Coupled hybrid nanoparticles for improved dispersion stability of nanosuspensions: a review
Source abstract
Abstract
Dispersion stability of nanosuspensions attracts increasing attention in the past decades due to its significant effect on the thermal performance and phase behaviors of suspensions applied in various areas. The review of DLVO, steric stability, and depletion theories along with the detailed analysis of intermolecular forces was provided to elucidate the stability mechanism of hybrid nanoparticles in nanosuspensions. On this basis, mixed approach and coupled approach for achieving superior dispersion stability of hybrid nanosuspensions were specifically introduced. By using the coupled approach, the performance of phase behaviors can be largely promoted, preventing the nanoparticle aggregation as a result of the chemical bond formed in the fabrication process. The improved stability of coupled hybrid nanosuspensions enables the feasibility of the applications in heat and mass transfer and phase behavior–related fields, which are extensively reviewed in the current study. It is revealed that the thermal conductivity and phase behavior of hybrid nanoparticles are the dominant factors that need to be examined to improve abilities in heat transfer and colloidal control. With the development of fabrication techniques, it is promising that highly stabilized nanosuspensions such as GO nanoplatelets could be incorporated with drugs or genes for achieving targeted delivery, controlled release of drugs, and DNA transfer in complicated conditions. This indicates the value of stability promotion of nanosuspensions composed by coupled hybrid nanoparticles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Abbasi SM, Rashidi A, Nemati A, Arzani K (2013) The effect of functionalisation method on the stability and the thermal conductivity of nanofluid hybrids of carbon nanotubes/gamma alumina. Ceram Int 39:3885–3891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.23210.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.232 ↗
2. Aboutalebi SH, Chidembo AT, Salari M, Konstantinov K, Wexler D, Liu HK, Dou SX (2011) Comparison of GO, GO/MWCNTs composite and MWCNTs as potential electrode materials for supercapacitors. Energy Environ Sci 4:1855–1865. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EE01039E10.1039/C1EE01039E ↗
3. Abu-Noqta OA, Aziz AA, Usman AI (2019) Colloidal stability of Iron oxide nanoparticles coated with different capping agents. Materials Today: Proceedings 17:1072–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.51610.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.516 ↗
4. Adams M, Dogic Z, Keller SL, Fraden S (1998) Entropically driven microphase transitions in mixtures of colloidal rods and spheres. Nature 393:349–352. https://doi.org/10.1038/3070010.1038/30700 ↗
5. Addad Y, Abutayeh M, Abu-Nada E Effects of nanofluids on the performance of a PCM-based thermal energy storage system. J Energy Eng 143(4):04017006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.000043310.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000433 ↗
6. Aguirre C I, Reguera E, Stein A. Tunable colors in opals and inverse opal photonic crystals. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 2565–2578. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20100014310.1002/adfm.201000143 ↗
7. Ahmed W, Iqbal J, Aisida SO, Badshah A, Ahmad I, Alamgir K, Gul IH (2020) Structural, magnetic and dielectric characteristics of optically tuned Fe doped ZrO2 nanoparticles with visible light driven photocatalytic activity. Mater Chem Phys 251:122999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12299910.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.122999 ↗
8. Aisida SO, Obodo RM, Arshad M, Mahmood I, Ahmad I, Ezema FI, Zhao TK, Malik M (2019) Irradiation-induced structural changes in ZnO nanowires. Nuclear Inst Methods Phys Res B 458:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2019.07.04110.1016/j.nimb.2019.07.041 ↗
9. Amin A, Meisam A, Alireza R, Lasse AR, Masoud A, Somchai W (2018) Heat transfer efficiency of Al2O3-MWCNT/thermal oil hybrid nanofluid as a cooling fluid in thermal and energy management applications: an experimental and theoretical investigation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 117:474–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.03610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.036 ↗
