journal article·2013-10

Size characterization of airborne SiO2 nanoparticles with on-line and off-line measurement techniques: an interlaboratory comparison study

C. Motzkus, T. Macé, F. Gaie-Levrel, S. Ducourtieux, A. Delvallee, K. Dirscherl, V.-D. Hodoroaba, I. Popov, O. Popov, I. Kuselman, K. Takahata, K. Ehara, P. Ausset, M. Maillé, N. Michielsen, S. Bondiguel, F. Gensdarmes, L. Morawska, G. R. Johnson, E. M. Faghihi, C. S. Kim, Y. H. Kim, M. C. Chu, J. A. Guardado, A. Salas, G. Capannelli, C. Costa, T. Bostrom, Å. K. Jämting, M. A. Lawn, L. Adlem, S. Vaslin-Reimann

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 15· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Results of an interlaboratory comparison on size characterization of SiO2 airborne nanoparticles using on-line and off-line measurement techniques are discussed. This study was performed in the framework of Technical Working Area (TWA) 34—“Properties of Nanoparticle Populations” of the Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards (VAMAS) in the project no. 3 “Techniques for characterizing size distribution of airborne nanoparticles”. Two types of nano-aerosols, consisting of (1) one population of nanoparticles with a mean diameter between 30.3 and 39.0 nm and (2) two populations of non-agglomerated nanoparticles with mean diameters between, respectively, 36.2–46.6 nm and 80.2–89.8 nm, were generated for characterization measurements. Scanning mobility particle size spectrometers (SMPS) were used for on-line measurements of size distributions of the produced nano-aerosols. Transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy were used as off-line measurement techniques for nanoparticles characterization. Samples were deposited on appropriate supports such as grids, filters, and mica plates by electrostatic precipitation and a filtration technique using SMPS controlled generation upstream. The results of the main size distribution parameters (mean and mode diameters), obtained from several laboratories, were compared based on metrological approaches including metrological traceability, calibration, and evaluation of the measurement uncertainty. Internationally harmonized measurement procedures for airborne SiO2 nanoparticles characterization are proposed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Coagulation and Flocculation Studies · Heavy metals in environment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. AFSSET (2006) Les nanomatériaux, effets sur la santé de l’homme et de l’environnement. Agence française de sécurité sanitaire de l’environnement et du travail
2. Allen MD, Raabe OG (1985) Slip correction measurements of spherical solid aerosol particles in an improved Millikan apparatus. Aerosol Sci Technol 4:269–28610.1080/02786828508959055 ↗
3. Asbach C, Kaminski H, Fissan H, Monz C, Dahmann D, Mülhopt S, Paur HR, Heinz JK, Herrmann F, Voetz M, Kuhlbusch T (2009) Comparison of four mobility particle sizers with different time resolution for stationary exposure measurements. J Nanopart Res 11:1593–160910.1007/s11051-009-9679-x ↗
4. Bau S, Ouf FX, Miquel S, Rastoix O, Witschger O (2010) Experimental measurement of the collection efficiency of nanoparticles samplers based on electrostatic and thermophoretic precipitation. International Aerosol Conference, August 29–September 3, 2010, Helsinki, Finlande
5. Buhr E, Senftleben N, Klein T, Bergmann D, Gnieser D, Frase CG, Bosse H (2009) Characterization of nanoparticles by scanning electron microscopy in transmission mode. Meas Sci Technol 20:08402510.1088/0957-0233/20/8/084025 ↗
6. Cadle SH, Mulawa PA (1990) Atmospheric carbonaceous species measurement methods comparison study: general motors results. Aerosol Sci Technol 12:128–14110.1080/02786829008959333 ↗
7. Calzolai G, Chiari M, Lucarelli F, Mazzei F, Nava S, Prati P, Valli G, Vecchi R (2008) PIXE and XRF analysis of particulate matter samples: an inter-laboratory comparison. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 266:2401–240410.1016/j.nimb.2008.03.056 ↗
8. Collins TJ (2007) Image J for microscopy. Biotechniques 43(1 Suppl):25–3010.2144/000112517 ↗
9. Countess RJ (1990) Interlaboratory analyses of carbonaceous aerosol samples. Aerosol Sci Technol 12(1):114–12110.1080/02786829008959331 ↗
