journal article·2011-12

Dynamic effects of dipolar interactions on the magnetic behavior of magnetite nanoparticles

Paolo Allia, Paola Tiberto

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 13· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Isothermal magnetization and initial dc susceptibility of spheroidal, nearly monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles (typical diameter: 8 nm) prepared by a standard thermo-chemical route have been measured between 10 and 300 K. The samples contained magnetite nanoparticles in the form of either a dried powder (each nanoparticle being surrounded by a stable oleic acid shell as a result of the preparation procedure) or a solid dispersion in PEGDA-600 polymer; different nanoparticle (NP) concentrations in the polymer were studied. In all samples the NPs were not tightly agglomerated nor their ferromagnetic cores were directly touching. The high-temperature inverse magnetic susceptibility is always found to follow a linear law as a function of T, crossing the horizontal axis at negative temperatures ranging from 175 to about 1,000 K. The deviation from the standard superparamagnetic behavior is related to dipolar interaction among NPs; however, a careful analysis makes it hard to conclude that such a behavior originates from a dominant antiferromagnetic character of the interaction. The results are well explained considering that the studied samples are in the interacting superparamagnetic (ISP) regime. The ISP model is basically a mean field theory which allows one to straightforwardly account for the role of magnetic dipolar interaction in a NP system. The model predicts the existence of specific scaling laws for the reduced magnetization which have been confirmed in all studied samples. The interaction of each magnetic dipole moment with the local, random dipolar field produced by the other dipoles results in the presence of a large fluctuating energy term whose magnitude is comparable to the static barrier for magnetization reversal/rotation related to magnetic anisotropy. On the basis of the existing theories on thermal crossing of a barrier whose height randomly fluctuates in time it is predicted that the rate of barrier crossing is substantially driven by the rate of barrier fluctuations, which is fast (108–109 Hz) and almost independent of temperature. As a consequence, the standard picture of superparamagnetic NPs which undergo single-particle blocking by a static barrier below the blocking temperature should be substantially revised, at least in the present materials. The ISP model is perfectly matching with the view of activated magnetization rotation whose kinetics is significantly modified by barrier height fluctuations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Allia P, Coisson M, Knobel M, Tiberto P, Vinai F (1999) Magnetic hysteresis based on dipolar interactions in granular magnetic systems. Phys Rev B 60:12207–12218. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.122010.1103/PhysRevB.60.12207 ↗
2. Allia P, Coisson M, Tiberto P, Vinai F, Knobel M, Novak MA, Nunes WC (2001a) Granular Cu-Co alloys as interacting superparamagnets. Phys Rev B 64:144420-1–144420-12. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.14442010.1103/PhysRevB.64.144420 ↗
3. Allia P, Coisson M, Tiberto P, Vinai F (2001b) Temperature behavior of anhysteretic magnetization in granular magnetic systems. J Magn Magn Mater 226–230:1904–1906. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(00)01389-510.1016/S0304-8853(00)01389-5 ↗
4. Allia P, Tiberto P, Coisson M, Chiolerio A, Celegato F, Vinai F, Sangermano M, Suber L, Marchegiani G (2011) Evidence for magnetic interactions among magnetite nanoparticles dispersed in photoreticulated PEGDA-600 matrix. J Nanopart Res. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0249-710.1007/s11051-011-0249-7 ↗
5. Azeggagh M, Kachkachi H (2007) Effects of dipolar interactions on the zero-field-cooled magnetization of a nanoparticle assembly. Phys Rev B 75:174410-1–174410-7. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.17441010.1103/PhysRevB.75.174410 ↗