10. Anderson VJ, Lekkerkerker HNW (2002) Insights into phase transition kinetics from colloid science. Nature 416:811–815. https://doi.org/10.1038/416811a10.1038/416811a ↗
11. Anil RY, Venkatachalapathy S (2019) Heat transfer enhancement studies in pool boiling using hybrid nanofluids. Thermochim Acta 672:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2018.11.01410.1016/j.tca.2018.11.014 ↗
12. Asadikia A, Mirjalily SAA, Nasirizadeh N, Kargarsharifabad H (2020) Characterization of thermal and electrical properties of hybrid nanofluids prepared with multi-walled carbon nanotubes and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 117:104603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.10460310.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104603 ↗
13. Atchudan R, Edison TNJI, Perumal S, Karthikeyan D, Lee YR (2016) Facile synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles decorated graphene oxide composite via simple solvothermal route and their photocatalytic activity on methylene blue degradation. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 162:500–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.07.01910.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.07.019 ↗
14. Bahruji H, Bowker M, Davies PR, Pedrono F (2011) New insights into the mechanism of photocatalytic reforming on Pd/TiO2. Appl Catal B Environ 107:205–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.07.01510.1016/j.apcatb.2011.07.015 ↗
15. Bandyopadhyaya R, Nativ-Roth E, Regev O, Yerushalmi-Rozen R (2002) Stabilization of individual carbon nanotubes in aqueous solutions. Nano Lett 2:25–28. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl010065f10.1021/nl010065f ↗
16. Bao HQ, Pan YZ, Ping Y, Sahoo NG, Wu TF, Li L, Li J, Gan LH (2011) Chitosan-functionalized graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for drug and gene delivery. Small 7(11):1569–1578. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20110019110.1002/smll.201100191 ↗
17. Barahuie F, Saifullah B, Dorniani D, Fakurazi S, Karthivashan G, Hussein MZ, Elfghi FM (2017) Graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for controlled release and targeted delivery of an anticancer active agent, chlorogenic acid. Mater Sci Eng C 74:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.11410.1016/j.msec.2016.11.114 ↗
18. Batmunkh M, Tanshen MR, Nine MJ, Myekhlai M, Choi H, Chung H, Jeong H (2014) Thermal conductivity of TiO2 nanoparticles based aqueous nanofluids with an addition of a modified silver particle. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(20):8445–8451. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie403712f10.1021/ie403712f ↗
19. Botha SS, Ndungu P, Bladergroen BJ (2011) Physicochemical properties of oil-based nanofluids containing hybrid structures of silver nanoparticles supported on silica. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:3071–3077. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101088x10.1021/ie101088x ↗
20. Bowker M, Morton C, Kennedy J, Bahruji H, Greves J, Jones W, Davies PR, Brookes C, Wells PP, Dimitratos N (2014) Hydrogen production by photoreforming of biofuels using Au, Pd and Au-Pd/TiO2 photocatalysts. J Catal 310:10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2013.04.00510.1016/j.jcat.2013.04.005 ↗
21. Byrd TL, Walz JY (2005) Interaction force profiles between Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts and silica surfaces. Environ Sci Technol 39(24):9574–9582. https://doi.org/10.1021/es051231e10.1021/es051231e ↗
22. Cacua K, Ordoñez F, Zapata C, Herrera B, Pabón E, Buitrago-Sierra R (2019) Surfactant concentration and pH effects on the zeta potential values of alumina nanofluids to inspect stability. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.12396010.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123960 ↗
23. Cai XY, Wang C, Chen Y, Cheng ZD, Shu RY, Zhang JT, Bu EQ, Liao MZ, Song QB (2018) A novel approach for enhancing hydrogen production from bio-glycerol photoreforming by improving colloidal dispersion stability. Sci Total Environ 627:1464–1472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.00910.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.009 ↗
24. Chan AT, Lewis JA (2005) Electrostatically tuned interactions in silica microsphere-polystyrene nanoparticle mixtures. Langmuir 21(19):8576–8579. https://doi.org/10.1021/la051007310.1021/la0510073 ↗
