Release potential of single-wall carbon nanotubes produced by super-growth method during manufacturing and handling
Source abstract
Abstract
We investigated the release potential of single-wall carbon nanotubes (CNTs) produced by the super-growth method during their manufacturing and handling processes at a research facility. We generally sampled air at points both outside and inside of protective enclosures such as a glove box and fume hood. Sampling the air outside of the enclosures was intended to evaluate the actual exposure of workers to CNTs, while sampling the air inside the enclosures was performed to quantify the release of CNTs to the air in order to estimate the potential exposure of workers without protection. The results revealed that airborne CNTs were generated when (1) CNTs were separated from the substrates using a spatula and placed in a container in a glove box; (2) an air gun was used to clean the air filters (containing dust that included CNTs) of a vacuum cleaner; (3) a vacuum cleaner was used to collect CNTs (emission with exhaust air from the cleaner); (4) the container of CNTs was opened; and (5) CNTs in the bin of the cleaner were transferred to a container. In these processes, airborne CNTs were only found inside the enclosures, except for a small amount of CNTs released from the glove box when it was opened. Electron microscopic observations of aerosol particles found CNT clusters, which were fragments of CNT forests, with sizes ranging from submicrometers to tens of micrometers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Nanotechnology research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Bello D, Hart AJ, Ahn K, Hallock M, Yamamoto N, Garcia EJ, Ellenbecker MJ, Wardle BL (2008) Particle exposure levels during CVD growth and subsequent handling of vertically-aligned carbon nanotube films. Carbon 46:974–981. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.03.00310.1016/j.carbon.2008.03.003 ↗
2. Bond TC, Bergstrom RW (2006) Light absorption by carbonaceous particles: an investigative review. Aerosol Sci Technol 40:27–67. doi: 10.1080/0278682050042152110.1080/02786820500421521 ↗
3. Donaldson K, Aitken R, Tran L, Stone V, Duffin R, Forrest G, Alexander A (2006) Carbon nanotubes: a review of their properties in relation to pulmonary toxicology and workplace safety. Toxicol Sci 92:5–22. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfj13010.1093/toxsci/kfj130 ↗
4. Futaba DN, Hata K, Namai T, Yamada T, Mizuno K, Hayamizu Y, Yumura M, Iijima S (2006) 84% Catalyst activity of water-assisted growth of single walled carbon nanotube forest characterization by a statistical and macroscopic approach. J Phys Chem B 110:8035–8038. doi: 10.1021/jp060080e10.1021/jp060080e ↗
5. Han JH, Lee EJ, Lee JH, So KP, Lee YH, Bae GN, Lee SB, Ji JH, Cho MH, Yu IJ (2008) Monitoring multiwalled carbon nanotube exposure in carbon nanotube research facility. Inhal Toxicol 20:741–749. doi: 10.1080/0895837080194223810.1080/08958370801942238 ↗
6. Hata K, Futaba DN, Mizuno K, Namai T, Yumura M, Iijima S (2004) Water-assisted highly efficient synthesis of impurity-free single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science 306:1362–1364. doi: 10.1126/science.110496210.1126/science.1104962 ↗
7. Helland A, Wick P, Koehler A, Schmid K, Som C (2007) Reviewing the environmental and human health knowledge base of carbon nanotubes. Environ Health Perspect 115:1125–1131. doi: 10.1289/ehp.965210.1289/ehp.9652 ↗
8. Hinds WC (1999) Aerosol technology: properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles, vol 54, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 374–375
9. ISO 10312 (1995) Ambient air—determination of asbestos fibres—direct transfer transmission electron microscopy method
10. Johnson DR, Methner MM, Kennedy AJ, Steevens JA (2010) Potential for occupational exposure to engineered carbon-based nanomaterials in environmental laboratory studies. Environ Health Perspect 118:49–54. doi: 10.1289/ehp.090107610.1289/ehp.0901076 ↗
11. Maynard AD, Kuempel ED (2005) Airborne nanostructured particles and occupational health. J Nanopart Res 7:587–614. doi: 10.1007/s11051-005-6770-910.1007/s11051-005-6770-9 ↗
12. Maynard AD, Baron PA, Foley M, Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Castranova V (2004) Exposure to carbon nanotube material: aerosol release during the handling of unrefined single-walled carbon nanotube material. J Toxicol Environ Health A 67:87–107. doi: 10.1080/1528739049025368810.1080/15287390490253688 ↗
13. Ogura I, Sakurai H, Gamo M (2009) Dustiness testing of engineered nanomaterials. J Phys Conf Ser 170:012003. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/170/1/01200310.1088/1742-6596/170/1/012003 ↗
14. Popov VN (2004) Carbon nanotubes: properties and application. Mat Sci Eng R 43:61–102. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2003.10.00110.1016/j.mser.2003.10.001 ↗
15. Terrones M (2004) Carbon nanotubes: synthesis and properties, electronic devices and other emerging applications. Int Mater Rev 49:325–377. doi: 10.1179/174328004X565510.1179/174328004X5655 ↗
16. Tsai SJ, Hofmann M, Hallock M, Ada E, Kong J, Ellenbecker M (2009) Characterization and evaluation of nanoparticle release during the synthesis of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes by chemical vapor deposition. Environ Sci Technol 43:6017–6023. doi: 10.1021/es900486y10.1021/es900486y ↗