journal article·2015-05Open access

Fate of cerium dioxide nanoparticles in endothelial cells: exocytosis

Claudia Strobel, Hartmut Oehring, Rudolf Herrmann, Martin Förster, Armin Reller, Ingrid Hilger

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 17· Issue 5

Abstract

Although cytotoxicity and endocytosis of nanoparticles have been the subject of numerous studies, investigations regarding exocytosis as an important mechanism to reduce intracellular nanoparticle accumulation are rather rare and there is a distinct lack of knowledge. The current study investigated the behavior of human microvascular endothelial cells to exocytose cerium dioxide (CeO 2 ) nanoparticles (18.8 nm) by utilization of specific inhibitors [brefeldin A; nocodazole; methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβcD)] and different analytical methods (flow cytometry, transmission electron microscopy, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry). Overall, it was found that endothelial cells were able to release CeO 2 nanoparticles via exocytosis after the migration of nanoparticle containing endosomes toward the plasma membrane. The exocytosis process occurred mainly by fusion of vesicular membranes with plasma membrane resulting in the discharge of vesicular content to extracellular environment. Nevertheless, it seems to be likely that nanoparticles present in the cytosol could leave the cells in a direct manner. MβcD treatment led to the strongest inhibition of the nanoparticle exocytosis indicating a significant role of the plasma membrane cholesterol content in the exocytosis process. Brefeldin A (inhibitor of Golgi-to-cell-surface-transport) caused a higher inhibitory effect on exocytosis than nocodazole (inhibitor of microtubules). Thus, the transfer from distal Golgi compartments to the cell surface influenced the exocytosis process of the CeO 2 nanoparticles more than the microtubule-associated transport. In conclusion, endothelial cells, which came in contact with nanoparticles, e.g., after intravenously applied nano-based drugs, can regulate their intracellular nanoparticle amount, which is necessary to avoid adverse nanoparticle effects on cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Bartczak D, Nitti S, Millar TM, Kanaras AG (2012) Exocytosis of peptide functionalized gold nanoparticles in endothelial cells. Nanoscale 4(15):4470–4472. doi: 10.1039/C2nr31064c10.1039/c2nr31064c ↗
2. Boutard T, Rousseau B, Couteau C, Tomasoni C, Simonnard C, Jacquot C, Coiffard LJM, Konstantinov K, Devers T, Roussakis C (2013) Comparison of photoprotection efficiency and antiproliferative activity of ZnO commercial sunscreens and CeO2. Mater Lett 108:13–16. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.06.08510.1016/j.matlet.2013.06.085 ↗
3. Canton I, Battaglia G (2012) Endocytosis at the nanoscale. Chem Soc Rev 41(7):2718–2739. doi: 10.1039/C2cs15309b10.1039/c2cs15309b ↗
4. Chaudhry Q, Scotter M, Blackburn J, Ross B, Boxall A, Castle L, Aitken R, Watkins R (2008) Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit Contam A 25(3):241–258. doi: 10.1080/0265203070174453810.1080/02652030701744538 ↗
5. Chen HI, Chang HY (2004) Homogeneous precipitation of cerium dioxide nanoparticles in alcohol/water mixed solvents. Colloids Surf A 242(1–3):61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.05610.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.056 ↗
6. Chen HI, Chang HY (2005) Synthesis of nanocrystalline cerium oxide particles by the precipitation method. Ceram Int 31(6):795–802. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2004.09.00610.1016/j.ceramint.2004.09.006 ↗
7. Chigurupati S, Mughal MR, Okun E, Das S, Kumar A, McCaffery M, Seal S, Mattson MP (2013) Effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles on the growth of keratinocytes, fibroblasts and vascular endothelial cells in cutaneous wound healing. Biomaterials 34(9):2194–2201. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.06110.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.061 ↗
8. Chithrani BD, Chan WC (2007) Elucidating the mechanism of cellular uptake and removal of protein-coated gold nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes. Nano Lett 7(6):1542–1550. doi: 10.1021/nl070363y10.1021/nl070363y ↗
9. Chithrani BD, Ghazani AA, Chan WCW (2006) Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett 6(4):662–668. doi: 10.1021/Nl052396o10.1021/nl052396o ↗
10. Cho K, Wang X, Nie S, Chen ZG, Shin DM (2008) Therapeutic nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14(5):1310–1316. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-144110.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1441 ↗
11. Chu ZQ, Huang YJ, Tao Q, Li Q (2011) Cellular uptake, evolution, and excretion of silica nanoparticles in human cells. Nanoscale 3(8):3291–3299. doi: 10.1039/C1nr10499c10.1039/c1nr10499c ↗
