How to statistically analyze nano exposure measurement results: using an ARIMA time series approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Measurement strategies for exposure to nano-sized particles differ from traditional integrated sampling methods for exposure assessment by the use of real-time instruments. The resulting measurement series is a time series, where typically the sequential measurements are not independent from each other but show a pattern of autocorrelation. This article addresses the statistical difficulties when analyzing real-time measurements for exposure assessment to manufactured nano objects. To account for autocorrelation patterns, Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models are proposed. A simulation study shows the pitfalls of using a standard t-test and the application of ARIMA models is illustrated with three real-data examples. Some practical suggestions for the data analysis of real-time exposure measurements conclude this article.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting · Air Quality and Health Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Bello D, Wardie BL, Yamamoto N, Guzman deVilloria R, Garcia EJ, Hart AJ, Ahn K, Ellenbecker MJ, Hallock M (2009) Exposure to nanoscale particles and fibres during machining of hybrid advanced composites containing carbon nanotubes. J Nanopart Res 11:231–24910.1007/s11051-008-9499-4 ↗
2. Box G, Jenkins G (1970) Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco
3. Brouwer DH, Gijsbers JHJ, Lurvink MWM (2004) Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: exploring sampling techniques and strategies. Ann Occup Hyg 48:439–45310.1093/annhyg/meh040 ↗
4. Cowpertwait PSP, Metcalfe AV (2009) Introductory time series with R. New York, Springer
5. Demou E, Peter P, Hellweg S (2008) Exposure to manufactured nanostructured particles in an industrial pilot plan. Ann Occup Hyg 52:695–70610.1093/annhyg/men058 ↗
6. Evans DE, Ki Ku B, Birch ME, Dunn KH (2010) Aerosol monitoring during carbon nanofiber production: mobile direct-reading sampling. Ann Occup Hyg 54:514–531
7. Hyndman RJ, Kostenko AV (2007) Minimum sample size requirements for seasonal forecasting models. Foresight 6:12–15
8. Mann JK, Balmes JR, Bruckner TA, Mortimer KM, Margolis HG, Pratt B, Hammond SK, Lurmann FW, Tager IB (2010) Short-term effects of air pollution on wheeze in asthmatic children in Fresno, California. Environ Health Perspect 118:1497–150210.1289/ehp.0901292 ↗
9. O’Brien DM, Fischbach TJ, Cooper TC, Todd WF, Gressel MG, Martinez KF (1989) Acquisition and spreadsheet analysis of real time dust exposure data: a case study. Applied Industrial Hygiene 4:238–243. doi: 10.1080/08828032.1989.1038857010.1080/08828032.1989.10388570 ↗
10. Park JI, Ramachandran G, Raynor PC, Eberly EB, Olson G (2010) Comparing exposure zones by different exposure metrics using statistical parameters: contrast and precision. Ann Occup Hyg 55:1–14
11. Pfefferkorn FE, Bello D, Haddad G, Park J-I, Powell M, McCarthy J, Bunker KL, Fehrenbacher A, Jeon Y, Virji MA, Gruetzmacher G, Hoover MD (2010) Characterization of exposures to airborne nanoscale particles during friction stir welding of aluminium. Ann Occup Hyg 54(5):486–503. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq03710.1093/annhyg/meq037 ↗
12. Prado R, West M (2010) Time series: modelling. Computation and Inference. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York10.1201/9781439882757 ↗
13. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna. http://www.R-project.org
14. Rappaport SM (1991) Assessment of long-term exposures to toxic substances in air. Ann Occup Hyg 35:61–12210.1093/annhyg/35.1.61 ↗
15. Schneider T, Brouwer DH, Koponen IK, Jensen KA, Fransman W, van Duuren-Stuurman B, van Tongeren M, Tielemans E (2011) Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure to manufactured nanoparticles. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 21:450–46310.1038/jes.2011.4 ↗
16. Sharma P, Chandra A, Kaushik SC (2009) Forecasts using Box–Jenkins models for the ambient air quality data of Delhi city. Environ Monit Assess 157:105–11210.1007/s10661-008-0520-2 ↗
17. Symanski E, Rappaport SM (1994) An investigation of the dependence of exposure variability on the interval between measurements. Ann Occup Hyg 38:361–37210.1093/annhyg/38.4.361 ↗
18. West M, Harrison PJ (1997) Bayesian forecasting and dynamic models, 2nd edn. Springer, New York