journal article·2010-06

Pure drug nanoparticles in tablets: what are the dissolution limitations?

Desmond Heng, Keiko Ogawa, David J. Cutler, Hak-Kim Chan, Judy A. Raper, Lin Ye, Jimmy Yun

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 12· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

There has been increasing interests for drug companies to incorporate drug nanoparticles into their existing formulations. However, technical knowledge in this area is still in its infancy and more study needs to be done to stimulate growth in this fledging field. There is a need to scrutinize the performance of pure drug nanoparticles in tablets, particularly relating formulation variables to their dissolution performance. Application of the pure form, synthesized without the use of surfactants or stabilizers, is often preferred to maximize drug loading and also to minimize toxicity. Cefuroxime axetil, a poorly water-soluble cephalosporin antibiotic, was used as the model drug in the formulation development. Drug release rate, tablet disintegration time, tensile strength and energy of failure were predominantly influenced by the amount of super-disintegrant, amount of surfactant, compression force and diluent species, respectively. The compression rate had minimal impact on the responses. The main hurdle confronting the effective use of pure drug nanoparticles in tablets is the difficulty in controlling aggregation in solution, which could potentially be aggravated by the tabletting process. Through the use of elevated levels of surfactants (8 w/w% sodium dodecyl sulphate), drug release from the nanoparticle preparation was enhanced from 58.0 ± 2.7% to 72.3 ± 0.7% in 10 min. Hence, it is recommended that physical formulations for pure drug nanoparticles be focused on the particle de-aggregation step in solution, if much higher rates are to be desired. In conclusion, even though pure drug nanoparticles could be easily synthesized, limitations from aggregation may need to be overcome, before successful application in tablets can be fully realized.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems · Advanced Drug Delivery Systems · Pharmaceutical studies and practices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Adams DH, Wood MJ, Farrell ID (1985) Oral cefuroxime axetil: clinical pharmacology and comparative dose studies in urinary tract infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 16:359–36610.1093/jac/16.3.359 ↗
2. Aguiar AJ, Zelmer JE, Kinkel AW (1967) Deaggregation behavior of a relatively insoluble substituted benzoic acid and its sodium salt. J Pharm Sci 56(10):1243–125210.1002/jps.2600561006 ↗
3. Alderborn G (2005) Tablets and compaction. In: Aulton ME (ed) Pharmaceutics. The science of dosage form design, 2nd edn. Elsevier, London, pp 397–440
4. Ashford M (2005) Bioavailability—physicochemical and dosage form factors. In: Aulton ME (ed) Pharmaceutics. The science of dosage form design, 2nd edn. Elsevier, London, pp 234–252
5. Attwood D, Florence AT (1983) Surfactant systems, their chemistry, pharmacy and biology. Chapman & Hall, New York
6. Brown CK, Chokshi HP, Nickerson B, Reed RA, Rohrs BR, Shah PA (2004) Acceptable analytical practices for dissolution testing of poorly soluble compounds. Pharm Technol 28: 56–65
7. Busignies V, Leclerc B, Porion P, Evesque P, Couarraze G, Tchoreloff P (2006) Compaction behaviour and new predictive approach to the compressibility of binary mixtures of pharmaceutical excipients. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 64:66–7410.1016/j.ejpb.2006.03.004 ↗
8. Chen JF, Zhang JY, Shen ZG, Zhong J, Yun J (2006) Preparation and characterisation of amorphous cefuroxime axetil drug nanoparticles with novel technology: high-gravity antisolvent precipitation. Ind Eng Chem Res 45(25):8723–872710.1021/ie060445h ↗
9. Date AA, Patravale VB (2004) Current strategies for engineering drug nanoparticles. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 9:222–23510.1016/j.cocis.2004.06.009 ↗
10. David ST, Augsburger LL (1974) Flexure test for determination of tablet tensile strength. J Pharm Sci 63:933–93610.1002/jps.2600630628 ↗
11. Diemunsch AM, Pabst JY, Constant C, Mathis C, Stamm A (1993) Tablet formulation: Genichi Taguchi’s approach. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 19(12):1461–147710.3109/03639049309047185 ↗
