journal article·2023-04

Linear correlation between electronegativity and adsorption energy of hydrated metal ions by carboxyl-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes

Chien-Lin Lee, Hsing-Cheng Hsi, Chia Ming Chang

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 25· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Most metals dissolve in aqueous solution in ionic form that tasks of purifying contaminated environments are always challenging for us, and the accurate prediction in the adsorption process is essential to identify determinants in surface science. We propose the simple representations of parameters described by Conceptual Density Functional Theory for hydrated metal ions. Different calculation methods through density functional theory (DFT) are developed and corresponding performance is revealed that the high correlation occurs between the global electronegativity and inner-sphere adsorption energy of hydrated metal ions by carboxyl-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes, in particular, the calculation concept involving fractional occupation numbers that R-square is above 0.8. The hydration energy is not negligible when determining the adsorption energy and it promotes the stability of the complexes in aqueous phase. That metal ions with trivalent charge exhibit stronger hydration energy than those with divalent charge is found. Meanwhile, the efficient system simulated by the meaningful fractional occupation methods for the wastewater treatment and optimal materials designing could be rationalized and accelerated.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manage 92(3):407–41810.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 ↗
2. Barakat MA (2011) New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab J Chem 4(4):361–37710.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.019 ↗
3. Kang S-Y et al (2004) Competitive adsorption characteristics of Co2+, Ni2+, and Cr3+ by IRN-77 cation exchange resin in synthesized wastewater. Chemosphere 56(2):141–14710.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.02.004 ↗
4. Li H et al (2017) Mechanisms of metal sorption by biochars: biochar characteristics and modifications. Chemosphere 178:466–47810.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.072 ↗
5. Lim A, Aris AZ (2014) A review on economically adsorbents on heavy metals removal in water and wastewater. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 13:163–18110.1007/s11157-013-9330-2 ↗
6. Agarwal M, Singh K (2017) Heavy metal removal from wastewater using various adsorbents: a review. J Water Reuse Desalination 7(4):387–41910.2166/wrd.2016.104 ↗
7. Rao GP, Lu C, Su F (2007) Sorption of divalent metal ions from aqueous solution by carbon nanotubes: a review. Sep Purif Technol 58(1):224–23110.1016/j.seppur.2006.12.006 ↗
8. Ren X et al (2011) Carbon nanotubes as adsorbents in environmental pollution management: a review. Chem Eng J 170(2):395–41010.1016/j.cej.2010.08.045 ↗
9. Tian Y et al (2012) Methods of using carbon nanotubes as filter media to remove aqueous heavy metals. Chem Eng J 210:557–56310.1016/j.cej.2012.09.015 ↗
10. Dehghani MH et al (2015) Removal of noxious Cr (VI) ions using single-walled carbon nanotubes and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng J 279:344–35210.1016/j.cej.2015.04.151 ↗
11. Alijani H, Shariatinia Z (2018) Synthesis of high growth rate SWCNTs and their magnetite cobalt sulfide nanohybrid as super-adsorbent for mercury removal. Chem Eng Res Des 129:132–14910.1016/j.cherd.2017.11.014 ↗
12. Lu C, Chiu H (2006) Adsorption of zinc(II) from water with purified carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng Sci 61(4):1138–114510.1016/j.ces.2005.08.007 ↗
13. Cho H-H et al (2010) Sorption of aqueous Zn[II] and Cd[II] by multiwall carbon nanotubes: the relative roles of oxygen-containing functional groups and graphenic carbon. Langmuir 26(2):967–98110.1021/la902440u ↗
