journal article·2016-06Open access

Taking stock of the occupational safety and health challenges of nanotechnology: 2000–2015

P. A. Schulte, G. Roth, L. L. Hodson, V. Murashov, M. D. Hoover, R. Zumwalde, E. D. Kuempel, C. L. Geraci, A. B. Stefaniak, V. Castranova, J. Howard

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 18· Issue 6

Abstract

Engineered nanomaterials significantly entered commerce at the beginning of the 21st century. Concerns about serious potential health effects of nanomaterials were widespread. Now, approximately 15 years later, it is worthwhile to take stock of research and efforts to protect nanomaterial workers from potential risks of adverse health effects. This article provides and examines timelines for major functional areas (toxicology, metrology, exposure assessment, engineering controls and personal protective equipment, risk assessment, risk management, medical surveillance, and epidemiology) to identify significant contributions to worker safety and health. The occupational safety and health field has responded effectively to identify gaps in knowledge and practice, but further research is warranted and is described. There is now a greater, if imperfect, understanding of the mechanisms underlying nanoparticle toxicology, hazards to workers, and appropriate controls for nanomaterials, but unified analytical standards and exposure characterization methods are still lacking. The development of control-banding and similar strategies has compensated for incomplete data on exposure and risk, but it is unknown how widely such approaches are being adopted. Although the importance of epidemiologic studies and medical surveillance is recognized, implementation has been slowed by logistical issues. Responsible development of nanotechnology requires protection of workers at all stages of the technological life cycle. In each of the functional areas assessed, progress has been made, but more is required.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Amdur MO, Chen LC, Guty J, Lam HF, Miller PD (1988) Speciation and pulmonary effects of acidic SOx formed on the surface of ultrafine zinc oxide aerosols. Atmos Environ (1967) 22:557–56010.1016/0004-6981(88)90199-0 ↗
2. Aschberger K, Christensen FM (2011) Approaches for establishing human health no effect levels for engineered nanomaterials. J Phys 304:012078. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/304/1/01207810.1088/1742-6596/304/1/012078 ↗
3. BAM Bundestalt für material forschung and prüfung. http://www.nano-refmat.bam.de/en/category_10_nanobjects_nanoparticles_nanomaterials.htm
4. Bekker C, Kuijpers E, Brouwer DH, Vermeulen R, Fransman W (2015) Occupational exposure to nano-objects and their agglomerates and aggregates across various life cycle stages. A Broad-Scale Exposure Study. Ann Occup Hyg 59:681–704. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev02310.1093/annhyg/mev023 ↗
5. Bergamaschi E (2009) Occupational exposure to nanomaterials: present knowledge and future development. Nanotoxicology 3:194–201. doi: 10.1080/1743539090303703810.1080/17435390903037038 ↗
6. Boutou-Kempf O, Marchand JL, Radauceanu A, Witschger O, Imbernon E (2011) Group Health Risks of N Development of a French epidemiological surveillance system of workers producing or handling engineered nanomaterials in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med/Am Coll Occup Environ Med 53:S103–S107. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b1d6810.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b1d68 ↗
7. Bouwmeester H et al (2011) Minimal analytical characterization of engineered nanomaterials needed for hazard assessment in biological matrices. Nanotoxicology 5:1–11. doi: 10.3109/1743539100377526610.3109/17435391003775266 ↗
8. Brenner SA, Neu-Baker NM, Caglayan C, Zurbenko IG (2015) Occupational exposure to Airborne nanomaterials: an assessment of worker exposure to aerosolized metal oxide nanoparticles in semiconductor Wastewater treatment. J Occup Environ Hyg 12:469–481. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.101851510.1080/15459624.2015.1018515 ↗