25. Chan AT, Lewis JA (2008) Size ratio effects on interparticle interactions and phase behavior of microsphere-nanoparticle mixtures. Langmuir 24(20):11399–11405. https://doi.org/10.1021/la800422g10.1021/la800422g ↗
26. Chen B, Liu M, Zhang LM, Huang J, Yao JL, Zhang ZJ (2011) Polyethylenimine-functionalized graphene oxide as an efficient gene delivery vector. J Mater Chem 21:7736. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM10341E10.1039/C1JM10341E ↗
27. Chen LF, Chen M, Yang DJ, Yang L (2014) Enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluid by synergistic effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Appl Mech Mater 548–549:118–123. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.548-549.11810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.548-549.118 ↗
28. Chen ZS, Liang XP, Zhu SY, Zhang D, Yang SM, Yao X, Zhao JQ, Wang HY, Li JX (2018a) Preparation, characterization and catalytic performance of Ag/Ce/La co-modified TiO2 photocatalysts. Ferroelectrics 522:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2018.139276910.1080/00150193.2018.1392769 ↗
29. Chen JP, Shi WL, Xiong CX (2018b) Mixed solvent-mediated exfoliation of graphene invoked by synergistic effect of steric hindrance and hydrogen bond for improved electrochemical performance on its polymeric composites. Electrochim Acta 283:818–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.02010.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.020 ↗
30. Chieruzzi M, Cerritelli GF, Miliozzi A, Kenny JM, Torre L Heat capacity of nanofluids for solar energy storage produced by dispersing oxide nanoparticles in nitrate salt mixture directly at high temperature. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 167:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2017.04.01110.1016/j.solmat.2017.04.011 ↗
31. Chrisey DB (2000) The power of direct writing. Science 289:879–881. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5481.87910.1126/science.289.5481.879 ↗
32. Chung SJ, Leonard JP, Nettleship I, Lee JK, Soong Y, Martello DV, Chyu MK (2009) Characterization of ZnO nanoparticle suspension in water: effectiveness of ultrasonic dispersion. Powder Technol 194:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.02510.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.025 ↗
33. Cinacchi G, Doshi N, Prescott SW, Cosgrove T, Grillo I, Lindner P, Phipps JS, Gittins D, van Duijneveldt JS (2012) The effect of size ratio on the sphere structure factor in colloidal sphere-plate mixtures. J Chem Phys 137:204909. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.476772210.1063/1.4767722 ↗
34. Dai K, Lu LH, Liang GH, Dai JM, Zhu GP, Liu ZL, Liu QZ, Zhang YX (2014) Graphene oxide modified ZnO nanorods hybrid with high reusable photocatalytic activity under UV-LED irradiation. Mater Chem Phys 143:1410–1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.11.05510.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.11.055 ↗
35. Dalkılıç A S, et. al. Experimental study on the thermal conductivity of water-based CNT-SiO2 hybrid nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 99 (2018) 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.10.00210.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.10.002 ↗
36. Das PK A review based on the effect and mechanism of thermal conductivity of normal nanofluids and hybrid nanofluids. J Mol Liq 240:420–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.05.07110.1016/j.molliq.2017.05.071 ↗
37. Depan D, Shah J, Misra RDK (2011) Controlled release of drug from folate-decorated and graphene mediated drug delivery system: synthesis, loading efficiency, and drug release response. Mater Sci Eng C 31:1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2011.04.01010.1016/j.msec.2011.04.010 ↗
38. Doshi N, Cinacchi G, van Duijneveldt JS, Cosgrove T, Prescott SW, Grillo I, Phipps J, Gittins DI (2011) Structure of colloidal sphere-plate mixtures. J Phys: Condensed Matter 23:194109. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/23/19/19410910.1088/0953-8984/23/19/194109 ↗
39. Dutta N, Green D (2010) Impact of solvent quality on nanoparticle dispersion in semidilute and concentrated polymer solutions. Langmuir 26(22):16737–16744. https://doi.org/10.1021/la102401w10.1021/la102401w ↗