6. Balazs AC, Emrick T, Russell TP (2006) Nanoparticle polymer composite: where two small worlds meet. Science 314:1107–1110. doi: 10.1126/science.113055710.1126/science.1130557 ↗
7. Bertotti G (1998) Hysteresis in magnetism. Academic Press, San Diego, p 185
8. Bier M, Astumian RD (1993) Matching a diffusive and a kinetic approach for escape over a fluctuating barrier. Phys Rev Lett 7:1649–1652. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.164910.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1649 ↗
9. Boguñá M, Porrà JM, Masoliver J, Lindenberg K (1998) Properties of resonant activation phenomena. Phys Rev E 57:3990–4002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.57.399010.1103/PhysRevE.57.3990 ↗
10. Chantrell RW, El-Hilo M, O’Grady K (1991) Spin-glass behavior in a fine particle system. IEEE Trans Magn 27:3570–3578. doi: 10.1109/20.10292910.1109/20.102929 ↗
11. Chatterjee U, Jewrajka SK, Guha S (2009) Dispersion of functionalized silver nanoparticles in polymer matrices: stability, characterization, and physical properties. Polym Compos 30:827–834. doi: 10.1002/pc.2065510.1002/pc.20655 ↗
12. Compton J, Kranbuehl D, Martin G, Espuche E, David L (2007) In Situ Formation of a Uniform Distribution of Silver Nanoparticles in PVDF: Kinetics of Formation and Resulting Properties. Macromol Symp 247:182–189. doi: 10.1002/masy.20075012110.1002/masy.200750121 ↗
13. Cooke AH, Jones DA, Silva JFA, Wells MR (1975) Ferromagnetism in lithium holmium fluoride-LiHoF4. I. Magnetic measurements. J Phys C 8:4083–4088. doi: 10.1088/0022-3719/8/23/02110.1088/0022-3719/8/23/021 ↗
14. Corbierre MK, Cameron NS, Sutton M, Mochrie SJG, Lurio LB, Ruhm A, Lennox RB (2001) Polymer-stabilized gold nanoparticles and their incorporation into polymer matrices. J Am Chem Soc 123:10411–10412. doi: 10.1021/ja016628710.1021/ja0166287 ↗
15. Djurberg C, Svedlindh P, Nordblad P, Hansen MF, Bødker F, Mørup S (1997) Dynamics of an interacting particle system: evidence of critical slowing down. Phys Rev Lett 79:5154–5157. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.515410.1103/PhysRevLett.79.5154 ↗
16. Doering CR, Gadoua JC (1992) Resonant activation over a fluctuating barrier. Phys Rev Lett 69:2318–2321. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.231810.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2318 ↗
17. Dormann JL, Bessais L, Fiorani D (1988) A dynamic study of small interacting particles: superparamagnetic model and spin-glass laws. J Phys C 21:2015–2034. doi: 10.1088/0022-3719/21/10/01910.1088/0022-3719/21/10/019 ↗
18. Dormann JL, Fiorani D, Tronc E (1999) On the models for interparticle interactions in nanoparticle assemblies: comparison with experimental results. J Magn Magn Mater 202:251–257. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00627-110.1016/S0304-8853(98)00627-1 ↗
19. Dutta P, Pal S, Seehra MS, Shah N, Huffman GP (2009) Size dependence of magnetic parameters and surface disorder in magnetite nanoparticles. J Appl Phys 105:07B501-1–07B501-3. doi: 10.1063/1.3055272
20. El-Hilo M, O’Grady K, Chantrell RW (1992) The ordering temperature in fine particle systems. J Magn Magn Mater 117:21–28. doi: 10.1016/0304-8853(92)90286-W10.1016/0304-8853(92)90286-W ↗
21. Fiorani D, Dormann JL, Cherkaoui R, Tronc E, Lucari F, D’Orazio F, Spinu L, Nogues M, Garcia A, Testa AM (1999) Collective magnetic state in nanoparticles systems. J Magn Magn Mater 196–197:143–147. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00694-510.1016/S0304-8853(98)00694-5 ↗
22. Fiory NT (1971) Electric dipole interactions among polar defects in alkali halides. Phys Rev B 4:614–627. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.4.61410.1103/PhysRevB.4.614 ↗
23. Franco V, Conde CF, Conde A, Kiss LF (2005) Relationship between coercivity and magnetic moment of superparamagnetic particles with dipolar interaction. Phys Rev B 72:174424-1–174424-10. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.17442410.1103/PhysRevB.72.174424 ↗
