek F, Iyer G, Mouratiadou I, Glynn J, Hejazi M, Dessens O, Rochedo P, Pietzcker R, Schaeffer R, Fujimori S, Dasgupta S et al (2020) Impacts of climate change on energy systems in global and regional scenarios. Nat Energy 5:794–802. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0664-z10.1038/s41560-020-0664-z ↗
6. Welch AW, Baranowski LL, Peng H, Hempel H, Eichberger R, Unold T, Lany S, Wolden C, Zakutayev A (2017) Trade-offs in thin film solar cells with layered chalcostibite photovoltaic absorbers. Adv Energy Mater 7:1601935. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20160193510.1002/aenm.201601935 ↗
7. Sinsermsuksakul P, Sun L, Lee SW, Park HH, Kim SB, Yang C, Gordon RG (2014) Overcoming efficiency limitations of SnS-based solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 4:1400496. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20140049610.1002/aenm.201400496 ↗
8. Steinmann V, Brandt RE, Buonassisi T (2015) Non-cubic solar cell materials. Nat Photonics 9:355–357. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.8510.1038/nphoton.2015.85 ↗
9. Green MA, Ho-Baillie A, Snaith HJ (2014) The emergence of perovskite solar cells. Nat Photonics 8:506–514. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.13410.1038/nphoton.2014.134 ↗
10. Kaltenbrunner M, White MS, Głowacki ED, Sekitani T, Someya T, Sariciftci NS, Bauer S (2012) Ultrathin and lightweight organic solar cells with high flexibility. Nat Commun 3:770. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms177210.1038/ncomms1772 ↗
11. Vermang B, Watjen JT, Fjallstrom V, Rostvall F, Edoff M, Kotipalli R, Henry F, Flandre D (2014) Employing Si solar cell technology to increase efficiency of ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 22:1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.252710.1002/pip.2527 ↗
12. Paudel NR, Wieland KA, Compaan AD (2012) Ultrathin CdS/CdTe solar cells by sputtering. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 105:109–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2012.05.03510.1016/j.solmat.2012.05.035 ↗
13. Vermang B, Goverde H, Tous L, Lorenz A, Choulat P, Horzel J, Joachim J, Poortmans J, Mertens R (2012) Approach for Al2O3 rear surface passivation of industrial p-type Si PERC above 19%. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 20:269–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.219610.1002/pip.2196 ↗
14. Aousgi F, Kanzari M (2011) Study of the optical properties of Sn-doped Sb2S3 thin films. Energy Procedia 10:313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.10.19710.1016/j.egypro.2011.10.197 ↗
15. Rhee JH, Chung CC, Diau EWG (2013) A perspective of mesoscopic solar cells based on metal chalcogenide quantum dots and organometal-halide perovskites. NPG Asia Mater 5:e68. https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2013.5310.1038/am.2013.53 ↗
16. Yang RX, Butler KT, Walsh A (2015) Assessment of hybrid organic–inorganic antimony sulfides for earth-abundant photovoltaic applications. J Phys Chem Lett 6:5009–5014. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0255510.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02555 ↗
17. Wang X, Tang R, Wu C, Zhu C, Chen T (2018) Development of antimony sulfide–selenide Sb2(S, Se)3-based solar cells. J Energy Chem 27:713–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2017.09.03110.1016/j.jechem.2017.09.031 ↗
18. Joschko M, Wafo FYF, Malsi C, Kisić D, Validžić I, Graf C (2021) Revealing the formation mechanism and band gap tuning of Sb2S3 nanoparticles. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 12:1021–1033. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.12.7610.3762/bjnano.12.76 ↗
19. Lojpur V, Joschko M, Graf C, Radmilović N, Novaković M, Validžić I (2022) Structural, morphological, optical, and electronic properties of amorphous non-doped and I and Sn doped Sb2S3 nanoparticles. Mater Sci Semicond Process 137:106196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2021.10619610.1016/j.mssp.2021.106196 ↗
20. Janosević V, Mitrić M, Bundaleski N, Rakočević Z, Validžić ILJ (2016) High-efficiency Sb2S3-based hybrid solar cell at low light intensity: cell made of synthesized Cu and Se-doped Sb2S3. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 24:704–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.272410.1002/pip.2724 ↗
21. Lojpur V, Krstić J, Kačarević-Popović Z, Filipović N, Validžić ILJ (2018) Flexible and high-efficiency Sb2S3/solid carrier solar cell at low light intensity. Environ Chem Lett 16:659–66410.1007/s10311-017-0702-7 ↗
22. Validžić ILJ, Popović M, Lojpur V, Bundaleski N, Rakočević Z (2018) Flexible and high-efficiency Sb2S3/solid carrier solar cell at low light intensity. J Electron Mater 47:2402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0702-710.1007/s10311-017-0702-7 ↗