40. Etale A, Tavengwa N, Tutu H, Drake DC (2016) Synthesis, characterization, and application of functionalized silica–carbon hybrid nanoparticles for the treatment of acidic Cu (II)-contaminated water. Clean – Soil, Air, Water 45(2):1500873. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.20150087310.1002/clen.201500873 ↗
41. Feng LZ, Zhang S, Liu Z (2011) Graphene based gene transfection. Nanoscale 3:1252–1257. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0NR00680G10.1039/C0NR00680G ↗
42. Gallego A, Cacua K, Herrera B, Cabaleiro D, Piñeiro MM, Lugo L (2020) Experimental evaluation of the effect in the stability and thermophysical properties of water-Al2O3 based nanofluids using SDBS as dispersant agent. Adv Powder Technol 31(2):560–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2019.11.01210.1016/j.apt.2019.11.012 ↗
43. Ghadimi A, Metselaar IH (2013) The influence of surfactant and ultrasonic processing on improvement of stability, thermal conductivity and viscosity of titania nanofluid. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 51:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.06.00110.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.06.001 ↗
44. Gupta A, Vasudevan S (2018) Understanding surfactant stabilization of MoS2 nanosheets in aqueous dispersions from zeta potential measurements and molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem C 122(33):19243–19250. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0592210.1021/acs.jpcc.8b05922 ↗
45. Han PX, Yue YH, Liu ZH, Xu W, Zhang LX, Xu HX et al (2011) Graphene oxide nanosheets/multi-walled carbon nanotubes hybrid as an excellent electrocatalytic material towards VO2+/VO2+ redox couples for vanadium redox flow batteries. Energy Environ Sci 4:4710–4717. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EE01776D10.1039/C1EE01776D ↗
46. Harandi SS, Karimipour A, Afrand M, Akbari M, D'Orazio A (2016) An experimental study on thermal conductivity of F-MWCNTs–Fe3O4/EG hybrid nanofluid: effects of temperature and concentration. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 76:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.05.02910.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.05.029 ↗
47. Harikrishnan S, Devaraju A, Kumar GR, Kalaiselvam S (2019a) Improved thermal energy storage behavior of a novel nanofluid as phase change material (PCM). Materials Today: Proceedings 9:410–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.02.17010.1016/j.matpr.2019.02.170 ↗
48. Harikrishnan S, Devaraju A, Sivasamy P, Kalaiselvam S (2019b) Experimental investigation of improved thermal characteristics of SiO2/myristic acid nanofluid as phase change material (PCM). Materials Today: Proceedings 9:397–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.02.16910.1016/j.matpr.2019.02.169 ↗
49. He YT, Wan JM, Tokunaga T (2008) Kinetic stability of hematite nanoparticles: the effect of particle sizes. J Nanopart Res 10:321–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-007-9255-110.1007/s11051-007-9255-1 ↗
50. He L, Wang MS, Ge JP, Yin YD (2012) Magnetic assembly route to colloidal responsive photonic nanostructures. Acc Chem Res 45(9):1431–1440. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar200276t10.1021/ar200276t ↗
51. He LX, Liao CZ, Tjong SC (2018 Apr) Scalable fabrication of high-performance transparent conductors using Graphene oxide-stabilized single-walled carbon nanotube inks. Nanomaterials (Basel) 8(4):224. https://doi.org/10.3390/2Fnano804022410.3390/2Fnano8040224 ↗
52. Hemmat EM, Rejvani M, Alirezaie A (2016) An applicable study on the thermal conductivity of SWCNT-MgO hybrid nanofluid and price-performance analysis for energy management. Appl Therm Eng 111:1202–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.09110.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.091 ↗
53. Ho CJ, Huang JB, Tsai PS, Yang YM (2010) Preparation and properties of hybrid water-based suspension of Al2O3 nanoparticles and MEPCM particles as functional forced convection fluid. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 37:490–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.12.00710.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.12.007 ↗
54. Ho CJ, Huang JB, Tsai PS, Yang YM (2011) On laminar convective cooling performance of hybrid water-based suspensions of Al2O3 nanoparticles and MEPCM particles in a circular tube. Int J Heat Mass Transf 54:2397–2407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.02.02210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.02.022 ↗