24. Frey NA, Peng S, Cheng K, Sun S (2009) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, functionalization, and applications in bioimaging and magnetic energy storage. Chem Soc Rev 38:2532–2542. doi: 10.1039/B815548H10.1039/b815548h ↗
25. Gonzalez A, Tiberto P, Garcia-Escorial A, Paramo D, Sinnecker JP, Allia P, Hernando A (1998) Magnetic interactions in melt spun CoCu system. J Phys IV France 8:Pr2-343–Pr2-34610.1051/jp4:1998280 ↗
26. Guardia P, Batlle-Brugal B, Roca AG, Iglesias O, Morales MP, Serna CJ, Labarta A, Batlle X (2007) Surfactant effects in monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles of controlled size. J Magn Magn Mater 316:e756–e759. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.08510.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.085 ↗
27. Gubin SP (2009) Chapter 1. Introduction. In: Gubin SP (ed) Magnetic nanoparticles. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA, Weinheim, pp 1–23. doi: 10.1002/978352762756110.1002/9783527627561 ↗
28. Hall LM, Anderson BJ, Zukoski CF, Schweizer KS (2009) Concentration fluctuations, local order, and the collective structure of polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 42:8435–8442. doi: 10.1021/ma901523w10.1021/ma901523w ↗
29. Hasegawa D, Yang H, Ogawa T, Takahashi M (2009) Challenge of ultra high frequency limit of permeability for magnetic nanoparticle assembly with organic polymer—application of superparamagnetism. J Magn Magn Mater 321:746–749. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.11.04110.1016/j.jmmm.2008.11.041 ↗
30. Kechrakos D, Trohidou KN (1998) Magnetic properties of dipolar interacting single-domain particles. Phys Rev B 58:12169–12177. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.1216910.1103/PhysRevB.58.12169 ↗
31. Knobel M, Nunes WC, Brandl AL, Vargas JM, Socolovsky LM, Zanchet D (2004) Interaction effects in magnetic granular systems. Physica B 354:80–87. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2004.09.02410.1016/j.physb.2004.09.024 ↗
32. Knobel M, Nunes WC, Socolovsky LM, De Biasi E, Vargas JM, Denardin JC (2008) Superparamagnetism and other magnetic features in granular materials: a review on ideal and real systems. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8:2836–2857. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2008.01710.1166/jnn.2008.15348 ↗
33. Luttinger JM, Tisza L (1946) Theory of dipole interaction in crystals. Phys Rev 70:954–964. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.70.95410.1103/PhysRev.70.954 ↗
34. Mayer ABR (1998) Formation of noble metal nanoparticles within a polymeric matrix: nanoparticle features and overall morphologies. Mat Sci Eng C 6:155–166. doi: 10.1016/S0928-4931(98)00049-610.1016/S0928-4931(98)00049-6 ↗
35. Morup S, Fougt Hansen M, Frandsen C (2010) Magnetic interactions between nanoparticles. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 1:182–190. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.1.2210.3762/bjnano.1.22 ↗
36. O’Grady K, Bradbury A, Charles SW, Menear S, Popplewell J, Chantrell RW (1983) Curie-Weiss behavior in ferrofluids. J Magn Magn Mater 31–34:958–960. doi: 10.1016/0304-8853(83)90755-210.1016/0304-8853(83)90755-2 ↗
37. Panissod P, Drillon M (2002) Magnetic ordering due to dipolar interaction in low dimensional materials. In: Miller JS, Drillon M (eds) Magnetism: molecules to materials, vol IV. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, pp 232–270. ISBNs: 3-527-30429-0
38. Pechukas P, Hänggi P (1994) Rates of activated processes with fluctuating barriers. Phys Rev Lett 73:2772–2775. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.277210.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2772 ↗
39. Péter L, Rolik Z, Kiss LF, Tóth L, Weihnacht V, Schneider CM, Bakonyi I (2006) Temperature dependence of giant magnetoresistance and magnetic properties in electrodeposited Co-Cu/Cu multilayers: the role of superparamagnetic regions. Phys Rev B 73:174410-1–174410-10. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.17441010.1103/PhysRevB.73.174410 ↗
40. Raoult J (2000) Origin of the Vogel-Fulcher-Tammann law in glass-forming materials: the a-b bifurcation. J Non-Cryst Solids 271:177–217. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3093(00)00099-510.1016/S0022-3093(00)00099-5 ↗