23. Lojpur V, Mitrić M, Validžić ILJ (2018) The role of low light intensity: A step towards understanding the connection between light, optic/lens and photovoltaic behavior for Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells. Opt Laser Technol 101:425–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.11.04510.1016/j.optlastec.2017.11.045 ↗
24. Lojpur V, Krstić J, Kačarević-Popović Z, Mitrić M, Rakočević Z, Validžić ILJ (2018) Efficient and novel Sb2S3 based solar cells with chitosan/poly(ethylene glycol)/electrolyte blend. Int J Energy Res 42:843–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.389910.1002/er.3899 ↗
25. Lojpur V, Tasić N, Validžić I (2017) Different behaviors in current–voltage measurements of undoped and doped Sb2S3-based solar cells. J Appl Electrochem 47:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-016-1025-210.1007/s10800-016-1025-2 ↗
26. Janošević V, Mitrić M, Savić J, Validžić ILj (2016) Structural, optical, and electrical properties of applied amorphized and polycrystalline Sb2S3 thin films. Metall Mater Trans A: Phys Metall Mater Sci 47: 1460-1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-015-3282-910.1007/s11661-015-3282-9 ↗
27. Lojpur V, Mitrić M, Kačarević-Popović Z, Radosavljević A, Rakočević Z, Validžić ILJ (2017) The role of low light intensity: A cheap, stable, and solidly efficient amorphous Sb2S3 powder/hypericin composite/PVA matrix loaded with electrolyte solar cell. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 36:1507–1516. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.1259710.1002/ep.12597 ↗
28. Tang R, Wang X, Jiang C, Li S, Liu W, Ju H, Yang S, Zhu C, Chen T (2018) n-type doping of Sb2S3 light-harvesting films enabling high-efficiency planar heterojunction solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:30314–30321. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b0896510.1021/acsami.8b08965 ↗
29. Diliegros-Godines CJ, Santos Cruz J, Mathews NR, Pal M (2018) Effect of Ag doping on structural, optical and electrical properties of antimony sulfide thin films. J Mater Sci 53:11562–11573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2420-310.1007/s10853-018-2420-3 ↗
30. Ito S, Tsujimoto K, Nguyen DC, Manabe K, Nishino H (2013) Doping effects in Sb2S3 absorber for full-inorganic printed solar cells with 5.7% conversion efficiency. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:16749–16754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.06910.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.069 ↗
31. Ömer SN, Horoz SS (2019) Fabrication of pure Sb2S3 and Fe (2.5%): Sb2S3 thin films and investigation their properties. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 29:1331–1336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-019-01097-010.1007/s10904-019-01097-0 ↗
32. Validžić ILJ, Janošević V, Mitrić M (2016) Characterization and current–voltage characteristics of solar cells based on the composite of synthesized Sb2S3 powder with small band gap and natural dye. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 35:512–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.1222110.1002/ep.12221 ↗
33. Janosevic V, Mitric M, Lezaic AJ, Validžić ILJ (2016) Weak light performance of synthesized amorphous Sb2S3-based hybrid solar cell. IEEE J Photovolt 6:473–479. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.250173110.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2501731 ↗
34. Peng Y, Xia C, Tan Z, Ana J, Zhang Q (2019) Size-controlled excitonic effects on electronic and optical properties of Sb2S3 nanowires. Phys Chem Chem Phys 21:26515–26524. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CP05134A10.1039/C9CP05134A ↗
35. Myagmarsereejid P, Ingram M, Batmunkh M, Zhong YL (2021) Doping strategies in Sb2S3 thin films for solar cells. Small 17:2100241. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20210024110.1002/smll.202100241 ↗
36. Kalangestani FC, Ghodsi FE, Bazhan Z (2020) Investigating the effect of Zn doping on physical properties of nanostructured Sb2S3 thin films by dip-coating technique. Appl Phys A 126:548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03734-910.1007/s00339-020-03734-9 ↗
37. Mathew NJ, Oommen R, Rajalakshmi PU, Rajalakshmi PU, Chinnappanadar S (2011) Investigations of the Se doped Sb2S3 thin films. Chalcogenide Lett 8:441–446 https://chalcogen.ro/441_Mathew.pdf
38. Lei H, Lin T, Wang X, Dai P, Guo Y, Gao Y, Hou D, Chen J, Tan Z (2019) Copper doping of Sb2S3: fabrication, properties, and photovoltaic application. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 30:21106–21116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-02481-910.1007/s10854-019-02481-9 ↗
