journal article·2015-10

Intensification of the separation of CuO nanoparticles from their highly diluted suspension using a foam flotation column with S type internal

Nan Hu, Rui Li, Zhao-liang Wu, Di Huang, Hong Zhen Li

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 17· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Foam flotation is a promising technique for recovering nanoparticles from their highly diluted suspensions. In this work, a novel S type internal was developed to intensify the foam flotation of CuO nanoparticles (357.6 nm in average particle size) from their suspension of 6.2 × 10−2 mmol/L. By enhancing foam drainage, the S type internal increased the enrichment ratio of CuO nanoparticles by 139.3 ± 12.5 % without significantly affecting their recovery percentage. Under the optimal conditions of Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) concentration 0.45 mmol/L, superficial airflow rate 2.6 mm/s, and volumetric feed rate 1.0 mL/min, the enrichment ratio and recovery percentage of CuO nanoparticles reached 81.6 ± 4.1 and 95.4 ± 4.9 %, respectively, using the foam flotation column with the S type internal. Furthermore, about 95 % CTAB could be recycled by recovering CTAB from the foamate and the residual solution. The recovered CuO nanoparticles were associated with CTAB molecules, so they had better dispersity and dispersion stability than the starting CuO nanoparticles. Therefore, they would have good reusability.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Extraction and Separation Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Aresta A, Calvano CD, Trapani A et al (2013) Development and analytical characterization of vitamin (s)-loaded chitosan nanoparticles for potential food packaging applications. J Nanopart Res 15(4):1–1210.1007/s11051-013-1592-7 ↗
2. Awatey B, Skinner W, Zanin M (2013) Effect of particle size distribution on recovery of coarse chalcopyrite and galena in Denver flotation cell. Can Metall Quart 52(4):465–47210.1179/1879139513Y.0000000085 ↗
3. Binks BP, Horozov TS (2005) Aqueous foams stabilized solely by silica nanoparticles. Angew Chem 117(24):3788–379110.1002/ange.200462470 ↗
4. Dickinson JE, Laskovski D, Stevenson P et al (2010) Enhanced foam drainage using parallel inclined channels in a single-stage foam fractionation column. Chem Eng Sci 65(8):2481–249010.1016/j.ces.2009.12.027 ↗
5. Donaldson K, Aitken R, Tran L et al (2006) Carbon nanotubes: a review of their properties in relation to pulmonary toxicology and workplace safety. Toxicol Sci 92(1):5–2210.1093/toxsci/kfj130 ↗
6. Esumi K, Toyoda A, Goino M et al (1998) Adsorption characteristics of cationic surfactants on titanium dioxide with quaternary ammonium groups and their adsolubilization. J Colloid Interf Sci 202(2):377–38410.1006/jcis.1998.5455 ↗
7. Gerakis AM, Koupparis MA (1994) Physicochemical studies of the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide micellar system using a bromide selective electrode. Talanta 41(5):765–77310.1016/0039-9140(93)E0045-F ↗
8. Guzman O, Abbott NL, de Pablo JJ (2005) Quenched disorder in a liquid-crystal biosensor: adsorbed nanoparticles at confining walls. J Chem Phys 122(18):18471110.1063/1.1896354 ↗
9. Jayaprakash J, Srinivasan N, Chandrasekaran P (2014) Surface modifications of CuO nanoparticles using Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid as a capping agent by sol–gel routine. Spectrochim Acta A 123:363–36810.1016/j.saa.2013.12.080 ↗
10. Jing X, Park JH, Peters TM et al (2015) Toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in lung epithelial cells exposed at the air–liquid interface compared with in vivo assessment. Toxicol In Vitro 29(3):502–51110.1016/j.tiv.2014.12.023 ↗
11. Li X, Evans GM, Stevenson P (2011) Process intensification of foam fractionation by successive contraction and expansion. Chem Eng Res Des 89(11):2298–230810.1016/j.cherd.2011.04.009 ↗
