Effects of weathering and rainfall conditions on the release of SiO2, Ag, and TiO2 engineered nanoparticles from paints
Source abstract
Abstract
Previous studies on the fate of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) incorporated in paints mainly focused on the release of the particles as affected by a limited number of factors or monitoring their release from natural sources. In this study, the effects of four factors (i.e., weathering duration, water pH, rainfall duration and intensity) were investigated on the release of SiO2-ENPs, Ag-ENPs, and TiO2-ENPs from paints applied on panels. The static water immersion test showed that the concentrations of studied particles all increased with weathering duration. At low and high pH, SiO2-ENPs and Ag-ENPs showed a higher release, while the release of TiO2-ENPs was relatively high at low pH. With increased simulated rainfall duration, the concentration released decreased for Si, and the opposite was observed for Ag, while no obvious correlation was noted for Ti. With greater rainfall intensity, there was increasing release of all particles. In total, the releases of Ag-ENPs and TiO2-ENPs were extremely low and within the level of 21.32–42.16 μg L−1and 0.6–2.3 μg L−1, respectively, while the values for SiO2-ENPs were in the range of 7.5–12 mg L−1. Additionally, microscopic results highlighted that SiO2-ENPs were mainly released in the form of agglomerates, and only a small fraction was below 0.1 μm. Considering these influence factors together, conclusions may be made that weathering time and rainfall duration are more important in controlling release than water pH.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Urban Stormwater Management Solutions · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Adeleye AS, Oranu EA, Tao M, Keller AA (2016) Release and detection of nanosized copper from a commercial antifouling paint. Water Res 102:374–38210.1016/j.watres.2016.06.056 ↗
2. Al-Kattan A, Wichser A, Vonbank R, Brunner S, Ulrich A, Zuin S, Nowack B (2013) Release of TiO2 from paints containing pigment-TiO2 or nano-TiO2 by weathering. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15(12):2186–219310.1039/c3em00331k ↗
3. Al-Kattan A, Wichser A, Vonbank R, Brunner S, Ulrich A, Zuin S, Arroyo Y, Golanski L, Nowack B (2014a) Characterization of materials released into water from paint containing nano-SiO2. Chemosphere 119:1314–132110.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.005 ↗
4. Al-Kattan A, Wichser A, Zuin S, Arroyo Y, Golanski L, Ulrich A, Nowack B (2014b) Behavior of TiO2 released from nano-TiO2-containing paint and comparison to pristine nano-TiO2. Environ Sci Technol 48(12):6710–671810.1021/es5006219 ↗
5. Alvarez PJ, Colvin V, Lead J, Stone V (2009) Research priorities to advance eco-responsible nanotechnology. ACS Nano 3(7):1616–161910.1021/nn9006835 ↗
6. Amy L, Linsebigler GL, John T, Yates J (1995) Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results. Chem Rev 95:735–75810.1021/cr00035a013 ↗
7. Beijing Municipal Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. (2009) DB11/T 685-2009 technical code on rainwater harvesting engineering in urban area
8. Bian X, Shi L, Yang X, Lu X (2011) Effect of nano-TiO2 particles on the performance of PVDF, PVDF-g-(maleic anhydride), and PVDF-g-poly(acryl amide) membranes. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(21):12113–1212310.1021/ie200232u ↗
9. Blaustein RA, Pachepsky YA, Hill RL, Shelton DR (2015) Solid manure as a source of fecal indicator microorganisms: release under simulated rainfall. Environ Sci Technol 49(13):7860–786910.1021/acs.est.5b01095 ↗
10. Chen G, Zhou S, Gu G, Yang H, Wu L (2005) Effects of surface properties of colloidal silica particles on redispersibility and properties of acrylic-based polyurethane/silica composites. J Colloid Interface Sci 281(2):339–35010.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.100 ↗
11. Choi S, Johnston MV, Wang GS et al (2017) Looking for engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in wastewater treatment systems: qualification and quantification aspects [J]. Sci Total Environ 590-591:809–81710.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.061 ↗