41. Roser MR, Corruccini LR (1990) Dipolar ferromagnetic order in a cubic system. Phys Rev Lett 65:1064–1067. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.106410.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1064 ↗
42. Sandhu A, Handa H, Abe M (2010) Synthesis and applications of magnetic nanoparticles for biorecognition and point of care medical diagnostics. Nanotechnology 21:442001-1–442001-44. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/44/44200110.1088/0957-4484/21/44/442001 ↗
43. Sauer JA (1940) Magnetic energy constants of dipolar lattices. Phys Rev 57:142–146. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.57.14210.1103/PhysRev.57.142 ↗
44. Slichter GP (1996) Principles of magnetic resonance. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p 33
45. Söffge F, Schmidbauer E (1981) AC susceptibility and static magnetic properties of AN Fe3O4 ferrofluid. J Magn Magn Mater 24:54–66. doi: 10.1016/0304-8853(81)90100-110.1016/0304-8853(81)90100-1 ↗
46. Souletie J, Tholence JL (1985) Critical slowing down in spin glasses and other glasses: Fulcher versus power law. Phys Rev B 32:516–519. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.32.51610.1103/PhysRevB.32.516 ↗
47. Sun S, Zeng H, Robinson DB, Raoux S, Rice PM, Wang SX, Li G (2004) Monodisperse MFe2O4 (M: Fe, Co, Mn) nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 124:8204–8205. doi: 10.1021/ja038085210.1021/ja026501x ↗
48. Sung LP, Scierka S, Baghai-Anaraki M, Ho DL (2003) Characterization of metal-oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and dispersion in polymeric coatings. In: Berndt C, Fischer TE, Ovid’ko I, Skandan G, Tsakalakos T (eds) Materials Research Society proceedings, vol 740—MRS symposium I: nanomaterials for structural applications. Cambridge Journals Online, pp I5.4.1–I5.4.6. doi: 10.1557/PROC-740-I5.410.1557/PROC-740-I5.4 ↗
49. Tartaj P, González-Carreño T, Bomatí-Miguel O, Serna CJ, Bonville P (2004) Magnetic behavior of superparamagnetic Fe nanocrystals confined inside submicron-sized spherical silica particles. Phys Rev B 69:094401-1–094401-8. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.09440110.1103/PhysRevB.69.094401 ↗
50. Tholence JL (1980) On the frequency dependence of the transition temperature in spin glasses. Solid State Commun 35:113–117. doi: 10.1016/0038-1098(80)90225-210.1016/0038-1098(80)90225-2 ↗
51. Tsiantos V, Schrefl T, Scholz W, Forster H, Suess D, Dittrich R, Fidler J (2003) Thermally activated magnetization rotation in small nanoparticles. IEEE Trans Magn 39:2507–2509. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2003.81645610.1109/TMAG.2003.816456 ↗
52. Vugmeister BE, Glinchuk MD (1990) Dipole glass and ferroelectricity in random-site electric dipole systems. Rev Mod Phys 62:993–1026. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.62.99310.1103/RevModPhys.62.993 ↗
53. Wiedwald U, Ziemann P (2010) Preparation, properties and applications of magnetic nanoparticles. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 1:21–23. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.1.410.3762/bjnano.1.4 ↗
54. Xi H, Gao KZ, Shi Y, Xue S (2006) Precessional dynamics of single-domain magnetic nanoparticles driven by small ac magnetic fields. J Phys D: Appl Phys 39:4746–4752. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/39/22/00210.1088/0022-3727/39/22/002 ↗
55. Xi H, Gao KZ, Xue S (2008) Reversal of single-domain magnetic nanoparticles induced by pulsed magnetic fields. J Appl Phys 103:07F502-1–07F502-3. doi: 10.1063/1.2829594
56. Yanes R, Chubykalo-Fesenko O, Evans RFL, Chantrell RW (2010) Temperature dependence of the effective anisotropies in magnetic nanoparticles with Neel surface anisotropy. J Phys D 43:474009-1–474009-8. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/43/47/47400910.1088/0022-3727/43/47/474009 ↗
57. Zhang H, Widom M (1995) Spontaneous magnetic order in random dipolar solids. Phys Rev B 51:8951–8957. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.895110.1103/PhysRevB.51.8951 ↗