12. Dombu CY, Kroubi M, Zibouche R, Matran R, Betbeder D (2010) Characterization of endocytosis and exocytosis of cationic nanoparticles in airway epithelium cells. Nanotechnology 21:355102. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/35/35510210.1088/0957-4484/21/35/355102 ↗
13. Errington RJ, Brown MR, Silvestre OF, Njoh KL, Chappell SC, Khan IA, Rees P, Wilks SP, Smith PJ, Summers HD (2010) Single cell nanoparticle tracking to model cell cycle dynamics and compartmental inheritance. Cell Cycle 9(1):121–130. doi: 10.4161/Cc.9.1.1024610.4161/cc.9.1.10246 ↗
14. Hahn MA, Singh AK, Sharma P, Brown SC, Moudgil BM (2011) Nanoparticles as contrast agents for in vivo bioimaging: current status and future perspectives. Anal Bioanal Chem 399(1):3–27. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-4207-510.1007/s00216-010-4207-5 ↗
15. He B, Jia ZR, Du WW, Yu C, Fan YC, Dai WB, Yuan L, Zhang H, Wang XQ, Wang JC, Zhang X, Zhang Q (2013a) The transport pathways of polymer nanoparticles in MDCK epithelial cells. Biomaterials 34(17):4309–4326. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.10010.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.100 ↗
16. He B, Lin P, Jia ZR, Du WW, Qu W, Yuan L, Dai WB, Zhang H, Wang XQ, Wang JC, Zhang X, Zhang Q (2013b) The transport mechanisms of polymer nanoparticles in Caco-2 epithelial cells. Biomaterials 34(25):6082–6098. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.05310.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.053 ↗
17. Hilger I (2013) In vivo applications of magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia. Int J Hyperth 29(8):828–834. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2013.83281510.3109/02656736.2013.832815 ↗
18. Hu L, Mao Z, Zhang Y, Gao C (2011) Influences of size of silica particles on the cellular endocytosis, exocytosis and cell activity of HepG2 cells. J Nanosci Lett 1(1):1–1610.4236/snl.2011.11001 ↗
19. Jiang S, Gnanasammandhan MK, Zhang Y (2010) Optical imaging-guided cancer therapy with fluorescent nanoparticles. J R Soc Interface 7(42):3–18. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.024310.1098/rsif.2009.0243 ↗
20. Johannsen M, Gneveckow U, Eckelt L, Feussner A, Waldöfner N, Scholz R, Deger S, Wust P, Loening SA, Jordan A (2005) Clinical hyperthermia of prostate cancer using magnetic nanoparticles: presentation of a new interstitial technique. Int J Hyperth 21(7):637–647. doi: 10.1080/0265673050015836010.1080/02656730500158360 ↗
21. Jung H, Kittelson DB, Zachariah MR (2005) The influence of a cerium additive on ultrafine diesel particle emissions and kinetics of oxidation. Combust Flame 142(3):276–288. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.11.01510.1016/j.combustflame.2004.11.015 ↗
22. Karakoti AS, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Aggarwal R, Davis JP, Narayan RJ, Self WT, McGinnis J, Seal S (2008) Nanoceria as antioxidant: synthesis and biomedical applications. Jom-US 60(3):33–37. doi: 10.1007/s11837-008-0029-810.1007/s11837-008-0029-8 ↗
23. Kim JS, Yoon TJ, Yu KN, Noh MS, Woo M, Kim BG, Lee KH, Sohn BH, Park SB, Lee JK, Cho MH (2006) Cellular uptake of magnetic nanoparticle is mediated through energy-dependent endocytosis in A549 cells. J Vet Sci 7(4):321–326. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2006.7.4.32110.4142/jvs.2006.7.4.321 ↗
24. Kim JA, Åberg C, Salvati A, Dawson KA (2012) Role of cell cycle on the cellular uptake and dilution of nanoparticles in a cell population. Nat Nanotechnol 7(1):62–68. doi: 10.1038/Nnano.2011.19110.1038/nnano.2011.191 ↗
25. Klein U, Gimpl G, Fahrenholz F (1995) Alteration of the myometrial plasma-membrane cholesterol content with beta-cyclodextrin modulates the binding-affinity of the oxytocin receptor. Biochemistry 34(42):13784–13793. doi: 10.1021/Bi00042a00910.1021/bi00042a009 ↗
26. Lesniak A, Fenaroli F, Monopoli MP, Åberg C, Dawson KA, Salvati A (2012) Effects of the presence or absence of a protein corona on silica nanoparticle uptake and impact on cells. ACS Nano 6(7):5845–5857. doi: 10.1021/nn300223w10.1021/nn300223w ↗
27. Ma N, Ma C, Li C, Wang T, Tang Y, Wang H, Moul X, Chen Z, Hel N (2013) Influence of nanoparticle shape, size, and surface functionalization on cellular uptake. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 13(10):6485–6498. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2013.752510.1166/jnn.2013.7525 ↗
28. Meng H, Yang S, Li Z, Xia T, Chen J, Ji Z, Zhang H, Wang X, Lin S, Huang C, Zhou ZH, Zink JI, Nel AE (2011) Aspect ratio determines the quantity of mesoporous silica nanoparticle uptake by a small GTPase-dependent macropinocytosis mechanism. ACS Nano 5(6):4434–4447. doi: 10.1021/nn103344k10.1021/nn103344k ↗
29. Miller SG, Carnell L, Moore HPH (1992) Post-golgi membrane traffic—brefeldin-a inhibits export from distal golgi compartments to the cell-surface but not recycling. J Cell Biol 118(2):267–283. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.2.26710.1083/jcb.118.2.267 ↗