39. Chen C, Tang J (2020) Open-circuit voltage loss of antimony chalcogenide solar cells: status, origin, and possible solutions. ACS Energy Lett 5:2294–2304. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0094010.1021/acsenergylett.0c00940 ↗
40. Wang W, Strössner F, Zimmermann E, Schmidt-Mende L (2017) Hybrid solar cells from Sb2S3 nanoparticle ink. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 172:335–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2017.07.04610.1016/j.solmat.2017.07.046 ↗
41. Abulikemu M, Del Gobbo S, Anjum DH, Malik MA, Bakr OM (2016) Colloidal Sb2S3 nanocrystals: synthesis, characterization and fabrication of solid-state semiconductor sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem A 4(18):6809–6814. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA09546H10.1039/C5TA09546H ↗
42. Swift P (1982) Adventitious carbon—the panacea for energy referencing? Surf Interface Anal 4:47–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.74004020410.1002/sia.740040204 ↗
43. Fairley N, Carrick A (2005) The Casa Cookbook—Part I: Recipes for XPS data processing. Knutsford: Acolyte Science, Publisher Acolyte Science 10:0954953304
44. Zhou W, Greer HF (2016) What can electron microscopy tell us beyond crystal structures? Eur J Inorg Chem 2016:941–950. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.20150134210.1002/ejic.201501342 ↗
45. Kostiantyn Kravchyk V, Maksym Kovalenko V, Maryna Bodnarchuk I (2020) Colloidal antimony sulfide nanoparticles as a high-performance anode material for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. Sci. Rep. 10:2554. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59512-310.1038/s41598-020-59512-3 ↗
46. Mourdikoudis S, Pallaresa RM, Thanh NTK (2018) Characterization techniques for nanoparticles: comparison and complementarity upon studying nanoparticle properties. Nanoscale 10:12871–12934. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR02278J10.1039/C8NR02278J ↗
47. Sampath S, Isdebski T, Jenkins JE, Ayon JV, Henning RW, JPRO O, Antipoa O, Yarger JL (2012) X-ray diffraction study of nanocrystalline and amorphous structure within major and minor ampullate dragline spider silks. Soft Matter 8:6713–6722. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2SM25373A10.1039/C2SM25373A ↗
48. Fritsch C, Hansen AL, Indris S, Knapp M, Ehrenberg H (2020) Mechanochemical synthesis of amorphous and crystalline Na2P2S6 – elucidation of local structural changes by X-ray total scattering and NMR. Dalton Trans 49:1668–1673. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9DT04777H10.1039/C9DT04777H ↗
49. Davis EA, Mott NF (1970) Conduction in non-crystalline systems V. Conductivity, optical absorption and photoconductivity in amorphous semiconductors. Philos Mag 22:903–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478643700822106110.1080/14786437008221061 ↗
50. Makuła P, Pacia M, Macyk W (2018) How to correctly determine the band gap energy of modified semiconductor photocatalysts based on UV–Vis spectra. J Phys Chem Lett 9:6814–6817. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0289210.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892 ↗
51. Grobelny J, DelRio FW, Pradeep N, Kim DI, Hackley VA, Cook RF (2011) Size measurement of nanoparticles using atomic force microscopy. Methods Mol Biol 697:71–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-198-1_710.1007/978-1-60327-198-1_7 ↗
52. Abdullahi SS, Güner S, Koseoglu Y, Musa IM, Adamu BI, Abdulhamid MI (2016) Sımple method for the determınatıon of band gap of a nanopowdered sample usıng Kubelka Munk theory. J Nigerian Assoc Math Phys 35:241–246 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305810656
53. Zanatta AR (2019) Revisiting the optical bandgap of semiconductors and the proposal of a unified methodology to its determination. Sci Rep 9:11225. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47670-y10.1038/s41598-019-47670-y ↗
54. Validžić ILJ, Mitric M, Abazovic ND, Jokic BM, Milosevic AS, Popovic ZS, Vukajlovic FR (2014) Structural analysis, electronic and optical properties of the synthesized Sb2S3 nanowires with small band gap. Semicond Sci Technol 29:035007. https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/29/3/03500710.1088/0268-1242/29/3/035007 ↗
55. Roberts M, Dunstan DJ (1985) A theory of band-gap fluctuations in amorphous semiconductors. J Phys C Solid State Phys 18:5429. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/18/28/01210.1088/0022-3719/18/28/012 ↗
56. Lee BH, Cho KS, Lee DY, Sohn A, Lee JY, Choo H, Park S, Kim SW, Kim S, Lee SY (2019) Investigation on energy bandgap states of amorphous SiZnSnO thin films. Scientific Reports 9:19246. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55807-210.1038/s41598-019-55807-2 ↗
57. Smith AM, Nie S (2010) Semiconductor nanocrystals: structure, properties, and band gap engineering. Acc Chem Res 43:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar900106910.1021/ar9001069 ↗