9. British Standards Institute (BSI) (2007) Nanotechnologies—Part 2: guide to safe handling and disposal of manufactured nanomaterials. British Standards Institution, London
10. Brouwer D (2010) Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces. Toxicology 269:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.11.01710.1016/j.tox.2009.11.017 ↗
11. Brouwer D, van Duuren-Stuurman B, Berges M, Jankowska E, Bard D, Mark D (2009) From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects. J Nanopart Res 11:1867–1881. doi: 10.1007/s11051-009-9772-110.1007/s11051-009-9772-1 ↗
12. Brouwer D et al (2012) Harmonization of measurement strategies for exposure to manufactured nano-objects; report of a workshop. Ann Occup Hyg 56:1–9. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer09910.1093/annhyg/mer099 ↗
13. Canu IG, Boutou-Kempf O, Delabre L, Ducamp S, Iwatsubo Y, Marchand JL, Imbernon E (2013) French registry of workers handling engineered nanomaterials as an instrument of integrated system for surveillance and research. J Phys 429:012066. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/429/1/01206610.1088/1742-6596/429/1/012066 ↗
14. Castillo AMPD (2013) Nanomaterials and workplace health & safety: What are the issues for workers? European Trade Union Institute
15. Cattaneo AG, Gornati R, Sabbioni E, Chiriva-Internati M, Cobos E, Jenkins MR, Bernardini G (2010) Nanotechnology and human health: risks and benefits. J Appl Toxicol 30:730–744. doi: 10.1002/jat.160910.1002/jat.1609 ↗
16. Dahm MM, Evans DE, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Birch ME, Fernback JE (2012) Occupational exposure assessment in carbon nanotube and nanofiber primary and secondary manufacturers. Ann Occup Hyg 56:542–556. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer11010.1093/annhyg/mer110 ↗
17. Dahm MM, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Evans DE, Birch ME, Fernback JE, Deddens JA (2015) Carbon nanotube and nanofiber exposure assessments: an Analysis of 14 site visits. Ann Occup Hyg 59:705–723. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev02010.1093/annhyg/mev020 ↗
18. Dankovic D, Kuempel E, Wheeler M (2007) An approach to risk assessment for TiO2. Inhal Toxicol 1(19 Suppl):205–212. doi: 10.1080/0895837070149775410.1080/08958370701497754 ↗
19. De Lorenzo AJD (1970) The olfactory nerve and the blood-brain barrier. In: Wolstenholme GEW, Knight J (eds) Taste and smell in vertebrates. Churchill, London, pp 151–176
20. Donaldson K, Li XY, MacNee W (1998) Ultrafine (nanometre) particle mediated lung injury. J Aerosol Sci 29:553–560. doi: 10.1016/s0021-8502(97)00464-310.1016/s0021-8502(97)00464-3 ↗
21. Donaldson K, Stone V, Tran CL, Kreyling W, Borm PJ (2004) Nanotoxicology. Occup Environ Med 61:727–728. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.01324310.1136/oem.2004.013243 ↗
22. Driscoll KE (1996) Role of inflammation in the development of rat lung tumors in response to chronic particle exposure. Inhal Tox 8:139
23. Duffin R, Tran C, Clouter A, Brown D, MacNee W, Stone V, Donaldson K (2002) The importance of surface area and specific reactivity in the acute pulmonary inflammatory response to particles. Ann Occup Hyg 46:242–24510.1093/annhyg/46.suppl_1.242 ↗
24. Environmental Defense—DuPont Nano Partnership (2007) NANO risk framework. Washington, DC
25. European Commission on Employment SAI (2014a) Guidance on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the potential risks related to nanomaterials at work—Guidance for employers and health and safety practitioners. European Commission, Brussels
26. European Commission on Employment SAI (2014b) Working safely with manufactured nanomaterials—guidance for workers. European Commission, Brussels
27. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. http://www.nanorefmat.bam.de/en/category_10_nanoobjects_nanoparticles_nanomaterials.htm . Accessed 16 Nov 2015
28. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (2010) NANOSH. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health. http://www.ttl.fi/partner/nanosh/sivut/default.aspx . Accessed 2 Dec 2015
29. Fischman M, Storey E, McCunney RJ, Kosnett M (2011) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference–medical surveillance session summary report. J Occup Environ Med/Am Coll Occup Environ Med 53:S35–S37. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b1b0a10.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b1b0a ↗
30. Fissan H, Neumann S, Trampe A, Pui DYH, Schin WG (2007) Rationale and principle of an instrument measuring lung deposited nanoparticle surface area. J Nanopart Res 9:55–59
31. Germany Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing [BAM] (2015) Nanoscaled Reference Materials. Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. http://www.nano-refmat.bam.de/en/category_10_nanoobjects_nanoparticles_nanomaterials.htm . Accessed 16 Nov 2015
32. Gordon SC, Butala JH, Carter JM, Elder A, Gordon T, Sayre PG et al (2014) Workshop report: strategies for setting occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials. Reg Toxicol Pharmcol 68:305–311. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.01.00510.1016/j.yrtph.2014.01.005 ↗
33. Grieger KD, Sayes CM, Chen E, Ensor DS, Jayanty R (2015) Safe Handling of Engineered Nanomaterials: Turning Knowledge into Practice. doi: 10.3768/rtipress.2015.op.0022.150510.3768/rtipress.2015.op.0022.1505 ↗
34. Groso A, Meyer T (2013) Concerns related to safety management of engineered nanomaterials in research environment. J Phys 429:012065. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/429/1/01206510.1088/1742-6596/429/1/012065 ↗
35. Groso A, Petri-Fink A, Magrez A, Riediker M, Meyer T (2010) Management of nanomaterials safety in research environment. Part Fibre Toxicol 7:40. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-7-4010.1186/1743-8977-7-40 ↗
36. Gulumian M, Kuempel ED, Savolainen K (2012) Global challenges in the risk assessment of nanomaterials: relevance to South Africa. S Afr J Sci 108:1–910.4102/sajs.v108i9/10.922 ↗
37. Gwinn MR, Vallyathan V (2006) Nanoparticles: health effects: pros and cons. Environ Health Perspect. doi: 10.1289/ehp.887110.1289/ehp.8871 ↗
38. Hassellöv M, Readman JW, Ranville JK, Tiede K (2008) Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles. Exotoxicology 17:344–36110.1007/s10646-008-0225-x ↗
39. Health Council of the Netherlands (2012) Working with nanoparticles: exposure registry and health monitoring. Health Council of the Netherlands, The Hague
40. Heinrich U, Fuhst R, Rittinghausen S, Creutzenberg O, Bellmann B, Koch W, Levsen K (1995) Chronic inhalation exposure of wistar rates and 2 different strains of mice to diesel-engine exhaust, carbon-black, and titaniumdioxide. Inhal Toxicol 7:533–556. doi: 10.3109/0895837950901521110.3109/08958379509015211 ↗
41. Hett A (2004) Nanotechnology: small matter, many unknowns. Swiss Reinsurance Company, Zurich
42. Howard J, Murashov V (2009) National nanotechnology partnership to protect workers. J Nanopart Res 11:1673–1683. doi: 10.1007/s11051-009-9682-210.1007/s11051-009-9682-2 ↗
43. HSE (2004) Nanoparticles: an occupational hygiene review. Norwich
44. HSE (2013) Using nanomaterials at work vol HSG272. UK health and safety executive (HSE), Norwich
45. Iavicoli I, Leso V, Manno M, Schulte PA (2014) Biomarkers of nanomaterial exposure and effect: current status. J Nanopart Res 16:1–33. doi: 10.1007/s11051-014-2302-910.1007/s11051-014-2302-9 ↗
46. Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (IFA) (2009) Criteria for assessment of the effectiveness of protective measures. http://www.dguv.de/ifa/Fachinfos/Nanopartikel-am-Arbeitsplatz/Beurteilung-von-Schutzmaßnahmen/index-2.jsp . Accessed 20 Oct 2015
47. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2008a) ISO/TR 12885:2008—Nanotechnologies—Health and safety practices in occupational settings relevant to nanotechnologies
48. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2008b) ISO/TS 27687:2008—Nanotechnologies—Terminology and definitions for nano-objects—Nanoparticle, nanofibre and nanoplate
49. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2012) ISO/TC 229 Nanotechnologies
50. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2013) ISO/TS 12901-2—Nanotechnologies—Occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials—Part 2: use of the control banding approach. Switzerland
51. Jiang J, Oberdörster G, Biswas P (2008) Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. J Nanopart Res 11:77–89. doi: 10.1007/s11051-008-9446-410.1007/s11051-008-9446-4 ↗
52. Joint Research Centre (2014) JRC Nanomaterials Repository. Joint Research Centre, European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/scientific-tool/jrc-nanomaterials-repository . Accessed 2 Dec 2015
53. Journeay WS, Goldman RH (2014) Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: a case report. Am J Ind Med 57:1073–107610.1002/ajim.22344 ↗
54. Kaiser J-P, Roesslein M, Diener L, Wick P (2013) Human health risk of ingested nanoparticles that are added as multifunctional agents to paints: an in vitro study. PloS One 8:e8321510.1371/journal.pone.0083215 ↗
55. Kreyling W et al (2002a) Translocation of ultrafine insoluble iridium particles from lung epithelium to extrapulmonary organs is size dependent but very low. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 65:1513–153010.1080/00984100290071649 ↗
56. Kreyling W, Semmler M, Erbe F, Mayer P, Takenaka S, Oberdörster G, Ziesenis A (2002b) Minute translocation of inhaled ultrafine insoluble iridium particles from lung epithelium to extrapulmonary tissues. Ann Occup Hyg 46:223–22610.1093/annhyg/46.suppl_1.223 ↗
57. Kreyling WG, Hirn S, Schleh C (2010) Nanoparticles in the lung. Nat Biotechnol 28:1275–1276. doi: 10.1038/nbt.173510.1038/nbt.1735 ↗
58. Krug HF (2014) Nanosafety research—are we on the right track? Angew Chem 53:12304–12319. doi: 10.1002/anie.20140336710.1002/anie.201403367 ↗
59. Krug HF, Wick P (2011) Nanotoxicology: an interdisciplinary challenge. Angewandte Chemie 50:1260–1278. doi: 10.1002/anie.20100103710.1002/anie.201001037 ↗
60. Kuempel ED, Tran CL, Castranova V, Bailer AJ (2006) Lung dosimetry and risk assessment of nanoparticles: evaluating and extending current models in rats and humans. Inhal Toxicol 18:717–724. doi: 10.1080/0895837060074788710.1080/08958370600747887 ↗
61. Kuempel E, Geraci C, Schulte P (2007) Risk assessment approaches and research needs for nanomaterials: an examination of data and information from current studies. Nanotechnology-toxicological issues and environmental safety and environmental safety. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 119–14510.1007/978-1-4020-6076-2_8 ↗
62. Kuempel ED, Castranova V, Geraci CL, Schulte PA (2012a) Development of risk-based nanomaterial groups for occupational exposure control. J Nanopart Res 14:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-1029-810.1007/s11051-012-1029-8 ↗
63. Kuempel ED, Geraci CL, Schulte PA (2012b) Risk assessment and risk management of nanomaterials in the workplace: translating research to practice. Ann Occup Hyg 56:491–505. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes04010.1093/annhyg/mes040 ↗
64. Kuhlbusch TA, Neumann S, Fissan H (2004) Number size distribution, mass concentration, and particle composition of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 in bag filling areas of carbon black production. J Occup Environ Hyg 1:660–671. doi: 10.1080/1545962049050224210.1080/15459620490502242 ↗
65. Kuhlbusch TA, Asbach C, Fissan H, Gohler D, Stintz M (2011) Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: a review. Part Fibre Toxicol 8:22. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-8-2210.1186/1743-8977-8-22 ↗
