Size characterization of metal oxide nanoparticles in commercial sunscreen products
Source abstract
Abstract
There is an increase in the usage of engineered metal oxide (TiO2 and ZnO) nanoparticles in commercial sunscreens due to their pleasing esthetics and greater sun protection efficiency. A number of studies have been done concerning the safety of nanoparticles in sunscreen products. In order to do the safety assessment, it is pertinent to develop novel analytical techniques to analyze these nanoparticles in commercial sunscreens. This study is focused on developing analytical techniques that can efficiently determine particle size of metal oxides present in the commercial sunscreens. To isolate the mineral UV filters from the organic matrices, specific procedures such as solvent extraction were identified. In addition, several solvents (hexane, chloroform, dichloromethane, and tetrahydrofuran) have been investigated. The solvent extraction using tetrahydrofuran worked well for all the samples investigated. The isolated nanoparticles were characterized by using several different techniques such as transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, differential centrifugal sedimentation, and x-ray diffraction. Elemental analysis mapping studies were performed to obtain individual chemical and morphological identities of the nanoparticles. Results from the electron microscopy techniques were compared against the bulk particle sizing techniques. All of the sunscreen products tested in this study were found to contain nanosized (≤100 nm) metal oxide particles with varied shapes and aspect ratios, and four among the 11 products were showed to have anatase TiO2.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Skin Protection and Aging · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Botta C, Labille J, Auffan M, Borschneck D, Miche H, Cabié M, Masion A, Rose J, Bottero J-Y (2011) Environ Pollut 159:1543–155010.1016/j.envpol.2011.03.003 ↗
2. Cheng W, Zhou X-F, Compton RG (2013) Angew Chem Int Ed 52:12980–1298210.1002/anie.201307653 ↗
3. Cho EJ, Holback H, Liu KC, Abouelmagd SA, Park J, Yeo Y (2013) Mol Pharm 10:2093–211010.1021/mp300697h ↗
4. Clément L, Hurel C, Marmier N (2013) Chemosphere 90:1083–109010.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.013 ↗
5. Dan Y, Shi H, Stephan C, Liang X (2015) Microchem J 122:119–12610.1016/j.microc.2015.04.018 ↗
6. Gamer AO, Leibold E, van Ravenzwaay B (2006) Toxicol in Vitro 20:301–30710.1016/j.tiv.2005.08.008 ↗
7. Gatoo MA, Naseem S, Arfat MY, Mahmood Dar A, Qasim K, Zubair S (2014) Biomed Res Int 2014:49842010.1155/2014/498420 ↗
8. Gondikas AP, Kammer FVD, Reed RB, Wagner S, Ranville JF, Hofmann T (2014) Environmental Science & Technology 48:5415–542210.1021/es405596y ↗
9. Jiang J, Oberdörster G, Elder A, Gelein R, Mercer P, Biswas P (2008) Nanotoxicology 2:33–4210.1080/17435390701882478 ↗
10. Jin C, Tang Y, Yang FG, Li XL, Xu S, Fan XY, Huang YY, Yang YJ (2010) Biol Trace Elem Res 141:3–1510.1007/s12011-010-8707-0 ↗
11. Jung HS, Kim H (2009) Electron Mater Lett 5:73–7610.3365/eml.2009.06.073 ↗
12. Labille J, Feng J, Botta C, Borschneck D, Sammut M, Cabie M, Auffan M, Rose J, Bottero J-Y (2010) Environ Pollut 158:3482–348910.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.012 ↗
13. Lewicka ZA, Benedetto AF, Benoit DN, Yu WW, Fortner JD, Colvin VL (2011) J Nanopart Res 13:3607–361710.1007/s11051-011-0438-4 ↗
14. Li S-Q, Zhu R-R, Zhu H, Xue M, Sun X-Y, Yao S-D, Wang S-L (2008) Food Chem Toxicol 46:3626–363110.1016/j.fct.2008.09.012 ↗
15. Lu P-J, Huang S-C, Chen Y-P, Chiueh L-C, Shih DY-C (2015) J Food Drug Anal 23:587–59410.1016/j.jfda.2015.02.009 ↗
16. Monteiro-Riviere NA, Wiench K, Landsiedel R, Schulte S, Inman AO, Riviere JE (2011) Toxicol Sci 123:264–28010.1093/toxsci/kfr148 ↗
17. Nagelreiter C, Valenta C (2013) Int J Pharm 456:517–51910.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.08.024 ↗
18. NanoDerm (2007) Quality of skin as a barrier to ultra-fine particles (Final Report), Report QLK4-CT-2002-02678
19. Newman MD, Stotland M, Ellis JI (2009) J Am Acad Dermatol 61:685–69210.1016/j.jaad.2009.02.051 ↗
20. Nischwitz V, Goenaga-Infante H (2012) J Anal At Spectrom 27:1084–109210.1039/c2ja10387g ↗
21. Rahi A, Sattarahmady N, Heli H (2015) The Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences 22:1737–1754
22. Sadrieh N, Wokovich AM, Gopee NV, Zheng JW, Haines D, Parmiter D, Siitonen PH, Cozart CR, Patri AK, McNeil SE, Howard PC, Doub WH, Buhse LF (2010) Toxicol Sci 115:156–16610.1093/toxsci/kfq041 ↗
23. Smijs TG, Pavel S (2011) Nanotechnology. Science and Applications 4:95–112
24. Sysoltseva M, Winterhalter R, Wochnik AS, Scheu C, Fromme H (2017) Int J Cosmet Sci 39:292–30010.1111/ics.12375 ↗
25. Tomaszewska E, Soliwoda K, Kadziola K, Tkacz-Szczesna B, Celichowski G, Cichomski M, Szmaja W, Grobelny J (2013) J Nanomater 2013:1010.1155/2013/313081 ↗
26. Tucci P, Porta G, Agostini M, Dinsdale D, Iavicoli I, Cain K, Finazzi-Agro A, Melino G, Willis A (2013) Cell Death Dis 4:e54910.1038/cddis.2013.76 ↗
27. Tyner KM, Wokovich AM, Doub WH, Buhse LF, Sung LP, Watson SS, Sadrieh N (2009) Nanomedicine (Lond) 4:145–15910.2217/17435889.4.2.145 ↗
28. Tyner KM, Wokovich AM, Godar DE, Doub WH, Sadrieh N (2011) Int J Cosmet Sci:33, 234–24410.1111/j.1468-2494.2010.00622.x ↗
29. H. Vegad (2010) An introduction to particle size characterisation by DCS: do you know the real size of your nano particles? http://www.analytik.co.uk/images/Whitepapers/Whitepaper-2-140110-CPS_Introduction_To_DCS.pdf .
30. Wu J, Liu W, Xue C, Zhou S, Lan F, Bi L, Xu H, Yang X, Zeng F-D (2009) Toxicol Lett 191:1–810.1016/j.toxlet.2009.05.020 ↗