Enhanced photocatalytic activities of low-bandgap TiO2-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, a hydrothermal method was successfully used to prepare a reduced graphene oxide (RG)–titanium dioxide (TiO2) hybrid in 10–20 nm, starting from commercial TiO2 P25 nanoparticles and liquid-exfoliated graphene oxide (GO). Compared to TiO2, an obvious red shift of light absorption (from 3.1 to 2.6 eV) of the as-prepared RG–TiO2 was observed by UV–Vis analysis, and an enhanced photocatalytic degradation of the Rhodamine B (Rh. B) was also observed under Xe lamp exposure test by using the as-prepared RG–TiO2. Multiple characterizations of this RG–TiO2 nanocomposite confirmed that its photocatalytic enhancement could be ascribed to two approaches. Firstly, RG extended the mean free path and photogenerated electrons’ lifetime of TiO2, which minimized electron–hole pairs’ recombination. Secondly, RG expanded the light absorption spectrum of TiO2 from UV range to UV and visible light range. The explication of these improvements was concluded as the energy gap changing and a likelihood of up-conversion photoluminescence mechanism (UCPL). Due to the low-cost, nonpoisonous and excellent photocatalytic properties of RG–TiO2, this material can be applied well in sewage treatment and other related fields.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Anandan S, Narasinga Rao T, Sathish M, Rangappa D, Honma I, Miyauchi M (2012) Superhydrophilic graphene-loaded TiO2 thin film for self-cleaning applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:207–21210.1021/am302557z ↗
2. Anderson C, Bard AJ (1997) Improved photocatalytic activity and characterization of mixed TiO2/SiO2 and TiO2/Al2O3 materials. J Phys Chem B 101:2611–261610.1021/jp9626982 ↗
3. Chen H, Wang L (2014) Nanostructure sensitization of transition metal oxides for visible-light photocatalysis. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 5:696–71010.3762/bjnano.5.82 ↗
4. Chien SC, Chang C, Chen S, Wang M, Rao MM, Veni SS (2011) Effect of sunlight irradiation on photocatalytic pyrene degradation in contaminated soils by micro-nano size TiO 2. Sci Total Environ 409:4101–410810.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.050 ↗
5. Cotto-Maldonado MDC, Campo T, Elizalde E, Gómez-Martínez A, Morant C, Márquez F (2013) Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine-B under UV-visible light irradiation using different nanostructured catalysts. Am Chem Sci J 3:178–20210.9734/ACSJ/2013/2712 ↗
6. Cozzoli PD, Fanizza E, Comparelli R, Curri ML, Agostiano A, Laub D (2004) Role of metal nanoparticles in TiO2/Ag nanocomposite-based microheterogeneous photocatalysis. J Phys Chem B 108:9623–963010.1021/jp0379751 ↗
7. Fan W, Lai Q, Zhang Q, Wang Y (2011) Nanocomposites of TiO2 and reduced graphene oxide as efficient photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. J Phys Chem C 115:10694–1070110.1021/jp2008804 ↗
8. Freitag M (2008) Graphene: nanoelectronics goes flat out. Nat Nanotechnol 3:455–45710.1038/nnano.2008.219 ↗
9. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) TiO2 photoelectrochemistry and photocatalysis. Nature 238:37–3810.1038/238037a0 ↗
10. Gan Z, Wu X, Zhou G, Shen J, Chu PK (2013) Is there real upconversion photoluminescence from graphene quantum dots? Advanced Opt Mater 1:554–55810.1002/adom.201300152 ↗
11. Gómez-Navarro C, Weitz RT, Bittner AM, Scolari M, Mews A, Burghard M, Kern K (2007) Electronic transport properties of individual chemically reduced graphene oxide sheets. Nano Lett 7:3499–350310.1021/nl072090c ↗
12. Zhu HY, Lan Y, Gao XP, Ringer SP, Zheng ZF, Song a DY, Zhao JC (2005) Phase transition between nanostructures of titanate and titanium dioxides via simple wet-chemical reactions. J Am Chem Soc 127:6730–673610.1021/ja044689+ ↗
13. Ha HD, Jang M-H, Liu F, Cho Y-H, Seo TS (2015) Upconversion photoluminescent metal ion sensors via two photon absorption in graphene oxide quantum dots. Carbon 81:367–37510.1016/j.carbon.2014.09.069 ↗
14. Hu Y, Yang J, Tian J, Jia L, Yu J-S (2015) Oxygen-driven, high-efficiency production of nitrogen-doped carbon dots from alkanolamines and their application for two-photon cellular imaging. RSC Adv 5:15366–1537310.1039/C4RA16989A ↗
15. Huang Q et al (2013) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of chemically bonded TiO2/graphene composites based on the effective interfacial charge transfer through the C–Ti bond. ACS Catal 3:1477–148510.1021/cs400080w ↗
