Properties of ceria nanoparticles with surface modified by acidic groups
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of the precursor and surface modification by sulfate and phosphate groups on the properties of cerium oxide was studied. The obtained materials were characterized by infrared (IR) and Raman spectroscopy, X-ray powder diffraction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) with the gas phase composition analysis, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method, and impedance spectroscopy. The significant fraction of Се3+ ions at the surface of cerium oxide particles obtained from Ce(NO3)3 promotes the formation of double sodium cerium sulfate and cerium phosphate upon treatment with solutions of sodium hydrogen sulfate and sodium dihydrogen phosphate, respectively. The modification of ceria surface by sulfate groups leads to a decrease in specific surface area and water content of the obtained materials, as well as to a significant decrease in their proton conductivity. CeO2 samples prepared from cerium ammonium nitrate have a significantly smaller particle size and higher conductivity. Its value for cerium oxide modified with phosphate groups increases up to 3.5 × 10−4 S/cm at 65 °C. The effect of hydration degree as well as Ce3+ content on the cerium oxides properties is discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Extraction and Separation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Alonso A, Macanas J, Shafir A, Munoz M, Vallribera A, Prodius D, Melnic S, Turtab C, Muraviev DN, Trans D (2010) Donnan-exclusion-driven distribution of catalytic ferromagnetic nanoparticles synthesized in polymeric fibers. Dalton Trans 39:2579–2586. https://doi.org/10.1039/B917970D10.1039/B917970D ↗
2. Askrabic S, Dohcevic-Mitrovic Z, Kremenovic A, Lazarevic N, Kahlenberg V, Popovic ZV (2012) Oxygen vacancy-induced microstructural changes of annealed CeO2−x nanocrystals. J Raman Spectrosc 43:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.298710.1002/jrs.2987 ↗
3. Avram D, Rotaru C, Cojocaru B, Sanchez-Dominiguez M, Florea M, Tiseanu C (2014) Heavily impregnated ceria nanoparticles with europium oxide: spectroscopic evidences for homogenous solid solutions and intrinsic structure of Eu3+-oxygen environments. J Mater Sci 49:2117–2126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7904-610.1007/s10853-013-7904-6 ↗
4. Azari A, Shokrzadeh M, Zamani E, Amani N, Shaki F (2018) Cerium oxide nanoparticles protects against acrylamide induced toxicity in HepG2 cells through modulation of oxidative stress. Drug Chem Toxicol 6:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2018.147779310.1080/01480545.2018.1477793 ↗
5. Baranchikov AE, Polezhaeva OS, Ivanov VK, Tretyakov YD (2010) Lattice expansion and oxygen non-stoichiometry of nanocrystalline ceria. CrystEngComm 12:3531–3533. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CE00245C10.1039/C0CE00245C ↗
6. Bellini M, Pagliaro MV, Lenarda A, Fornasiero P, Marelli M, Evangelisti C, Innocenti M, Jia Q, Mukerjee S, Jankovic J, Wang L, Varcoe JR, Krishnamurthy CB, Grinberg I, Davydova E, Dekel DR, Miller HA, Vizza F (2019) Palladium- ceria catalysts with enhanced alkaline hydrogen oxidation activity for anion exchange membrane fuel cells. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2:4999–5008. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b0065710.1021/acsaem.9b00657 ↗
7. Bracamonte MV, Melchionna M, Giuliani A, Nasi L, Tavagnacco C, Prato M, Fornasiero P (2017) H2O2 sensing enhancement by mutual integration of single walled carbon nanohorns with metal oxide catalysts: the CeO2 case. Sensors Actuators B Chem 239:923–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.11210.1016/j.snb.2016.08.112 ↗
8. Brenneisen P, Reichert AS (2018) Nanotherapy and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cancer: a novel perspective. Antioxidants 7:31. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox702003110.3390/antiox7020031 ↗
9. Caputo F, De Nicola M, Sienkiewicz A, Giovanetti A, Bejarano I, Licoccia S, Traversabe E, Ghibelli L (2015) Cerium oxide nanoparticles, combining antioxidant and UV shielding properties, prevent UV-induced cell damage and mutagenesis. Nanoscale 7:15643–15656. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr03767k10.1039/c5nr03767k ↗
10. Corsi F, Caputo F, Traversa E, Ghibelli L (2018) Not only redox: the multifaceted activity of cerium oxide nanoparticles in cancer prevention and therapy. Front Oncol 8:309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.0030910.3389/fonc.2018.00309 ↗
11. Filtschew A, Hess C (2017) Interpretation of Raman spectra of oxide materials: the relevance of absorption effects. J Phys Chem C 1121(35):19280–19287. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0610510.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06105 ↗
12. Ge X, Li Z, Yuan Q (2015) 1D ceria nanomaterials: versatile synthesis and bio-application. J Mater Sci Technol 31:645–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2015.01.00810.1016/j.jmst.2015.01.008 ↗
