journal article·2020-08

Melting temperature and binding energy of metal nanoparticles: size dependences, interrelation between them, and some correlations with structural stability of nanoclusters

V. M. Samsonov, S. A. Vasilyev, K. K. Nebyvalova, I. V. Talyzin, N. Yu. Sdobnyakov, D. N. Sokolov, M. I. Alymov

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 22· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Size dependences of the melting temperature Tm and binding energy E, i.e., their dependences on the particle radius R, have been investigated by employing thermodynamics, a local coordination approximation for E as well as molecular dynamics. We have found that both quantities Tm and E decrease at decreasing the particle size and follow to the linear or close to linear dependence on the reciprocal particle radius R−1. However, Tm(R−1) and E(R−1) dependences are characterized by different values of the slope coefficients : KT > 1 whereas KE < 1. As a result, the binding energy does not take zero value even for the limiting case of smallest nanoclusters down to tetramers, trimer, and dimers. As for the melting temperature Tm, the linear dependence on R−1 should be relevant to mesoscopic metal nanoparticles (NPs) only consisting of at least several hundreds of atoms. A concept is put forward of a characteristic particle radius Rch corresponding to a crossover from region I of mesoscopic NPs (R > Rch) to region II of metal nanoclusters (R < Rch). This characteristic radius cannot be exactly determined. For metal NPs, including Au ones, it is of order of 1 nm, and the characteristic number of atoms Nch varies in a wider range from 100 to 500 atoms as Nch is proportional to ( {R}_{mathrm{ch}}^3 ). In range II, noticeable fluctuations and non-scalable behavior of Tm are reported. We believe that for nanoclusters (range II), the concepts of the phase transition and of the melting temperature lose their physical meaning. On the structural level, region II relates to statistical distributions of different isomers, their instabilities and corresponding structural transformations depending on temperature and particle size.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Material Dynamics and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Adams JB, Foiles SM, Wolfer WG (1989) Self-diffusion and impurity diffusion of fcc metals using the five-frequency model and the embedded atom method. J Mater Res 4:102–112. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.1989.010210.1557/jmr.1989.0102 ↗
2. Baletto F, Ferrando R (2005) Structural properties of nanoclusters: energetic, thermodynamic, and kinetic effects. Rev Mod Phys 77:371–423. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.37110.1103/RevModPhys.77.371 ↗
3. Briant CL, Burton JJ (1973) Thermodynamics–melting of small clusters of atoms. Nature Phys Sci 243:100–10210.1038/physci243100a0 ↗
4. Briant CL, Burton JJ (1975) Molecular dynamics study of the structure and thermodynamic properties of argon microclusters. J Chem Phys 63:2045–2058. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.43154210.1063/1.431542 ↗
5. Buffat P, Borel JP (1976) Size effect on the melting temperature of gold particles. Phys Rev A 13:2287–2297. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.13.228710.1103/physreva.13.2287 ↗
6. Castro T, Reifenberger R (1990) Size-dependent melting temperature of individual nanometer-sized metallic clusters. Phys Rev B 42:8548–8556. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.42.854810.1103/physrevb.42.8548 ↗
7. Chini P (1979) Synthesis of large anionic carbonyl clusters as models for small metallic crystallites. Gazzeta Chimica Italiana 109:225–240
8. Dash JG (1999) History of the search for continuous melting. Rev Mod Phys 71:1737–1743. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.71.173710.1103/RevModPhys.71.1737 ↗
9. Dick K, Dhanasekaran T, Zhang Z, Meisel D (2002) Size-dependent melting of silica-encapsulated gold nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 124:2312–2317. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja017281a10.1021/ja017281a ↗
10. Eustathopoulos N (1983) Energetics of solid/liquid interfaces of metals and alloys. Internat Met Rev 28:189–210 imtr.1983.28.1.18910.1179/imr.1983.28.1.189 ↗
11. Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS (1986) Embedded-atom-method functions for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. Phys Rev B 33:7983–7991. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.33.798310.1103/physrevb.33.7983 ↗
12. Foster DM, Ferrando R, Palmer RE (2018) Experimental determination of the energy difference between competing isomers of deposited, size-selected gold nanoclusters. Nat Commun 9:1323. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03794-910.1038/s41467-018-03794-9 ↗
13. Gafner SL, Redel LV, Golovenko ZV, YuYa G, Samsonov VM, Kharechkin SS (2009) Structural transitions in small nickel clusters. JETP Lett 89:364–369. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002136400907012110.1134/S0021364009070121 ↗
14. Grigorev IS, Meilikhov EZ (eds) (1997) Handbook of physical quantities. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton
15. Guinea F, Rose JH, Smith JR, Ferrante J (1984) Scaling relations in the equation of state, thermal expansion, and melting of metals. Appl Phys Lett 44:53–55. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.9454910.1063/1.94549 ↗
16. Haberland H, Hippler T, Donges J, Kostko O, Schmidt M, von Issendorff B (2005) Melting of sodium clusters: where do the magic numbers come from? Phys Rev Lett 94:035701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.03570110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.035701 ↗
17. Häkkinen H, Moseler M, Landman U (2002) Bonding in Cu, Ag, and Au clusters: relativistic effects, trends, and surprises. Phys Rev Lett 89:033401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.03340110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.033401 ↗