30. Niu JL, Azfer A, Rogers LM, Wang XH, Kolattukudy PE (2007) Cardioprotective effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles in a transgenic murine model of cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res 73(3):549–559. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.11.03110.1016/j.cardiores.2006.11.031 ↗
31. Oh N, Park JH (2014) Endocytosis and exocytosis of nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Int J Nanomed 9(Suppl 1):51–63. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S26592
32. Ohtani Y, Irie T, Uekama K, Fukunaga K, Pitha J (1989) Differential-effects of alpha-cyclodextrins, beta-cyclodextrins and gamma-cyclodextrins on human-erythrocytes. Eur J Biochem 186(1–2):17–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb15171.x10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb15171.x ↗
33. Panyam J, Labhasetwar V (2003) Dynamics of endocytosis and exocytosis of poly(d, l-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles in vascular smooth muscle cells. Pharm Res 20(2):212–220. doi: 10.1023/A:102221900355110.1023/A:1022219003551 ↗
34. Park B, Donaldson K, Duffin R, Tran L, Kelly F, Mudway I, Morin JP, Guest R, Jenkinson P, Samaras Z, Giannouli M, Kouridis H, Martin P (2008) Hazard and risk assessment of a nanoparticulate cerium oxide-based diesel fuel additive—a case study. Inhalation Toxicol 20(6):547–566. doi: 10.1080/0895837080191530910.1080/08958370801915309 ↗
35. Peterson JR, Mitchison TJ (2002) Small molecules, big impact: a history of chemical inhibitors and the cytoskeleton. Chem Biol 9(12):1275–1285. doi: 10.1016/S1074-5521(02)00284-310.1016/S1074-5521(02)00284-3 ↗
36. Pitha J, Irie T, Sklar PB, Nye JS (1988) Drug solubilizers to aid pharmacologists—amorphous cyclodextrin derivatives. Life Sci 43(6):493–502. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(88)90150-610.1016/0024-3205(88)90150-6 ↗
37. Schubert D, Dargusch R, Raitano J, Chan SW (2006) Cerium and yttrium oxide nanoparticles are neuroprotective. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 342(1):86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.12910.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.129 ↗
38. Silva GA (2006) Nanomedicine: seeing the benefits of ceria. Nat Nanotechnol 1(2):92–94. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2006.11110.1038/nnano.2006.111 ↗
39. Strobel C, Torrano AA, Herrmann R, Malissek M, Bräuchle C, Reller A, Treuel L, Hilger I (2014a) Effects of the physicochemical properties of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, commonly used as sun protection agents, on microvascular endothelial cells. J Nanopart Res 16:2130. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-2130-310.1007/s11051-013-2130-3 ↗
40. Strobel C, Förster M, Hilger I (2014b) Biocompatibility of cerium dioxide and silicon dioxide nanoparticles with endothelial cells. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 5:1795–1807. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.5.19010.3762/bjnano.5.190 ↗
41. Summers H (2010) Can cells reduce nanoparticle toxicity? Nano Today 5(2):83–84. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.01.00310.1016/j.nantod.2010.01.003 ↗
42. Summers HD, Rees P, Holton MD, Brown MR, Chappell SC, Smith PJ, Errington RJ (2011) Statistical analysis of nanoparticle dosing in a dynamic cellular system. Nat Nanotechnol 6(3):170–174. doi: 10.1038/Nnano.2010.27710.1038/nnano.2010.277 ↗
43. Treuel L, Jiang XE, Nienhaus GU (2013) New views on cellular uptake and trafficking of manufactured nanoparticles. J R Soc Interface 10:20120939. doi: 10.1098/Rsif.2012.093910.1098/rsif.2012.0939 ↗
44. Truffault L, Winton B, Choquenet B, Andreazza C, Simmonard C, Devers T, Konstantinov K, Couteau C, Coiffard LJM (2012) Cerium oxide based particles as possible alternative to ZnO in sunscreens: effect of the synthesis method on the photoprotection results. Mater Lett 68:357–360. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.10.10810.1016/j.matlet.2011.10.108 ↗
45. Wang L, Liu Y, Li W, Jiang X, Ji Y, Wu X, Xu L, Qiu Y, Zhao K, Wei T, Li Y, Zhao Y, Chen C (2011) Selective targeting of gold nanorods at the mitochondria of cancer cells: implications for cancer therapy. Nano Lett 11(2):772–780. doi: 10.1021/nl103992v10.1021/nl103992v ↗
46. Yabe S, Sato T (2003) Cerium oxide for sunscreen cosmetics. J Solid State Chem 171(1–2):7–11. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4596(02)00139-110.1016/S0022-4596(02)00139-1 ↗
47. Zheng XC, Zhang XL, Wang XY, Wang SR, Wu SH (2005) Preparation and characterization of CuO/CeO2 catalysts and their applications in low-temperature CO oxidation. Appl Catal A 295(2):142–149. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.07.04810.1016/j.apcata.2005.07.048 ↗