12. Dokoumetzidis A, Macheras P (2006) A century of dissolution research: from Noyes and Whitney to the biopharmaceutics classification system. Int J Pharm 321:1–1110.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.07.011 ↗
13. Dressman JB, Amidon GL, Reppas C, Shah VP (1998) Dissolution testing as a prognostic tool for oral drug absorption: immediate release dosage forms. Pharm Res 15(1):11–2210.1023/A:1011984216775 ↗
14. Edge S, Steele DF, Chen A, Tobyn MJ, Staniforth JN (2000) The mechanical properties of compact of microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm 200:67–7210.1016/S0378-5173(00)00343-4 ↗
15. Edge S, Steele DF, Tobyn MJ, Staniforth JN, Chen A (2001) Directional bonding in compacted microcrystalline cellulose. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 27(7):613–62110.1081/DDC-100107317 ↗
16. Eerikainen H, Watanabe W, Kauppinen EI, Ahonen PP (2003) Aerosol flow reactor method for synthesis of drug nanoparticles. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 55:357–36010.1016/S0939-6411(03)00005-5 ↗
17. El-Shabouri MH (2002) Nanoparticles for improving the dissolution and oral bioavailability of spironolactone, a poorly-soluble drug. STP Pharm Sci 12(2):97–101
18. Esezobo S, Pilpel N (1977) Formulation factors affecting strength and dissolution of uncoated oxytetracycline tablets. J Pharm Sci 66(6):852–85810.1002/jps.2600660630 ↗
19. Fassihi AR (1986) Mechanisms of disintegration and compactibility of disintegrants in a direct compression system. Int J Pharm 32:93–9610.1016/0378-5173(86)90104-3 ↗
20. Fell JT, Newton JM (1970) Determination of tablet strength by the diametral-compression test. J Pharm Sci 59(5):688–69110.1002/jps.2600590523 ↗
21. Florence AT (2007) Pharmaceutical nanotechnology: more than size. Ten topics for research. Int J Pharm 339:1–210.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.06.009 ↗
22. Gupta RB (2006) Fundamentals of drug nanoparticles. In: Gupta RB, Kompella UB (eds) Drugs and the pharmaceutical sciences: nanoparticle technology for drug delivery. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 6–910.1201/9780849374555 ↗
23. Heng D, Cutler DJ, Chan HK, Yun J, Raper JA (2008a) Dissolution kinetic behavior of drug nanoparticles and their conformity to the diffusion model. Langmuir 24(14):7538–754410.1021/la800694j ↗
24. Heng D, Cutler DJ, Chan HK, Yun J, Raper JA (2008b) What is a suitable dissolution method for drug nanoparticles? Pharm Res 25(7):1696–170110.1007/s11095-008-9560-0 ↗
25. Huang J, Bartell LS (2001) Structure and properties of potassium iodide nanoparticles. A molecular dynamics study. J Mol Struct 567–568:145–15610.1016/S0022-2860(01)00543-9 ↗
26. Iskandarani B, Clair JH, Patel P, Shiromani PK, Dempski RE (1993) Simultaneous optimization of capsule and tablet formulation using response surface methodology. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 19(16):2089–210110.3109/03639049309069343 ↗
27. Johnson BK, Prud’homme RK (2003) Chemical processing and micromixing in confined impinging jets. AlChE Journal 49(9):2264–228210.1002/aic.690490905 ↗
28. Jose-Yacaman M, Gutierrez-Wing C, Miki M, Yang DQ, Piyakis KN, Sacher E (2005) Surface diffusion and coalescence of mobile metal nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 109:9703–971110.1021/jp0509459 ↗
29. Kanfer I (2002) Report on the international workshop on the biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS): scientific and regulatory aspects in practice. J Pharm Pharm Sci 5(1):1–4
30. Katz LM (2007) Nanotechnology and applications in cosmetics: general overview. Am Chem Soc Symp Ser 961: 193–20010.1021/bk-2007-0961.ch011 ↗
31. Kesisoglou F, Panmai S, Wu Y (2007) Application of nanoparticles in oral delivery of immediate release formulations. Curr Nanosci 3:183–19010.2174/157341307780619251 ↗
32. Kim KD, Choi DW, Choa YH, Kim HT (2007) Optimization of parameters for the synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles by Taguchi robust design method. Colloids Surf A 311:170–17310.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.06.017 ↗
33. Langguth P, Hanafy A, Frenzel D, Grenier P, Nhamias A, Ohlig T et al (2005) Nanosuspension formulations for low-soluble drugs: pharmacokinetic evaluation using spironolactone as model compound. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 31:319–32910.1081/DDC-52182 ↗