18. Kaptay G (2012) Nano-Calphad: extension of the Calphad method to systems with nano-phases and complexions. J Mater Sci 47:8320–8335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6772-910.1007/s10853-012-6772-9 ↗
19. Kittel C, McEuen P (2018) Introduction to solid state physics. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
20. Kofman R, Cheyssac P, Aouaj A, Lereah Y, Deutscher G, Ben-David T, Penisson JM, Bourret A (1994) Surface melting enhanced by curvature effects. Surf Sci 303:231–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(94)90635-110.1016/0039-6028 ↗
21. Kuhn A, Weigend F, Ahlrichs R (2001) Theoretical study on clusters of magnesium. Phys Chem Chem Phys 3:711–719. https://doi.org/10.1039/B007869G10.1039/B007869G ↗
22. Kumar R, Kumar M (2012) Effect of size on cohesive energy, melting temperature and Debye temperature of nanomaterials. Ind J Pure Appl Phys 50:329–334
23. Lewis JL, Jensen P, Barrat J-L (1997) Melting, freezing, and coalescence of gold nanoclusters. Phys Rev B 56:2248–2257. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.224810.1103/PhysRevB.56.2248 ↗
24. Meissner F (1920) Über den Einfluß der Zerteilung auf die Schmelztemperatur. Mitteilungen aus dem Institut für phys Chemie der Universität Göttingen 8:169–186
25. Nanda KK (2009) Size-dependent melting of nanoparticles: hundred years of thermodynamic model. Pramana 72:617–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-009-0055-210.1007/s12043-009-0055-2 ↗
26. Pawlow PN (1909) “Über die Abhängigkeit des Schmelzpunktes von der Oberflächenenergie eines festen Korpers” (on the dependency of the melting point on the surface energy of a solid body). Z Phys Chem 65:545–54810.1515/zpch-1909-6532 ↗
27. Peters KF, Cohen JB, Chung YW (1998) Melting of Pb nanocrystals. Phys Rev B 57:13430–13438. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1343010.1103/PhysRevB.57.13430 ↗
28. Qi Y, Cagin T, Johnson WL, Goddard WA (2001) Melting and crystallization in Ni nanoclusters: the mesoscale regime. J Chem Phys 114:385–394. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.137366410.1063/1.1373664 ↗
29. Qi WH, Wang MP (2004) Size and shape dependent melting temperature of metallic nanoparticles. Mater Chem Phys 88:280–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.04.02610.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.04.026 ↗
30. Qi W (2016) Nanoscopic thermodynamics. Acc Chem Res 49:1587–1595. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0020510.1021/acs.accounts.6b00205 ↗
31. Roduner E (2006) Nanoscopic materials. Size-dependent Phenomena Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge https://doi.org/10.1039/978184755763610.1039/9781847557636 ↗
32. Rowlinson JS, Widom B (2002) Molecular theory of capillarity. Courier Corporation, US
33. Rusanov AI (2002) The surprising world of nanostructures. Russ J Gen Chem 72:495–51210.1023/A:1016332113912 ↗
34. Samsonov VM, Kharechkin SS, Gafner SL, Redel LV, Gafner YY (2009) Molecular dynamics study of the melting and crystallization of nanoparticles. Crystallogr Rep 54:526–531. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377450903025010.1134/S1063774509030250 ↗
35. Samsonov VM, Vasilyev SA, Bembel AG, Samsonov TE, Skopich VL (2014) Molecular dynamics investigation of the size dependence of the heat of melting of metal nanoclusters. Phys Sol State 56:2369–2373. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106378341412027010.1134/S1063783414120270 ↗
36. Samsonov VM, Vasilyev SA, Bembel AG (2016a) Size dependence of the melting temperature of metallic nanoclusters from the viewpoint of the thermodynamic theory of similarity. Phys Met Metallogr 117:749–755. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X1608013510.1134/S0031918X16080135 ↗
37. Samsonov VM, Vasilyev SA, Talyzin IV, Ryzhkov YA (2016b) On reasons for the hysteresis of melting and crystallization of nanoparticles. JETP Lett 103:94–99. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002136401602011910.1134/S0021364016020119 ↗
38. Samsonov VM, Bembel AG, Kartoshkin AY, Vasilyev SA, Talyzin IV (2018) Molecular dynamics and thermodynamic simulations of segregation phenomena in binary metal nanoparticles. JTAC 133:1207–1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7245-410.1007/s10973-018-7245-4 ↗
39. Samsonov VM, Talyzin IV, Kartoshkin AY, Vasilyev SA (2019a) Surface segregation in binary Cu–Ni and Au–Co nanoalloys and the core–shell structure stability/instability: thermodynamic and atomistic simulations. Appl Nanosci 9:119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-018-0895-510.1007/s13204-018-0895-5 ↗
40. Samsonov VM, Talyzin IV, Kartoshkin AY, Samsonov MV (2019b) Prediction of segregation in binary metal nanoparticles: thermodynamic and atomistic simulations. Phys Met Metallogr 120:578–583. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0031918x1906011510.1134/s0031918x19060115 ↗
41. Schissel P (1957) Dissociation energies of Cu2, Ag2, and Au2. J Chem Phys 26:1276–1280. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.174350710.1063/1.1743507 ↗
42. Sdobnyakov NYu, Repchak SV, Samsonov VM, Bazulev AN, Kul’pin DA, Sokolov DN (2011) Correlation between the size-dependent melting and crystallization temperatures of metal nanoparticles. J Surf Investig. X-ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques 5:508–511. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102745101105012010.1134/S1027451011050120 ↗
43. Sdobnyakov NY, Veselov AD, Ershov PM, Sokolov DN, Samsonov VM, Vasilyev SA, Myasnichenko VS (2018) Size dependence of the entropies of melting and crystallisation of metal nanoparticles. Comput Mater Sci 153:153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.03710.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.037 ↗
44. Singh M, Lara S, Tlali S (2017) Effects of size and shape on the specific heat, melting entropy and enthalpy of nanomaterials. J Taibal Univ Sci 11:922–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2016.09.01110.1016/j.jtusci.2016.09.011 ↗