Effects of Al(OH)O nanoparticle agglomerate size in epoxy resin on tension, bending, and fracture properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Several epoxy Al(OH)O (boehmite) dispersions in an epoxy resin are produced in a kneader to study the mechanistic correlation between the nanoparticle size and mechanical properties of the prepared nanocomposites. The agglomerate size is set by a targeted variation in solid content and temperature during dispersion, resulting in a different level of stress intensity and thus a different final agglomerate size during the process. The suspension viscosity was used for the estimation of stress energy in laminar shear flow. Agglomerate size measurements are executed via dynamic light scattering to ensure the quality of the produced dispersions. Furthermore, various nanocomposite samples are prepared for three-point bending, tension, and fracture toughness tests. The screening of the size effect is executed with at least seven samples per agglomerate size and test method. The variation of solid content is found to be a reliable method to adjust the agglomerate size between 138–354 nm during dispersion. The size effect on the Young’s modulus and the critical stress intensity is only marginal. Nevertheless, there is a statistically relevant trend showing a linear increase with a decrease in agglomerate size. In contrast, the size effect is more dominant to the sample’s strain and stress at failure. Unlike microscaled agglomerates or particles, which lead to embrittlement of the composite material, nanoscaled agglomerates or particles cause the composite elongation to be nearly of the same level as the base material. The observed effect is valid for agglomerate sizes between 138–354 nm and a particle mass fraction of 10 wt%.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Al-Turaif HA (2010) Effect of nano TiO2 particle size on mechanical properties of cured epoxy resin. Prog Org Coat 69:241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.05.01110.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.05.011 ↗
2. Bittmann B, Haupert F, Schlarb AK (2009) Ultrasonic dispersion of inorganic nanoparticles in epoxy resin. Ultrason Sonochem 16:622–628. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.01.00610.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.01.006 ↗
3. Evans AG (1972) The strength of a brittle material containing second phase dispersions. PHIL MAG A 26(6):1327–1344. doi: 10.1080/1478643720822034610.1080/14786437208220346 ↗
4. Exner W, Arlt C, Mahrholz T, Riedel U, Sinapius M (2012) Nanoparticles with various surface modifications as functionalized cross-linking agents for composite resin materials. Compos Sci Technol 72:1153–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.024 ↗
5. Faber KT, Evans AG (1983a) Crack deflection processes—I. Theory ACTA METALL 31(4):565–576. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(83)90046-910.1016/0001-6160(83)90046-9 ↗
6. Faber KT, Evans AG (1983b) Crack deflection processes—II. Experiment ACTA METALL 31(4):577–584. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(83)90047-010.1016/0001-6160(83)90047-0 ↗
7. Fankhänel J, Silbernagl D, Ghasem Zadeh Khorasani M et al (2016) Mechanical properties of boehmite evaluated by atomic force microscopy experiments and molecular dynamic finite element simulations. J Nanomater 2016(2016):1–13. doi: 10.1155/2016/501721310.1155/2016/5017213 ↗
8. Fu SY, Feng XQ, Lauke B, Mai YW (2008) Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. COMPOS PART B-ENG 39:933–961. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002 ↗
9. Green DJ, Nicholson PS, Embury JD (1979) Fracture of a brittle particulate composite. J Mater Sci 14:1413–1420. doi: 10.1007/BF0054931610.1007/BF00549316 ↗
10. Hall JN, Jones JW, Sachdev AK (1994) Particle size, volume fraction and matrix strength effects on fatigue behavior and particle fracture in 2124 aluminum-SiCp composites. Mater Sci Eng A183:69–8010.1016/0921-5093(94)90891-5 ↗