66. Kulinowski K, Lippy B (2011) Training workers on risks of nanotechnology. DHHS, Bethesda
67. Laney AS, McCauley LA, Schubauer-Berigan MK (2011) Workshop summary: epidemiologic design strategies for studies of nanomaterial workers Journal of occupational and environmental medicine/American College of. Occup Environ Med 53:S87–S90. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b1af510.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b1af5 ↗
68. Lee JH, Ahn K, Kim SM, Jeon KS, Lee JS, Yu IJ (2012) Continuous 3-day exposure assessment of workplace manufacturing silver nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 14:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-1134-810.1007/s11051-012-1134-8 ↗
69. Li Z et al (2007) Cardiovascular effects of pulmonary exposure to single-wall carbon nanotubes. Environ Health Perspect 115:377–382. doi: 10.1289/ehp.968810.1289/ehp.9688 ↗
70. Liao HY et al (2014) Six-month follow-up study of health markers of nanomaterials among workers handling engineered nanomaterials. Nanotoxicology 8(Suppl 1):100–110. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2013.85879310.3109/17435390.2013.858793 ↗
71. Linsinger TPJ, Roebben G, Solans C, Ramsch R (2011) Reference materials for measuring the size of nanoparticles. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 30:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2010.09.00510.1016/j.trac.2010.09.005 ↗
72. Liou S-H et al (2012) Epidemiological study of health hazards among workers handling engineered nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 14:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-0878-510.1007/s11051-012-0878-5 ↗
73. Liou S-H, Tsai CSJ, Pelclova D, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Schulte PA (2015) Assessing the first wave of epidemiological studies of nanomaterial workers. J Nanopart Res 17:1–19. doi: 10.1007/s11051-015-3219-710.1007/s11051-015-3219-7 ↗
74. Lux Research Inc. (2014) Nanotechnology Update: Corporations up their spending as revenues for nano-enabled products increase. Lux Research Inc, New York
75. Martin J, Bello D, Bunker K, Shafer M, Christiani D, Woskie S, Demokritou P (2015) Occupational exposure to nanoparticles at commercial photocopy centers. J Haz Mat 298:351–360. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.02110.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.021 ↗
76. Maynard AD, Aitken RJ (2007) Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: current abilities and future requirements. Nanotoxicology 1:26–41. doi: 10.1080/1743539070131472010.1080/17435390701314720 ↗
77. Maynard AD, Kuempel ED (2005) Airborne nanostructured particles and occupational health. J Nanopart Res 7:587–614. doi: 10.1007/s11051-005-6770-910.1007/s11051-005-6770-9 ↗
78. Maynard AD, Baron PA, Foley M, Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Castranova V (2004) Exposure to carbon nanotube material: aerosol release during the handling of unrefined single-walled carbon nanotube material. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 67:87–107. doi: 10.1080/1528739049025368810.1080/15287390490253688 ↗
79. Maynard AD et al (2006) Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444:267–26910.1038/444267a ↗
80. Mazzuckeli LF (ed), Methner MM, Birch ME, Evan DE, Ku BK, Crouch KG, Hoover MD (2007) Case study: identification and Characterization of potential sources of worker exposure to carbon nanofibers during polymer composite laboratory operations. J Occup Environ Hyg 4(12):0125–013010.1080/15459620701683871 ↗
81. Meli F, Klein T, Buhr E, Frase CG, Gleber G, Krumrey M et al (2012) Traceable size determination of nanoparticles, a comparison among European metrology institutes. Meas Sci Technol 23(12). http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0957-0233/23/12/12005/meta10.1088/0957-0233/23/12/125005 ↗
82. Mercer RR et al (2010) Distribution and persistence of pleural penetrations by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Part Fibre Toxicol 7:28. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-7-2810.1186/1743-8977-7-28 ↗