12. Chowdhury I, Hong Y, Honda RJ, Walker SL (2011) Mechanisms of TiO2 nanoparticle transport in porous media: role of solution chemistry, nanoparticle concentration, and flowrate. J Colloid Interface Sci 360(2):548–55510.1016/j.jcis.2011.04.111 ↗
13. European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (2002) EN 1062-11:2002 paint and varnish: coating materials and coating systems for exterior masonry and concrete. Part 11: methods of conditioning before testing. CEN, San Diego
14. Gondikas AP, von der Kammer F, Reed RB, Wagner S, Ranville JF, Hofmann T (2014) Release of TiO2 nanoparticles from sunscreens into surface waters: a one-year survey at the old Danube recreational Lake. Environ Sci Technol 48(10):5415–542210.1021/es405596y ↗
15. Hagendorfer H, Lorenz C, Kaegi R, Sinnet B, Gehrig R, Goetz NV, Scheringer M, Ludwig C, Ulrich A (2009) Size-fractionated characterization and quantification of nanoparticle release rates from a consumer spray product containing engineered nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 12(7):2481–249410.1007/s11051-009-9816-6 ↗
16. Hincapié I, Caballero-Guzman A, Hiltbrunner D, Nowack B (2015) Use of engineered nanomaterials in the construction industry with specific emphasis on paints and their flows in construction and demolition waste in Switzerland. Waste Manag 43(3):451–455
17. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2007a) ISO 11507:2007 paints and varnishes: exposure of coatings to artificial weathering: exposure to fluorescent UV lamps and water. ISO, Geneva
18. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2007b) ISO 2812-2:2007 Paints and varnishes: determination of resistance to liquids. Part 2: water immersion test. ISO, Geneva
19. Kaegi R, Ulrich A, Sinnet B, Vonbank R, Wichser A, Zuleeg S, Simmler H, Brunner S, Vonmont H, Burkhardt M, Boller M (2008) Synthetic TiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 156(2):233–23910.1016/j.envpol.2008.08.004 ↗
20. Kaegi R, Sinnet B, Zuleeg S, Hagendorfer H, Mueller E, Vonbank R, Boller M, Burkhardt M (2010) Release of silver nanoparticles from outdoor facades. Environ Pollut 158(9):2900–290510.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.009 ↗
21. Kai S, Alenius H, Norppa H, Pylkkänen L, Tuomi T, Kasper G (2010) Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials and nanotechnologies—a review. Toxicology 269(2–3):92–104
22. Keller AA, Lazareva A (2013) Predicted releases of engineered nanomaterials: from global to regional to local. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1:65–7010.1021/ez400106t ↗
23. Keller AA, McFerran S, Lazareva A, Suh S (2013) Global life-cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 15:169210.1007/s11051-013-1692-4 ↗
24. Khanna AS (2008) Nanotechnology in high performance paint coatings. Asian J Exp Sci 21:25–32
25. Koponen IK, Jensen KA, Schneider T (2009) Sanding dust from nanoparticle-containing paints: physical characterisation. J Phys Conf Ser 151:374–38010.1088/1742-6596/151/1/012048 ↗
26. Kulthong K, Srisung S, Boonpavanitchakul K, Kangwansupamonkon W, Maniratanachote R (2010) Determination of silver nanoparticle release from antibacterial fabrics into artificial sweat. Part Fibre Toxicol 7(7):206–212
27. Lebow S, Williams RS, Lebow P (2003) Effect of simulated rainfall and weathering on release of preservative elements from CCA treated wood. Environ Sci Technol 37(18):4077–408210.1021/es0343048 ↗
28. Li JF, Huang YF, Duan S, Pang R, Wu DY, Ren B, Xu X, Tian ZQ (2010) SERS and DFT study of water on metal cathodes of silver, gold and platinum nanoparticles. PCCP 12(10):249310.1039/b919266b ↗
29. Lorenz C, Windler L, von Goetz N, Lehmann RP, Schuppler M, Hungerbuhler K, Heuberger M, Nowack B (2012) Characterization of silver release from commercially available functional (nano) textiles. Chemosphere 89(7):817–82410.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.063 ↗
