journal article·2006-12-29

An axial flow cyclone to remove nanoparticles at low pressure conditions

Sheng-Chieh Chen, Chuen-Jinn Tsai

Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the axial flow cyclone used in Tsai et al. (2004) was further tested for the collection efficiency of both solid (NaCl) and liquid (OA, oleic acid) nanoparticles. The results showed that the smallest cutoff aerodynamic diameters achieved for OA and NaCl nanoparticles were 21.7 nm (cyclone inlet pressure: 4.3 Torr, flow rate: 0.351 slpm) and 21.2 nm (5.4 Torr, 0.454 slpm), respectively. The collection efficiencies for NaCl and OA particles were close to each other for the aerodynamic diameter ranging from 25 to 180 nm indicating there was almost no solid particle bounce in the cyclone. The 3-D numerical simulation was conducted to calculate the flow field in the cyclone and the flow was found to be nearly paraboloid. Numerical simulation of the particle collection efficiency based on the paraboloid flow assumption showed that the collection efficiency was in good agreement with the experimental data with less than 15% of error. A semi-empirical equation for predicting the cutoff aerodynamic diameter at different inlet pressures and flow rates was also obtained. The semi-empirical equation is able to predict the cutoff aerodynamic diameter accurately within 9% of error. From the empirical cutoff aerodynamic diameter, a semi-empirical square root of the cutoff Stokes number, √St 50 * , was calculated and found to be a constant value of 0.241. This value is useful to the design of the cyclone operating in vacuum to remove nanoparticles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics · Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Biswas P., Flagan R.J. (1988) Particle trap impactor. Aerosol Sci. 19: 113–12110.1016/0021-8502(88)90260-1 ↗
2. Blachman M.W., Lippmann M. (1974) Performance characteristics of the multicyclone aerosol sampler. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 35: 311–32610.1080/0002889748507040 ↗
3. Boysan F., Ewan B.C.R., Swithenbank J., Ayers W.H. (1983) Experimental and theoretical studies of cyclone aeparator aerodynamics. IChemeE. Symp. Series 69: 305–320
4. Harwood R., Slack M. (2002) CFD analysis of a cyclone. QNET-CFD Network Newsletter. 1: 25–27
5. Hinds W.C. (1999) Aerosol Technology. Wiley, New York, p126
6. Hoekstra A.J., Derksen J.J., Van Den Akker H.E.A. (1999) An experimental and numerical study of turbulent swirling flow in gas cyclones. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54: 2055–206510.1016/S0009-2509(98)00373-X ↗
7. Hsu Y.D., Chein H.M., Chen T.M., Tsai C.J. (2005) Axial flow cyclone for segregation and collection of ultrafine particle: Theoretical and experimental study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39: 1299–130810.1021/es0491735 ↗
8. Liu B.Y.H., Rubow K.L. (1984) A new axial flow cascade cyclone for size characterization of airborne particulate matter. In: Liu B.Y.H., Pui D.Y., Fissan H.J. (eds) Aerosols. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 115–118
9. Maynard A.D. (2000) A simple model of axial flow cyclone performance under laminar flow conditions. J. Aerosol Sci. 31: 151–16710.1016/S0021-8502(99)00035-X ↗
10. Patankar S.V. (1980) Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. Hemisphere Publishing Co, Washington
11. Schmidt S., Thiele F. (2002) Comparison of numerical methods applied to the flow over wall-mounted cubes. Inter. J. Heat & Fluid Flow. 23: 330–33910.1016/S0142-727X(02)00180-7 ↗
12. Schmidt S., H.M. Blackburn, M. Rudman & I. Sutalo, 2003. Simulation of turbulent flow in a cyclonic separator. 3rd International conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, 10–12 December 2003, p. 365–369
13. Tsai C.J., Shiau H.G., Lin K.C., Shih T.S. (1999) Effect of deposited particles and particle charge on the penetration of small sampling cyclones. J. Aerosol Sci. 30: 313–32310.1016/S0021-8502(98)00054-8 ↗
14. Tsai C.J., Lin T.I. (2000) Particle collection efficiency of different impactor designs. Sep. Sci. Technol. 35: 2639–265010.1081/SS-100102360 ↗
15. Tsai C.J., Cheng Y.H. (1995) Solid particle collection characteristics on impaction surfaces of different designs. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 23: 96–10610.1080/02786829508965297 ↗
16. Tsai C.J., Chen D.R., Chein H.M., Chen S.C., Roth J.L., Hsu Y.D., Li W., Biswas P. (2004) Theoretical and experimental study of an axial flow cyclone for fine particle removal in vacuum conditions. J. Aerosol Sci. 35: 1105–111810.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.03.007 ↗
17. Vaughan N.P. (1988) Construction and testing of an axial flow cyclone pre-separator. J. Aerosol Sci. 19: 295–30510.1016/0021-8502(88)90270-4 ↗
18. Weiss Z., Martinec P., Vitek J. (1987) Vlastnosti Dulnibo Prachu A Zaklady Protiprasne Techniky. SNTL, Prague
19. Xiang R.B. & K.W. Lee, 2004. The flow pattern in cyclones with different cone dimensions and its effect on separation efficiency. Abstract, EAC 2004, Budapest, Hungary, Sep. 6–10, p. 289–290
20. Zhu Y., Lee K.W. (1999) Experimental study on small cyclones operating at high flowrates. J. Aerosol Sci. 30: 1303–131510.1016/S0021-8502(99)00024-5 ↗