journal article·2021-07Open access

Contribution in PCE enhancement: numerical designing and optimization of SnS thin film solar cell

Vishnu V. Kutwade, Ketan P. Gattu, Makrand E. Sonawane, Dipak A. Tonpe, Manoj K. Mishra, Ramphal Sharma

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 23· Issue 7

Abstract

This study aims to improve the experimentally low performance of p-SnS/n-ZnMgO thin film solar cells (TFSCs). We report a modification in the p-SnS/n-ZnMgO cell structure to address the issues with the help of detailed numerical modeling and analysis via solar cell capacitance simulator software (SCAPS). Here, CdS is used as a thin buffer layer about a few nanometers in between the p-SnS absorber layer and n-ZnMgO window layer. However, in terms of band alignment, SnS/CdS interface attributed the minimum band-offset, resulting in the enhancement of open-circuit voltage (Voc) and overall performance. Furthermore, to evaluate the final cell structure, the solar cell simulation has been investigated by varying several parameters such as thickness and defect density of absorber layer; interface defect density and the operating temperature affect the electrical parameters of TFSCs. Initially, the band-alignment engineering has been investigated for variable doping concentration (x) of magnesium (Mg) in the Zn1-xMgxO window layer. However, Mg concentration (x) = 0.18 shows the better results (Voc = ~ 0.7 V, short-circuit current density (Jsc) = 38.54 mA/cm2, Fill Factor = 83%, and efficiency (ɳ) = ~ 23%) with minimum band-offset at the CdS/ZnMgO interface, and the hexagonal nanorod-like morphology of ZnMgO helps to improve open-circuit voltage. Finally, with the optimized parameters (tSnS = 2 μm, tCdS = 50 nm, and tZnMgO = 70 nm) with maximum SnS/CdS interface defect density (Nt = 1 × 1011 cm−2), the simulated optimal p-SnS/CdS/n-ZnMgO cell structure exhibited the highest efficiency ~ 20% comparably higher than the reported p-SnS/n-ZnMgO experimental value of 2.1%.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Andrade-Arvizu JA, Courel-Piedrahita M, Vigil-Galán O (2015) SnS-based thin film solar cells: perspectives over the last 25 years. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 26(7):4541–4556
2. Baig F et al (2018) Numerical analysis a guide to improve the efficiency of experimentally designed solar cell. Appl Phys A 124(7):47110.1007/s00339-018-1877-x ↗
3. Bittau F et al (2018) Analysis and optimisation of the glass/TCO/MZO stack for thin film CdTe solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 187:15–2210.1016/j.solmat.2018.07.019 ↗
4. Burgelman M et al (2007) Numerical simulation of thin film solar cells: practical exercises with SCAPS
5. Chantana J et al (2019) Characterization of Cd-free Zn1–xMgxO:Al/Zn1–xMgxO/Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 solar cells fabricated by an all dry process using ultraviolet light excited time-resolved photoluminescence10.1021/acsami.8b19344 ↗
6. Cho JY et al (2019) Controlled thickness of a chemical-bath-deposited CdS buffer layer for a SnS thin film solar cell with more than 3% efficiency. J Alloy Compd 796:160–16610.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.035 ↗
7. Cho JY et al (2020) Achieving over 4% efficiency for SnS/CdS thin-film solar cells by improving the heterojunction interface quality. J Mater Chem 8(39):20658–2066510.1039/D0TA06937J ↗
8. Devika M et al (2008) Ohmic contacts to SnS films: selection and estimation of thermal stability. J Appl Phys 104(12):12450310.1063/1.3041622 ↗
9. Garain R, Basak A, Singh UP (2021) Study of thickness and temperature dependence on the performance of SnS based solar cell by SCAPS-1D. Mater Today 39:1833–1837
10. Gharibshahian I, Sharbati S, Orouji AA (2018) Potential efficiency improvement of Cu (In, Ga) Se2 thin-film solar cells by the window layer optimization. Thin Solid Films 655:95–10410.1016/j.tsf.2018.04.014 ↗