58. Thanh NTK, Maclean N, Mahiddine S (2014) Mechanisms of nucleation and growth of nanoparticles in solution. Chem Rev 114:7610–7630. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400544s10.1021/cr400544s ↗
59. Liu Y, Miao HY, Tan GQ, Zhu GQ (2010) Hydrothermal synthesis ultralong single-crystal Sb2S3 nanowires. J Wuhan Univ Technol Mater Sci Ed 25:411–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-010-0013-310.1007/s11595-010-0013-3 ↗
60. Hu HM, Mo MS, Yan BJ, Zhang XJ, Li QW, Yu WC, Qian YT (2003) Solvothermal synthesis of Sb2S3 nanowires on a large scale. J Cryst Growth 258:106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(03)01494-510.1016/S0022-0248(03)01494-5 ↗
61. Mane RS, Lokhande CD (2003) Thickness-dependent properties of chemically deposited Sb2S3 thin films. Mater Chem Phys 82:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(03)00271-210.1016/S0254-0584(03)00271-2 ↗
62. Vinayakumar V, Shaji S, Avellaneda D, Aguilar-Martınez JA, Krishnan B (2018) Copper antimony sulfide thin films for visible to near infrared photodetector applications. RSC Adv 8:31055–31065. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA05662E10.1039/C8RA05662E ↗
63. Megahid NM, Wakkad MM, Shokr EK, Abass NM (2004) Microstructure and electrical conductivity of In-doped CdS thin films. Phys B Condens Matter 353:150–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2004.08.01310.1016/j.physb.2004.08.013 ↗
64. Crist BV (2000) Handbook of Monochromatic XPS Spectra: The Elements of Native Oxides. John Wiley & Sons LTD, NY, USA, p 548
65. Iacomi F, Purica M, Budianu E, Prepelita P, Macovei D (2007) Structural studies on some doped CdS thin films deposited by thermal evaporation. Thin Solid Films 515:6080–6084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.09110.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.091 ↗
66. Sheng-Ping G, Chen-Xing L, Yang C, Ze M, Guo XH (2016) Novel 3-D network SeSx/NCPAN composites prepared by one-pot in-situ solid-state method and its electrochemical performance as cathode material for lithium-ion battery. J Alloys Compd 664:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.20810.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.208 ↗
67. Suk HD, Bill B, Ahmed AW (2013) XPS analysis of sorption of selenium (IV) and selenium (VI) to mackinawite (FeS). Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 32:84–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.1060910.1002/ep.10609 ↗
68. Vincent Crist B (1999) Handbooks of Monochromatic XPS Spectra. Wiley, Hoboken
69. Thermo Scientific XPS: Knowledge Base, 2013–2021, accessed 2021-12-23, https://www.thermofisher.com/ru/ru/home/materials-science/learning-center/periodic-table.html
70. Dou Y, Fishlock T, Egdell RG (1997) Band-gap shrinkage in n-type-doped CdO probed by photoemission spectroscopy. Physical Review B 55:R13381. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R1338110.1103/PhysRevB.55.R13381 ↗
71. Gee CM, Kastner M (1980) Defects in lone-pair semiconductors: The valence-alternation model and new directions. J. Non-Cryst Solids 35-36:807–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(80)90300-210.1016/0022-3093(80)90300-2 ↗
72. Yonezawa F (1980) Fundamental Physics of Amorphous Semiconductors, Proceedings of the Kyoto Summer Institute, Kyoto, Japan. Springer, Berlin
73. Alemi A, Woo Joo S, Hanifehpour Y, Khandar A, Morsali A, Min BK (2011) Hydrothermal synthesis of Sb2S3 nanorods using iodine via redox mechanism. J Nanomater 2011:186528. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/18652810.1155/2011/186528 ↗
74. Beril SI, Stamov IG, Tiron AV, Zalamai VV, Syrbu NN (2020) Frenkel excitons and band structure in Sb2S3 single crystals. Opt Mater 101:109737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2020.10973710.1016/j.optmat.2020.109737 ↗
75. Narayan Banerjee A, Woo Joo S, Bong KM (2012) Quantum size effect in the photoluminescence properties of p-type semiconducting transparent CuAlO2 nanoparticles for solar energy applications. J Appl Phys 112:114329. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.476893310.1063/1.4768933 ↗
76. Nozik AJ, Beard MC, Luther JM, Law M, Ellingson RJ, Johnson JC (2010) Semiconductor quantum dots and quantum dot arrays and applications of multiple exciton generation to third-generation photovoltaic solar cells. Chem Rev 110:6873. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900289f10.1021/cr900289f ↗
77. Yousefi R, Cheragizade M, Farid JS, Mahmoudian MR, Abdolhossein S, Huang NM (2014) Influences of anionic and cationic dopants on the morphology and optical properties of PbS nanostructures. Chin Phys B 23:108101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/23/10/10810110.1088/1674-1056/23/10/108101 ↗