34. Larhrib H, Wells JI (1997) Compression of thermally treated polyethylene glycol 10 000. Int J Pharm 153:51–5810.1016/S0378-5173(97)00085-9 ↗
35. Lee J (2003) Drug nano and microparticles processed into solid dosage forms: physical properties. J Pharm Sci 92(10):2057–206810.1002/jps.10471 ↗
36. Lee J (2007) Nanoscopic friction behavior of pharmaceutical materials. Int J Pharm 340:191–19710.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.03.017 ↗
37. Liu J, Stewart PJ (1998) Deaggregation during the dissolution of benzodiazepines in interactive mixtures. J Pharm Sci 87(12):1632–163810.1021/js960384k ↗
38. Lopez-Quintela MA (2003) Synthesis of nanomaterials in microemulsions: formation mechanisms and growth control. Current Opin Colloid Interface Sci 8(2):137–14410.1016/S1359-0294(03)00019-0 ↗
39. Mackay ME, Dao TT, Tuteja A, Ho DL, van Horn B, Kim H et al (2003) Nanoscale effects leading to non-Einstein-like decrease in viscosity. Nat Mater 2:762–76610.1038/nmat999 ↗
40. Muller RH, Junghanns JAH (2006) Drug nanocrystals/nanosuspensions for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs. In: Torchilin VP (ed) Nanoparticulates as drug carriers. Imperial College Press, London, pp 308–309
41. Muller RH, Runge S, Ravelli V, Mehnert W, Thunemann AF, Souto EB (2006) Oral bioavailability of cyclosporine: solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN®) versus drug nanocrystals. Int J Pharm 317:82–8910.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.02.045 ↗
42. Obae K, Iijima H, Imada K (1999) Morphological effect of microcrystalline cellulose particles on tablet tensile strength. Int J Pharm 182:155–16410.1016/S0378-5173(99)00057-5 ↗
43. Palmieri GF, Wehrle P (1997) Evaluation of ethylcellulose-coated pellets optimized using the approach of Taguchi. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 23(11):1069–107710.3109/03639049709150495 ↗
44. Peace GS (1993) Taguchi methods. A hands-on approach to quality engineering. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts
45. Rees JE, Rue PJ (1978) Work required to cause failure of tablets in diametral compression. Drug Dev Ind Phar 4(2):131–15610.3109/03639047809055644 ↗
46. Reverchon E, Adami R (2006) Nanomaterials and supercritical fluids. J Supercrit Fluids 37:1–2210.1016/j.supflu.2005.08.003 ↗
47. Ruddy SB, Matuszewska BK, Grim YA, Ostovic D, Storey DE (1999) Design and characterization of a surfactant-enriched tablet formulation for oral delivery of a poorly water-soluble immunosuppressive agent. Int J Pharm 182:173–18610.1016/S0378-5173(99)00056-3 ↗
48. Ryu JM, Cho SK, Jung SH, Seong SK, Cho EH, Ahn SH et al (2006) An oral preparation having improved bioavailability (WO 2006/057507 A1), Korea
49. Sager TM, Porter DW, Robinson VA, Lindsley WG, Schwegler-Berry DE, Castranova V (2007) Improved method to disperse nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo investigation of toxicity. Nanotoxicology 1(2):118–12910.1080/17435390701381596 ↗
50. Taguchi G (1986) Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and processes. Kraus International Publications, White Plains, NY
51. Varshosaz J, Hassanzadeh F, Mahmoudzadeh M, Sadeghi A (2009) Preparation of cefuroxime axetil nanoparticles by rapid expansion of supercritical fluid technology. Powder Technol 189:97–10210.1016/j.powtec.2008.06.009 ↗
52. Wang J, Flanagan DR (2002) General solution for diffusion-controlled dissolution of spherical particles. 2. Evaluation of experimental data. J Pharm Sci 91(2):534–54210.1002/jps.10039 ↗
53. Yang K, Teo E-C, Fuss FK (2007) Application of Taguchi method in optimization of cervical ring cage. J Biomech 40:3251–325610.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.12.016 ↗
54. Zhang JY, Shen ZG, Zhong J, Hu TT, Chen JF, Ma ZQ et al (2006) Preparation of amorphous cefuroxime axetil nanoparticles by controlled nanoprecipitation method without surfactants. Int J Pharm 323:153–16010.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.05.048 ↗
55. Zhao N, Augsburger L (2005) Functionality comparison of 3 classes of superdisintegrants in promoting aspirin tablet disintegration and dissolution. AAPS PharmSciTech 6(4):E634–E64010.1208/pt060479 ↗