11. Ghosh B et al (2011) Fabrication of CdS/SnS heterostructured device using successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction deposited SnS. Thin Solid Films 519(10):3368–337210.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.151 ↗
12. Haleem AMA, Ichimura M (2010) Experimental determination of band offsets at the SnS/CdS and SnS/InSxOy heterojunctions. J Appl Phys 107(3):03450710.1063/1.3294619 ↗
13. Hertwig R et al. (2020) ALD-ZnMgO and absorber surface modifications to substitute CdS buffer layers in co-evaporated CIGSe solar cells. EPJ Photovolt 1110.1051/epjpv/2020010 ↗
14. He X et al (2018) Simulation of high-efficiency CdTe solar cells with Zn1-x Mg x O window layer by SCAPS software. Mater Res Express 5(6):06590710.1088/2053-1591/aacae2 ↗
15. He X et al (2019) The Band Structures of Zn1−xMgxO(In) and the simulation of CdTe solar cells with a Zn1−xMgxO(In) window layer by SCAPS. Energies 12:29110.3390/en12020291 ↗
16. Hodes G, Kamat PV (2015) Understanding the implication of carrier diffusion length in photovoltaic cells. J Phys Chem Lett 6(20):4090–409210.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02052 ↗
17. Klochko NP et al (2016) Development of a new thin film composition for SnS solar cell. Sol Energy 134:156–16410.1016/j.solener.2016.04.031 ↗
18. Maity S, Sahu PP (2019) Efficient Si-ZnO-ZnMgO heterojunction solar cell with alignment of grown hexagonal nanopillar. Thin Solid Films 674:107–11110.1016/j.tsf.2019.02.007 ↗
19. Minbashi M et al (2018) Simulation of high efficiency SnS-based solar cells with SCAPS. Sol Energy 176:520–52510.1016/j.solener.2018.10.058 ↗
20. Mohammadnejad S, MollaaghaeiBahnamiri Z, EnayatiMaklavani S (2020) Enhancement of the performance of kesterite thin-film solar cells using dual absorber and ZnMgO buffer layers. Superlattice Microst 144:10658710.1016/j.spmi.2020.106587 ↗
21. Nguyen D (2020) Modelling and numerical analysis of ZnO/CuO/Cu2O heterojunction solar cell using SCAPS. Engineering Research Express 210.1088/2631-8695/ab9716 ↗
22. Niemegeers A, Burgelman M, Vos AD (1995) On the CdS/CuInSe2 conduction band discontinuity. Appl Phys Lett 67(6):843–84510.1063/1.115523 ↗
23. Niemeyer M et al (2017) Minority carrier diffusion length, lifetime and mobility in p-type GaAs and GaInAs. J Appl Phys 122(11):11570210.1063/1.5002630 ↗
24. Omrani MK et al (2018) Improve the performance of CZTSSe solar cells by applying a SnS BSF layer. Solid-State Electron 141:50–5710.1016/j.sse.2017.12.004 ↗
25. Rajpal S and SR Kumar (2019) Effect of Mg concentration on the structural, morphological and optical properties of ternary ZnMgO nanocrystalline thin films. in Innovation in materials science and engineering. Singapore: Springer Singapore10.1007/978-981-13-2944-9_20 ↗
26. Ramakrishna Reddy KT, Koteswara Reddy N, Miles RW (2006) Photovoltaic properties of SnS based solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 90(18):3041–304610.1016/j.solmat.2006.06.012 ↗
27. Reddy KTR et al (2011) Studies on the energy band discontinuities in SnS/ZnMgO Thin film heterojunction.10.1016/j.egypro.2011.10.172 ↗
28. Rühle S (2016) Tabulated values of the Shockley–Queisser limit for single junction solar cells. solar energy10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.015 ↗
29. Singh P et al (2008) Temperature dependence of I-V characteristics and performance parameters of silicon solar cell. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 92(12):1611–161610.1016/j.solmat.2008.07.010 ↗
30. Sinsermsuksakul P et al (2014) Overcoming efficiency limitations of SnS-based solar cells10.1002/aenm.201400496 ↗
31. Tebyetekerwa M et al (2019) Quantifying quasi-Fermi level splitting and mapping its heterogeneity in atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides. Adv Mater 31(25):190052210.1002/adma.201900522 ↗
32. Todorov TK et al (2017) Ultrathin high band gap solar cells with improved efficiencies from the world’s oldest photovoltaic material. Nat Commun 8(1):68210.1038/s41467-017-00582-9 ↗
33. Xu J, Yang Y (2014) Study on the performances of SnS heterojunctions by numerical analysis. Energy Convers Manage 78:260–26510.1016/j.enconman.2013.10.062 ↗