16. Ide Y, Inami N, Hattori H, Saito K, Sohmiya M, Tsunoji N, Komaguchi K, Sano T, Bando Y, Golberg D, Sugahara Y (2016) Remarkable charge separation and photocatalytic efficiency enhancement through interconnection of TiO2 nanoparticles by hydrothermal treatment. Angew Chem Int Ed 55(11):3600–360510.1002/anie.201510000 ↗
17. Jiang G et al (2011) TiO 2 nanoparticles assembled on graphene oxide nanosheets with high photocatalytic activity for removal of pollutants. Carbon 49:2693–270110.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.059 ↗
18. Jiang Y, Wang W-N, Biswas P, Fortner JD (2014) Facile aerosol synthesis and characterization of ternary crumpled graphene–TiO2–magnetite nanocomposites for advanced water treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:11766–1177410.1021/am5025275 ↗
19. Kaiser AB, Gómez-Navarro C, Sundaram RS, Burghard M, Kern K (2009) Electrical conduction mechanism in chemically derived graphene monolayers. Nano Lett 9:1787–179210.1021/nl803698b ↗
20. Kapilashrami M, Zhang Y, Liu Y-S, Hagfeldt A, Guo J (2014) Probing the optical property and electronic structure of TiO2 nanomaterials for renewable energy applications. Chem Rev 114:9662–970710.1021/cr5000893 ↗
21. Kim Y-G, Walker J, Samuelson LA, Kumar J (2003) Efficient light harvesting polymers for nanocrystalline TiO2 photovoltaic cells. Nano Lett 3:523–52510.1021/nl0259535 ↗
22. Liao D, Badour C, Liao B (2008) Preparation of nanosized TiO2/ZnO composite catalyst and its photocatalytic activity for degradation of methyl orange. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 194:11–1910.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.07.008 ↗
23. Liu F, Jang MH, Ha HD, Kim JH, Cho YH, Seo TS (2013) Facile synthetic method for pristine graphene quantum dots and graphene oxide quantum dots: origin of blue and green luminescence. Adv Mater 25:3657–366210.1002/adma.201300233 ↗
24. Loh KP, Bao Q, Eda G, Chhowalla M (2010) Graphene oxide as a chemically tunable platform for optical applications. Nat Chem 2:1015–102410.1038/nchem.907 ↗
25. Long M, Qin Y, Chen C, Guo X, Tan B, Cai W (2013) Origin of visible light photoactivity of reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 by in situ hydrothermal growth of undergrown TiO2 with graphene oxide. J Phys Chem C 117:16734–1674110.1021/jp4058109 ↗
26. Ma Y, Wang X, Jia Y, Chen X, Han H, Li C (2014) Titanium dioxide-based nanomaterials for photocatalytic fuel generations. Chem Rev 114:9987–1004310.1021/cr500008u ↗
27. Marcano DC et al (2010) Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4:4806–481410.1021/nn1006368 ↗
28. Mir NA, Khan A, Muneer M, Vijayalakhsmi S (2013) Photocatalytic degradation of a widely used insecticide Thiamethoxam in aqueous suspension of TiO2: adsorption, kinetics, product analysis and toxicity assessment. Sci Total Environ 458:388–39810.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.041 ↗
29. Ong W-J, Tan L-L, Chai S-P, Yong S-T, Mohamed AR (2014) Self-assembly of nitrogen-doped TiO2 with exposed {001} facets on a graphene scaffold as photo-active hybrid nanostructures for reduction of carbon dioxide to methane. Nano Res 7:1528–154710.1007/s12274-014-0514-z ↗
30. Pan D et al (2015) Efficient separation of electron-hole pairs in graphene quantum dots by TiO2 heterojunctions for dye degradation. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00771 ↗
31. Pan X, Zhao Y, Liu S, Korzeniewski CL, Wang S, Fan Z (2012) Comparing graphene-TiO2 nanowire and graphene-TiO2 nanoparticle composite photocatalysts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:3944–395010.1021/am300772t ↗
32. Pelizzetti E, Carlin V, Minero C, Pramauro E, Vincenti M (1992) Degradation pathways of atrazine under solar light and in the presence of TiO2 colloidal particles. Sci Total Environ 123:161–16910.1016/0048-9697(92)90142-F ↗
33. Perera SD, Mariano RG, Vu K, Nour N, Seitz O, Chabal Y, Balkus KJ Jr (2012) Hydrothermal synthesis of graphene-TiO2 nanotube composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. ACS Catal 2:949–95610.1021/cs200621c ↗
34. Qian W, Greaney PA, Fowler S, Chiu S-K, Goforth AM, Jiao J (2014) Low-temperature nitrogen doping in ammonia solution for production of N-doped TiO2-hybridized graphene as a highly efficient photocatalyst for water treatment. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:1802–181010.1021/sc5001176 ↗