14. Li H et al (2009) Ferric ion adsorption and electrodesorption by carbon nanotubes and nanofibres films. Water Sci Technol 59(8):1657–166310.2166/wst.2009.162 ↗
15. Diaz-Flores PE et al (2009) Simultaneous adsorption of Cd2+ and phenol on modified N-doped carbon nanotubes: experimental and DFT studies. J Colloid Interface Sci 334(2):124–13110.1016/j.jcis.2009.02.045 ↗
16. Kosa SA, Al-Zhrani G, Abdel Salam M (2012) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified with 8-hydroxyquinoline. Chem Eng J 181–182:159–16810.1016/j.cej.2011.11.044 ↗
17. Zhang C et al (2012) Efficient removal of heavy metal ions by thiol-functionalized superparamagnetic carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng J 210:45–5210.1016/j.cej.2012.08.062 ↗
18. Iannazzo D et al (2017) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters using dendrimer-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(17):14735–1474710.1007/s11356-017-9086-2 ↗
19. Deb AKS, Ali SM, Shenoy KT (2015) Unanticipated favoured adsorption affinity of Th(iv) ions towards bidentate carboxylate functionalized carbon nanotubes (CNT–COOH) over tridentate diglycolamic acid functionalized CNT: density functional theoretical investigation. RSC Adv 5(97):80076–8008810.1039/C5RA16651A ↗
20. Zhang J et al (2021) A key role of inner-cation-π interaction in adsorption of Pb(II) on carbon nanotubes: experimental and DFT studies. J Hazard Mater 412:12518710.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125187 ↗
21. Sahu P et al (2018) Tailoring of carbon nanotubes for the adsorption of heavy metal ions: molecular dynamics and experimental investigations. Mol Syst Des Eng 3(6):917–92910.1039/C8ME00039E ↗
22. Robati D (2013) Pseudo-second-order kinetic equations for modeling adsorption systems for removal of lead ions using multi-walled carbon nanotube. J Nanostruct Chem 3(1):5510.1186/2193-8865-3-55 ↗
23. Moradi O, Zare K, Yari M (2011) Interaction of some heavy metal ions with single walled carbon nanotube. Int J Nano Dimens (IJND) 1(3):203–220
24. Rezaei-Sameti M, Zarei P (2018) NBO, AIM, HOMO–LUMO and thermodynamic investigation of the nitrate ion adsorption on the surface of pristine, Al and Ga doped BNNTs: a DFT study. Adsorption 24(8):757–76710.1007/s10450-018-9977-7 ↗
25. Rakrai W et al (2022) Theoretical and experimental investigations of a gold nanosensor based on rhodamine-modified carbon nanotubes. J Mol Struct 1260:13276510.1016/j.molstruc.2022.132765 ↗
26. Anitha K, Namsani S, Singh JK (2015) Removal of heavy metal ions using a functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube: a molecular dynamics study. J Phys Chem A 119(30):8349–835810.1021/acs.jpca.5b03352 ↗
27. Zhang C et al (2019) Adsorption behavior of engineered carbons and carbon nanomaterials for metal endocrine disruptors: experiments and theoretical calculation. Chemosphere 222:184–19410.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.128 ↗
28. Poorsargol M, Razmara Z, Amiri MM (2020) The role of hydroxyl and carboxyl functional groups in adsorption of copper by carbon nanotube and hybrid graphene–carbon nanotube: insights from molecular dynamic simulation. Adsorption 26(3):397–40510.1007/s10450-020-00214-7 ↗
29. Gao Z et al (2009) Investigation of factors affecting adsorption of transition metals on oxidized carbon nanotubes. J Hazard Mater 167(1):357–36510.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.050 ↗
30. Li Y-H et al (2003) Competitive adsorption of Pb2+, Cu2+ and Cd2+ ions from aqueous solutions by multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 41(14):2787–279210.1016/S0008-6223(03)00392-0 ↗
31. Oyetade OA et al (2017) Experimental and DFT studies on the selective adsorption of Pb2+ and Zn2+ from aqueous solution by nitrogen-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Sep Purif Technol 188:174–18710.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.022 ↗