55. Hu XH, Li D, Tan HP, Pan CB, Chen XX (2014) Injectable graphene oxide/graphene composite supramolecular hydrogel for delivery of anti-cancer drugs. J Macromol Sci Part A 51:378–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10601325.2014.88270410.1080/10601325.2014.882704 ↗
56. Huang J, Wang XJ, Long Q, Wen XY, Zhou YJ, Li LM (2009) Influence of pH on the stability characteristics of nanofluid. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOPO.2009.523010210.1109/SOPO.2009.5230102 ↗
57. Huang L, Zhang M, Li C, Shi GQ (2015) Graphene-based membranes for molecular separation. J Phys Chem Lett. 6(14):2806–2815. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0091410.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00914 ↗
58. Huang D, Wu Z, Sunden B (2016) Effects of hybrid nanofluid mixture in plate heat exchangers. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 72:190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.11.00910.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.11.009 ↗
59. Huminic G, Huminic A (2018) Heat transfer capability of the hybrid nanofluids for heat transfer applications. J Mol Liq 272:857–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.10.09510.1016/j.molliq.2018.10.095 ↗
60. Hung YH, Wang WP, Hsu YC, Teng TP (2017) Performance evaluation of an air-cooled heat exchange system for hybrid nanofluids. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 81:43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.10.00610.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.10.006 ↗
61. Islam MF, Rojas E, Bergey DM, Johnson AT, Yodh AG (2003) High weight fraction surfactant solubilization of single-wall carbon nanotubes in water. Nano Lett 3:269–273. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl025924u10.1021/nl025924u ↗
62. Israr M, Iqbal J, Arshad A, Aisida SO, Ahmad I (2020) A unique ZnFe2O4/graphene nanoplatelets nanocomposite for electrochemical energy storage and efficient visible light driven catalysis for the degradation of organic noxious in wastewater. J Phys Chem Solids 140:109333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.10933310.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109333 ↗
63. Jia LS, L Y, Chen Y, Wang JC, Mo SP, Li J, Liu G (2019) New hybrid suspension of MEPCM/GO particles with enhanced dispersion stability and thermo-physical properties. Appl Energy 255:113827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11382710.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113827 ↗
64. Justin R, Chen BQ (2014) Characterisation and drug release performance of biodegradable chitosan–graphene oxide nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 103:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.12.01210.1016/j.carbpol.2013.12.012 ↗
65. Kazi SN, Badarudin A, Zubir MNM, Ming HN, Misran M, Sadeghinezhad E, Mehrali M, Syuhada NI (2015) Investigation on the use of graphene oxide as novel surfactant to stabilize weakly charged graphene nanoplatelets. Nanoscale Res Lett 10(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-015-0882-710.1186/s11671-015-0882-7 ↗
66. Kim YK, Min DH (2010) Preparation of scrolled graphene oxides with multi-walled carbon nanotube templates. Carbon 48:4283–4288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.07.03910.1016/j.carbon.2010.07.039 ↗
67. Kim J, Cote LJ, Kim F, Yuan W, Shull KR, Huang JX (2010) Graphene oxide sheets at interfaces. J Am Chem Soc 132(23):8180–8186. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja102777p10.1021/ja102777p ↗
68. Kim J, Tung VC, Huang JX (2011a) Water processable graphene oxide: single walled carbon nanotube composite as anode modifier for polymer solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 1:1052–1057. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20110046610.1002/aenm.201100466 ↗
69. Kim H, Namgung R, Singha K, Oh IK, Kim WJ (2011b) Graphene oxide-polyethylenimine nanoconstruct as a gene delivery vector and bioimaging tool. Bioconjugate Chem 22(12):2558–2567. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc200397j10.1021/bc200397j ↗
70. Kim JH, Nishimura F, Yonezawa S, Takashima M (2012) Enhanced dispersion stability and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 particles fluorinated by fluorine gas. J Fluor Chem 144:165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2012.08.01010.1016/j.jfluchem.2012.08.010 ↗