13. Gerasimova E, Safronova E, Ukshe A, Dobrovolskii Yu, Yaroslavtsev A (2016) Electrocatalytic and transport properties of hybrid Nafion (R) membranes doped with silica and cesium acid salt of phosphotungstic acid in hydrogen fuel cells. Chem Eng J 305:121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.07910.1016/j.cej.2015.11.079 ↗
14. Giffin GA, Piga M, Lavina S, Navarra MA, D’Epifanio A, Scrosati B, Di Noto V (2012) Characterization of sulfated-zirconia/Nafion® composite membranes for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources 198:66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.09310.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.093 ↗
15. Ivanov VK, Polezhaeva OS (2009) Synthesis of ultrathin ceria nanoplates. Russ J Inorg Chem 54:1528–1530. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602360910004010.1134/S0036023609100040 ↗
16. Jaiswal N, Tanwar K, Suman R, Kumar D, Upadhyay S, Parkash O (2019) A brief review on ceria based solid electrolytes for solid oxide fuel cells. J Alloys Compd 781:984–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.01510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.015 ↗
17. Kaur G (2020) Intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells electrolytes, electrodes and interconnects. Elsevier, Amsterdam
18. Ketpang K, Oh K, Lim S-C, Shanmugam S (2016) Nafion-porous cerium oxide nanotubes composite membrane for polymer electrolyte fuel cells operated under dry conditions. J Power Sources 329:441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.08610.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.086 ↗
19. Kolcu O, Zumreoglu-Karan B (1994) Thermal properties of sodium—light-lanthanoid double sulfate monohydrates. Thermochim Acta 240:185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6031(94)87040-310.1016/0040-6031(94)87040-3 ↗
20. Krindges I, Andreola R, Perottoni CA, Zorzi JE, Krindges I, Andreola R, Perottoni CA, Zorzi JE (2008) Low-pressure injection molding of ceramic springs. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 5(3):243–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2008.02226.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2008.02226.x ↗
21. Lysova AA, Stenina IA, Volkov AO, Ponomarev II, Yaroslavtsev AB (2019) Proton conductivity of hybrid membranes based on polybenzimidazoles and surface-sulfonated silica. Solid State Ionics 329:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2018.11.01210.1016/j.ssi.2018.11.012 ↗
22. Montini T, Melchionna M, Monai M, Fornasiero P (2016) Fundamentals and catalytic applications of CeO2-based materials. Chem Rev 116:5987–6041. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0060310.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00603 ↗
23. Mossayebi Z, Parnian MJ, Rowshanzamir S (2018) Effect of the sulfated zirconia nanostructure characteristics on physicochemical and electrochemical properties of SPEEK nanocomposite membranes for PEM fuel cell applications. Macromol Mater Eng 303(5):1700570. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20170057010.1002/mame.201700570 ↗
24. Nakamoto K (1978) Infrared and Raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds. John Wiley & Sons Marquette University, New York
25. Ooi YX, Ya KZ, Maegawa K, Tan WK, Kawamura G, Muto H, Matsuda A (2020) Incorporation of titanium pyrophosphate in polybenzimidazole membrane for medium temperature dry PEFC application. Solid State Ionics 344:115140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2019.11514010.1016/j.ssi.2019.115140 ↗
26. Parnian MJ, Rowshanzamir S, Prasad AK, Advani SG (2018) Effect of ceria loading on performance and durability of sulfonated poly (etheretherketone) nanocomposite membranes for proton exchange membrane fuel cell applications. J Membr Sci 565:342–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.02910.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.029 ↗
27. Perrichon V, Laachir A, Bergeret G, Fréty R, Tournayan L, Touret O (1994) Reduction of cerias with different textures by hydrogen and their reoxidation by oxygen. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 90:773–781. https://doi.org/10.1039/FT994900077310.1039/FT9949000773 ↗
28. Pezzini I, Marino A, Del Turco S, Nesti C, Doccini S, Cappello V, Gemmi M, Parlanti P, Santorelli FM, Mattoli V, Ciofani G (2017) Cerium oxide nanoparticles: the regenerative redox machine in bioenergetic imbalance. Nanomedicine 12:403–416. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2016-034210.2217/nnm-2016-0342 ↗
29. Prabhakaran V, Ramani V (2014) Structurally-tuned nitrogen-doped cerium oxide exhibits exceptional regenerative free radical scavenging activity in polymer electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 161:F1–F9. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.004401jes10.1149/2.004401jes ↗
30. Rodgers MP, Brooker RP, Mohajeri N, Bonville LJ, Kunz HR, Slattery DK, Fenton JM (2012) Comparison of proton exchange membranes degradation rates between accelerated and performance tests. J Electrochem Soc 159:F338–F352. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.040207jes10.1149/2.040207jes ↗
