journal article·2019-11Open access

Convergence education—an international perspective

Daniel J. C. Herr, Bushra Akbar, Jennifer Brummet, Sarah Flores, Ashley Gordon, Brian Gray, James Murday

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 21· Issue 11

Abstract

Abstract The US National Science Foundation defines convergence as the deep integration of knowledge, techniques, and expertise from multiple fields to form new and expanded frameworks for addressing scientific and societal challenges and opportunities. Because convergence research is progressing at a rapid clip, the quick evolution of non-traditional perspectives that it engenders will present a number of challenges/opportunities to education. NSF, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine; and the University of Southern California sponsored a workshop, with global participation, to explore actions that would facilitate convergence in education. A descriptive of the workshop and the key action items it identified are presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Technology Assessment and Management · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (10)

Show source-provided references
1. Bainbridge WS, Roco MC, (Eds) (2016) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Dordrecht10.1007/978-3-319-07052-0 ↗
2. Friedrichs S (2018) Report on statistics and indicators of biotechnology and nanotechnology, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2018/06. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/3c70afa7-en10.1787/3c70afa7-en ↗
3. National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) (2014) Convergence: facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering and beyond, National Academies Press, Washington (NAP 18722)
4. National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) (2016). Triennial review of the national nanotechnology initiative, National Academies Press, Washington (NAP 23603)
5. National Science Foundation (2017) NSF 17–065, Dear colleague letter: growing convergence research at NSF. www.nsf.gov/about/congress/reports/nsf_big_ideas.pdf . Accessed 3 Apr 2017
6. National Science Foundation (2018) NSF 18–058, Dear colleague letter: growing convergence research. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2018/nsf18058/nsf18058.jsp . Accessed 23 Mar 2018
7. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (Eds) (2003). Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Kluwer Academic Publishers (presently Springer), Dordrecht
8. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS, Tonn B, Whitesides G (Eds) (2013). Convergence of knowledge, technology and society. London: Springer
9. Sharp, P., Jacks, T., and Hockfield, S. (2016). Convergence: the future of health, MIT report. www.ConvergenceRevolution.net . Accessed 23 June 2016
10. Winkelmann K, Bhushan G (Eds) (2016). Global perspectives of nanoscience and engineering education, Springer Science Policy Reports, Switzerland