35. Ramadoss A, Kim SJ (2013) Improved activity of a graphene–TiO 2 hybrid electrode in an electrochemical supercapacitor. Carbon 63:434–44510.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.006 ↗
36. Sher Shah MSA, Park AR, Zhang K, Park JH, Yoo PJ (2012) Green synthesis of biphasic TiO2–reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites with highly enhanced photocatalytic activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:3893–390110.1021/am301287m ↗
37. Strickler S, Berg RA (1962) Relationship between absorption intensity and fluorescence lifetime of molecules. J Chem Phys 37:814–82210.1063/1.1733166 ↗
38. Subramanian V, Wolf EE, Kamat PV (2003) Influence of metal/metal ion concentration on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2-Au composite nanoparticles. Langmuir 19:469–47410.1021/la026478t ↗
39. Sun Z, Chang H (2014) Graphene and graphene-like two-dimensional materials in photodetection: mechanisms and methodology. ACS Nano 8:4133–415610.1021/nn500508c ↗
40. Tributsch H (1972) Reaction of excited chlorophyll molecules at electrodes and in photosynthesis. Photochem Photobiol 16:261–26910.1111/j.1751-1097.1972.tb06297.x ↗
41. Wang P et al (2013) Dye-sensitization-induced visible-light reduction of graphene oxide for the enhanced TiO2 photocatalytic performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:2924–292910.1021/am4008566 ↗
42. Wang SC, Yun JH, Luo B, Butburee T, Peerakiatkhajohn P, Thaweesak S, Xiao M, Wang LZ (2017) Recent progress on visible light responsive heterojunctions for photocatalytic applications. J Mater Sci Technol 33(1):1–2210.1016/j.jmst.2016.11.017 ↗
43. Wu T, Liu G, Zhao J, Hidaka H, Serpone N (1998) Photoassisted degradation of dye pollutants. V. Self-photosensitized oxidative transformation of rhodamine B under visible light irradiation in aqueous TiO2 dispersions. J Phys Chem B 102:5845–585110.1021/jp980922c ↗
44. Wu Y, Zhu W (2013) Organic sensitizers from D–π–A to D–A–π–A: effect of the internal electron-withdrawing units on molecular absorption, energy levels and photovoltaic performances. Chem Soc Rev 42:2039–205810.1039/C2CS35346F ↗
45. Xiang Q, Yu J, Jaroniec M (2012) Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts. Chem Soc Rev 41:782–79610.1039/C1CS15172J ↗
46. Yamashita H et al (1994) Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 with H2O on TiO2 and Cu/TiO2 catalysts. Res Chem Intermed 20:815–82310.1163/156856794X00568 ↗
47. Yang S, Lin Y, Song X, Zhang P, Gao L (2015) Covalently coupled ultrafine H-TiO2 nanocrystals/nitrogen-doped graphene hybrid materials for high-performance supercapacitor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:17884–1789210.1021/acsami.5b04368 ↗
48. Yu Y-J, Zhao Y, Ryu S, Brus LE, Kim KS, Kim P (2009) Tuning the graphene work function by electric field effect. Nano Lett 9:3430–343410.1021/nl901572a ↗
49. Zhang H, Lv X, Li Y, Wang Y, Li J (2009) P 25-graphene composite as a high performance photocatalyst. ACS Nano 4:380–38610.1021/nn901221k ↗
50. Zhang H, Xu P, Du G, Chen Z, Oh K, Pan D, Jiao Z (2011a) A facile one-step synthesis of TiO2/graphene composites for photodegradation of methyl orange. Nano Res 4:274–28310.1007/s12274-010-0079-4 ↗
51. Zhang Y, Tang Z-R, Fu X, Xu Y-J (2010) TiO2–graphene nanocomposites for gas-phase photocatalytic degradation of volatile aromatic pollutant: is TiO2–graphene truly different from other TiO2–carbon composite materials? ACS Nano 4:7303–731410.1021/nn1024219 ↗
52. Zhang Y, Tang Z-R, Fu X, Xu Y-J (2011b) Engineering the unique 2D mat of graphene to achieve graphene-TiO2 nanocomposite for photocatalytic selective transformation: what advantage does graphene have over its forebear carbon nanotube? ACS Nano 5:7426–743510.1021/nn202519j ↗
53. Zheng XT, Ananthanarayanan A, Luo KQ, Chen P (2015) Glowing graphene quantum dots and carbon dots: properties, syntheses, and biological applications. Small 11:1620–163610.1002/smll.201402648 ↗
54. Zhu S, Song Y, Zhao X, Shao J, Zhang J, Yang B (2015) The photoluminescence mechanism in carbon dots (graphene quantum dots, carbon nanodots, and polymer dots): current state and future perspective. Nano Res 8:355–38110.1007/s12274-014-0644-3 ↗
55. Zhu S et al (2012) Graphene quantum dots with controllable surface oxidation, tunable fluorescence and up-conversion emission. RSC Adv 2:2717–272010.1039/c2ra20182h ↗
56. Zhuo S, Shao M, Lee S-T (2012) Upconversion and downconversion fluorescent graphene quantum dots: ultrasonic preparation and photocatalysis. ACS Nano 6:1059–106410.1021/nn2040395 ↗