Systematic analysis of ferrofluid: a visualization review, advances engineering applications, and challenges
Source abstract
Abstract
With the broader use of ferrofluid in industry and the sciences, ferrofluid research has produced many new branches. To obtain systematic analytical results and to help researchers gain insight into the dynamics of ferrofluid research, in this review, we first track and summarize the ferrofluid research over the past 15 years to assay how ferrofluid can contribute to modern technology. We have got several important research directions (basic physics research, medical applications, and engineering applications) using keywords as an entry point by visualizing the cluster analysis. Visualization to highlight important schools and organizations. By analyzing the number of papers and citations at a given institution, we obtained a list of influential institutions and schools and indicated the current research directions of these institutions. This list greatly helps researchers to understand the authoritative papers as well as the latest results. In particular, we draw connections between publication year and novel engineering applications and show how they impact future development—the increasing use of ferrofluids in microfluidic environments and the increasing study of their soft and reshapable properties. Next, we focus on ferrofluid applications in six engineering fields and summarize the development history and research status. Finally, by analyzing the current status of each application, we summarize two challenges, that is to strengthen the research on the micromechanism of ferrofluid and to prepare a ferrofluid with better performance. The originality of this study is that it uses visualization to describe the current state of research and development patterns instead of thousands of papers, providing valuable reference information for existing researchers and practitioners.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Afifah AN, Syahrullail S, Sidik NAC (2016) Magnetoviscous effect and thermomagnetic convection of magnetic fluid: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:1030–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.01810.1016/j.rser.2015.11.018 ↗
2. Aghazadeh M, Ganjali MR (2018) Evaluation of supercapacitive and magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nano-particles electrochemically doped with dysprosium cations: development of a novel iron-based electrode. Ceram Int 44:520–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.20610.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.206 ↗
3. Ahn JJ, Oh JG, Choi B (2004) A novel type of a microfluidic system using ferrofluids for an application of μ-TAS. Microsyst Technol 10:622–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-003-0340-910.1007/s00542-003-0340-9 ↗
4. Alazemi SF, Bibo A, Daqaq MF (2015) A ferrofluid-based energy harvester: an experimental investigation involving internally-resonant sloshing modes. Eur Phys J Spec Top 224:2993–3004. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2015-02602-910.1140/epjst/e2015-02602-9 ↗
5. Alazmi S, Xu Y, Daqaq MF (2016) Harvesting energy from the sloshing motion of ferrofluids in an externally excited container: analytical modeling and experimental validation. Phys Fluids 28:077101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.495478710.1063/1.4954787 ↗
6. Aminfar H, Mohammadpourfard M, Zonouzi SA (2013) Numerical study of the ferrofluid flow and heat transfer through a rectangular duct in the presence of a non-uniform transverse magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater 327:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.09.01110.1016/j.jmmm.2012.09.011 ↗
7. Ando B, Ascia A, Baglio S et al (2006) Development of novel ferrofluidic pumps. Conference proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference 2006:2828–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2006.26023910.1109/IEMBS.2006.260239 ↗
8. Ando B, Ascia A, Baglio S, et al (2007) A novel architecture to implement low-cost ferrofluidic pumps. 24th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. 2007:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.2007.37911810.1109/IMTC.2007.379118 ↗
9. Andò B, Ascia A, Baglio S et al (2009) The “One drop” ferrofluidic pump with analog control. Sens Actuators, A 156:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2009.05.00610.1016/j.sna.2009.05.006 ↗