71. Kim BJ, Cha SH, Kang GH, Kong K, Ji W, Park HW, Park YB (2018) Interfacial control through ZnO nanorod growth on plasma-treated carbon fiber for multiscale reinforcement of carbon fiber/polyamide 6 composites. Mater Today Commun 17:438–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.10.01110.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.10.011 ↗
72. Labib MN, Nine MJ, Afrianto H, Chung H, Jeong H (2013) Numerical investigation on effect of base fluids and hybrid nanofluid in forced convective heat transfer. Int J Therm Sci 71:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2013.04.00310.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2013.04.003 ↗
73. Lamy-Mendes A, Silva RF, Durães L (2018) Advances in carbon nanostructure–silica aerogel composites: a review. J Mater Chem A 6:1340–1369. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA08959G10.1039/C7TA08959G ↗
74. Lee MH, Yang ZG, Lim CW, Lee YH, Sun DB, Kang C, Kim JS (2013) Disulfide-cleavage-triggered chemosensors and their biological applications. Chem Rev 113(7):5071–5109. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300358b10.1021/cr300358b ↗
75. Lekkerkerker HNW (2000) Liquid-crystalline phase behavior of a colloidal rod-plate Mixture. Phys Rev Lett 84:781–784. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.84.78110.1103/physrevlett.84.781 ↗
76. Li XF, Zhu DS, Wang XJ (2007) Evaluation on dispersion behavior of the aqueous copper nano-suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci 310:456–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.02.06710.1016/j.jcis.2007.02.067 ↗
77. Li J, Zheng C, Cansiz S, Wu CC, Xu JH, Cui C, Liu Y, Hou WJ, Wang YY, Zhang LQ, Teng IT, Yang HH, Tan WH (2015) Self-assembly of DNA nanohydrogels with controllable size and stimuli-responsive property for targeted gene regulation therapy. J Am Chem Soc 137(4):1412–1415. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja512293f10.1021/ja512293f ↗
78. Li GJ, Xiao L, Liu SY, Wang HM, Gao Y, Wang Q (2018) Effect of nanowires in microporous structures on the thermoelectric properties of oxidized Sb-doped ZnO film. J Eur Ceram Soc 38(4):1608–1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.11.02210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.11.022 ↗
79. Li NX, Zhang YW, Huang B, Li H (2019) Ultrasonic dispersion temperature- and pH-tuned spectral and electrochemical properties of bovine serum albumin on carbon nanotubes and its conformational transition. Electrochim Acta 296:555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.08910.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.089 ↗
80. Li Y, Li YQ, Huang XB, Zheng HY, Lu GL, Xi ZS, Wang G (2020) Graphene-CoO/PEG composite phase change materials with enhanced solar-to-thermal energy conversion and storage capacity. Composites Sci Technol 195:108197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10819710.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108197 ↗
81. Liu JW, Luijten E (2004) Stabilization of colloidal suspensions by means of highly charged nanoparticles. Phys Rev Lett 93(24):247802. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.24780210.1103/PhysRevLett.93.247802 ↗
82. Liu Z, Robinson JT, Sun XM, Dai HJ (2008) PEGylated nanographene oxide for delivery of water-insoluble cancer drugs. J Am Chem Soc 130(33):10876–10877. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja803688x10.1021/ja803688x ↗
83. Liu ZW, Chen Y, Mo SP, Cheng ZD, Li HW (2015a) Stability of TiO2 nanoparticles in deionized water with ZrP nanoplatelets. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 15(4):3271–3275. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2015.968510.1166/jnn.2015.9685 ↗
84. Liu ZW, Yin T, Chen Y, Cheng ZD, Mo SP, Jia LS (August 2015b) Improving the stability of TiO2 aqueous suspensions by coupling TiO2 nanoparticles on ZrP nanoplatelets. Energy Procedia 75:2199–2204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.37710.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.377 ↗
85. Liu T, Yang B, Graham N, Yu WZ, Sun KN (2017) Trivalent metal cation cross-linked graphene oxide membranes for NOM removal in water treatment. J Membr Sci 542:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.06110.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.061 ↗
