journal article·2016-06Open access

The melting and solidification of nanowires

B. J. Florio, T. G. Myers

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 18· Issue 6

Abstract

A mathematical model is developed to describe the melting of nanowires. The first section of the paper deals with a standard theoretical situation, where the wire melts due to a fixed boundary temperature. This analysis allows us to compare with existing results for the phase change of nanospheres. The equivalent solidification problem is also examined. This shows that solidification is a faster process than melting; this is because the energy transfer occurs primarily through the solid rather than the liquid which is a poorer conductor of heat. This effect competes with the energy required to create new solid surface which acts to slow down the process, but overall conduction dominates. In the second section, we consider a more physically realistic boundary condition, where the phase change occurs due to a heat flux from surrounding material. This removes the singularity in initial melt velocity predicted in previous models of nanoparticle melting. It is shown that even with the highest possible flux the melting time is significantly slower than with a fixed boundary temperature condition.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Thermal properties of materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Buffat P, Borel JP (1976) Size effect on the melting temperature of gold particles. Phys Rev A 13:2287–229710.1103/PhysRevA.13.2287 ↗
2. Chinen AB, Guan CM, Ferrer JR, Barnaby SN, Merkel TJ, Mirkin CA (2015) Nanoparticle probes for the detection of cancer biomarkers, cells, and tissues by fluorescence. Chem Rev 115:10530–1057410.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00321 ↗
3. Davis SH (2001) Theory of solidification. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511546747 ↗
4. Font F, Myers TG (2013) Spherically symmetric nanoparticle melting with a variable phase change temperature. J Nanopart Res 15:208610.1007/s11051-013-2086-3 ↗
5. Font F, Myers TG, Mitchell SL (2014) A mathematical model for nanoparticle melting with density change. Microfluid Nanofluid 18:233–24310.1007/s10404-014-1423-x ↗
6. Garnett EC, Brongersma ML, Cui Y, McGehee MD (2011) Nanowire solar cells. Ann Rev Mater Res 41(1):269–29510.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100434 ↗
7. Ge M, Rong J, Fang X, Zhou C (2012) Porous doped silicon nanowires for lithium ion battery anode with long cycle life. Nano Lett 12:2318–232310.1021/nl300206e ↗
8. Goswami GK, Nanda KK (2010) Size-dependent melting of finite-length nanowires. J Phys Chem 114:14327–1433110.1021/jp105943d ↗
9. Hennessy MG (2010) Liquid snowflake formation in superheated ice. Master’s Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford
10. Jou D, Casas-Vázquez J, Lebon G (2010) Extended irreversible thermodynamics, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-90-481-3074-0 ↗
11. Kofman R, Cheyssac P, Lereah Y, Stella A (1999) Melting of clusters approaching 0D. Eur Phys J D 9:441–44410.1007/s100530050475 ↗
12. Liu M, Wang RY (2013) Phase change nanocomposites with tunable melting temperature and thermal energy storage density. Nanoscale 5:7234–723710.1039/c3nr02842a ↗
13. Liu Z, Xu J, Chen D, Shen G (2015) Flexible electronics based on inorganic nanowires. Chem Soc Rev 44:161–19210.1039/C4CS00116H ↗
14. McCue SW, Wu B, Hill JM (2009) Micro/nanoparticle melting with spherical symmetry and surface tension. IMA J Appl Math 74:439–45710.1093/imamat/hxn038 ↗
15. Myers TG (2016) Mathematical modelling of phase change at the nanoscale. Int Commun Heat Mass Trans 76:59–6210.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.05.005 ↗
16. Wu B, McCue SW, Tillman P, Hill JM (2009a) Single phase limit for melting nanoparticles. Appl Math Model 33:2349–236710.1016/j.apm.2008.07.009 ↗
17. Wu B, Tillman P, Hill JM (2009b) Nanoparticle melting as a Stefan moving boundary problem. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 9:885–88810.1166/jnn.2009.C046 ↗
18. Xiong S, Qi W, Cheng Y, Huang B, Wang M, Li Y (2011) Universal relation for size dependent thermodynamic properties of metallic nanoparticles. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:10652–1066010.1039/c0cp90161j ↗
19. Zhang Y, Zhang HL, Wu JH, Wang XT (2011) Enhanced thermal conductivity in copper matrix composites reinforced with titanium-coated diamond particles. Scr Mater 65:1097–110010.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.09.028 ↗