10. Ando B, Ascia A, Baglio S et al (2009) Ferrofluidic pumps: a valuable implementation without moving parts. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 58:3232–3237. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2009.201716710.1109/tim.2009.2017167 ↗
11. Aquino VRR, Figueiredo LC, Coaquira JAH et al (2020) Magnetic interaction and anisotropy axes arrangement in nanoparticle aggregates can enhance or reduce the effective magnetic anisotropy. J Magn Mater 498:166170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.16617010.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166170 ↗
12. Ashouri M, Shafii MB, Moosavi A et al (2015) A novel revolving piston minipump. Sens Actuators B 218:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.04.10410.1016/j.snb.2015.04.104 ↗
13. Auzans E, Zins D, Blums E et al (1999) Synthesis and properties of Mn-Zn ferrite ferrofluids. J Mater Sci 34:1253–1260. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100452541032410.1023/A:1004525410324 ↗
14. Babu LK, Reddy YV (2020) A novel thermal decomposition approach for the synthesis and properties of superparamagnetic nanocrystalline NiFe2O4 and its antibacterial, electrocatalytic properties. J Supercond Novel Magn 33:1013–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-019-05262-x10.1007/s10948-019-05262-x ↗
15. Balaji G, Gajbhiye NS, Wilde G et al (2002) Magnetic properties of MnFe2O4 nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 242–245:617–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(01)01043-510.1016/S0304-8853(01)01043-5 ↗
16. Bao L, Dong X, Zhang S et al (2018) Magnetic field sensor based on magnetic fluid-infiltrated phase-shifted fiber Bragg grating. IEEE Sens J 18:4008–4012. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2018.282074110.1109/jsen.2018.2820741 ↗
17. Barvinschi P, Stefanescu O, Dippong T et al (2013) CoFe2O4/SiO2 nanocomposites by thermal decomposition of some complex combinations embedded in hybrid silica gels. J Therm Anal Calorim 112:447–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-012-2704-910.1007/s10973-012-2704-9 ↗
18. Bashtovoi VG, Kabachnikov DN, Kolobov AY et al (2002) Research of the dynamics of a magnetic fluid dynamic absorber. J Magn Magn Mater 252:312–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-8853(02)00599-110.1016/s0304-8853(02)00599-1 ↗
19. Bibo A, Masana R, King A et al (2012) Electromagnetic ferrofluid-based energy harvester. Phys Lett A 376:2163–2166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2012.05.03310.1016/j.physleta.2012.05.033 ↗
20. Bitter F (1931) On inhomogeneities in the magnetization of ferromagnetic materials. Phys Rev 38:1903. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.38.190310.1103/PhysRev.38.1903 ↗
21. Borbáth T, Bica D, Potencz I et al (2010) Magnetic nanofluids and magnetic composite fluids in rotating seal systems. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/12/1/01210510.1088/1755-1315/12/1/012105 ↗
22. Borbáth T, Bica D, Potencz I et al (2011) Leakage-free rotating seal systems with magnetic nanofluids and magnetic composite fluids designed for various applications. Int J Fluid Mach Syst 4:67–75. https://doi.org/10.5293/ijfms.2011.4.1.06710.5293/ijfms.2011.4.1.067 ↗
23. Botta PM, Bercoff PG, Aglietti EF et al (2003a) Synthesis and magnetic properties of zinc ferrite from mechanochemical and thermal treatments of Zn–Fe3O4 mixtures. Mater Sci Eng A 360:146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00412-X10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00412-X ↗
24. Botta PM, Mercader RC, Aglietti EF et al (2003b) Synthesis of Fe–FeAl2O4–Al2O3 by high-energy ball milling of Al–Fe3O4 mixtures. Scr Mater 48:1093–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00630-910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00630-9 ↗
25. Branquinho LC, Carrião MS, Costa AS et al (2014) Effect of magnetic dipolar interactions on nanoparticle heating efficiency: implications for cancer hyperthermia. Sci Rep 3:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0288710.1038/srep03637 ↗
26. Bu, Li, Li (2013) Magnetic field induced chain alignment of ferroparticles in magnetic fluid. J Inorg Mater 28:745–750. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1077.2013.1254710.3724/sp.j.1077.2013.12547 ↗