12. Li J, Wu Z, Li R (2012) Technology of streptomycin sulfate separation by two-stage foam separation. Biotechnol Progr 28(3):733–73910.1002/btpr.1543 ↗
13. Limbach LK, Bereiter R, Müller E et al (2008) Removal of oxide nanoparticles in a model wastewater treatment plant: influence of agglomeration and surfactants on clearing efficiency. Environ Sci Technol 42(15):5828–583310.1021/es800091f ↗
14. Linke D, Zorn H, Gerken B et al (2005) Foam fractionation of exo-lipases from a growing fungus (Pleurotus sapidus). Lipids 40(3):323–32710.1007/s11745-005-1389-x ↗
15. Liu JF, Sun J, Jiang GB (2010) Use of cloud point extraction for removal of nanosized copper oxide from wastewater. Chin Sci Bull 55(4–5):346–349
16. Lu K, Li R, Wu Z et al (2013) Wall effect on rising foam drainage and its application to foam separation. Sep Purif Technol 118:710–71510.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.024 ↗
17. Lyubutin IS, Starchikov SS, Lin CR et al (2013) Magnetic, structural, and electronic properties of iron sulfide Fe3S4 nanoparticles synthesized by the polyol mediated process. J Nanopart Res 15(1):1–1310.1007/s11051-012-1397-0 ↗
18. Merz J, Burghoff B, Zorn H et al (2011) Continuous foam fractionation: performance as a function of operating variables. Sep Purif Technol 82:10–1810.1016/j.seppur.2011.07.023 ↗
19. Qiang Y, Antony J, Sharma A et al (2006) Iron/iron oxide core-shell nanoclusters for biomedical applications. J Nanopart Res 8(3–4):489–49610.1007/s11051-005-9011-3 ↗
20. Rakoczy R, Masiuk S (2009) Experimental study of bubble size distribution in a liquid column exposed to a rotating magnetic field. Chem Eng Process 48(7):1229–124010.1016/j.cep.2009.05.001 ↗
21. Rao CNR, Cheetham AK (2011) Science and technology of nanomaterials: current status and future prospects. J Mater Chem 11(12):2887–2894
22. Rehman S, Mumtaz A, Hasanain SK (2011) Size effects on the magnetic and optical properties of CuO nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 13(6):2497–250710.1007/s11051-010-0143-8 ↗
23. Ren J, Lu S, Shen J et al (2001) Research on the composite dispersion of ultra fine powder in the air. Mater Chem Phys 69(1):204–20910.1016/S0254-0584(00)00396-5 ↗
24. Saint-Jalmes A, Vera MU, Durian DJ (2000) Free drainage of aqueous foams: container shape effects on capillarity and vertical gradients. Epl-Europhys Lett 50(5):69510.1209/epl/i2000-00326-y ↗
25. Shen YH (1998) Colloidal titanium dioxide separation from water by foam flotation. Sep Sci Technol 33:2623–263510.1080/01496399808545323 ↗
26. Stevenson P (2007) Hydrodynamic theory of rising foam. Miner Eng 20(3):282–28910.1016/j.mineng.2006.10.003 ↗
27. Stone V, Johnston H, Clift MJD (2007) Air pollution, ultrafine and nanoparticle toxicology: cellular and molecular interactions. IEEE T Nanobiosci 6(4):331–34010.1109/TNB.2007.909005 ↗
28. Valcárcel M (2011) Nanoparticles in the water cycle. In: FH Frimmel, R Niessner (eds) Properties, analysis, and environmental relevance. Anal Bioanal Chem 400(9): 2679–2680
29. Westerhoff P, Song G, Hristovski K et al (2011) Occurrence and removal of titanium at full scale wastewater treatment plants: implications for TiO2 nanomaterials. J Environ Monitor 13(5):1195–120310.1039/c1em10017c ↗
30. Yan J, Wu Z, Zhao Y et al (2011) Separation of tea saponin by two-stage foam fractionation. Sep Purif Technol 80(2):300–30510.1016/j.seppur.2011.05.010 ↗
31. Yang QW, Wu ZL, Zhao YL et al (2011) Enhancing foam drainage using foam fractionation column with spiral internal for separation of sodium dodecyl sulfate. J Hazard Mater 192(3):1900–190410.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.018 ↗
32. Zhang Y, Chen Y, Westerhoff P et al (2008) Stability of commercial metal oxide nanoparticles in water. Water Res 42(8):2204–221210.1016/j.watres.2007.11.036 ↗