32. Zhu Z et al (2020) The adsorption of divalent heavy metal ions on (8, 0) carbon nanotubes: the first-principles study. Mod Phys Lett B 34(32):205036810.1142/S0217984920503686 ↗
33. Geerlings P, De Proft F, Langenaeker W (2003) Conceptual Density Functional Theory. Chem Rev 103(5):1793–187410.1021/cr990029p ↗
34. Delley B (1990) An all-electron numerical method for solving the local density functional for polyatomic molecules. J Chem Phys 92(1):508–51710.1063/1.458452 ↗
35. Delley B (2000) From molecules to solids with the DMol 3 approach. J Chem Phys 113(18):7756–776410.1063/1.1316015 ↗
36. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77(18):3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
37. Klamt A, Schüürmann G (1993) COSMO: a new approach to dielectric screening in solvents with explicit expressions for the screening energy and its gradient. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2(5):799–80510.1039/P29930000799 ↗
38. Delley B (2006) The conductor-like screening model for polymers and surfaces. Mol Simul 32(2):117–12310.1080/08927020600589684 ↗
39. Pearson Ralph G (1986) Absolute electronegativity and hardness correlated with molecular orbital theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci 83(22):8440–844110.1073/pnas.83.22.8440 ↗
40. Parr RG, Pearson RG (1983) Absolute hardness: companion parameter to absolute electronegativity. J Am Chem Soc 105(26):7512–751610.1021/ja00364a005 ↗
41. Hirshfeld FL (1977) Bonded-atom fragments for describing molecular charge densities. Theoret Chim Acta 44(2):129–13810.1007/BF00549096 ↗
42. Persson I (2022) Structures of hydrated metal ions in solid state and aqueous solution. Liquids 2(3):210–24210.3390/liquids2030014 ↗
43. Lee SS et al (2010) Hydrated cation speciation at the muscovite (001)−water interface. Langmuir 26(22):16647–1665110.1021/la1032866 ↗
44. Kong X-P, Wang J (2016) Copper(II) adsorption on the kaolinite(001) surface: insights from first-principles calculations and molecular dynamics simulations. Appl Surf Sci 389:316–32310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.112 ↗
45. Wang Q et al (2017) Adsorption of Zn(II) on the kaolinite(001) surfaces in aqueous environment: a combined DFT and molecular dynamics study. Appl Surf Sci 414:405–41210.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.062 ↗
46. Watts HD, O’Day PA, Kubicki JD (2019) Gibbsite (100) and kaolinite (100) sorption of cadmium(II): a density functional theory and XANES study of structures and energies. J Phys Chem A 123(29):6319–633310.1021/acs.jpca.9b05159 ↗
47. Flogeac K, Guillon E, Aplincourt M (2004) Surface complexation of copper(II) on soil particles: EPR and XAFS studies. Environ Sci Technol 38(11):3098–310310.1021/es049973f ↗
48. Lepore GO et al (2022) Lanthanum captured in montmorillonite: evidence of inner-sphere complexes from X-ray absorption spectroscopy investigations. Appl Clay Sci 230:10667610.1016/j.clay.2022.106676 ↗
49. Roberts DR, Ford RG, Sparks DL (2003) Kinetics and mechanisms of Zn complexation on metal oxides using EXAFS spectroscopy. J Colloid Interface Sci 263(2):364–37610.1016/S0021-9797(03)00281-9 ↗
50. Roe AL et al (1991) In situ X-ray absorption study of lead ion surface complexes at the goethite-water interface. Langmuir 7(2):367–37310.1021/la00050a029 ↗
51. Sheng G et al (2011) Behavior and mechanism of Ni(II) uptake on MnO2 by a combination of macroscopic and EXAFS investigation. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 289(1):129–13510.1007/s10967-011-1053-7 ↗
52. Zhang P-C et al (2001) Adsorption of barium(II) on montmorillonite: an EXAFS study. Colloids Surf, A 190(3):239–24910.1016/S0927-7757(01)00592-1 ↗
53. O’Day PA, Parks GA, Brown GE (1994) Molecular structure and binding sites of cobalt(II) surface complexes on kaolinite from X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Clays Clay Miner 42(3):337–35510.1346/CCMN.1994.0420312 ↗