27. Camp PJ, Ivanov AO, Sindt JO (2021) How chains and rings affect the dynamic magnetic susceptibility of a highly clustered ferrofluid. Phys Rev E 103(6):062611. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.06261110.1103/PhysRevE.103.062611 ↗
28. Cao D, Liu G, Qiu D et al (2006) Status and development trend of magnetic fluid sensors. Transducer Microsyst Technol 25 (5–6):9
29. Cao Q, Zhang Z, Di N et al (2019) Study on the fluidity experiments of engine oil-based magnetic fluid with Fe3O4/Ag nanoparticles. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/678/1/01214510.1088/1757-899X/678/1/012145 ↗
30. Chae S H, Ju S, Choi Y, et al (2013) Electromagnetic vibration energy harvester using springless proof mass and ferrofluid as a lubricant. 13th International Conference on Micro and Nano Technology for Power Generation and Energy Conversion Applications (PowerMEMS). 476:012013 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/476/1/01201310.1088/1742-6596/476/1/012013 ↗
31. Chang YJ, Hu CY, Lin CH (2013) A microchannel immunoassay chip with ferrofluid actuation to enhance the biochemical reaction. Sens Actuators B 182:584–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.03.07810.1016/j.snb.2013.03.078 ↗
32. Chen Q, Wang H, Wang Q et al (2018) Plasmon enhanced Faraday rotation in Fe3O4/Ag ferrofluids for magneto optical sensing applications. Plasmonics 13:353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-017-0606-110.1007/s11468-017-0606-1 ↗
33. Chen Y, Li D, Zhang Y et al (2020) The influence of the temperature rise on the sealing performance of the rotating magnetic fluid seal. IEEE Trans Magn 56:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2020.302301810.1109/tmag.2020.3023018 ↗
34. Chirikov DN, Fedotov SP, Iskakova LY et al (2010) Viscoelastic properties of ferrofluids. Phys Rev E 82(5):051405. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.05140510.1103/PhysRevE.82.051405 ↗
35. Clark NA (2013) Ferromagnetic ferrofluids. Nature 504:229–230. https://doi.org/10.1038/504229a10.1038/504229a ↗
36. Coey JMD, Smith PAI (1999) Magnetic nitrides. J Magn Magn Mater 200:405–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00429-110.1016/S0304-8853(99)00429-1 ↗
37. Coulombre RE, Schnee L, d'Auril H et al (1967) Feasibility Study and Model Development for a Ferrofluid Viscous Damper. Final Report, contract No. NASS-9431, Goddard Space Flight Centre, Greenbelt, Maryland. Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19680021013
38. Cowley MD, Rosensweig RE (1967) The interfacial stability of a ferromagnetic fluid. J Fluid Mech 30:671–688. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211206700169710.1017/S0022112067001697 ↗
39. Curtis RA (1974) Second order effects in fluidmagnetic buoyancy. Appl Sci Res 29:342–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0038415710.1007/BF00384157 ↗
40. Dai J, Yang M, Li X et al (2011) Magnetic field sensor based on magnetic fluid clad etched fiber Bragg grating. Opt Fiber Technol 17:210–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2011.02.00410.1016/j.yofte.2011.02.004 ↗
41. Das P, Colombo M, Prosperi D (2019) Recent advances in magnetic fluid hyperthermia for cancer therapy. Colloids Surf B 174:42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.10.051Get10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.10.051Get ↗
42. Dippong T, Cadar O, Levei EA et al (2018) Formation of CoFe2O4/PVA-SiO2 nanocomposites: effect of diol chain length on the structure and magnetic properties. Ceram Int 44:10478–10485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.06510.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.065 ↗
43. Dippong T, Levei EA, Cadar O (2021a) Recent advances in synthesis and applications of MFe2O4 (M= Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, Zn) nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 11:1560. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1106156010.3390/nano11061560 ↗
44. Dippong T, Levei EA, Cadar O (2021b) Formation, structure and magnetic properties of MFe2O4@ SiO2 (M= Co, Mn, Zn, Ni, Cu) nanocomposites. Materials 14:1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1405113910.3390/ma14051139 ↗