10. Cyrs WD, Boysen DA, Casuccio G, Lersch T, Peters TM (2010) Nanoparticle collection efficiency of capillary pore membrane filters. J Aerosol Sci 41:655–66410.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.04.007 ↗
11. Dixkens J, Fissan H (1999) Development of an electrostatic precipitator for off-line particle analysis. Aerosol Sci Technol 30:438–45310.1080/027868299304480 ↗
12. EC (2009) Preparing for our future: developing a common strategy for key enabling technologies in the EU, COM
13. EC (2011a) Key Enabling Technologies- Final - Report June 2011
14. EC (2011b) Commission recommendation on the definition of nanomaterials. Brussels
15. Ehara K, Mulholland GW, Hagwood RC (2000) Determination of arbitrary moments of aerosol size distribution from measurements with a differential mobility analyzer. Aerosol Sci Technol 32:434–45210.1080/027868200303560 ↗
16. Environmental Protection Agency (1987) Federal register. Rules Regul 52(210):41880–41881
17. Fissan H, Hummes D, Stratmann F, Büscher P, Neumann S, Pui DYH, Chen D (1996) Experimental comparison of four differential mobility analyzers for nanometer aerosol measurements. Aerosol Sci Technol 24:1–1310.1080/02786829608965347 ↗
18. Giechaskiel B, Dilara P, Andersson J (2008) Particle measurement programme (PMP) light-duty inter-laboratory exercise: repeatability and reproducibility of the particle number method. Aerosol Sci Technol 42:528–54310.1080/02786820802220241 ↗
19. Hering SV, Appel BR, Cheng W, Salaymeh F, Cadle SH, Mulawa PA, Cahill TA, Eldred RA, Surovik M, Fitz D, Howes JE, Knapp KT, Stockburger L, Turpin BJ, Huntzicker JJ, Zhang X, McMurry PH (1990) Comparison of sampling methods for carbonaceous aerosols in ambient air. Aerosol Sci Technol 12:200–21310.1080/02786829008959340 ↗
20. ISO (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—part 2: basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method, ISO 5725-2
21. ISO (2007) Workplace atmospheres—ultrafine, nanoparticle and nanostructured aerosols—inhalation exposure characterization and assessment, ISO/TR 27628
22. ISO (2009) Determination of particle size distribution-differential electrical mobility analysis for aerosol particles, ISO 15900
23. ISO (2010) Conformity assessment—general requirements for proficiency testing, ISO 17043
24. ISO (2011) Workplace atmosphere characterization of ultrafine aerosols/nanoaerosols—determining the size distribution and number concentration using differential electrical mobility analyzing systems, ISO 28439
25. ISO (2012) Air quality—sampling conventions for airborne particle deposition in the human respiratory system, ISO/CD 13138
26. Jeong C-H, Evans GJ (2009) Inter-comparison of a fast mobility particle sizer and a scanning mobility particle sizer incorporating an ultrafine water-based condensation particle counter. Aerosol Sci Technol 43:364–37310.1080/02786820802662939 ↗
27. Lahmani M, Marano F, Houdy P (2010) Les nanosciences. Tome 4: Nanotoxicologie et nanoéthique. Paris, éditions Belin
28. Li C, Liu S, Zhu Y (2010) Determining ultrafine particle collection efficiency in a nanometer aerosol sampler. Aerosol Sci Technol 44:1027–104110.1080/02786826.2010.508761 ↗
29. Maynard AD, Kuempel ED (2005) Airborne nanostructured particles and occupational health. J Nanopart Res 7:587–61410.1007/s11051-005-6770-9 ↗
30. Maynard AD, Pui DYH (2007) Nanotechnology and occupational health: new technologies—new challenges. J Nanopart Res 9:1–310.1007/s11051-006-9164-8 ↗
31. Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdörster G, Philbert MA, Ryan J, Seaton A, Stone V, Tinkle SS, Tran L, Walker HJ, Warheit D (2006) Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444:267–26910.1038/444267a ↗
32. Motzkus C, Macé T, Vaslin-Reimann S (2010) Techniques for characterizing morphology and size of airborne nanoparticles. Congrès Metrology of Airborne Nanoparticles, Standardisation and Applications (MANSA), Abstract Proceeding, 8–9 June 2010, NPL Teddington
33. Motzkus C, Macé T, Vaslin-Reimann S, Soukiassian L, Ducourtieux D, Michielsen N, Gensdarmes F, Sillon P, Ausset P, Maillé M (2011) Travaux prénormatifs sur la caractérisation des nanoparticules dans l’air : Qualification d’un protocole de génération d’un aérosol nanométrique de SiO2, Abstract Proceeding, CFA, January 2011, Paris,10.1051/rfm/2012002 ↗