86. Lu CH, Zhu CL, Li J, Liu JJ, Chen X, Yang HH (2010) Using graphene to protect DNA from cleavage during cellular delivery. Chem Commun 46:3116–3118. https://doi.org/10.1039/B926893F10.1039/B926893F ↗
87. Luo J, Cote LJ, Tung VC, Tan ATL, Goins PE, Wu JS et al (2010) Graphene oxide nanocolloids. J Am Chem Soc 132(50):17667–17669. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja107894310.1021/ja1078943 ↗
88. Madni I, Hwang CY, Park SD, Choa YH, Kim HT (2010) Mixed surfactant system for stable suspension of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Colloids Surface A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 358(1–3):101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.01.03010.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.01.030 ↗
89. Mageshbabu D, Nagarajan PK, Madhu B, Bharathwaaj R, Somchai W, El-Naby KA, Ravishankar S (2018) Thermophysical properties of CNT and CNT/Al2O3 hybrid nanofluid. Micro Nano Lett 13(5):617–621. https://doi.org/10.1049/mnl.2017.002910.1049/mnl.2017.0029 ↗
90. Mandari KK, Kwak BS, Police AKR, Kang M (2017) In-situ photo-reduction of silver particles and their SPR effect in enhancing the photocatalytic water splitting of Ag2O/TiO2 photocatalysts under solar light irradiation: a case study. Mater Res Bull 95:515–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.08.02810.1016/j.materresbull.2017.08.028 ↗
91. Manilo M, Bohacs K, Lebovka N, Barany S (2018) Impact of surfactant and clay platelets on electrokinetic potential and size distribution in carbon nanotubes aqueous suspensions. Colloids and Surfaces A 544:205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.02.03010.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.02.030 ↗
92. Mason TG Osmotically driven shape-dependent colloidal separations. Phys Rev E 66:060402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.66.06040210.1103/PhysRevE.66.060402 ↗
93. Mo SP, Shao XF, Chen Y, Cheng ZD (2016) Increasing entropy for colloidal stabilization. Sci Rep 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3683610.1038/srep36836 ↗
94. Mo SP, Liu ZW, Yuan X, Chen Y, Jia LS, Yang Z, Yin T, Cheng ZD (October 2017) Synthesis and comparative study on dispersion stability of binary suspensions of mixed and composite nanoparticles. Nanosci Nanotechnol Lett 9(10):1505–1513. https://doi.org/10.1166/nnl.2017.250810.1166/nnl.2017.2508 ↗
95. Mohammad K, Azar NS, Hossein M, Seyedeh ER (2018) Magnetic graphene oxide inlaid with silver nanoparticles as antibacterial and drug delivery composite. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:3607–3621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8880-110.1007/s00253-018-8880-1 ↗
96. Mohsen I, Rasul M, Davood K, Sheremet MA (2018) Numerical simulation of natural convection heat transfer inside a ┴ shaped cavity filled by a MWCNT-Fe3O4/water hybrid nanofluids using LBM. Chemical Engineering & Processing: Process Intensification 125:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2018.01.00410.1016/j.cep.2018.01.004 ↗
97. Mostafa Z, Mojtaba R, Mozhgan A, Hamidreza KM, Kobra R, Hossein D (2018) Mesoporous titanium dioxide@ zinc oxide–graphene oxide nanocarriers for colon-specific drug delivery. J Mater Sci 53:1634–1645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1673-610.1007/s10853-017-1673-6 ↗
98. Munkhbayar B, Tanshen MR, Jeoun J, Chung H, Jeong H (2013) Surfactant-free dispersion of silver nanoparticles into MWCNT-aqueous nanofluids prepared by one-step technique and their thermal characteristics. Ceram Int 39(6):6415–6425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.01.06910.1016/j.ceramint.2013.01.069 ↗
99. Muñoz-sánchez B, Nieto-maestre J, Iparraguirre-torres I, García-romero A, Sala-lizarraga JM Molten salt-based nano fluids as efficient heat transfer and storage materials at high temperatures. An overview of the literature. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:3924–3945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.08010.1016/j.rser.2017.10.080 ↗
100. Mwamb A K, Walter W F, Elizabeth L D T, Heidi R, Shatish R. Breakdown mechanisms of oil-in-water emulsions stabilised with Pluronic F127 and co-surfactants. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2020, . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124101, 58510.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124101 ↗