45. Dwivedi V, Kaushal A, Singh RK et al (2020) Analysis of an adaptive vibration absorber in robotics using ferrofluid. 2020 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Applications (IC3A)2020: 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1109/ic3a48958.2020.23332010.1109/ic3a48958.2020.233320 ↗
46. Dong Y, Wu B, Wang M et al (2018) Magnetic field and temperature sensor based on D-shaped fiber modal interferometer and magnetic fluid. Opt Laser Technol 107:169–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.05.04110.1016/j.optlastec.2018.05.041 ↗
47. Dunne P, Adachi T, Dev AA et al (2020) Liquid flow and control without solid walls. Nature 581:58–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2254-410.1038/s41586-020-2254-4 ↗
48. Ejeian F, Azadi S, Razmjou A et al (2019) Design and applications of MEMS flow sensors: a review. Sens Actuators, A 295:483–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.06.02010.1016/j.sna.2019.06.020 ↗
49. Elói MTA, Azevedo RB, Lima ECD et al (2005) Zero-field birefringence of biocompatible magnetic fluids: a concentration dependence investigation. J Magn Magn Mater 293:220–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.02.01510.1016/j.jmmm.2005.02.015 ↗
50. Fan X, Dong X, Karacakol AC et al (2020) Reconfigurable multifunctional ferrofluid droplet robots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:27916–27926. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.201638811710.1073/pnas.2016388117 ↗
51. Fukuda H, Ueno K, Kamiyama S et al (1998) Study on active damper with a magnetic fluid. JSME Int. J. Ser B 41:822–829. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmeb.41.82210.1299/jsmeb.41.822 ↗
52. Gao R, Jiang Y, Abdelaziz S (2013) All-fiber magnetic field sensors based on magnetic fluid-filled photonic crystal fibers. Opt Lett 38:1539–1541. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.001539/10.1364/OL.38.001539/ ↗
53. García-Jimeno S, Estelrich J (2013) Ferrofluid based on polyethylene glycol-coated iron oxide nanoparticles: characterization and properties. Colloids Surf A 420:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.12.02210.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.12.022 ↗
54. Genc S, Derin B (2014) Synthesis and rheology of ferrofluids: a review. Curr Opin Chem Eng 3:118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2013.12.00610.1016/j.coche.2013.12.006 ↗
55. Goebl J, Liu Y, Wong S et al (2016) Magnetically tunable colloidal micromirrors. Nanoscale Horiz 1:64–68. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nh00035a10.1039/c5nh00035a ↗
56. Goshayeshi HR, Goodarzi M, Safaei MR et al (2016) Experimental study on the effect of inclination angle on heat transfer enhancement of a ferrofluid in a closed loop oscillating heat pipe under magnetic field. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 74:265–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.01.00310.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.01.003 ↗
57. Gu Z, Ling Q, Lan J et al (2017) High sensitive LPFG magnetic field sensor based on dual-peak resonance. Opt Laser Technol 96:249–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.05.01310.1016/j.optlastec.2017.05.013 ↗
58. Guobin L, Shuncheng S, Baorong Z (2005) Finite element magnetic, field analysis of the typical magnetic fluid sealing structure. Lubr Eng 1:79–81
59. Hang Koh W, Seng Lok K, Nguyen NT (2013) A Digital micro magnetofluidic platform for lab-on-a-chip applications. J Fluids Eng Trans Asme. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402344310.1115/1.4023443 ↗
60. Hao D, Li D, Chen J et al (2016) Theoretical analysis and experimental study of the characteristics of magnetic fluid seal with a large diameter at high/low temperatures. Int J Appl Electromagnet Mech 58 (4):531–550. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-18006510.3233/JAE-180065 ↗
61. Hartshorne H, Backhouse CJ, Lee WE (2004) Ferrofluid-based microchip pump and valve. Sens Actuators B 99:592–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2004.01.01610.1016/j.snb.2004.01.016 ↗
62. Hatch A, Kamholz AE, Holman G et al (2001) A ferrofluidic magnetic micropump. J Microelectromech Syst 10:215–221. https://doi.org/10.1109/84.92574810.1109/84.925748 ↗
63. Hauser H, Hochreiter J, Stangl G et al (2000) Anisotropic magnetoresistance effect field sensors. J Magn Magn Mater 215:788–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-8853(00)00289-410.1016/s0304-8853(00)00289-4 ↗
