journal article·2024-01

Magnesium dendrite growth during electrodeposition in conditioned Mg(TFSI)2/AlCl3/MgCl2/DME electrolyte

Lin Wang, Peter Chun Pang Li, Roxana Family, Eric Detsi

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 26· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Mg-ion batteries (MIBs) have emerged as a promising alternative to Li-ion batteries (LIBs) since Mg metal is more abundant, cheaper, and safer than Li metal. However, the growth of Mg dendrites on metal Mg anodes is still very controversial, while several studies claim that Mg dendrites do not form on Mg metal anodes; other studies claim the opposite. Recently, a new class of MIB electrolytes which we refer to here as MACT has received extensive attention due to its higher ionic conductivity and wider potential window. MACT is made of magnesium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (Mg(TFSI)2), aluminum chloride (AlCl3), and magnesium chloride (MgCl2) in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME). Previous studies have claimed that Mg dendrites do not grow in conditioned MACT electrolytes. This article explores the formation of magnesium (Mg) dendrites in a conditioned MACT electrolyte during electrodeposition. A symmetric cell configuration, Mg|MACT|Mg, was utilized to investigate the dendrite formation at different current densities. The morphology, chemical composition, and crystal structure of the deposition products were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Our findings demonstrate the growth of Mg dendrites within the MACT electrolyte. We observed that the morphology of these dendrites undergoes evolution with varying the electrodeposition current density, transitioning between mossy clusters, granular structures, and porous mesh formations in a size range from approximately 10 to 125 μm. These results significantly enhance our understanding of Mg dendrite formation in MIBs.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Yoo HD, Shterenberg I, Gofer Y et al (2013) Mg rechargeable batteries: an on-going challenge. Energy Environ Sci 6:2265–2279. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee40871j10.1039/c3ee40871j ↗
2. Singh N, Arthur TS, Tutusaus O et al (2018) Achieving high cycling rates via in situ generation of active nanocomposite metal anodes. ACS Appl Energy Mater 1:4651–4661. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b0079410.1021/acsaem.8b00794 ↗
3. Crowther O, West AC (2008) Effect of electrolyte composition on lithium dendrite growth. J Electrochem Soc 155:806–811. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.296942410.1149/1.2969424 ↗
4. Muldoon J, Bucur CB, Gregory T (2014) Quest for nonaqueous multivalent secondary batteries: magnesium and beyond. Chem Rev 114:11683–11720. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500049y10.1021/cr500049y ↗
5. Wang L, Welborn SS, Kumar H et al (2019) High-Rate and long cycle-life alloy-type magnesium-ion battery anode enabled through (de)magnesiation-induced near-room-temperature solid–liquid phase transformation. Adv Energy Mater 9:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20190208610.1002/aenm.201902086 ↗
6. Niu J, Gao H, Ma W et al (2018) Dual phase enhanced superior electrochemical performance of nanoporous bismuth-tin alloy anodes for magnesium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater 14:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.05.02310.1016/j.ensm.2018.05.023 ↗
7. Wang L, Weker JN, Family R et al (2023) Morphology evolution in self-healing liquid-gallium-based Mg-ion battery anode. ACS Energy Lett:4932–4940. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSENERGYLETT.3C0176110.1021/ACSENERGYLETT.3C01761 ↗
8. Ding MS, Diemant T, Behm RJ et al (2018) Dendrite growth in Mg metal cells containing Mg(TFSI) 2/glyme electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 165:A1983–A1990. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1471809jes10.1149/2.1471809jes ↗
9. Niu J, Song M, Zhang Y, Zhang Z (2021) Dealloying induced nanoporosity evolution of less noble metals in Mg ion batteries. J Magnes Alloy 9:2122–2132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2021.04.00310.1016/j.jma.2021.04.003 ↗
10. Niu J, Zhang Z, Aurbach D (2020) Alloy anode materials for rechargeable Mg ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 10:2000697. https://doi.org/10.1002/AENM.20200069710.1002/AENM.202000697 ↗
11. Aurbach D, Cohen Y, Moshkovich M (2001) The study of reversible magnesium deposition by in situ scanning tunneling microscopy. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 4:A113. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1379828/XML10.1149/1.1379828/XML ↗
12. Hu XC, Shi Y, Lang SY et al (2018) Direct insights into the electrochemical processes at anode/electrolyte interfaces in magnesium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 49:453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NANOEN.2018.04.06610.1016/J.NANOEN.2018.04.066 ↗
13. Hagopian A, Kopač D, Filhol JS, Kopač Lautar A (2020) Morphology evolution and dendrite growth in Li- and Mg-metal batteries: a potential dependent thermodynamic and kinetic multiscale ab initio study. Electrochim Acta 353:136493. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELECTACTA.2020.13649310.1016/J.ELECTACTA.2020.136493 ↗
14. Jäckle M, Groß A (2014) Microscopic properties of lithium, sodium, and magnesium battery anode materials related to possible dendrite growth. J Chem Phys 141:174710. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.490105510.1063/1.4901055 ↗
15. Davidson R, Verma A, Santos D et al (2019) Formation of magnesium dendrites during electrodeposition. ACS Energy Lett 4:375–376. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0247010.1021/acsenergylett.8b02470 ↗
16. Davidson R, Verma A, Santos D et al (2020) Mapping mechanisms and growth regimes of magnesium electrodeposition at high current densities. Mater Horizons 7:843–854. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9mh01367a10.1039/c9mh01367a ↗
17. Zhao Y, Zhang X, Xiao J et al (2022) Effect of Mg cation diffusion coefficient on Mg dendrite formation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14:6499–6506. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c1854310.1021/acsami.1c18543 ↗
18. Kwak JH, Jeoun Y, Oh SH et al (2022) Operando visualization of morphological evolution in Mg metal anode: insight into dendrite suppression for stable Mg metal batteries. ACS Energy Lett 7:162–170. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0248610.1021/acsenergylett.1c02486 ↗
19. Ha SY, Lee YW, Woo SW et al (2014) Magnesium(II) bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl) imide-based electrolytes with wide electrochemical windows for rechargeable magnesium batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:4063–4073. https://doi.org/10.1021/am405619v10.1021/am405619v ↗
20. Eaves-Rathert J, Moyer K, Zohair M, Pint CL (2020) Kinetic- versus diffusion-driven three-dimensional growth in magnesium metal battery anodes. Joule 4:1324–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.00710.1016/j.joule.2020.05.007 ↗
21. Shterenberg I, Salama M, Yoo HD et al (2015) Evaluation of (CF 3 SO 2 ) 2 N − (TFSI) based electrolyte solutions for Mg batteries. J Electrochem Soc 162:A7118–A7128. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0161513jes10.1149/2.0161513jes ↗
22. Yang L, Yang C, Chen Y et al (2021) Hybrid MgCl2/AlCl3/Mg(TFSI)2 electrolytes in DME enabling high-rate rechargeable Mg batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13:30712–30721. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c0756710.1021/acsami.1c07567 ↗
23. He Y, Li Q, Yang L et al (2019) Electrochemical-conditioning-free and water-resistant hybrid AlCl 3 /MgCl 2 /Mg(TFSI) 2 electrolytes for rechargeable magnesium batteries. Angew Chem 131:7697–7701. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.20181282410.1002/ange.201812824 ↗
24. Gao T, Hou S, Wang F et al (2017) Reversible S0/MgSx redox chemistry in a MgTFSI2/MgCl2/DME electrolyte for rechargeable Mg/S batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 56:13526–1353010.1002/anie.201708241 ↗