11. Jamaati R, Mohammad RT, Hossein E, Mohammad RS (2014) Comparison of microparticles and nanoparticles effects on the microstructure and mechanical properties of steel-based composite and nanocomposite fabricated via accumulative roll bonding process. MATER DESIGN 56:359–367. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.04910.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.049 ↗
12. Johnsen BB, Kinloch AJ, Mohammend RD, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2007) Toughening mechanisms of nanoparticle-modified epoxy polymers. Polymer 48:530–541. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.03810.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.038 ↗
13. Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Eger C, Sprenger S, Egan D (2005) The effect of silica nano particles and rubber particles on the toughness of multiphase thermosetting epoxy polamers. J Mater Sci 40:5083–5086. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-1716-210.1007/s10853-005-1716-2 ↗
14. Kinloch AJ, Maxwell D, Young RJ (1985) Micromechanisms of crack propagation in hybrid-particulate composites. J Mater Sci Lett 4:1276–1279. doi: 10.1007/BF0072348010.1007/BF00723480 ↗
15. Kinloch AJ, Williams JG (1980) Crack blunting mechanisms in polymers. J Mater Sci 15:987–996. doi: 10.1007/BF0055211210.1007/BF00552112 ↗
16. Knieke C et al (2010) Nanoparticle production with stirred-media mills: opportunities and limits. Chem Eng Technol 33:1401–1411. doi: 10.1002/ceat.20100010510.1002/ceat.201000105 ↗
17. Lange FF, Radford KC (1971) Fracture energy of an epoxy composite system. J Mater Sci 6:1197–1203. doi: 10.1007/BF0055009110.1007/BF00550091 ↗
18. Lange FF (1970) The interaction of a crack front with a second-phase dispersion. PHIL MAG A 22(179):983–992. doi: 10.1080/1478643700822106810.1080/14786437008221068 ↗
19. Nakamura Y, Yamaguchi M, Okubo M, Matsumoto T (1992) Effects of particle size on mechanical and impact properties of epoxy resin filled with spherical silica. J Appl Polym Sci 45:1281–1289. doi: 10.1002/app.1992.07045071610.1002/app.1992.070450716 ↗
20. Nolte H, Schilde C, Kwade A (2012) Determination of particle size distributions and the degree of dispersion in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 72:948–958. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.010 ↗
21. Nolte H, Schilde C, Kwade A (2010) Production of highly loaded nanocomposites by dispersing nanoparticles in epoxy resin. Chem Eng Technol 33:1447–1455. doi: 10.1002/ceat.20100009610.1002/ceat.201000096 ↗
22. Radford KC (1971) The mechanical properties of an epoxy resin with a second phase dispersion. J Mater Sci 6:1286–1291. doi: 10.1007/BF0055204210.1007/BF00552042 ↗
23. Reichert H, Ruhmling K (1976) Misch- und Desagglomerationskinetik beim Kneten von Pigmentpasten. CHEM-ING-TECH 46:559–587. doi: 10.1002/cite.33048061810.1002/cite.330480618 ↗
24. Rumpf H (1959) Beanspruchungstheorie der Prallzerkleinerung. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 31(5):323–33710.1002/cite.330310505 ↗
25. Rumpf H, Raasch J (1962) Desagglomeration in Strömungen. European symposium on size reduction (1st:Frankfurt a.M.:151-159)
26. Schilde C, Kampen I, Kwade A (2010) Dispersion kinetics of nano-sized particles for different dispersing machines. Chem Eng Sci 65:3518–3527. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2010.02.04310.1016/j.ces.2010.02.043 ↗
27. Singh RP, Zhang M, Chan D (2002) Toughening of a brittle thermosetting polymer: effects of reinforcement particle size and volume fraction. J Mater Sci 37:781–788. doi: 10.1023/A:101384401549310.1023/A:1013844015493 ↗
28. Torno O (2008) Dispergierbare Böhmite aus Alkoxidprozess. Science Day 2008 Nano-Techno-Science in Composite Structures and Adaptive Systems
29. Wetzel B, Rosso P, Haupert F, Friedrich K (2006) Epoxy nanocomposites—fracture and toughening mechanisms. Eng Fract Mech 73(16):2375–2398. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.018 ↗