64. He XZ, Li DC, Hao RC (2015) The influence of magnetic fluid yield stress on the performance of magnetic fluid seal. Acta Armamentarii 36:175–181
65. He X, Wang L, Yu J et al (2019) Influence of gravity on the anti-pressure ability of magnetic fluid seal. Int J Appl Electromagnet Mech 60:21–32. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-18005410.3233/JAE-180054 ↗
66. Hegde B, Dinesh NS (2015) Design, modeling and simulation of a novel variable reluctance type linear ferrofluid pump. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE). pp 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccsce.2015.748217110.1109/iccsce.2015.7482171 ↗
67. Homa D, Pickrell G (2014) Magnetic sensing with ferrofluid and fiber optic connectors. Sensors 14:3891–3896. https://doi.org/10.3390/s14030389110.3390/s140303891 ↗
68. Hong CY, Horng HE, Kuo FC et al (1999) Evidence of multiple states of ordered structures and a phase transition in magnetic fluid films under perpendicular magnetic fields. Appl Phys Lett 75:2196–2198. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.12496210.1063/1.124962 ↗
69. Hong RY, Pan TT, Han YP et al (2007) Magnetic field synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles used as a precursor of ferrofluids. J Magn Magn Mater 310:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.07.02610.1016/j.jmmm.2006.07.026 ↗
70. Horng HE, Yang SY, Tse WS et al (2002) Magnetically modulated optical transmission of magnetic fluid films. J Magn Magn Mater 252:104–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-8853(02)00629-710.1016/s0304-8853(02)00629-7 ↗
71. Hu T, Zhao Y, Li X et al (2010) Novel optical fiber current sensor based on magnetic fluid. Chin Opt Lett 8:392–394. https://doi.org/10.3788/col20100804.039210.3788/col20100804.0392 ↗
72. Huang C, Yao J, Zhang T et al (2017) Damping applications of ferrofluids: a review. Journal of Magnetics 22:109–121. https://doi.org/10.4283/jmag.2017.22.1.10910.4283/jmag.2017.22.1.109 ↗
73. Hwang JG, O’Sullivan F, Zahn M et al (2008) Modeling of streamer propagation in transformer oil-based nanofluids. IEEE Conf Electr Insul Dielectr Phenom 2008:361–366. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP.2008.477277710.1109/CEIDP.2008.4772777 ↗
74. Hwang JG, Zahn M, O’Sullivan FM et al (2010) Effects of nanoparticle charging on streamer development in transformer oil-based nanofluids. J Appl Phys 107:014310. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.326747410.1063/1.3267474 ↗
75. Ikari et al (2014) Frequency analysis of semi-active tuned magnetic fluid column damper with two electromagnets. Mater Sci Forum. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.792.27510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.792.275 ↗
76. Iskakova LY, Zubarev AY (2002) Effect of interaction between chains on their size distribution: strong magnetic field. Phys Rev E 66:041405–041405. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.66.04140510.1103/PhysRevE.66.041405 ↗
77. Ivanov AO, Kantorovich SS (2004) Chain aggregate structure and magnetic birefringence in polydisperse ferrofluids. Phys Rev E 70(2):021401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.02140110.1103/PhysRevE.70.021401 ↗
78. Ivanov AO, Wang Z, Holm C (2004) Applying the chain formation model to magnetic properties of aggregated ferrofluids. Phys Rev E 69:031206. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.03120610.1103/PhysRevE.69.031206 ↗
79. Jia Z, Pu S, Rao J et al (2019) Temperature self-compensative all-fiber magnetic field sensing structure based on no-core fiber cascaded with fiber Bragg gratings. Opt Lasers Eng 119:26–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.02.00410.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.02.004 ↗
80. Jian W, Tonggang L, Song W et al (2010) Research progress of the magnetic fluid-based micropump. Micronanoelectronic Technology
81. Jordan A, Scholz R, Maier-Hauff K et al (2001) Presentation of a new magnetic field therapy system for the treatment of human solid tumors with magnetic fluid hyperthermia. J Magn Magn Mater 225:118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-8853(00)01239-710.1016/s0304-8853(00)01239-7 ↗
82. Kadau H, Schmitt M, Wenzel M et al (2016) Observing the Rosensweig instability of a quantum ferrofluid. Nature 530:194–197. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1648510.1038/nature16485 ↗
