journal article·2013-12

Role of oxygen admixture in stabilizing TiO x nanoparticle deposition from a gas aggregation source

Amir Mohammad Ahadi, Vladimir Zaporojtchenko, Tilo Peter, Oleksandr Polonskyi, Thomas Strunskus, Franz Faupel

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 15· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

For the use of a gas aggregation cluster source a high and stable deposition rate is desired. For many metals, nanoparticle formation is enhanced by admixture of reactive gases. Here, the role of reactive gas admixtures on the nanoparticle deposition rates is investigated for the case of reactive direct current magnetron sputtering of Ti in a gas aggregation chamber. The results show that, at low working gas (argon) pressures, stable cluster deposition at high rates can only be achieved for admixtures with a very narrow oxygen flow range. At higher pressures, stable deposition can be observed only after an intermediate maximum rate has been crossed or a stable deposition rate is not reached at all. For the different sputtering conditions, the partial pressure of oxygen was monitored with a mass spectrometer. The results are explained in terms of the competing roles of oxygen in cluster nucleation as well as in target poisoning. The cluster size distributions for different conditions were characterized by scanning electron microscopy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Anders C, Bringa EM, Ziegenhain G, Urbassek HM (2011) Stopping of hypervelocity clusters in solids. New J Phys 13:113019. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/11301910.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113019 ↗
2. Baletto F, Ferrando R (2005) Structural properties of nanoclusters: energetic, thermodynamic, and kinetic effects. Rev Mod Phys 77:371–423. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.37110.1103/RevModPhys.77.371 ↗
3. Bauer G, Pittner F, Schalkhammer T (1999) Metal nano-cluster biosensors. Microchim Acta 114:107–114. doi: 10.1007/PL0002139510.1007/s006040050015 ↗
4. Biederman H (2011) Nanocomposites and nanostructures based on plasma polymers. Surf Coat Technol 205:S10–S14. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.11510.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.115 ↗
5. De Heer W (1993) The physics of simple metal clusters: experimental aspects and simple models. Rev Mod Phys 65:611–676. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.61110.1103/RevModPhys.65.611 ↗
6. Depla D, Mahieu S (2008) Reactive sputter deposition, chap 5. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-540-76664-3 ↗
7. Drabik M, Choukourov A, Artemenko A et al (2011a) Structure and composition of titanium nanocluster films prepared by a gas aggregation cluster source. J Phys Chem C 115:20937–20944. doi: 10.1021/jp205948510.1021/jp2059485 ↗
8. Drabik M, Choukourov A, Artemenko A et al (2011b) Morphology of titanium nanocluster films prepared by gas aggregation cluster source. Plasma Process Polym 8:640–650. doi: 10.1002/ppap.20100012610.1002/ppap.201000126 ↗
9. Faupel F, Zaporojtchenko V, Strunskus T, Elbahri M (2010) Metal-polymer nanocomposites for functional applications. Adv Eng Mater 12:1177–1190. doi: 10.1002/adem.20109003610.1002/adem.201000231 ↗
10. Grabowska E, Remita H, Zaleska A (2010) Photocatalytic activity of TiO2 immobilized on glass beads. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 45:29–38
11. Haberland H, Karrais M, Mall M, Thurner Y (1992) Thin films from energetic cluster impact: a feasibility study. J Vac Sci Technol A 10:3266–3271. doi: 10.1116/1.57785310.1116/1.577853 ↗
12. Hihara T, Sumiyama K (1998) Formation and size control of a Ni cluster by plasma gas condensation. J Appl Phys 84:5270. doi: 10.1063/1.36877610.1063/1.368776 ↗
13. Kashtanov PV, Smirnov BM, Hippler R (2007) Magnetron plasma and nanotechnology. Phys Usp 50:455. doi: 10.1070/PU2007v050n05ABEH00613810.1070/PU2007v050n05ABEH006138 ↗
14. Kashtanov PV, Smirnov BM, Hippler R (2010) Efficiency of cluster generation in a magnetron discharge. EPL (Europhys Lett) 91:63001. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/91/6300110.1209/0295-5075/91/63001 ↗
15. Kortshagen U (2009) Nonthermal plasma synthesis of semiconductor nanocrystals. J Phys D Appl Phys 42:113001. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/11/11300110.1088/0022-3727/42/11/113001 ↗
16. Marek A, Valter J, Kadlec S, Vyskočil J (2011) Gas aggregation nanocluster source—reactive sputter deposition of copper and titanium nanoclusters. Surf Coat Technol 205:S573–S576. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.12.02710.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.12.027 ↗
17. Palmer RE, Pratontep S, Boyen H-G (2003) Nanostructured surfaces from size-selected clusters. Nat Mater 2:443–448. doi: 10.1038/nmat89710.1038/nmat897 ↗
18. Peter T, Polonskyi O, Gojdka B et al (2012) Influence of reactive gas admixture on transition metal cluster nucleation in a gas aggregation cluster source. J Appl Phys 112:114321. doi: 10.1063/1.476852810.1063/1.4768528 ↗
19. Peter T, Rehders S, Schürmann U et al (2013) High rate deposition system for metal-cluster/SiOxCyHz–polymer nanocomposite thin films. J Nanoparticle Res 15:1710. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-1710-610.1007/s11051-013-1710-6 ↗
20. Polonskyi O, Solar P, Kylian O et al (2012) Nanocomposite metal/plasma polymer films prepared by means of gas aggregation cluster source. Thin Solid Films 520:4155–4162. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.04.10010.1016/j.tsf.2011.04.100 ↗
21. Safi I (2000) Recent aspects concerning DC reactive magnetron sputtering of thin films: a review. Surf Coat Technol 127:203–218. doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00566-110.1016/S0257-8972(00)00566-1 ↗
22. Schultes G, Schmidt M, Truar M et al (2007) Co-deposition of silver nanoclusters and sputtered alumina for sensor devices. Thin Solid Films 515:7790–7797. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.18310.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.183 ↗
23. Shyjumon I, Gopinadhan M, Helm CA et al (2006) Deposition of titanium/titanium oxide clusters produced by magnetron sputtering. Thin Solid Films 500:41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.11.00610.1016/j.tsf.2005.11.006 ↗
24. Smirnov BM (2000) Cluster plasma. Phys Usp 43:453–491. doi: 10.1070/PU2000v043n05ABEH00072210.1070/PU2000v043n05ABEH000722 ↗
25. Smirnov BM (2003) Generation of cluster beams. Phys Usp 46:589–628. doi: 10.1070/PU2003v046n06ABEH00138110.1070/PU2003v046n06ABEH001381 ↗
26. Wegner K, Piseri P, Tafreshi HV, Milani P (2006) Cluster beam deposition: a tool for nanoscale science and technology. J Phys D Appl Phys 39:R439–R459. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/39/22/R0210.1088/0022-3727/39/22/R02 ↗
27. Wilcoxon JP, Abrams BL (2006) Synthesis, structure and properties of metal nanoclusters. Chem Soc Rev 35:1162–1194. doi: 10.1039/b517312b10.1039/b517312b ↗