Outsourced English revision, editing, publication consultation, and integrity services should be acknowledged in an academic paper

1. Abbott A (2019) The science institutions hiring integrity inspectors to vet their papers. Nature 575(7783):430–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03529-w10.1038/d41586-019-03529-w ↗

2. Di Bitetti MS, Ferreras JA (2017) Publish (in English) or perish: the effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications. Ambio 46:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0820-710.1007/s13280-016-0820-7 ↗

3. Ellis C, Zucker IM, Randall D (2018) The infernal business of contract cheating: understanding the business processes and models of academic custom writing sites. Int J Educ Integr 14:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-017-0024-310.1007/s40979-017-0024-3 ↗

4. Flowerdew J (2015) Some thoughts on English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP) and related issues. Lang Teach 48(2):250–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481200052310.1017/S0261444812000523 ↗

5. Fogarty TJ (2009) Show me the money: academic research as currency. Acc Educ 18(1):3–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928080255441810.1080/09639280802554418 ↗

6. Hyland K (2016) Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. J Second Lang Writ 31:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.00510.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005 ↗

7. ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) (n.d.) Defining the role of authors and contributors. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html;http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. Last Updated: December, 2019; Last Accessed: February 10, 2021

8. Ingstrup MB, Aarikka-Stenroos L, Adlin N (2021) When institutional logics meet: alignment and misalignment in collaboration between academia and practitioners. Ind Market Manag 92:267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.01.00410.1016/j.indmarman.2020.01.004 ↗

9. Kendall G, Yee A, McCollum B (2016) Is there a role for publication consultants and how should their contribution be recognized? Sci Eng Ethics 22:1553–1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9710-910.1007/s11948-015-9710-9 ↗

10. Lane T, Tang J (2016) Publishing challenges faced by authors with English as a second language. Eur Sci Editing 42(2):36–38

11. Lozano GA (2014) Ethics of using language editing services in an era of digital communication and heavily multi-authored papers. Sci Eng Ethics 20:363–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9451-610.1007/s11948-013-9451-6 ↗

12. Olafson L, Schraw G, Kehrwald N (2014) Academic dishonesty: behaviors, sanctions, and retention of adjudicated college students. J Coll Stud Dev 55(7):661–674. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.006610.1353/csd.2014.0066 ↗

13. Pinna N, Clavel G, Roco MC (2020) The Journal of Nanoparticle Research victim of an organized rogue editor network! J Nanopart Res 22:376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-05094-010.1007/s11051-020-05094-0 ↗

14. Prager EM, Chambers KE, Plotkin JL, McArthur DL, Bandrowski AE, Bansal N, Martone ME, Bergstrom HC, Bespalov A, Graf C (2019) Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing. J Neurosci Res 97(4):377–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.2434010.1002/jnr.24340 ↗

15. Resnik DB, Shamoo AE (2017) Reproducibility and research integrity. Account Res 24(2):116–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.125738710.1080/08989621.2016.1257387 ↗

16. Rezaeian M (2015) Disadvantages of publishing biomedical research articles in English for non-native speakers of English. Epidemiol Health 37:e2015021. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e201502110.4178/epih/e2015021 ↗

17. Seifert R (2021) How Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology deals with fraudulent papers from paper mills. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 394:431–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-021-02056-810.1007/s00210-021-02056-8 ↗

18. Teixeira da Silva JA (2016) An error is an error… is an erratum. The ethics of not correcting errors in the science literature. Publ Res Q 32(3):220–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9469-010.1007/s12109-016-9469-0 ↗

19. Teixeira da Silva JA (2021) Paper mills and on-demand publishing: risks to the integrity of journal indexing and metrics. Med J Armed Forces India 77(1):119–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.08.00310.1016/j.mjafi.2020.08.003 ↗

20. Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J (2017) Notices and policies for retractions, expressions of concern, errata and corrigenda: their importance, content, and context. Sci Eng Ethics 23(2):521–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9769-y10.1007/s11948-016-9769-y ↗

21. Teixeira da Silva JA, Al-Khatib A, Katavić V, Bornemann-Cimenti H (2018) Establishing sensible and practical guidelines for desk rejections. Sci Eng Ethics 24(4):1347–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9921-310.1007/s11948-017-9921-3 ↗