31. Rubio L, Marcos R, Hernández A (2018) Nanoceria acts as antioxidant in tumoral and transformed cells. Chem Biol Interact 291:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2018.06.00210.1016/j.cbi.2018.06.002 ↗
32. Safronova EY, Stenina IA, Yaroslavtsev AB (2010) Synthesis and characterization of MF-4SK + SiO2 hybrid membranes modified with tungstophosphoric heteropolyacid. Russ J Inorg Chem 55:13–1710.1134/S0036023610010031 ↗
33. Schlick S (2018) The chemistry of membranes used in fuel cells: degradation and stabilization. Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/978111919608210.1002/9781119196082 ↗
34. Schmitt R, Nenning A, Kraynis O, Korobko R, Frenkel AI, Lubomirsky I, Haile SM, Rupp JLM (2020) A review of defect structure and chemistry in ceria and its solid solutions. Chem Soc Rev 49:554–592. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CS00588A10.1039/C9CS00588A ↗
35. Shaari N, Kamarudin SK (2019) Recent advances in additive-enhanced polymer electrolyte membrane properties in fuel cell applications: an overview. Int J Energy Res 43(7):2756–2794. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.434810.1002/er.4348 ↗
36. Skorodumova NV, Simak SI, Lundqvist BI, Abrikosov IA, Johansson B (2002) Quantum origin of the oxygen storage capability of ceria. Phys Rev Lett 89:166601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.16660110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.166601 ↗
37. Spanier JE, Robinson RD, Zhang F, Chan S-W, Herman IP (2001) Size-dependent properties of CeO2−y nanoparticles as studied by Raman scattering. Phys Rev B 64:245407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.24540710.1103/PhysRevB.64.245407 ↗
38. Stenina IA, Yaroslavtsev AB (2017) Low- and intermediate-temperature proton-conducting electrolytes. Inorg Mater 53:253–262. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002016851703010410.1134/S0020168517030104 ↗
39. Stenina IA, Il’in AB, Zhilyaeva NA, Kirik SD, Yurkov GY, Yaroslavtsev AB (2014) Catalytic properties of composite materials based on mesoporous silica and zirconium hydrogen phosphate. Inorg Mater 50:586–591. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002016851406018110.1134/S0020168514060181 ↗
40. Thomas S, Sunny AT, Velayudhan P (2020) Colloidal metal oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-03725-710.1016/C2016-0-03725-7 ↗
41. Trogadas P, Parrondo J, Ramani V (2008) Degradation mitigation in polymer electrolyte membranes using cerium oxide as a regenerative free-radical scavenger. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 11:B113–B116. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.291644310.1149/1.2916443 ↗
42. Tsunekawa S, Ito S, Kawazoe Y (2004) Surface structures of cerium oxide nanocrystalline particles from the size dependence of the lattice parameters. Appl Phys Lett 85:3845–3847. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.181177110.1063/1.1811771 ↗
43. Walkey C, Das S, Seal S, Erlichman J, Heckman K, Ghibelli L, Traversa E, McGinnis JF, Self WT (2015) Catalytic properties and biomedical applications of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Environ Sci Nano 2:33–53. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4en00138a10.1039/c4en00138a ↗
44. Weissbach T, Peckham TJ, Holdcroft S (2016) CeO2, ZrO2 and YSZ as mitigating additives against degradation of proton exchange membranes by free radicals. J Membr Sci 498:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.00410.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.004 ↗
45. Wong CY, Wong WY, Ramya K, Khalid M, Loh KS, Daud WRW, Lim KL, Walvekar R, Kadhum AAH (2019) Additives in proton exchange membranes for low- and high-temperature fuel cell applications: a review. Int J Hydrog Energy 44:6116–613510.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.084 ↗
46. Yaroslavtsev AB (1994) Proton conductivity of inorganic hydrates. Russ Chem Rev 63:429–43510.1070/RC1994v063n05ABEH000095 ↗
47. Yaroslavtsev AB (1997) Ion exchange on inorganic sorbents. Russ Chem Rev 66:579–596. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC1997v066n07ABEH00034810.1070/RC1997v066n07ABEH000348 ↗
48. Yaroslavtsev AB (2012) Ion conductivity of composite materials on the base of solid electrolytes and ion-exchange membranes. Inorg Mater 48:1193–1209. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002016851213005510.1134/S0020168512130055 ↗
49. Yaroslavtsev AB, Yampolskii YP (2014) Hybrid membranes containing inorganic nanoparticles. Mendeleev Commun 24(6):319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2014.11.00110.1016/j.mencom.2014.11.001 ↗
50. Zheng Y, Li K, Wang H, Wang Y, Tian D, Wei Y, Zhu X, Zeng C (2016) Structure dependence and reaction mechanism of CO oxidation: a model study on macroporous CeO2 and CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts. J Catal 344:365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.10.00810.1016/j.jcat.2016.10.008 ↗