83. Mercer RR et al (2013) Extrapulmonary transport of MWCNT following inhalation exposure. Part Fibre Toxicol 10:38. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-10-3810.1186/1743-8977-10-38 ↗
84. Methner MM (2008) Engineering case reports. Effectiveness of local exhaust ventilation (LEV) in controlling engineered nanomaterial emissions during reactor cleanout operations. J Occup Environ Hyg 5:D63–D69. doi: 10.1080/1545962080205939310.1080/15459620802059393 ↗
85. Methner MM, Birch ME, Evans DE, Ku BK, Crouch K, Hoover MD (2007) Identification and characterization of potential sources of worker exposure to carbon nanofibers during polymer composite laboratory operations. J Occup Environ Hyg 4:D125–D130. doi: 10.1080/1545962070168387110.1080/15459620701683871 ↗
86. Methner M, Hodson L, Dames A, Geraci C (2009) Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials—Part B: results from 12 field studies. J Occup Environ Hyg 7:163–17610.1080/15459620903508066 ↗
87. Methner M, Hodson L, Dames A, Geraci C (2010a) Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials–Part B: results from 12 field studies. J Occup Environ Hyg 7:163–176. doi: 10.1080/1545962090350806610.1080/15459620903508066 ↗
88. Methner M, Hodson L, Geraci C (2010b) Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials—part A. J Occup Environ Hyg 7:127–132. doi: 10.1080/1545962090347635510.1080/15459620903476355 ↗
89. Moller KL, Thygesen LC, Schipperijn J, Loft S, Bonde JP, Mikkelsen S, Brauer C (2014) Occupational exposure to ultrafine particles among airport employees–combining personal monitoring and global positioning system. PLoS One 9:e106671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.010667110.1371/journal.pone.0106671 ↗
90. Morrow PE (1988) Possible mechanisms to explain dust overloading of the lungs. Toxicol Sci 10:369–384. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/10.3.36910.1093/toxsci/10.3.369 ↗
91. Murashov V, Schulte P, Howard J (2012) Progression of occupational risk management with advances in nanomaterials. J Occup Environ Hyg 9:D12–22. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.63821710.1080/15459624.2012.638217 ↗
92. Nakanishi J et al (2015) Risk Assessment of the Carbon Nanotube Group Risk analysis: an official publication of the Society for Risk Analayis. Risk Anal. doi: 10.1111/risa.1239410.1111/risa.12394 ↗
93. Nasterlack M (2011) Role of medical surveillance in risk management. J Occup Environ Med/Am Coll Occup Environ Med 53:S18–S21. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b1d5410.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b1d54 ↗
94. Nasterlack M, Zober A, Oberlinner C (2008) Considerations on occupational medical surveillance in employees handling nanoparticles. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81:721–726. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0245-510.1007/s00420-007-0245-5 ↗
95. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622–627. doi: 10.1126/science.111439710.1126/science.1114397 ↗
96. Nel AE et al (2009) Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater 8:543–557. doi: 10.1038/nmat244210.1038/nmat2442 ↗
97. Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (2014) Nanotechnology. Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport. http://www.rivm.nl/en/Topics/N/Nanotechnology/Workplace . Accessed 2015 Oct 30
98. NIOSH (2009a) Approaches to safe nanotechnology: managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials. DHHS (NIOSH), Cincinnati, OH
99. NIOSH (2009b) Current intelligence bulletin 60: interim guidance for medical screening and hazard surveillance for workers potentially exposed to engineered nanoparticles, 60 edn. DHHS (NIOSH), Cincinnati, OH
100. NIOSH (2011) Current intelligence bulletin 63: occupational exposure to Titanium Dioxide, 63 edn. DHHS (NIOSH) Cincinnati, OH