34. Motzkus C, Macé T, Vaslin-Reimann S, Soukiassian L, Ducourtieux D, Michielsen N, Gensdarmes F, Sillon P, Ausset P, Maillé M (2012) Qualification of generation protocol of nanometer aerosol of SiO2. Revue française de métrologie 29:31–3710.1051/rfm/2012002 ↗
35. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622–62710.1126/science.1114397 ↗
36. Oberdörster G (2001) Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 74:1–810.1007/s004200000185 ↗
37. Oberdörster G, Maynard AD, Donaldson K, Castranova V, Fritzpatrick J, Ausman K, Carter J, Karn B, Kreyling W, Lai D, Olin S, Monteiro-Riviere N, Warheit D, Yang H (2005) Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy. Particle Fiber Technol 2:1–35
38. Rasband WS (1997–2009) Image J, US National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/ . Accessed 07 Jan 2013
39. Rodrigue J, Dhaniyala S, Ranjan M, Hopke PK (2007) Performance comparison of scanning electrical mobility spectrometers. Aerosol Sci Technol 41:360–36810.1080/02786820701203199 ↗
40. Schmid H, Laskus L, Abraham HJ, Baltensperger U, Lavanchy V, Bizjak M, Burba P, Cachier H, Crow D, Chow J, Gnauk T, Even A, Brink HM, Giesen KP, Hitzenberger R, Hueglin C, Maenhaut W, Pio C, Carvalho A, Putaud J-P, Toom-Sauntry D, Puxbaum H (2011) Results of the carbon conference international aerosol carbon round robin test stage I. Atmos Environ 35:2111–212110.1016/S1352-2310(00)00493-3 ↗
41. Sebastien P, Billon MA, Janson X, Bonnaud G, Bignon J (1978) Utilisation du microscope électronique à transmission (MET) pour la mesure des contaminations par l'amiante. Arch Mal Prof Med Trav 39:229–248
42. Slowik JG, Cross ES, Han J-H, Davidovits P, Onasch TB, Jayne JT, Williams LR, Canagaratna MR, Worsnop DR, Chakrabarty RK, Moosmüller H, Arnott WP, Schwarz JP, Gao R-U, Fahey DW, Kok GL, Petzold A (2007) An inter-comparison of instruments measuring black carbon content of soot particles. Aerosol Sci Technol 41:295–31410.1080/02786820701197078 ↗
43. Spurny KR (1994) Sampling analysis, identification and monitoring of fibrous dust and aerosols. Analyst 119:41–5110.1039/an9941900041 ↗
44. Tsuji JS, Maynard AD, Howard PC, James JT, Lam CW, Warheit DB, Santamaria AB (2006) Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials. Part IV: risk assessment of nanoparticles. Toxicol Sci 89:42–5010.1093/toxsci/kfi339 ↗
45. Wiedensohler A (1988) An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range. J Aerosol Sci 19:387–38910.1016/0021-8502(88)90278-9 ↗
46. Wiedensohler A, Aalto P, Covert D, Heintzenberg J, McMurry P (1993) Intercomparison of three methods to determine size distributions of ultrafine aerosols with low number concentrations. J Aerosol Sci 24:551–55410.1016/0021-8502(93)90038-B ↗
47. Wiedensohler A, Birmili W, Nowak A, Sonntag A, Weinhold K, Merkel M, Wehner B, Tuch T, Pfeifer S, Fiebig M, Fjäraa AM, Asmi E, Sellegri K, Depuy R, Venzac H, Villani P, Laj P, Aalto P, Ogren JA, Swietlicki E, Roldin P, Williams P, Quincey P, Hüglin C, Fierz-Schmidhauser R, Gysel M, Weingartner E, Riccobono F, Santos S, Grüning C, Faloon K, Beddows D, Harrison RM, Monahan C, Jennings SG, O’Dowd CD, Marinoni A, Horn H-G, Keck L, Jiang J, Scheckman J, McMurry PH, Deng Z, Zhao CS, Moerman M, Henzing B, de Leeuw G (2012) Mobility particle size spectrometers: harmonization of technical standards and data structure to facilitate high quality long-term observations of atmospheric particle number size distributions. Atmos Meas Technol 5:657–68510.5194/amt-5-657-2012 ↗
48. Witschger O, Fabriès JF (2005) Particules ultra-fines et santé au travail. 1—Caractérisation des effets potentiels sur la santé. INRS, Hygiène et Sécurité au Travail (ND 2227) 199:21–35
49. Witschger O, Le-Bihan O, Reynier M, Durand C, Marchetto A, Zimmermann E, Charpentier D (2012) Préconisations en matière de caractérisation des potentiels d’émission et d’exposition professionnelle aux aérosols lors d’opérations mettant en oeuvre des nanomatériaux. INRS, Hygiène et sécurité au travail (ND 2355) 226:41–55
50. Zervas E, Dorlhène P, Forti L, Perrin C, Momique JC, Monier R, Ing H, Lopez B (2005) Interlaboratory test of exhaust PM using ELPI. Aerosol Sci Technol 39:333–34610.1080/027868290930222 ↗