83. Kefayati GHR (2014) Natural convection of ferrofluid in a linearly heated cavity utilizing LBM. J Mol Liq 191:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2013.11.02110.1016/j.molliq.2013.11.021 ↗
84. Khairul MA, Doroodchi E, Azizian R et al (2016) Experimental study on fundamental mechanisms of ferro-fluidics for an electromagnetic energy harvester. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:12491–12501. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0316110.1021/acs.iecr.6b03161 ↗
85. Khairul MA, Doroodchi E, Azizian R et al (2017) Advanced applications of tunable ferrofluids in energy systems and energy harvesters: a critical review. Energy Convers Manag 149:660–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.07.06410.1016/j.enconman.2017.07.064 ↗
86. Khan TT, Abeykoon AMHS, Bora T et al (2019) Design of a prototype of a ferrofluid based soft actuator. In: 2019 1st International Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering and Robotics Technology (ICASERT). IEEE, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.201638811710.1073/pnas.2016388117 ↗
87. Kim YS, Kim YH (2003) Application of ferro-cobalt magnetic fluid for oil sealing. J Magn Magn Mater 267:105–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(03)00342-110.1016/S0304-8853(03)00342-1 ↗
88. Kim YS, Lee JH (2001) Application of a hydrophilic Fe-Co magnetic fluid to the oil seal of a rotary shaft. IEEE Int Symp IndElectron (ISIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2001.93185010.1109/ISIE.2001.931850 ↗
89. Kim EG, Oh J, Choi B (2006) A study on the development of a continuous peristaltic micropump using magnetic fluids. Sens Actuators A 128:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2006.01.02110.1016/j.sna.2006.01.021 ↗
90. Kole M, Khandekar S (2021) Engineering applications of ferrofluids: a review. J Magn Magn Mater 537:168222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.16822210.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168222 ↗
91. Komilov K, Zaripov AK, Majid OA (2020) Frequency dispersion of the coefficient of shear viscosity and the magnetic viscous effect in magnetic liquids. Russ J Phys Chem A 94:1726–1731. https://doi.org/10.1134/s003602442008016610.1134/s0036024420080166 ↗
92. Kondo S, Ikari K, Sawada T (2016) Vibrating properties of a magnetic-fluid tuned liquid column damper with different U-pipes. Mater Sci Forum. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.856.2110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.856.21 ↗
93. Konstantaki M, Candiani A, Pissadakis S (2009) Magnetic tuning of optical fibre long period gratings utilizing ferrofluids. 11th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2009.518509110.1109/ICTON.2009.5185091 ↗
94. Kopcanský P, Marton K, Tomco L et al (2005) The influence of magnetic nanoparticles on DC-and ac-dielectric breakdown in transformer oil-based magnetic fluid. J Magn Mater 289(415)10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.117 ↗
95. Kozissnik B, Bohorquez AC, Dobson J et al (2013) Magnetic fluid hyperthermia: advances, challenges, and opportunity. Int J Hyperthermia 29:706–714. https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2013.83720010.3109/02656736.2013.837200 ↗
96. Krakov MS (1999) Influence of rheological properties of magnetic fluid on damping ability of magnetic fluid shock-absorber. J Magn Magn Mater 201:368–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-8853(99)00100-610.1016/s0304-8853(99)00100-6 ↗
97. Krauß R, Reimann B, Richter R et al (2005) Fluid pumped by magnetic stress. Appl Phys Lett 86:024102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.184695610.1063/1.1846956 ↗
98. Krauß R, Liu M, Reimann B et al (2006) Pumping fluid by magnetic surface stress. New J Phys 8:18. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/8/1/01810.1088/1367-2630/8/1/018 ↗
99. Kudelcik J, Bury P, Kopcansky P et al (2010) (2010) Dielectric breakdown in mineral oil ITO 100 based magnetic fluid. Phys Procedia 9:78–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.11.01910.1016/j.phpro.2010.11.019 ↗
100. Kudelcik J, Bury P, Hardon S et al (2015) Influence of nanoparticles diameter on structural properties of magnetic fluid in magnetic field. J Electr Eng 66:231–234. https://doi.org/10.2478/jee-2015-003710.2478/jee-2015-0037 ↗