54. Chen G-C et al (2011) Adsorption of diuron and dichlobenil on multiwalled carbon nanotubes as affected by lead. J Hazard Mater 188(1):156–16310.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.095 ↗
55. Chen G-C et al (2008) Effects of copper, lead, and cadmium on the sorption and desorption of atrazine onto and from carbon nanotubes. Environ Sci Technol 42(22):8297–830210.1021/es801376w ↗
56. Lin D et al (2012) Surface-bound humic acid increased Pb2+ sorption on carbon nanotubes. Environ Pollut 167:138–14710.1016/j.envpol.2012.03.044 ↗
57. Zhou Y et al (2012) Coadsorption of copper and perfluorooctane sulfonate onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng J 203:148–15710.1016/j.cej.2012.06.156 ↗
58. Adapa S, Malani A (2018) Role of hydration energy and co-ions association on monovalent and divalent cations adsorption at mica-aqueous interface. Sci Rep 8(1):1219810.1038/s41598-018-30549-9 ↗
59. Adapa S et al (2018) Role of mono- and divalent surface cations on the structure and adsorption behavior of water on mica surface. Langmuir 34(48):14472–1448810.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01128 ↗
60. Marcus Y (1991) Thermodynamics of solvation of ions. Part 5.—Gibbs free energy of hydration at 298.15 K. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 87(18):2995–299910.1039/FT9918702995 ↗
61. Bock CW et al (2006) The arrangement of first- and second-shell water molecules around metal ions: effects of charge and size. Theoret Chem Acc 115(2):100–11210.1007/s00214-005-0056-2 ↗
62. Liu L et al (2021) Understanding the sorption behaviors of heavy metal ions in the interlayer and nanopore of montmorillonite: a molecular dynamics study. J Hazard Mater 416:12597610.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125976 ↗
63. Koopmans T (1934) Über die Zuordnung von Wellenfunktionen und Eigenwerten zu den Einzelnen Elektronen Eines Atoms. Physica 1(1):104–11310.1016/S0031-8914(34)90011-2 ↗
64. Janak JF (1978) Proof that ∂E∂ni=ε in density-functional theory. Phys Rev B 18(12):7165–716810.1103/PhysRevB.18.7165 ↗
65. Chattaraj PK, Sarkar U, Roy DR (2006) Electrophilicity index. Chem Rev 106(6):2065–209110.1021/cr040109f ↗
66. Oral I et al (2022) Lithium selectivity of crown ethers: the effect of heteroatoms and cavity size. Sep Purif Technol 294:12114210.1016/j.seppur.2022.121142 ↗
67. Sun Y et al (2020) A novel approach for the selective extraction of Li+ from the leaching solution of spent lithium-ion batteries using benzo-15-crown-5 ether as extractant. Sep Purif Technol 237:11632510.1016/j.seppur.2019.116325 ↗
68. Kallies B, Meier R (2001) Electronic structure of 3d [M(H2O)6]3+ ions from ScIII to FeIII: a quantum mechanical study based on DFT computations and natural bond orbital analyses. Inorg Chem 40(13):3101–311210.1021/ic001258t ↗
69. Pokhrel N, Lamichhane H (2018) Natural bond orbital analysis of [Fe(H2O)6]2+/3+ and [Zn(H2O)6](H2O)N2+;N=0-4. J Inst Sci Technol 22:14810.3126/jist.v22i2.19607 ↗
70. Manku G (1980) Theoretical principles of inorganic chemistry. Tata McGraw-Hill Education
71. Pearson RG (1963) Hard and soft acids and bases. J Am Chem Soc 85(22):3533–353910.1021/ja00905a001 ↗
72. Klopman G (1968) Chemical reactivity and the concept of charge- and frontier-controlled reactions. J Am Chem Soc 90(2):223–23410.1021/ja01004a002 ↗
73. Parr RG, Yang W (1984) Density functional approach to the frontier-electron theory of chemical reactivity. J Am Chem Soc 106(14):4049–405010.1021/ja00326a036 ↗
74. Fitzgerald G (2008) On the use of fractional charges for computing Fukui functions. Mol Simul 34(10–15):931–93610.1080/08927020802073065 ↗
75. Chattaraj P (2001) Chemical reactivity and selectivity: local HSAB principle versus frontier orbital theory. J Phys Chem A 105(2):511–51310.1021/jp003786w ↗