30. Majestic BJ, Erdakos GB, Lewandowski M, Oliver KD, Willis RD, Kleindienst TE, Bhave PV (2010) A review of selected engineered nanoparticles in the atmosphere: sources, transformations, and techniques for sampling and analysis. Int J Occup Environ Health 16(4):488–50710.1179/oeh.2010.16.4.488 ↗
31. Mitrano DM, Motellier S, Clavaguera S, Nowack B (2015) Review of nanomaterial aging and transformations through the life cycle of nano-enhanced products. Environ Int 77:132–14710.1016/j.envint.2015.01.013 ↗
32. Nowack B, Ranville JF, Diamond S, Gallego-Urrea JA, Metcalfe C, Rose J, Horne N, Koelmans AA, Klaine SJ (2011) Potential scenarios for nanomaterial release and subsequent alteration in the environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 31(1):50–5910.1002/etc.726 ↗
33. Olabarrieta J, Zorita S, Peña I, Rioja N, Monzón O, Benguria P, Scifo L (2012) Aging of photocatalytic coatings under a water flow: long run performance and TiO2 nanoparticles release. Appl Catal B Environ 123–124(4):182–19210.1016/j.apcatb.2012.04.027 ↗
34. Peretyazhko TS, Zhang QB, Colvin VL (2014) Size-controlled dissolution of silver nanoparticles at neutral and acidic pH conditions: kinetics and size changes. Environ Sci Technol 48:11954–1196110.1021/es5023202 ↗
35. Pham KN, Fullston D, Sagoe-Crentsil K (2007) Surface charge modification of nano-sized silica colloid. Aust J Chem 60:662–66610.1071/CH07138 ↗
36. Piccinno F, Gottschalk F, Seeger S, Nowack B (2011) Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. J Nanopart Res 14(9):1–11
37. Ranjbar Z, Rastegar S (2009) The influence of surface chemistry of nano-silica on microstructure, optical and mechanical properties of the nano-silica containing clear-coats. Prog Org Coat 65(1):125–13010.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.10.006 ↗
38. Saber AT, Koponen IK, Jensen KA, Jacobsen NR, Mikkelsen L, Møller P, Loft S, Vogel U, Wallin H (2012) Inflammatory and genotoxic effects of sanding dust generated from nanoparticle-containing paints and lacquers. Nanotoxicology 6(7):776–78810.3109/17435390.2011.620745 ↗
39. Schnippering M, Carrara M, Foelske A, Kötz R, Fermín DJ (2007) Electronic properties of Ag nanoparticle arrays. A Kelvin probe and high resolution XPS study. PCCP 9(6):725–73010.1039/B611496B ↗
40. Scrinzi E, Rossi S, Kamarchik P, Deflorian F (2011) Evaluation of durability of nano-silica containing clear coats for automotive applications. Prog Org Coat 71:384–39010.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.04.009 ↗
41. Sun TY, Bornhoft NA, Hungerbuhler K, Nowack B (2016) Dynamic probabilistic modeling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 50(9):4701–471110.1021/acs.est.5b05828 ↗
42. Sundaram N, Chandrasekar S (2011) Shape and eccentricity effects in adhesive contacts of rodlike particles. Langmuir 27(20):12405–1241010.1021/la202740b ↗
43. Tang A, Zhuang G, Wang Y, Yuan H, Sun Y (2005) The chemistry of precipitation and its relation to aerosol in Beijing. Atmos Environ 39(19):3397–340610.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.02.001 ↗
44. Troester M, Brauch HJ, Hofmann T (2016) Vulnerability of drinking water supplies to engineered nanoparticles [J]. Water Res 96:25510.1016/j.watres.2016.03.038 ↗
45. Wiesner MR, Lowry GV, Jones KL, Jr HM, Di GR, Casman E, Bernhardt ES (2009) Decreasing uncertainties in assessing environmental exposure, risk, and ecological implications of nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 43(17):6458–646210.1021/es803621k ↗
46. Windler L, Lorenz C, von Goetz N, Hungerbuhler K, Amberg M, Heuberger M, Nowack B (2012) Release of titanium dioxide from textiles during washing. Environ Sci Technol 46(15):8181–818810.1021/es301633b ↗
47. Yang H, Wang L, Yuan B, Yang K, Ma Y (2015) Adhesion of an ultrasmall nanoparticle on a bilayer membrane is still size and shape dependent. J Mater Sci Technol 31(6):660–66310.1016/j.jmst.2014.09.012 ↗
48. Zhang GS, Zhang J, Liu SM (2007) Chemical composition of atmospheric wet depositions from the Yellow Sea and East China Sea. Atmos Res 85(1):84–9710.1016/j.atmosres.2006.11.005 ↗
49. Zuin S, Gaiani M, Ferrari A, Golanski L (2014) Leaching of nanoparticles from experimental water-borne paints under laboratory test conditions. J Nanopart Res 16(16):1–17